Post a draft of the Agenda Comparison Grid you completed for Part 1 of the Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheets or Talking Points Brief Assignment. 

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s laDiscussion_Rubric

• Grid View
• List View

ExcellentGoodFairPoorMain Posting45 (45%) – 50 (50%)Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.40 (40%) – 44 (44%)Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Post is cited with two credible sources.

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.0 (0%) – 34 (34%)Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only one or no credible sources.

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.Main Post: Timeliness10 (10%) – 10 (10%)Posts main post by day 3.0 (0%) – 0 (0%)0 (0%) – 0 (0%)0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not post by day 3.First Response17 (17%) – 18 (18%)Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.15 (15%) – 16 (16%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.13 (13%) – 14 (14%)Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.0 (0%) – 12 (12%)Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.Second Response16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.12 (12%) – 13 (13%)Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.0 (0%) – 11 (11%)Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.Participation5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.0 (0%) – 0 (0%)0 (0%) – 0 (0%)0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6050_Module01_Week01_Discussion_Rubric

 

In this assignment, you will be exploring actual and potential health problems in the childhood years using a functional health assessment and Erickson’s Stages of Child Development. To complete this assignment, do the following:

1. Using the textbook, complete the “Children’s Functional Health Pattern Assessment.” Follow the instructions in the resource for completing the assignment.
2. Cite and reference any outside sources used in your answers. Include in your assessment a thorough discussion of Erickson’s Stages of Child Development as it pertains to the development age of the child.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

NRS-434VN-R-Childrens-functional-health-pattern-assessment-Student.docx
 

  

Assignment Content

You have been tasked by your CNO to provide a report and present to the board of directors about how your organization is transforming based on Health and Medicine Division (HMD) recommendations in high-profile reports.

Review the HMD reports (To Err is Human, A Bridge to Quality Gap & Crossing the Quality Chasm).

Review the attached grading rubric (criteria) for the assignment

Determine which recommendations directly affect how nurses provide care at the bedside.

Research quality indicators at the organization where you practice, one in your community, or one of interest.

Cite evidence (statistical data) from the organization’s quality measures that demonstrate they are carrying out the HMD’s vision.

Provide specific examples from the organization in the form of changes in care, governance, training, communication, and partnerships.

Write a 260-word executive summary and create a 10- to 12-slide presentation about your findings, with detailed speaker notes. The executive summary should be a slide in the presentation (the title and reference slides are not included in the slide count)

  

Module 5 discussion Therapeutic interventions for client with severe Anxiety or Panic

In this discussion, we’ll discuss anxiety, effective and ineffective interventions, and stress management. Please include the following in your initial posting:

Describe a client from your clinical setting or work who experienced severe anxiety or panic. Include a brief history and three most pertinent medications.

Describe the assessment process for this patient.

Identify at least one effective and one non-effective nursing intervention. Why did they work? What didn’t work?

Name and describe two stress reduction techniques you have used and whether they were helpful or not in reducing stress.

 Strategic Thinking Map: Recommendations

The next component of your Project is evaluating alternatives and strategic choice as part of the Recommendations section for your analysis. Using the Project Case Study provided conduct an evaluation of alternatives and strategic choice pertaining to your recommendations for this project. Your recommendations should be based directly on what you outlined in your assessment and include the following:

• Strategies for intervening in potential weaknesses and threats discovered in your market and SWOT analyses
• Strategies for attracting healthcare professionals and staff
• Feasibility for development satellite clinic
• Value-adding strategies, support, and resources (e.g., equipment, technology, etc.)
• Development of strategic initiatives

Consider the use of corporate-level, divisional-level, organizational-level, and unit-level strategies in your recommendations section and include a summary of key points.

For this assignment, develop a written report of your recommendations section and use the example strategic thinking maps from previous modules as a tool to assist with the different facets of the strategic planning process.

The map is to be used only as a supplement for your written recommendations.

Your well-written recommendations should meet the following requirements:

• Be 3-4 pages in length, not including the cover, abstract (optional), or reference pages.
• Utilize headings to organize the content in your work.
• Include the strategic thinking map in addition to/or as a part of the 3-4 pages of content.
• Include a minimum of four references with associated in-text citations. 
• Be formatted according to the APA writing requirements.