majorfels24 2025

Final Project The final assignment will synthesize what you have discovered about the different advanced practice roles and scope of practice found in the master of nursing curriculum: NP, nurse educator, nurse informaticist, and nurse administrator. You will review all roles and then examine the specialty for which you were admitted, focusing on the scope of practice, core competencies, certification requirements, and legal aspects of practice for that specific role. You will also identify the practice environment and population you will be working with, as well as peers and colleagues. In addition, you will discuss your future leadership role and participation in professional organizations. Your paper is to be based on current literature, standards of practice, core competencies, and certification bodies for your chosen role. The paper should be 10–12 pages excluding the title and reference, and APA format is required. Criteria : Advanced Practice Roles in Nursing: Compare and contrast the roles of the NP, nurse educator, nurse informaticist, and nurse administrator in advanced practice nursing pertaining to clinical practice, primary care, education, administration, and research. Selected Advanced Practice Role: Examine regulatory and legal requirements for the state in which you plan to practice. Describe the professional organizations available for membership based on your selected role. Identify required competencies, including certification requirements for your selected role. Predict the organization and setting, population, and colleagues with whom you plan to work. Leadership Attributes of the Advanced Practice Role: Determine your leadership style ( http://psychology.about.com/library/quiz/bl-leadershipquiz.htm ). Identify leadership attributes you currently possess, and attributes you may need to develop. Determine how to attain and evaluate those missing attributes. Health Policy and the Advanced Practice Role Visit the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation ( http://www.rwjf.org/en/about-rwjf/newsroom/features-and-articles/health-policy.html ) and identify a health policy issue. Conduct a review of literature and address the following: Describe the current policy and what needs to change; justify your conclusions with citations from the literature. Provide the process required to make the change with key players and parties of interest. Explain how you could lead the effort to make or influence the change in policy. Predict the effect on healthcare quality if the change in policy is implemented.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Discussion Question 2025

1. Compare and contrast the two definitions of advanced practice nursing as defined by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) DNP Essentials, the APRN consensus model, and as defined in your textbook. Guidelines: Support your responses with scholarly academic references using APA style format. Assigned course readings and online library resources are preferred.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Developing an Advocacy Campaign 2025

Application Assignment 2: Part 2 – Developing an Advocacy Campaign To prepare: · Review Chapter 3 of Milstead, J. A. (2012). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (Laureate Education, Inc., custom ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers · In the first assignment, you reflected on whether the policy you would like to promote could best be achieved through the development of new legislation, or a change in an existing law or regulation. Refine as necessary using any feedback from your first paper. · Contemplate how existing laws or regulations may affect how you proceed in advocating for your proposed policy. · Consider how you could influence legislators or other policymakers to enact the policy you propose. · Think about the obstacles of the legislative process that may prevent your proposed policy from being implemented as intended. To complete: Part Two will have 4 pages of content plus a title page and references (MINIMUM OF 4 REFERENCES FROM THE REQUIRED READING BELOW). Part Two will address the following: · Explain whether your proposed policy could be enacted through a modification of existing law or regulation or the creation of new legislation/regulation. · Explain how existing laws or regulations could affect your advocacy efforts. Be sure to cite and reference the laws and regulations using primary sources. · Provide an analysis of the methods you could use to influence legislators or other policymakers to support your policy. In particular, explain how you would use the “three legs” of lobbying in your advocacy efforts. o Summarize obstacles that could arise in the legislative process and how to overcome these hurdles . REREFERENCES sr MMilstead, J. A. (2013). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (Laureate Education, Inc., custom ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers. Chapter 1, “Advanced Practice Nurses and Public Policy, Naturally” (pp. 1–27) This chapter explains public policy and the nurse’s role in directing health care issues to the government and securing a response. Chapter 2, “Agenda Setting” (pp. 19–44) This chapter provides examples of the process of moving a problem to the attention of the government so the solution can be considered at the state and federal levels. Chapter 3, “Government Response: Legislation—Politics: Playing the Game” (pp. 45–71) This chapter explores the multiple factors that influence the development of public policy through the legislative branch of government. Coalition for Patients’ Rights. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.patientsrightscoalition.org/ This website details the initiative of the Coalition for Patients’ Rights, which seeks to ensure that patients everywhere have access to the quality health care providers of their choice. University of Washington School of Medicine. (n.d.) Ethics in medicine: Managed care . Retrieved from http://depts.washington.edu/bioethx/topics/manag.html This article explains the effects and ethical concerns associated with managed care, which integrates payment with the delivery of health care. Evaluation Criteria for Applications and Formal Papers Levels of Achievement Criteria Outstanding Performance Excellent Performance Competent Performance Proficient Performance Room for Improvement QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED – 1. The extent to which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking (0-30 Points) 30 to 30 points Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics 25 to 29 points Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics 20 to 24 points Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. 16 to 19 points Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed. 0 to 15 points Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed. QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED: Purpose of the paper is clear (0-5 Points) 5 to 5 points A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria. 5 to 5 points A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria. 4 to 4 points Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. 1 to 3 points Purpose of the assignment is vague. 0 to 0 points No purpose statement was provided. ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to- 1. Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts (0-10 Points) 10 to 10 points Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts. 9 to 9 points Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts. 8 to 8 points Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. 5 to 7 points Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts. 0 to 4 points Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS 2. Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources (0-20 Points) 20 to 20 points Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 3-4 course resources to support point of view. 15 to 19 points Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 3-4 course resources to support point of view. 10 to 14 points Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 3 to 4 course resources to support major points and point of view. 3 to 9 points Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view. 0 to 2 points Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resource to support major points and point of view. ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS 3. Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. (0-20 Points) 20 to 20 points Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice. 18 to 19 points Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice. 16 to 17 points Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. 14 to 15 points Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped. 0 to 13 points Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING 1. Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. (0-5 Points) 5 to 5 points Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards. 5 to 5 points Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards. 4 to 4 points Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards 80% of the time. 3 to 3 points Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards 70% of the time. 0 to 2 points Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards < 70% of the time. WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING 2. English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation (0-5 Points) 5 to 5 points Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 5 to 5 points Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 to 4 points Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 to 3 points Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 0 to 2 points Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING 3. The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list (0-5 Points) 5 to 5 points Uses correct APA format with no errors. 5 to 5 points Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4 to 4 points Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. 3 to 3 points Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. 0 to 2 points Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Nursing Assignment Help 2025

STRATEGIC PLANNED CHANGE 2025

Application: Strategic Plan for Change “Measurement is the first step that leads to control and eventually to improvement. If you can’t measure something, you can’t understand it. If you can’t understand it, you can’t control it. If you can’t control it, you can’t improve it.” —H. James Harrington Effective nurse managers recognize the innumerable challenges in contemporary health care organizations—and, they pursue solutions. As you continue to progress professionally, you will likely discover many opportunities for improvement in your own workplace. For instance, you may notice issues with the performance appraisal system, operational planning, staffing, or patient classification system. Clinical problems such as hourly rounds, medication errors, fall risks, or any other problem you observed are also prime for needing change. As a leader/manager you can contribute toward addressing these challenges to produce positive results and create sustainable change through a structured process of strategic planning. For this Assignment, you explore one challenge that you would like to see addressed in your organization or one with which you are familiar. You will continue to work on this Assignment over the next several weeks. This Assignment also serves as your Portfolio Assignment. To prepare Read the full Assignment instructions in the Strategic Plan for Change—Overview document, located in this week’s Learning Resources. Identify a problem that you would like to investigate for this Assignment. SELECTED TOPIC: Inadequate documentation of antipsychotic medications monitoring approved.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Respond back to student paper 2025

Response should be a thick one paragraph The Two-Minus One Pregnancy Collapse Ruth Padawer’s article, The Two-Minus One Pregnancy, discusses the ever growing “reduction” procedure, or, in more crude terms, the abortion of one fetus and not of another also present at the time in the same womb. The procedure became more popular with the rise of artificial insemination; reproductive technology often lead to women conceiving multiple fetuses, not just the one sought out. The first woman Padawer interviews, Jenny, had been trying to get pregnant for a while, only to end up aborting one of her twin’s because of financial constraints. The article points out that many pro-choicers found that the idea of reduction unethical. Dr.Mark Evans, the creator of the procedure, issued out a guideline that a reduction below twins was unethical, and urged fellow physician’s not to become “technicians to our patients desires”. Many women that get a reduction are coddled by physicians telling them that carrying two babies instead of one may have health risks to both infant and mother, though Columbia’s Dr. Richard Berkowitz points out that “overwhelming majority of women carrying twins are going to be able to deliver two healthy babies”. Berkowitz goes on to argue however, that if aborting a single fetus is morally acceptable, why is aborting a paired fetus because financial, social, or economic reasons not? A study was also cited which states that there is more disruption in families with multiple infants, than families with just one. Shelby Van Voris had a difficult time finding a doctor who would ‘reduce’ two of her triplets. Voris said that her husband was deployed, and she couldn’t raise three infants on her own. It is a recurring theme between all the interviewed women that they were afraid of being unable to care for twins (or more) for whatever reason, be it because of finances, another child, or they just didn’t want twins. The doctors mentioned within the text overall seemed to acquiesce that they are the one’s with the skill to perform this act, so they do it, and that it is ultimately the mother’s choice to reduce or not. The author brings up her own twin pregnancy, and how she too was deathly afraid of what was to come. She wrote on that she now cannot imagine life without all of her children because they are no longer “shadowy fetuses”. This dissonance between a “person”, as Kant may have prescribed, and a fetus, seems to stake the author’s claim that the fear of the future should perhaps not reason for a need of a reduction. Despite this brief personal interlude, the author does not let in much bias when interviewing women who had undergone reductions.The author also brings up the dilemma doctor’s face when choosing which fetus to abort: does gender play a role in that decision? If they’re both equally healthy, is it up completely to chance? The main question the article props up is, is single abortion as ethical as reduction ones? The author leaves the answer up for the reader to answer for themselves. Personally, I could not understand at all why these women would undergo reductions. Jenny surely should have been informed of the chance of a “mega” pregnancy. Responsibility is a fundamental to parenthood, and it does not seem as if Jenny had completely accepted this when she underwent IVF. Shelby Van Voris too seemed irresponsible to me, was she prepared to raise a single child on her own as well? Or did the idea of three simply just scare her? Can fear justify an abortion? ‘A’ is perhaps the only woman who’s reason I may be able to swallow easily, as she reduced because it was negatively affecting her health, and she had a baby to take care of, along with her also pregnant partner. This is the classic dilemma of ‘giving up a life to save a life’ where there really isn’t a right or wrong choice. Speciests would be completely against reduction, as they find it immoral to kill any innocent human. Marquis may perhaps agree with reduction in a case where the mother is saving the fetus from a bleak future, such as what a euthanasia patient does, despite his strict ideal of the “essence of the wrongness of killing”. Dr.Gregory’s theory would not out-rule reduction, as long as it was done before the fetus was physically sentient. Thomson would most probably be against reduction, especially if it was conceived after a contraceptive failure, although, she would be against reduction if it was for convenience, as some may argue many of these mother’s did. Brody would be for a reduction as long as it was before the fetus’s neural system was formed. Works Cited Munson, Ronald, et al.” Bio-Medical Ethics: PHI 227, Northern Virginia Community College”, ELI Distance Learning . Cengage Learning, 2013. P.63-98. Print. Padawer, Ruth. “ The Two-Minus-One Pregnancy .” The New York Times Magazine, august 10. 2011, web. October 2, 2016 Here are some theories to examine Quizlet note cards, https://quizlet.com/125478977/phi-227-exam-2-flash-cards/ I am anti-abortion on he subject.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025