Week 2 Discussion

• Choose two concepts in the theory you choose last week and describe:
  • How are the concepts defined in general (from other references)? 
  • How does the theorist define each of the concepts you have chosen?
  • How do those concepts apply to your clinical practice? Give concrete examples. To support your work, use the textbooks from your course and also use the South University Online Library, citing your sources in your work and providing references for the citations in APA format.

Remember to list two concepts – and remember that theories are derived from conceptual models and are comprised of concepts and propositions. The only concepts that are common to all nursing theories, in some shape or form, are patient, nurse, health, and environment – which we discussed last week.

This week, select two concepts that are unique to your selected theory from last week – but they CANNOT be one of the four metaparadigm concepts – person, nurse, health or environment.

This is weeks one discussion please use this as a reference like stated above 

Basic four metaparadigms’ concepts

A metaparadigm is an arrangement of thoughts or speculations that structure the way a training works. These hypotheses consist of four essential ideas for a nursing discipline that address the patient all in all, the health and environment of the patient, the condition of the patient and the nursing duties. While there are a few distinctive nursing hypotheses, these four vital nursing metaparadigms point to an all-encompassing care perspective where four intelligent parts are associated with the prosperity and restorative health of a man.

Patient:

The patient component of the metaparadigm focuses on the patient. In any event, in addition, the individual association includes relatives and various meetings vital to the patient. The care structure considers the otherworldly and social needs of the individual and the needs of medical services as well. How the individual collaborates with these physical and social associations is credited with the subsequent health outcome. The preface is that the individual is involved with constructive individual associations in dealing with his health and prosperity with pride and self-protection.

Environment:

The environment portion of nursing metaparadigms environment and society that affects the patient. The earth is made up of internal and external impacts, and fights that there is a health and health heading for how a man constantly communicates with his environment. Collaborations with families, partners and other people, as well as physical and social factors such as monetary conditions, geographical areas, culture, social associations and innovation, are a part of the world. In order to improve her health status, this metaparadigm segment conjectures that a person can change her ecological components.

Health:

The fourth metaparadigms in the health segment allude to the level of health and human services a patient has. This health component is described as one in a consistent state of motion with distinct measurements. Health covers the life expectancy and hereditary cosmetics of a man, and how physical, passionate, scholarly, social and other-worldly prosperity for the most extreme medical benefits is incorporated into human services. The hypothesis is that these factors influence the state of prosperity of the patient.

Nurse:

The nursing component of the metaparadigm includes the transmission of the patient’s ideal health outcomes through a common relationship in a sheltered and mindful condition. The nursing segment applies learning standards, skills, innovation, coordinated efforts, competent judgment and correspondence to fulfill duties and responsibilities in achieving the most ideal quiet health outcome situation. This nursing part appreciates a high level of administration and coordinates for persistent prosperity with other metaparadigm segments.

Theory:

Practice theory is used in nursing to consider the duality of practice and atmosphere and establish a proposal within that interpretation that asserts the interdependence of the metaparadigm realms of nursing practice and environment. In a discipline, the Metaparadigm principles comprise the core problems. Fawcett has described human beings (patients as a whole), the environment, health and nursing as the four core principles of nursing that need to be comprehensively established. The human portion of the metaparadigm reflects on the treatment recipient. The treatment structure addresses the person’s spiritual and social interests as well as clinical care needs. The environmental component of nursing metaparadigms reflects on the patient’s climate. This metaparadigm aspect theorizes that a person may change her environmental factors to enhance her health status. The wellbeing portion of the four metaparadigms relates to the level of access to health and health services that a patient has and includes the lifetime and genetic composition of an individual, and how physical, physiological, behavioral, social and spiritual well-being is implemented for full health benefits into health care. The nursing part of the metaparadigm includes supplying the patient with optimum health effects in a shared partnership in a healthy and caring atmosphere (Dupree, 2018). 

References:

Dupree D. (2018, December 27). Four basic Metaparadigm concepts in nursing. Career Trend. https://careertrend.com/13373959/fourbasic-metaparadigm-concepts-in-nursing

DELIKTAS, A., KORUKCU, O., AYDIN, R., & KABUKCUOGLU, K. (2019). Nursing StudentsʼPerceptions of Nursing Metaparadigms. Journal of Nursing Research, 27(5), 1. https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000311

Assignment-2 slides of power point only

1. U tube video link on power point

2. 2 Slides  power point. only.

3. Pictures and be creative

4. Please use pathophysiology

5. Add pictures of diseases.

6. Samples of power point attached

1. Keep it simple and make sure that the content that your are covering demonstrates to me that you understand the impact of the pathophysiological process that you are trying to educate your ‘patient about”. As a Nurse Practitioner you will on a daily basis be explaining complex diseases for your patients and it is imperative that you educate the patient with the underlying cause, outcomes and impact on their lives using the foundation pathophysiology as your guide.

BEFORE SUBMITTING the make absolutely certain that your that your work contains:

1. Some information of interest about the disorder could historical facts
2. A description of the manifestations of the disorder with an explanation as to the cause of these manifestations (MAKE SURE THAT YOUR EXPLANATION OF THE CAUSE OF THE MANIFESTATIONS IS PRESENTED USING PATHO TO EXPLAIN WHY!!!).
3. A description of the abnormal diagnostic testing with a discussion of the causes of the abnormal test results (MAKE SURE THAT THE CAUSES OF THE ABNORMAL DIAGNOSTIC TESTING IS PRESENTED USING PATHO TO EXPLAIN WHY!!!)

A discussion of the treatment plan and/alternative therapies with potential expectations of the treatment plan etc.

1. A discussion of the specific information patients who have the selected disorder need to know (make sure this is evidence-based information where applicable)

At the completion of your intervention, you will produce a 5–8 minute video discussion script of your care coordination intervention for a peer-reviewed media platform. 
As an advanced practice health care provider, it’s likely that you will be asked to give a presentation at some point in your career. Now that you have completed this project, it’s time to disseminate the outcomes in the form of a recorded professional presentation. A professional presentation style requires the confidence and ability to convey the right image that you want your audience to see. Unfortunately, it’s easy to miss some of the opportunities available to help you present yourself in the best possible light and, as a result, enjoy the success you deserve. Remember to be forthright about what happened during the project and about how data were collected and analyzed, and present the findings so stakeholders and external parties clearly understand the steps in the process. By completing this final activity, you can help others recreate this type of project and enhance outcomes in other patient care settings.

Assessment Instructions

In Assessment 3, you will build on the work you completed in Assessments 1 and 2.
Assignment Summary
This assessment requires you to prepare a 5–8 minute video discussion script of your care coordination intervention. Note: If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in this activity, please contact DisabilityServices@Capella.edu to request accommodations. If you are unable to record a video, please contact your faculty member as soon as possible to explore options for completing the assessment.
You have completed the intervention and achieved enhanced outcomes. Now you need to disseminate your findings and provide recommendations to sustain the results of your intervention. You have been asked by nursing leadership to produce a scholarly video for a peer-reviewed media platform. The video will include 5–8 minutes of scholarly discussion covering the topics listed below.
Grading Criteria
The numbered assignment instructions outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Disseminating the Evidence Scholarly Video Media Submission Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. You may also want to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

1. Analyze care coordination efforts related to clinical priorities based on a PICOT question. 
   • Provide the PICOT question and a brief introduction of the issues.
2. Describe the change in practice related to services and resources that will be available for the interprofessional care coordination team. 
   • Describe the key care coordination efforts.
3. Explain efforts to build stakeholder engagement within the interprofessional team. 
   • How did you lead the change in practice?
   • Summarize how you encouraged and built stakeholder engagement.
4. Recommend next steps that that support thoughtful resource utilization and a safe environment in care coordination. 
   • Propose how you will sustain the current outcomes with the coordinated care interprofessional team.
   • Make recommendations on moving forward that support thoughtful resource utilization and a safe environment.
5. Produce a video that provides insight, understanding, and reflective thought about care coordination.
6. Communicate audibly and professionally, using proper grammar and including a reference list formatted in current APA style.
7. Important Note: but do address each scoring guide criterion in the video, including a discussion of authors in the literature who support the ideas presented. Please submit a separate APA-formatted reference list for the resources discussed in your reflection.
   Additional Requirements 

• Written communication: Write clearly, accurately, and professionally, incorporating sources appropriately.
• APA guidelines: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA Style and Format. When appropriate, use APA-formatted headings.

QA: In line with the HBS case reprint, Southwest’s plan to serve La Guardia. Do you think that Southwest should try to expand who their customers are? Do you think that it hurts them at all not playing in the market of a ‘fancy flight’?

QB: In line with tendencies that change management professionals/leaders will face some sort of obstacles in the process of carrying out the projected change.

I wonder though if you take a look at what and who a stakeholder is – it could be the community, it could be suppliers, it could be employees – can you discuss a bit more some of the various objections that each type could have?