Translating Theory Into Practice 2025

Translating Theory Into Practice When water is in a solid state, particles are packed in a rigid pattern, conforming to the shape of its container. As the water turns into a liquid, the particles regain their fluidity, moving as the other particles around them begin to shift. Kurt Lewin’s change theory is much like the changing state of water. Applying this theory, Lewin describes workplaces as being frozen in their procedures. In this state, it is impossible for change to occur successfully because people are “frozen.” Informaticists must recognize this rigid culture and begin to implement strategies that will unfreeze the opinions and procedures of the setting. According to Lewin, only then will staff begin to accept new processes over old ones. This process of moving from “freezing” to “unfreezing” can be a turbulent one. In fact, many nurses have equated this to “working in slush.” By applying theories and frameworks developed by Lewin and others, nurse informaticists can better facilitate informatics implementations. In this Discussion, you explore how theories and conceptual frameworks can be applied to informatics implementations . To prepare : Review this week’s media presentation, Theories and Conceptual Frameworks, and consider how a nurse informaticist can use theories to guide informatics initiatives. What are the benefits of using theories? Review the article “Organization-Wide Adoption of Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems: A Study Based on Diffusion of Innovations Theory” in this week’s Learning Resources. Consider how Roger’s diffusion of innovation theory impacted the adoption of the informatics system. Conduct research in the Walden Library to locate a peer-reviewed article that (1) focuses on implementing a new informatics project or procedure and (2) discusses how a theory was used to guide this implementation. Consider alternative theories that might also be applicable to that specific implementation. Post by tomorrow Tuesday 06/14/2016 550 words in APA format with a minimum of 4 references 1) The APA citation for your article and a brief summary that includes the setting of the implementation, what was being implemented, the need for the implementation, and the titles of the staff who spearheaded the project (if provided). 2) Identify the theory that drove the implementation, and explain how this theory was translated into practice by the planning team. 3) Finally, suggest alternative theories that could have been used and support your response with references to the research literature. Required Resources Readings Adams, R., Tranfield, D., & Denyer, D. (2011). How can toast be radical? Perceptions of innovations in healthcare. International Journal of Clinical Leadership , 17 (1), 37–48. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. This article examines four case studies that present successful innovations in the NHS. The authors propose a descriptive framework of innovation attributes to convey the perceptions of health care innovators. Doran, D. M., Haynes, R. B., Kushniruk, A., Straus, S., Grimshaw, J., Hall, L. M., & … Jedras, D. (2010). Supporting evidence-based practice for nurses through information technologies. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing , 7 (1), 4–15. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. The authors of this article discuss the practicality and usability of mobile technologies. In addition, they detail how mobile technologies can help to provide evidence-based practice and ultimately benefit the work of nurse informaticists. Rahimi, B., Timpka, T., Vimarlund, V., Uppugunduri, S., & Svensson, M. (2009). Organization-wide adoption of computerized provider order entry systems: A study based on diffusion of innovations theory. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making , 9 (1),52. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. The effectiveness of a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system implementation is examined in this article. The attitudes, reactions, and thoughts of nurses and physicians involved in the implementation are also discussed. @Current. (2012). Jean Watson’s philosophy of nursing. Retrieved from http://currentnursing.com/nursing_theory/Watson.html Access this website to explore one prominent philosophy of nursing, Watson’s philosophy of caring. Connelly, M. (n.d.) Kurt Lewin change management model. Retrieved from http://www.change-management-coach.com/kurt_lewin.html Kurt Lewin’s change theory consists of a three stages: unfreeze, change, and freeze. Access this website to learn more about each phase. Lewin, K. (2011). Change theory. Retrieved from http://currentnursing.com/nursing_theory/change_theory.html This website provides a brief overview of the concepts and stages of Lewin’s change theory. Lee, T. (2006). Adopting a personal digital assistant system: application of Lewin’s change theory. Journal Of Advanced Nursing , 55 (4), 487-496 Media Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2012i). Theories and conceptual frameworks . Baltimore: Author. Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 8 minutes. In this week’s media presentation, Gail Latimer, Dr. Patricia Button, and Dr. Roy Simpson discuss the importance of using theories and frameworks to guide informatics initiatives. In addition, Dr. Simpson provides an overview of two frameworks he commonly uses in his position, Moore’s Law and the Integrated Research Operational (IRO) model, as well as two well-known theories, Roger’s diffusion of innovation and Watson’s theory of caring.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Assignment 4 2025

Key Points- 1000-1100 words (excluding cover page, abstract, references, etc.). 5 sources (I have already researched the sources, check the Sources and Format Doc) APA Format Must have in text citations Three documents attached, each is important so go through them for details. the Grading rubric contains all the expected sections and their value to the assignment. make sure you go through it as well.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Assignment 2025

Week 5: Week 5 – W5 Assignment 1 Discussion Discussion Assignment Assignment 1: Discussion Assignment By Friday, March 18, 2016, go to the Discussion Area and post your responses to the discussion question. Discussion Question 1 (1) Discuss how the U.S. should prepare for the future of public health. For example, discuss some considerations to prepare for and reduce any effects from a bioterrorism attack, prepare for natural disasters, and plan for community disaster preparedness (2) In your summation, provide your thoughts about establishing members of a multidisciplinary task force to improve the health and welfare of society for self-betterment, improve lives, and help individuals see a better future. Presents the grading criteria and rubric for this assignment. Maximum Quality of initial posting 40 Participation in discussion  25 Writing mechanics (spelling, grammar, APA) and information Literacy 25 Total 100 Week 5 Assignment 2 Week 5: Week 5 – W5 Assignment 2 Turnitin Assignment Assignment 2: Public Health Preparedness Capabilities Model “Review the Public Health Preparedness Capabilities at http://www.cdc.gov/phpr/capabilities/dslr_capabilities_july.pdf . Pay specific attention to the Public Health Preparedness Capabilities Planning Model. Your report should identify and plan for a state of your choosing with an emphasis on the three defined phases”: (1) Assess current state: Assess organizational roles and responsibilities, resource elements, and performance. (2) Determine goals: Review jurisdictional inputs, prioritize capabilities and functions, and develop short- and long-term goals. (3) Develop plans: Plan organizational initiatives, capability building/sustain activities, and capability evaluations/demonstrations. “Each of the three phases and associated steps must be explored in depth and presented in a 4- to 6-page report. Format your report in APA style, citing appropriate references”. By Saturday, March 19th, 2016, submit your work to the W5 Assignment 2 Turnitin. Assignment 2 Grading Criteria Maximum Points Assignment Components: Assessed the current state, including roles and responsibilities, resource elements, and performance. 60 Determined the goals, including a review of jurisdictional inputs, capabilities, and goals. 60 Developed the plan, including initiative, sustainability considerations, and demonstrations. 80 Presentation and Writing Components: Organization Introduction Transitions Conclusion 15 Style Tone Audience Word choice 15 Usage and Mechanics Grammar Spelling Sentence structure 15 APA Elements Attribution Paraphrasing Quotations When appropriate or assigned 15 Total: 300 Presents the rubric for this assignment.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

WK 5 JOURNAL 2025

Practicum: Pediatric Journal Entry 1 to 2 pages ( i have attached a sample paper to follow but choose your own case study) Reflect on a patient who presented with a dermatologic disorder (Children) during your Practicum experience as nurse practitioner provider . Describe your experience in assessing and managing the patient and his or her family. Include details of your “aha” moment in identifying the patient’s dermatologic disorder. Then, explain how the experience connected your classroom studies to the real-world clinical setting. you may select a related case study from a reputable source or reflect on previous clinical experiences. References Burns, C. E., Dunn, A. M., Brady, M. A., Starr, N. B., & Blosser, C. G. (2013). Pediatric primary care (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier. ◦Chapter 21, “Introduction to Disease Management” (pp. 398–414). ◦Chapter 36, “Dermatologic Disorders” (pp. 877–927) DermNet New Zealand Trust. (2014). DermNet NZ. Retrieved from http://www.dermnetnz.org/ •Dermnet.com. (2011). Dermnet Skin Disease Atlas. Retrieved from http://www.dermnet.com/ •Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections: 2014 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America by Stevens, D.L., Bisno, A.L., Chambers, H.F., Dellinger, E.P., Goldstein, E.J.C., Gorbach, S.L., Hirschmann, J.V., Kaplan, S.L., Montoya, J.G., & Wade, J.C. in Clinical Infectious Diseases , 59(2), 10-52.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Successful Implementation Of Electronic Health Information Technology 2025

A Nurse’s Role in the Systems Development Life Cycle While the process of developing and implementing a health information technology system may seem overwhelming at first, the systems development life cycle (SDLC) provides organizations with a framework to deliver efficient and effective information systems. Though the SDLC is a common overarching structure for implementing information systems, it is not a one-size-fits-all process. In fact, there are a multitude of approaches that can be used to guide the systems development life cycle. The SDLC approach that is most appropriate for a particular organization will be highly contextual and subject to organization-specific differences. This week prompts you to analyze the process of selecting an appropriate health information technology and then evaluate techniques that positively impact the steps of the systems development life cycle in an EHR implementation. You also determine what barriers might occur at each stage and how these could be overcome. Learning Objectives Students will: Analyze how a nurse can contribute to each stage of the systems development life cycle Photo Credit: Jose Luis Pelaez Inc]/[Brand X Pictures]/Getty ImagesCredit Learning Resources Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus. Required Readings McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2015). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning. Chapter 10, “Systems Development Life Cycle: Nursing Informatics and Organizational Decision Making” This chapter explains the systems development life cycle and explores various methods of applying it. The chapter also examines the importance of interoperability in implementing HITECH. Chapter 11, “Administrative Information Systems” This chapter provides an overview of agency-based health information systems. The text also details how administrators can use core business systems in their practice. Boswell, R. A. (2011). A physician group’s movement toward electronic health records: A case study using the transtheoretical model for organizational change. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 63 (2), 138–148. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. The authors of this article present a case study on an EHR implementation in a multispecialty physician group. The case study attempts to determine actions that promote successful EHR implementation and the pros and cons of implementation. Hsiao, J., Chang, H., & Chen, R. (2011).A study of factors affecting acceptance of hospital information systems: A nursing perspective. Journal of Nursing Research, 19 (2), 150–160. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. The focus of this article is to determine what factors are most important in predicting the acceptance of new health information technology. The results of the study indicated that self-efficacy, top management support, and the quality of information retrieved are the most important determinants of the willingness of nurses to adopt and use a new technology. Kelley, T. F., Brandon, D. H., & Docherty, S. L. (2011). Electronic nursing documentation as a strategy to improve quality of patient care. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 43 (2), 154–162. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. This article summarizes a literature review of the relationship between electronic health records (EHRs) and quality of patient care. The article identifies deficiencies in existing research regarding the daily interactions of nurses, patients, and electronic documentation, and it provides a comparison between electronic and paper-based documentation and its effect on quality of care. Nurse leaders discuss the nurse’s role in driving technology decisions. (2010). Virginia Nurses Today, 18 (1), 8–9. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. This article summarizes a roundtable held with a number of nursing executives to discuss the role nurses should take in the selection and adoption of new technologies for health care. The executives concluded that the nurses’ goals should be to select technology that will further their ability to provide safe, quality care to their patients. Page, D. (2011). Turning nurses into health IT superusers. Hospitals & Health Networks, 85 (4), 27–28. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. This article highlights the importance of involving nurses with all phases of the decision and implementation process surrounding new health information technology. The author stresses the importance of communication in the process as well as defining success. Swab, J., & Ciotti, V. (2010). What to consider when purchasing an EHR system. hfm(Healthcare Financial Management), 64 (5), 38–41. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. In this article, recommendations are given for purchasing health information technology. These include selecting the appropriate vendor, carefully considering the cost of both new equipment and personnel, and involving clinicians in decisions. Successful Implementation of Electronic Health Information Technology Since the inception of the HITECH Act, health organizations have faced increased pressure to update their health information technology (HIT) resources. As discussed last week, many believe that the increased use of electronic health records and the quick and efficient communication afforded by HIT can lead to improved quality of patient care. Yet there are significant costs associated with implementing such systems. What can organizations do to ensure that the correct system is selected and that the system will be appropriate for those required to use it? Who should be involved in those decisions? This week introduces the systems development life cycle and discusses how it can guide an organization through the complexities of adopting a new HIT system. In this Discussion, you are asked to consider the role of nurses in the SDLC process. To prepare: Review the steps of the systems development life cycle. Think about your own organization, or one with which you are familiar, and the steps the organization goes through when purchasing and implementing a new HIT system. Consider what a nurse could contribute to decisions made at each stage when planning for new health information technology. What might be the consequences of not involving nurses? Reflect on your own experiences with your organization selecting and implementing new technology. As an end user, do you feel you had any input in the selection or and planning of the new HIT system? ASSIGNMENT: Post an analysis of the ramifications of an organization not involving nurses in each stage of the systems development life cycle when purchasing and implementing a new HIT system. Give specific examples of potential issues at each stage and how the inclusion of nurses could help avoid such issues. APA FORMAT 2 pages minimum 3 references

Nursing Assignment Help 2025