Please note that the teacher marked me down for reference, she really wants an ENGLISH TITLED PEER REVIEWED NURSING JOURNAL. (Thanks :)) 

APA format: The letter h in Running head is not capitalized. The title after the words, Running head, is related to the title of the paper (review guidelines for formulating a running head). No first initials used for in text citation. The reference page is alphabetized. Remove hyperlinks from the reference page. 

Please, respond to the following discussion, the response

requires one reference from a peer-reviewed NURSING journal less than 5 y/o from database and not internet.

 Professional, governmental, or educational organizations (.org, .gov, or .edu) may be used as supplemental references.

APA format required. 

Nurses are to be constantly updated with scientific and technological changes through several avenues: formal academic education; institution-based human resource development programs; and voluntary or legislatively mandated continuing education (Blais 141).  As educators, they can hold individual or group sessions and may teach various populations, whether it be clients and their family members or other health professionals (153).  It is important for nurses to understand the impact of generational diversity.  The nursing community consists of five generations: Silent (1937-1945); Boomers (1946-1964); Generation X (1965-1976); Generation Y (1977-1991); and Generation Z (1992-present) (Bell 206).  The Silent and Boomer Generation prefer a structured environment; they value order and authority.  Generation X prefers learning on their own, role play, visual stimulation, and immediate feedback and Millennials prefer to learn through experimentation rather than through theoretical concepts (208-209).  Each generation has a different set of values and priorities.  Nurses are to acknowledge the differences amongst one another to have effective patient care.

 

Identify a quality improvement opportunity in your organization or practice. In a 1,250-1,500 word paper, describe the problem or issue and propose a quality improvement initiative based on evidence-based practice. Apply “The Road to Evidence-Based Practice” process, illustrated in Chapter 4 of your textbook, to create your proposal.

Include the following:

1. Provide an overview of the problem and the setting in which the problem or issue occurs.
2. Explain why a quality improvement initiative is needed in this area and the expected outcome.
3. Discuss how the results of previous research demonstrate support for the quality improvement initiative and its projected outcomes. Include a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5 years, not included in the course materials or textbook, that establish evidence in support of the quality improvement proposed.
4. Discuss steps necessary to implement the quality improvement initiative. Provide evidence and rationale to support your answer.
5. Explain how the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated to determine whether there was improvement.
6. Support your explanation by identifying the variables, hypothesis test, and statistical test that you would need to prove that the quality improvement initiative succeeded.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

  

When writing please make it understandable ….this is not doctorate level!

You will use walden library search and I will give you my sign in information to be able to conduct the search

Part 1: An Introduction to Clinical Inquiry

Create a 4- to 5-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: Powerpoint template attached

1-Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. BEST PRACTICE IN TREATING DECUBITUS ULCERS IN HOSPICE

2-Describe how you used keywords to search on your chosen clinical issue of interest.

3-Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

4-Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Part 2: Identifying Research Methodologies

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet) (ATTACHED) template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following: PLEASE USE THE TEMPLATE

-The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.

-A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest. 

-A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.

-A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.

-A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

In the assigned article, “Core Principles & Values of Effective Team-Based Health Care,” the authors state that “the incorporation of multiple perspectives in health care offers the benefit of diverse knowledge and experience; however, in practice, shared responsibility without high-quality teamwork can be fraught with peril.” Describe the perils that the authors say lead to uncoordinated care and unnecessary waste and cost. How do communication and interdisciplinary collaboration prevent adverse events?

300 WORDS, MINIMUM OF 1 REFERENCE, CHECK PLAGIARISM  

Read “The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research” (1979):  http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html  Write a 1,250-1,500 word paper that addresses the significance of autonomy, patient advocacy, and informed consent. Your paper should include: 1.A description of the concepts of autonomy, patient advocacy, and informed consent. 2.A discussion of the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki and a summary of the events that led up to the development of ethical guidelines for conducting human clinical trials, including Institutional Review Boards (IRB). 3.Three examples of ways “The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research” works to protect special populations (e.g., minors, prisoners, persons with mental illness).  A minimum of three references are required.  

Original work only!  Free of many grammatical errors and on time.