5 DQ 2

Every nurse is a leader in their own right. Our impact on the patient’s result is unquestionable. Together with the actual result of the patient, we are also responsible for promoting our profession and makes it a better workforce. Medical care is reform and nurses will benefit in the future, but nurses are currently those dealing with work stress. Therefore, to see any progress in reforms, we must defend our profession (Tomaján, 2012). I can be an active player to solve problems by listening to the concerns of team members and suggest solutions that are acceptable and advantageous for everyone. Working towards implementing these changes is also a way to return to the profession and improve the work environment. By participating in shared governance, it is another way I can claim to create a positive change in my workplace.

Being a proactive nurse in itself must be a leader who is willing to reach positive changes in the system and in his people (Whitney, 2018). This would mean examining the problem from different angles, collecting the data to support it, using the most recent technology to maximize resources, consider all opinions and work for an acceptable solution and aim to achieve a common goal. Enhanced members of my team and my collaborators are another way to improve the dynamics of the workplace. This will give you a sense of power and confidence to each member and touch the talent and innovation found in each of us. I would also have promoted the sense of responsibility and responsibility in each member. The Dynamics team will show a positive change with this and would involve better care and a better work environment.

   The influence of leadership can be far-reaching in practice and improving patient outcomes even when not in a formal role. Describe advocacy strategies that you can use as a leader to create positive change in your current workplace. In response to peers, describe a time when you provided leadership and the outcome. Was there anything that you would do differently? 

Using 200-300 words APA format with at least two references. Sources must be published within the last 5 years.

Explain the contribution of the Roman Law to the modern society. Use at least one law from the Twelve Tables and explain its application to the current legal system. Write at least two well-developed paragraphs of at least five (5) sentences each.  

From the list of the Twelve Tables provided below, choose two Tables and analyze the laws. Compare and contrast the Roman Laws with the social norms/laws of our current society. Explain if the Roman laws changed or maintained their original validity. 

Table I: Civil Procedures.

●        If someone is accused and called to go to court, he must go.

●        If he does not go, he may send a witness to stand for him. If he does not come or send a witness, he may be captured and forced to come to court.

Table II: Civil Procedures.

●        If a person needs evidence or a witness, he may go every third day to the doorway of the person and call for him.

Table III: Debt.

●        If a person owes a debt and is brought to court, he shall have 30 days to pay the debt.

●        After 30 days if the debt is not paid, the person owing the debt may be put in chains.

●        After 60 days in custody the person owing the debt can be sold into slavery or be put to death if the debt is not settled.

Table IV: Parents and Children.

●        If a child is born with a severe deformity, it shall be killed.

●        Parents have the right to sell their children into slavery.

Table V: Inheritance.

●        If a person goes insane, he shall not have power over his goods and they shall be given to his nearest male relative.

●        If a person dies without a male heir, his nearest male relative shall inherit his goods.

●        Women shall always be given a male guardian to accompany them

Table VI: Property.

●        If a person makes a promise or contract verbally, it shall be considered binding and must be fulfilled.

●        If a man and woman shall live together for a year, they shall be considered married.

Table VII: Real Property.

●        If a person builds a road and it becomes unusable because of decay or damage, travelers may travel across the property wherever they wish and are not bound to use the road.

●        If a person’s road or building shall cause damage to another’s property, the owner of the road or building shall pay for the damage.

Table VIII: Crimes.

●        If a person insults or gossips about another person publicly, the person who did the insulting or gossiping shall be clubbed to death.

●        If a person injures another person physically, he will be injured in the same way unless he agrees to pay for damages.

●        No one may hold meetings at night.

●        If a person who is called to be a witness in court and lies, he shall be thrown from a cliff.

●        If a person throws something without aiming and injures another person, he shall owe that a person one ram.

Table IX: Constitutional Principles.

●        A man cannot be put to death without first having been found guilty in court.

●        A judge who is found guilty of taking a bribe shall be put to death.

●        It is forbidden to pass laws in private.

●        It is also forbidden to pass laws against a single person.

Table X: Funeral Rites.

●        No man shall be buried or cremated within the city.

●        Women are not allowed to mourn loudly or slap their own cheeks or tear their clothes during a funeral.

Table XI: Marriage Laws.

●        Marriages are forbidden between plebeians and patricians.

●        Men in the army may not marry until their training is complete.

Table XII: Punishments.

●        If a person accuses another but is lying, the liar must pay double the penalty of the crime or be put to death.

The eight forms of punishment are: fines, placing in chains, whipping, inflicting the same injury as was committed, public humiliation, banishment from the city, slavery and death. 

to conduct an assessment of health promotion while applying the nursing process and evidence-based research to disseminate findings to course colleagues.

Case:

Jessica is a 32 y/old math teacher who presents to the ER with a friend for evaluation of sudden decrease of vision in the left eye. She denies any trauma or injury. It started this morning when she woke up and has progressively worsened over the past few hours. She had some blurring of her vision 1 month ago and thinks that may have been related to getting overheated since it improved when she was able to get in a cool, air-conditioned environment. She has some pain if she tries to move her eye, but none when she just rests. She is also unable to determine colors. She denies tearing or redness or exposure to any chemicals. Nothing has made it better or worse.

She denies fever, chills, night sweats, weight loss, fatigue, headache, changes in hearing, sore throat, nasal or sinus congestion, neck pain or stiffness, chest pain or palpitations, shortness of breath or cough, abdominal pain, diarrhea, constipation, dysuria, vaginal discharge, swelling in the legs, polyuria, polydipsia, and polyphagia.

The patient is alert; she appears anxious. BP 135/85 mm Hg; HR 64bpm and regular, RR 16 per minute, T: 98.5F. Visual acuity 20/200 in the left eye and 20/30 in the right eye. Sclera white, conjunctivae clear. Unable to assess visual fields on the left side; visual fields on the right eye are intact. Pupil response to light is diminished in the left eye and brisk in the right eye. The optic disc is swollen. Full range of motions; no swelling or deformity. Mental status: Oriented x 3. Cranial nerves: I-XII intact; horizontal nystagmus is present. Muscles with normal bulk and tone; Normal finger to nose, negative Romberg. Intact to temperature, vibration, and two-point discrimination in upper and lower extremities. Reflexes: 2+ and symmetric in biceps, triceps, brachioradialis, patellar, and Achilles tendons; no Babinski.

Submission Instructions:

• Complete a comprehensive history and Physical Examination.
• What physical findings are you looking for to help determine a presumptive nursing diagnosis?
• Support your findings with peer-reviewed articles. 2016-2021!
• The assignment is original work and logically organized in the current APA style. Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. NO WEBSITE REFERENCE
• 3 page, excluding the title page and the reference page.

Class Assignment: Envision a time in the future when patients’ healthcare will be guided by their personal genetic profile (their human genome). 

Discuss: 

1. What will the future be like? 

2. What will it look like? 

I encourage you to go beyond what you think is realistic and imagine the most extreme or seemingly exaggerated possibilities.

Discuss how advances in genetic testing and profiling will play a major role in shaping how technology is used as a healthcare tool in the future.

This will be graded as a Discussion Forum without the student reply. 

300 words. No APA Format.

• Relate how a quality improvement program is based on a system of willful choice decision-making in a health organization. Can a reality-based decision making model work in quality improvement? Why or why not?
•   2. How would you describe the cycle of leadership? How do you ‘learn the ropes’ in a health organization?
•   3.   How would you describe the complexity of the health workforce environment and societal expectations? How might this lead to communication failure and conflict?