2025 Short term goals can usually be achieved by the end of your shift Long term

by

Short term goals can usually be achieved by the end of your shift. Long term goals are usually achieved by… 2025

Short term goals can usually be achieved by the end of your shift. Long term goals are usually achieved by discharge. Write one short term and one long term goal for the following nursing diagnosis. Nursing Diagnosis: Impaired physical mobility related to ventilation-perfusion mismatch as evidenced by shortness of breath on ambulation and inability to ambulate more than 10 feet independently. Registered nurses perform interventions based on the following actions: (MEATA) Monitor Evaluate Assess Teach Administer Provide 2 RN interventions for each goal that you developed in #1. Provide rationale for each intervention being performed by an RN. Short term goals can usually be achieved by the end of your shift. Long term goals are usually achieved by discharge. Write one short term and one long term goal for the following nursing diagnosis. Nursing Diagnosis: Impaired physical mobility related to ventilation-perfusion mismatch as evidenced by shortness of breath on ambulation and inability to ambulate more than 10 feet independently. Registered nurses perform interventions based on the following actions: (MEATA) Monitor Evaluate Assess Teach Administer Provide 2 RN interventions for each goal that you developed in #1. Provide rationale for each intervention being performed by an RN.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Ethical Case Studies Consider the ethical dilemma the health care professional faces in the selected case study Pay

by

Ethical Case Studies 2025

Ethical Case Studies Consider the ethical dilemma the health care professional faces in the selected case study. Pay particular attention to details that will help you analyze the situation using the three components of the Ethical Decision Making Model (moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior). Note: The case study may not supply all of the information you may need for the assignment. In such cases, you should consider a variety of possibilities and infer potential conclusions. However, please be sure to identify any speculations that you make. Open Icon View All Open and Close Icon Reducing Hospital Readmissions Caleb Powell was preparing the agenda for the upcoming executive leadership meeting and he shook his head ruefully. As chief executive officer for Virginia County Regional Hospital (VCRH), Caleb believes that a key piece of VCRH’s future success lies in reducing readmission rates, not only in the areas identified by federal guidelines, but across the board. A few weeks ago, he read a piece from the National Institutes of Health discussing strategies associated with reduction in readmission rates. He decided that he wanted to discuss the issue in detail with his leadership team. Caleb’s goal is to align the hospital’s strategic planning with the goal of reducing readmissions. The stakes are high; under provisions of the Affordable Care Act, hospitals with higher than expected 30 day readmission rates for heart failure, heart attack and pneumonia are penalized with reduced payments. Historically, hospitals (including VCRH) have struggled to avoid the penalties, but Caleb believes that believes that a focused approach will allow them to be successful. He also believes that reducing readmission rates will improve patient satisfaction, which has become a key metric in measuring hospital quality. Caleb’s initial research into this issue revealed that while many facilities were incurring the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) penalties, there was still significant variability in terms of hospitals implementing successful strategies for reducing their readmission rates. However, several themes have emerged. Hospitals that established partnerships with physicians, physician groups and other local hospitals have had greater success. In addition, a clear discharge planning process and nurse driven medication reconciliation have also been associated with reducing the risk of readmissions. At the same time, Caleb is concerned that an aggressive policy to avoid readmissions could be construed as too focused on the hospital’s bottom line and indifferent to patient needs. The last thing he wants is to create a policy that prevents patients from seeking or receiving care. Caleb hopes that this meeting will begin a productive discussion around developing strategies to improve VCRH’s performance in this area. Caleb’s email to the executive leadership team with the agenda for the meeting included the following note: “As we research the readmission rate issue for improvement, we need to be aware that we cannot add additional days to the patient’s initial stay. It’s a balancing act. We also cannot hinder a patient from coming back into the hospital for a readmission. I’ll be asking for your input about whether we should create a system to profile health care providers whose patients have high readmission rates.” Develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional by applying ethical principles. Describe the issues and a possible solution in a 3-5 page paper. For this assessment, you will develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional. Read each portion of the assessment carefully and use the suggested resources to help you complete the assessment. This assessment provides an opportunity to consider ethical principles and how they can be applied in health care situations. Note : The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. For this assessment, you will develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional. In your assessment: Access the Ethical Case Studies media piece linked in the Resources to review the case studies you may use for this assessment and select the case most closely related to your area of interest and use that case study to complete the assessment. Note : The case study may not supply all of the information you may need. In such cases, you should consider a variety of possibilities and infer potential conclusions. However, please be sure to identify any assumptions or speculations you make. Identify which case study you selected, briefly summarize the facts surrounding the case study, and identify the problem or issue in the case study that presents an ethical dilemma or challenge and describe that dilemma or challenge. Use the three components of the ethical decision-making model (moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior) found in the Ethical Decision-Making Model media piece in the Resources to analyze the ethical issues. Analyze the factors that contributed to the problem or issue. Identify who is involved or affected by the problem or issue. Describe the factors that contributed to the problem or issue and explain how they contributed. In addition to the readings provided, use the Capella library to locate at least one academic peer-reviewed journal article relevant to the problem or issue that you can use to support your analysis of the situation. Cite and apply the journal article as evidence to support your critical thinking and analysis of the case. Assess the credibility of the information source. Assess the relevance of the information source. Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in the case study. Describe how the health care professional communicated with others. Describe the communication and communication strategies that were applied, both in creating and in resolving the problems or issues presented. Assess instances where the professional communicated effectively or ineffectively. Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by the professional related to any problems or issues involving ethical practice in the case. Describe the actions taken in response to the ethical dilemma or challenge presented in the case study. Summarize how well the professional managed professional responsibilities and priorities to resolve the problem or issue in the case. Discuss the key lessons this case provides for health care professionals. Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to the proposed problem or issue from the case study. Describe the proposed solution. Discuss how the approach makes this professional more effective or less effective in building relationships across disciplines within his or her organization. Discuss how likely it is the proposed solution will foster professional collaboration. Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. Determine the proper application of the rules of grammar and mechanics. Write using APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references. Determine the proper application of APA formatting requirements and scholarly writing standards. Apply the principles of effective composition. Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style. Example Assessment: You may use the assessment example, linked in the Assessment Example section of the Resources, to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like. Additional Requirements Length : At least 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page. Font and font size : Times New Roman, 12 point. APA Template : Use the APA Style Paper Template as the paper format and the APA Style Paper Tutorial for guidance. See the Resources for these documents. Written communication : Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. References : Integrate information from outside sources to include at least two references (the case study and an academic peer-reviewed journal article) and three in-text citations within the paper. APA format : Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citation of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page. Turnitin : Submit your assessment to Turnitin prior to grading. Then, only submit your final assessment to faculty for grading. Note : Read the Applying Ethical Principles Scoring Guide to fully understand how your paper will be graded. Submit your paper for evaluation by clicking on the assessment title and uploading the paper as a Word document. If you would like assistance in organizing your assessment, or if you simply have a question about your assessment, please do not hesitate to ask your courseroom instructor or the teaching assistants in the NHS Learner Success Lab for guidance and suggestions. Ethics for Health Care American College of Healthcare Executives. (2016). ACHE code of ethics . Retrieved from https://www.ache.org/abt_ache/code.cfm American Nurses Association. (n.d.). Ethics topics and articles . Retrieved from http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/EthicsStandards/Resources Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). Public health ethics resources . Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/od/science/integrity/phethics/resources.htm Levitt, D. (2014). Ethical decision-making in a caring environment: The four principles and LEADS . Healthcare Management Forum, 27 (2), 105–107. Levitt-Rosenthal, N. (2013). Ethics, values, and decision making . Frontiers of Health Services Management, 30 (1), 27–32. Mahoney, J. S., Mulder, C., Hardesty, S., & Madan, A. (2017). Integrating caring into patient-centered care through interprofessional education and ethics: The Caring Project . Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 81 (3), 233–246. Maintaining Academic Honesty .

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Benchmark Effective Approaches in Leadership and Management In this assignment you will

by

Benchmark – Effective Approaches in Leadership and Management 2025

Benchmark – Effective Approaches in Leadership and Management In this assignment, you will be writing a 1,000-1,250 word paper describing the differing approaches of nursing leaders and managers to issues in practice. To complete this assignment, do the following: Select an issue from the following list: bullying, unit closers and restructuring, floating, nurse turnover, nurse staffing ratios, use of contract employees (i.e., registry and travel nurses), or magnet designation. Describe the selected issue. Discuss how it impacts quality of care and patient safety in the setting in which it occurs. Discuss how professional standards of practice should be demonstrated in this situation to help rectify the issue or maintain professional conduct. Explain the differing roles of nursing leaders and nursing managers in this instance and discuss the different approaches they take to address the selected issue and promote patient safety and quality care. Support your rationale by using the theories, principles, skills, and roles of the leader versus manager described in your readings. Discuss what additional aspects mangers and leaders would need to initiate in order to ensure professionalism throughout diverse health care settings while addressing the selected issue. Describe a leadership style that would best address the chosen issue. Explain why this style could be successful in this setting. Use at least three peer-reviewed journal articles other than those presented in your text or provided in the course. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies: RN to BSN 1.1: Exemplify professionalism in diverse health care settings. 1.3: Exercise professional nursing leadership and management roles in the promotion of patient safety and quality care. 3.4: Demonstrate professional standards of practice . RUBRIC Attempt Start Date: 05-Aug-2019 at 12:00:00 AM Due Date: 11-Aug-2019 at 11:59:59 PM Maximum Points: 150.0 Benchmark – Effective Approaches for Leadership and Management No of Criteria: 10 Achievement Levels: 5 CriteriaAchievement LevelsDescriptionPercentageUnsatisfactory0.00 %Less Than Satisfactory75.00 %Satisfactory79.00 %Good89.00 %Excellent100.00 %Content80.0 Selected Issue, Setting, and Impact on Patient Safety15.0The issue described does not meet the assignment criteria. The description of the issue and its impact to quality of care and patient safety is omitted.A partial summary of the issue is presented. How it impacts quality of care and patient safety is unclear. There are omissions of key information.A general description of the issue is presented. A summary of how it impacts quality of care and patient safety is presented; more information is needed. There are some inaccuracies.A description of the issue is presented. How the issue impacts quality of care and patient safety is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.A clear description of the issue is presented. How the issue impacts quality of care and patient safety is detailed and accurate.Professional Standards of Practice to Rectify Issue or Maintain Professional Conduct (D3.4)15.0How professional standards of practice should be demonstrated in this situation to help rectify the issue or maintain professional conduct is not discussed.A summary of how professional standards of practice should be demonstrated in this situation to help rectify the issue or maintain professional conduct is presented. The summary is incomplete. More information is needed. There are significant inaccuracies.A general discussion of how professional standards of practice should be demonstrated in this situation to help rectify the issue or maintain professional conduct is presented. There are some gaps in the discussion; some information is needed. There are minor inaccuracies. Rationale is needed for support.A discussion of how professional standards of practice should be demonstrated in this situation to help rectify the issue or maintain professional conduct is presented. Minor detail is needed for clarity or accuracy. Rationale provides adequate support.A through discussion of how professional standards of practice should be demonstrated in this situation to help rectify the issue or maintain professional conduct is presented. An understanding of the importance of professional standards of practice in resolving issues and maintaining professional conduct is demonstrated. Strong rationale supports discussion.Differing Roles and Approaches of Nursing Leaders and Nursing Managers (C1.3)15.0Explanation of the differing roles and approaches for nursing leaders and nursing managers is omitted.A partial explanation of the differing roles and approaches for nursing leaders and nursing managers is presented. It is unclear how the roles and approaches relate to the selected issue, or how they would promote patient safety and quality care. Rationale using theories, principles, skills, and nursing manger or nursing leader roles is not used.A general explanation of the differing roles and approaches for nursing leaders and nursing managers is presented. A general summary of how the roles and approaches relate to the selected issue, and how they would promote patient safety and quality care, is provided. Some rationale using theories, principles, skills, and nursing manger or nursing leader roles is used.An explanation of the differing roles and approaches for nursing leaders and nursing managers is presented. An explanation of how the roles and approaches relate to the selected issue, and how they would promote patient safety and quality care, is provided. Rationale using theories, principles, skills, and nursing manger or nursing leader roles is used. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. More rationale is needed in some areas. The explanation demonstrates a general understanding of the of nursing leadership and management roles in the promotion of patient safety and quality care.A detailed explanation of the differing roles and approaches for nursing leaders and nursing managers is presented. A well-developed explanation of how the roles and approaches relate to the selected issue, and how they would promote patient safety and quality care, is provided. Rationale using theories, principles, skills, and nursing manger or nursing leader roles is used. The explanation demonstrates insight into exercising the roles of professional nursing leadership and management in the promotion of patient safety and quality care.Ensuring Professionalism Through Diverse Health Care Settings (C1.1)20.0Discussion on what additional aspects mangers and leaders would need to initiate to ensure professionalism throughout diverse health care settings while addressing the selected issue is omitted. The discussion fails to meet the assignment criteria.A partial summary on what additional aspects mangers and leaders would need to initiate to ensure professionalism throughout diverse health care settings while addressing the selected issue is presented. The summary contains significant omissions. There are inaccuracies.A general discussion on what additional aspects mangers and leaders would need to initiate to ensure professionalism throughout diverse health care settings while addressing the selected issue is presented. It is unclear how some of the aspects continue to address the selected issue, or the aspects do not appear to relate to a diverse health care setting.A discussion on what additional aspects mangers and leaders would need to initiate to ensure professionalism throughout diverse health care settings while addressing the selected issue is presented. Overall, the aspects presented address the selected issue and relate to a diverse health care setting. The items proposed in the discussion generally support professionalism in diverse health care settings.A detailed discussion on what additional aspects mangers and leaders would need to initiate to ensure professionalism throughout diverse health care settings while addressing the selected issue is presented. The aspects presented clearly continue to address the selected issue and relate to a diverse health care setting. The items proposed in the discussion support the exemplification of professionalism in diverse health care settings.Leadership Style to Address Issue15.0A leadership style to address the chosen issue is omitted. The proposed item is not a leadership style.A leadership style to address the chosen issue is partially summarized. The characteristics of the leadership style are vaguely presented. It is unclear why this style could be successful in this setting.The characteristics of the identified leadership style are described. A general explanation of why this style could be successful in this setting is presented. There are some gaps in the explanation. More information or rationale is needed.The characteristics of the identified leadership style are described. An explanation of why this style could be successful in this setting is presented. Some rationale is needed for support.The characteristics of the identified leadership style are clearly described. A detailed explanation of why this style could be successful in this setting is presented. Strong rationale is provided for support. Organization, Effectiveness, and Format20.0 Thesis Development and Purpose5.0Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.Argument Logic and Construction5.0Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5.0Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)2.0Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)3.0Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Total Percentage 100

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Select a community organization or group that you feel would be interested in learning about ethical and policy issues

by

#2 Ethical and Policy Factors in Care Coordination 2025

Select a community organization or group that you feel would be interested in learning about ethical and policy issues that affect the coordination of care. Then, develop and record a 10-12-slide, Create a detailed narrative script for your presentation, 4-5 pages in length. As coordinators of care, nurses must be aware of the code of ethics for nurses and health policy issues that affect the coordination of care within the context of the community. To help patients navigate the continuum of care, nurses must be proficient at interpreting and applying the code of ethics for nurses and health policy, specifically, the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Being knowledgeable about ethical and policy issues helps ensure that care coordinators are upholding ethical standards and navigating policy issues that affect patient care. This assessment provides an opportunity for you to develop a presentation for a local community organization of your choice, which provides an overview of ethical standards and relevant policy issues that affect the coordination of care. Completing this assessment will strengthen your understanding of ethical issues and policies related to the coordination and continuum of care, and will empower you to be a stronger advocate and nursing professional. It would be an excellent choice to complete the Vila Health: Ethical Decision Making activity prior to developing the presentation. The activity provides a helpful update on the ethical principles that will help with success in this assessment. Demonstration of Proficiency By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria: Competency 4: Defend decisions based on the code of ethics for nursing. Assess the impact of the code of ethics for nurses on the coordination and continuum of care. Competency 5: Explain how health care policies affect patient-centered care. Explain how governmental policies related to the health and/or safety of a community affect the coordination of care. Identify national, state, and local policy provisions that raise ethical questions or dilemmas for care coordination. Competency 6: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead patient-centered care. Communicate key ethical and policy issues in a presentation affecting the coordination and continuum of care for a selected community organization or support group. Either speaker notes or audio voice-over are included. Preparation Your nurse manager at the community care center is well connected and frequently speaks to a variety of community organizations and groups. She has noticed the good work you are doing in your new care coordination role and respects your speaking and presentation skills. Consequently, she thought that an opportunity to speak publicly about contemporary issues in care coordination would be beneficial for your career and has suggested reaching out to a community organization or support group to gauge their interest in hearing from you, as a care center representative, on a topic of interest to both you and your prospective audience. You have agreed that this is a good idea and have decided to research a community organization or support group that might be interested in learning about ethical and policy issues related to the coordination of care. Your manager has suggested the following community organizations and support groups, but acknowledges that the choice is yours. Homeless shelters. Local religious groups. Nursing homes. Local community organizations (Rotary Club or Kiwanis Club). To prepare for this assessment, you may wish to: Research your selected community organization or support group. Review the Code of Ethics for Nurses With Interpretive Statements and associated health policy issues, specifically, the ACA. Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to ensure you understand the work you will be asked to complete. Allocate sufficient time to rehearse your presentation before recording the final version for submission. Note : Remember that you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft presentation to Smarthinking Tutoring for feedback, before you submit the final version for this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback. Instructions For this assessment: Choose the community organization or support group that you plan to address. Develop and record a presentation, with typed speaker notes (the script for your voice recording) and audio voice-over recording, intended for that audience. Video is not required. Note : PowerPoint has a feature to type the speaker notes directly into the presentation. You are encouraged to use that feature or you may choose to submit a separate document. See Microsoft Office Software for technical support about the use of PowerPoint, including voice recording and speaker notes. Note: For this assessment, develop your presentation slides and speaker notes, then record your presentation. You are not required to deliver your presentation to an actual audience but you certainly could if you chose to. Presentation Format and Length You may use PowerPoint (recommended) or other suitable presentation software to create your slides and add your voiceover. If you elect to use an application other than PowerPoint, check with your faculty to avoid potential file compatibility issues. You can also record your presentation using Kaltura or similar software. Be sure that your slide deck includes the following slides: Title slide. Presentation title. Your name. Date. Course number and title. References (at the end of your presentation). Your slide deck should consist of 10–12 slides, not including a title and references slide with typed speaker notes and audio voice over. Your presentation should not exceed 20 minutes. Create a detailed narrative script for your presentation, approximately 4–5 pages in length. Supporting Evidence Cite 3–5 credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry publications to support your presentation. Include your source citations on a references page appended to your narrative script. Grading Requirements The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Ethical and Policy Factors in Care Coordination Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. Explain how governmental policies related to the health and/or safety of the community affect the coordination of care. Provide examples of a specific policy affecting the organization or group. Refer to the assessment resources for help in locating relevant policies. Be sure influential policies include the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA). Identify national, state, and local policy provisions that raise ethical questions or dilemmas for care coordination. What are the implications and consequences of specific policy provisions? What evidence do you have to support your conclusions? Assess the impact of the code of ethics for nurses on the coordination and continuum of care. Consider the factors that contribute to health, health disparities, and access to services. Consider the social determinants of health identified in Healthy People 2020 as a framework for your assessment. Provide evidence to support your conclusions. Communicate key ethical and policy issues in a presentation affecting the coordination and continuum of care for a selected community organization or support group. Either speaker notes or audio voice-over are included. Present a concise overview. Support your main points and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 For this task you will first compare the ACHE and AHIMA code of ethics and then review a

by

Module Three Worksheet Guidelines and Rubric Ethical Decision-Making in Healthcare Marketing 2025

For this task you will first compare the ACHE and AHIMA code of ethics, and then review a brief case from Healthcare Marketing: A Case Study that involves ethical decision-making. Then, you will discuss the role of the healthcare marketer in relation to ethical behavior and conduct. To complete this assignment, review the Module Three Worksheet Guidelines and Rubric document. This is assignment needs to be due by Sunday. Rubric is attached & case study exercise. Following reference should be used as well: Cellucci, L. W., Wiggins, C., & Farnsworth, T. J. (2014). Healthcare marketing: a case study approach. Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press. ISBN: 978-1-56793-605-6

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Select two diverse clinical settings for example ED versus ICU PeriOp versus Med Surg Pediatrics versus Adults or Sports Medicine vs

by

advance health care informatic 2025

Select two diverse clinical settings; for example: ED versus ICU, PeriOp versus Med-Surg, Pediatrics versus Adults, or Sports Medicine vs. Nursing Home, etc. For your two selected clinical settings, compare and contrast the content, features, need, and value of data, information, knowledge, and decision support to clinical practitioners in those settings. Justify the clinical elements necessary for each clinical setting and create a recommendation of necessary elements for a shared clinical system. Make sure that you include the four expanding rings of information (EMR, warehouse, regional, NHIN/PHIN) in your analysis. Describe how the differences would alter the design or features of a clinical system. Support your statements where you claim either similarities or differences between your two settings. Construct a justification for the shared clinical system from ethical, legal, social, and public policy viewpoints. Formulate a plan for implementation and create the necessary workflow for a successful implementation. Evaluate the role of the master’s prepared informatics nurse after implementation. Please submit one APA formatted paper between 1000 – 1500 words, not including the title and reference page. The assignment should have a minimum of two scholarly sources, in addition to the textbook. Hebda, T. & Czar, P. (2013). Handbook of Informatics for Nurses & Healthcare Professionals (5th ed.) . Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Hello I have everything needed attached below Thank you Hesselink G Zegers M Vernooij Dassen M Barach P Kalkman

by

NR 449 Evidence BASED practice RUA Analyzing Published Research 2025

Hello! I have everything needed attached below. Thank you! Hesselink, G., Zegers, M., Vernooij-Dassen, M., Barach, P., Kalkman, C., Flink, M., … & Suñol, R. (2014). Improving patient discharge and reducing hospital readmissions by using Intervention Mapping. BMC health services research, 14(1), 389. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-389 Kripalani, S., Theobald, C. N., Anctil, B., & Vasilevskis, E. E. (2014). Reducing hospital readmission rates: current strategies and future directions. Annual review of medicine, 65, 471-485. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-022613-090415

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 In this week s Discussion you shared your experiences with health care practice problems as a consumer and or

by

Practice Experience Discussion CAUTI 2025

In this week’s Discussion, you shared your experiences with health care practice problems as a consumer and/or as a practitioner. Now, consider your current practice setting and think about something specific and relevant to your practice setting that you would like to see improved or changed. Interview a key leader in your practice setting who can confirm that your practice problem is one that should be addressed to enhance delivery or performance in the field. It is important to remember from the beginning that your practice problem must be measurable , and that you identify data that suggests a problem exists, and although this comes up more specifically in Week 2, it is important to consider this from the start. This will be the problem discussed in your Practice Experience Project, Capstone Paper, and Storyboard. By Day 4 Identify a measurable patient-centered practice problem related to quality or safety and relevant to your practice setting that you will also focus on in your Capstone Paper, and post a brief description of the problem and an explanation of why you selected it. Explain how the conversation you had with the key leader in your practice setting impacted your decision to address this particular practice problem. Be sure to support your practice problem with the literature that indicates the relevance of this problem for nursing practice. Provide evidence from your practice area and describe the data that is available. You will not be collecting any data during the practice experience project; you will use data already available to you in your workplace or other practice setting. Think about the different kinds of data that is shared with you in your work area. For example, data may include patient satisfaction scores, medication error rates, fall, CLABSI or CAUTI rates. Analyzing the data available to you is how you will identify that a quality problem exists. Data identifies potential areas for improvement, and monitors the effectiveness of any changes. It is important to obtain baseline data before beginning a quality improvement project and to analyze results during and at the end of a projec

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Explain basic legal and ethical terms and guidelines that pertain to the topic of workplace discrimination Summarize your

by

Workplace Discrimination: Understanding Legal and Ethical Requirements 2025

§ Explain basic legal and ethical terms and guidelines that pertain to the topic of workplace discrimination. § Summarize your findings from the EEOC website, including types of discrimination and those most frequently charged, trends in reporting of discrimination, and implications for healthcare organizations in statistics and trends. § Explain legal protections for employees with regard to discrimination in the workplace. § Explain the role of nurse executives in reporting potential violations of employment law. § Analyze potential ethical conflicts nurse executives may face in accusations and lawsuits related to charges of discrimination. § Explain recommendations for negotiating those ethical conflicts. § Explain the role of nurse executives in preventing discriminatory practices in a healthcare setting and ways discrimination may be managed.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Assign CPT code s and appropriate modifiers to each statement 1 After performing an emergency cesarean

by

Medical Coding 2025

Assign CPT code(s) and appropriate modifiers to each statement. 1) After performing an emergency cesarean section, the physician noticed that the appendix was distended, resulting in medical necessity for an appendectomy performed during the same operative session. 2) The physician freed intestinal adhesions. 3) The physician resected two segments of small intestine and performed an anastomosis between the remaining intestinal ends. An open approach was used for this surgery. 4) The physician repaired a defect in the mesentery with sutures. 5) The physician performed a laparoscopic partial colectomy with end colostomy and closure of the distal segment. 6) The physician drained a pelvic abscess through the rectum. 7) The physician removed a portion of the rectum through combined abdominal and transsacral approaches. 8) The physician performed rigid proctosigmoidoscopy and obtained brushings. 9) The physician performed a flexible sigmoidoscopy and removed a polyp. The physician inserted the sigmoidoscope through the anus and advanced the scope into the sigmoid colon. The lumen of the sigmoid colon and rectum were well visualized, and the polyp was identified and removed with hot biopsy forceps. The sigmoidoscope was withdrawn upon completion of the procedure. 10) The physician inserted a colonscope through the anus and advanced the scope past the splenic flexure. Two polps were identified and removed by hot biopsy forceps. 1) Hepatotomy for open drainage of abscess or cyst, 1 stage. 2) Surgeon removed segments II, III, and IV (the whole left lobe) of the liver from a living donor. 3) The physician performed radiofrequency ablation of a liver tumor via open laparotomy. 4) The physician removed the gallbladder and performed a common bile duct exploration through the laparoscope. 5) The physician performed a cholecystostomy with removal of calculus. 6) Subsequent to previous peritoneocentesis (performed at a different operative session), the physician withdrew fluid and performed infusion and drainage of fluid from the abdominal cavity (peritoneal lavage). 7) The physician reopened a recent laparotomy incision, before the incision had fully healed, to drain a postoperative infection. 8) The physician performed laparoscopic repair of an initial inguinal hernia. 9) The physician performed a reducible ventral hernia (initial) repair and inserted mesh implantation. 10) The physician repaired an initial reducible, inguinal hernia with hydrocelectomy in a 5 month old infant. 1) Physician made an open incision and inserted multiple drain tubes to drain an infection (abscess) from the kidney. 2) The physician pulverized a kidney stone (renal calculus) by directing shock waves through a water cushion that was placed against the left side of the patient’s body at the location of the kidney stone. 3) The physician removed a kidney stone (calculus) by making an incision in the right kidney. 4) The interventional radiologist inserted a percutaneous nephrostomy catheter into the right renal pelvis for drainage. Fluoroscopic guidance was provided. 5) The physician performed a laparoscopic ablation of a solid mass from the posterior hilum of the left kidney. 6) The physician made an incision in the left ureter through the abdominal wall for examination of the ureter and insertion of a catheter for drainage. 7) The physician examined the patient’s right and left renal and ureteral structures with an endoscope, which passed through an established opening between the skin and the ureter (ureterostomy). He also inserted a catheter into the ureter. 8) The physician revised a surgical opening between the skin and the right ureter. 9) The physician injected contrast agent through an opening between the skin and the left ureter (ureterostomy) for ureterography (study of renal collecting system). 10) The physician made an incision in the left ureter (ureterotomy) to insert a catheter (stent) into the ureter. 11) The physician performed a transurethral resection of a postoperative bladder neck contracture using a resectoscope. 12) The physician inserted a special instrument through the cystourethroscope to fragment a calculus in the ureter using electrohydraulics. 13) The physician inserted a cystourethroscope through the urethra to drain an abscess on the prostate. 14) The physician made an incision through the abdominal wall into the urinary bladder and inserted a suprapubic catheter to withdraw urine. 15) The physician performed a cystourethroscopy with fulguration of the bladder neck and then removed a calculus from the ureter. 16) The physician performed a sling procedure using synthetic material to treat a male patient’s urinary incontinence. 17) The physician made an initial attempt to treat a male patient’s urethral stricture using a dilator. 18) The physician, in the first two stages to reconstruct the urethra identified the area of stricture by urethrography and marked it with ink. 19) The physician performed a transurethral destruction of the prostate using microwave therapy. The physician excised a specimen of tis

Nursing Assignment Help 2025