NUR-671-D7Q3J3 – 2025 Journaling provides a valuable tool for recording reflecting on and reviewing your learning This approach provides

by

Nursing Assignment Help

NUR-671-D7Q3J3 – 2025

 

Journaling provides a valuable tool for recording, reflecting on, and reviewing your learning. This approach provides an opportunity for you to “connect the dots” and observe the relationships between and among activities, interactions, and outcomes.

Unlike a personal journal of thoughts and feelings, this leadership journal is a record of your activities, assessments, and learning related to this academic experience.

Journal entries should include a record of the number of hours spent with your nurse leader each week.

Write a journal entry of 750-1,500 words on the subject of purpose, including the following:

  1. Practicum Activities Reflection: Provide observations and thoughts on the activities in your practicum during Topics 5-6.
  2. Application of Leadership: Describe how your nurse leader’s leadership style affects the people the nurse leads. Do staff members express feelings of support and helpfulness? Are there examples of dictating rather than leading? Does the leader say or do things designed to “build up” staff or were there missed opportunities?
  3. Practicum Project Preparation: What have you learned about the goals and mission of the organization where you are performing your practicum? After learning this, did you alter the focus of your project? Why or why not?
  4. Leadership Video Reflection: Reflect on at least two things you learned from the “Servant Leadership – Issue of Rule” video.

The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies – 2025 Assignment Literature Review The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and

by

Nursing Assignment Help

The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies – 2025

  

Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies

New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.

Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting existing research to inform their thinking.

In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.

To Prepare:

· Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery.

· Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.”

· Identify and select 5 peer-reviewed articles from your research.

The Assignment: (5 pages)

In a 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Be sure to address the following:

· Identify the 5 peer-reviewed articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.

· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Name: NURS_5051_Module04_ _Assignment_Rubric

· Grid View

· List View

   

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

 

In a 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you   reviewed. Be sure to address the following:
 

·   Properly identify 5 peer-reviewed articles   selected.
·   Summarize each study, explaining the improvement   to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the   clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide   examples.

77 (77%) – 85 (85%)

The responses   accurately and clearly identify 5 peer-reviewed research articles for the   Assignment.
 

  The responses accurately and thoroughly summarize in detail each study   reviewed, explaining in detail the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and   lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each   peer-reviewed article described.
 

  Specific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support   the responses.

68 (68%) – 76 (76%)

The responses   identify 5 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.
 

  The responses summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to   outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the   clinical system each peer-reviewed article described.
 

  Accurate examples are provided which support the responses provided.

60 (60%) – 67 (67%)

The responses   vaguely or inaccurately identify 5 or less peer-reviewed articles for the   Assignment.
 

  The responses summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to   outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the   clinical system each peer-reviewed article described that is vague or   inaccurate.
 

  Examples provided to support the responses are vague or inaccurate.

0 (0%) – 59 (59%)

The responses   vaguely and inaccurately identify less than 5 peer-reviewed articles for the   Assignment, or are missing.
 

  The responses vaguely and inaccurately summarize each study reviewed,   explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned   from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article   described, or are missing.
 

  Examples provided to support the responses are vague and inaccurate, or are   missing.

 

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and   Organization:
 

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed   ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are   carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and   sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and   sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of   the time.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and   sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79%   of the time.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and   sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60%   of the time.

 

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
 

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct   grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2)   grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several   (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5)   grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s   understanding.

 

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct   APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins,   indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations,   and reference list.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA   format with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2)   APA format errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several   (3-4) APA format errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5)   APA format errors.

 

Total   Points: 100

          

Assignment: Assessing and Treating Clients With Pain – 2025 Examine Case Study A Caucasian Man With Hip Pain You will be

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Assignment: Assessing and Treating Clients With Pain – 2025

Examine Case Study: A Caucasian Man With Hip Pain. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this client. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the client’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.

At each decision point stop to complete the following:

  • Decision #1    
    • Which decision did you select?
    • Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
    • What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. 
    • Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #1 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?
  • Decision #2    
    • Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
    • What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. 
    • Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #2 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?
  • Decision #3    
    • Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
    • What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. 
    • Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #3 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?

Also include how ethical considerations might impact your treatment plan and communication with clients.

Essentials of Nursing research – 2025 Ethics and Evidence Based Research Write a 1250 1500 word essay addressing each of the

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Essentials of Nursing research – 2025

 

Ethics and Evidence-Based Research

Write a 1250-1500 word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. There should be three main sections, one for each bullet below. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least two (2) sources using citations in your essay. Make sure to cite using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page in correct APA do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

Part 1: Describe why ethical safeguards designed for clinical research may not be feasible or appropriate for evidence-based practice or evidence-based practice implementation projects.

Part 2:  Review the sectioned headed, Two Ethical Exemplars in Chapter 22 of the textbook (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2015, pages 518-519). Discuss three main ethical controversies related to implementing Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI) Initiatives. Describe how these controversies relate to the four core ethical principles.

Part 3: Identify which ethical principles may be in conflict with the concept of “patients having an ethical responsibility in improving healthcare.” Discuss how these conflicts may be resolved.

At least 2 scholarly references should be used for this assignment.

Pruitt Health Law Dis 4 – 2025 You should write all questions and your corresponding answer to them in

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Pruitt Health Law Dis 4 – 2025

  You should write all questions and your corresponding answer to them in this discussion board 

submit one (1)original post with questions with answers of no less than 300 total words
 

Ethics Issue 1:

HIPAA has made it illegal, under threat of penalty, for health care practitioners to disclose confidential health information about patients to unauthorized sources.

Discussion Questions

  1. Sharon, a second-year nursing student, is completing a surgical rotation in a community hospital. At the breakfast table, Sharon’s husband asks her to find out what is wrong with one of his employees, who has been hospitalized for several days. He is interested in knowing when the man may be able to return to work. Is it ethical for Sharon to give her husband this information? Explain your answer.
  2. What should health care practitioners do when family members or friends ask them for information about others that they have discovered in the course of their employment?

health informatics – 2025 A major obstacle to the global adoption expansion and progress of eHealth is the lack

by

Nursing Assignment Help

health informatics – 2025

A major obstacle to the global adoption, expansion, and progress of eHealth is the lack of available healthcare workers trained in informatics and adequately prepared to work in this growing field. What unique skill set(s) are needed to work in this evolving discipline? What obstacles present themselves as informatics expands globally (e.g., education/language barriers, differences in terminology, legal issues, access to technology, regulatory policies, etc.)? How might these challenges be overcome? 600 words. please bid only if you have the book nelson & staggers, health informatics and Braunstein. atleast 2 peer reviewed articles

HCA 699-Section B: Literature Support- EHR – 2025 Section B Literature Support To begin work through the reference list that was created in the Problem Description Assignment in

by

Nursing Assignment Help

HCA 699-Section B: Literature Support- EHR – 2025

 

Section B: Literature Support

To begin, work through the reference list that was created in the Problem Description Assignment in Topic 2. Appraise each resource using the “Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists” available in the textbook appendix. The specific checklist you use will be determined by the type of evidence within the resource.

Develop a research table to organize and summarize the research studies. Using a summary table allows you to be more concise in your narrative description. Only research studies used to support your intervention are summarized in this table. Refer to the “Evaluation Table Template” available in the textbook appendix or use the “Evaluation Table Template” resource as an adaptable template.

Write a narrative of 750-1,000 words (not including the title page and references) that presents the research support for the project’s problem and proposed solution. Make sure to include:

  1. Description of the search method (i.e., databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit your criteria).
  2. Summarization of all of the research studies used as evidence. The essential components of each study need to be described so that readers can evaluate its scientific merit, including study strengths and limitations.
  3. Description of the validity of the internal and external research.

It is essential to make sure that the research support for the proposed solution is sufficient, compelling, relevant and from peer-reviewed professional journal articles.

Although you will not be submitting the checklist information or the evaluation table you design in Topic 3 with the narrative, the checklist information and evaluation table should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required for the individual sections, but is required for the final paper.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. 

Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine Section B for your final submission.

AttachmentsHCA699.R.EvaluationTable_student.docx 

Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative – 2025 This assignment will incorporate a common practical tool in helping clinicians begin to ethically analyze a case

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative – 2025

 

This assignment will incorporate a common practical tool in helping clinicians begin to ethically analyze a case. Organizing the data in this way will help you apply the four principles and four boxes approach.

Based on the “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” (attached) and other required topic study materials, you will complete the “Applying the Four Principles: Case Study” document that includes the following: (attached)

Part 1: Chart

This chart will formalize the four principles and four boxes approach and the four-boxes approach by organizing the data from the case study according to the relevant principles of biomedical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice.

Part 2: Evaluation

This part includes questions, to be answered in a total of 500 words, that describe how principalism would be applied according to the Christian worldview.

Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials.  

Read Chapters 3 from Practicing Dignity.

URL:https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/grand-canyon-university/2020/practicing-dignity_an-introduction-to-christian-values-and-decision-making-in-health-care_1e.php 

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. 

Nursing (see below) – 2025 1 Your community is at risk for a specific type of natural disaster e g tornado flood hurricane earthquake Use Nightingale s

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Nursing (see below) – 2025

1. Your community is at risk for a specific type of natural disaster (e.g., tornado, flood, hurricane, earthquake). Use Nightingale’s principles and observations to develop an emergency plan for one of these events. Outline the items you would include in the plan.

2. Using Nightingale’s concepts of ventilation, light, noise, and cleanliness, analyze the setting in which you are practicing nursing as an employee or student.

3. You are participating in a quality improvement project in your work setting. Share how you would develop ideas to present to the group based on a Nightingale approach

NR439-10601 Week 3 Assignment: Problem/PICOT/Evidence Search (PPE) Worksheet – 2025 Purpose Collaborative identification and interpretation of practice problems is a requirement of professional

by

Nursing Assignment Help

NR439-10601 Week 3 Assignment: Problem/PICOT/Evidence Search (PPE) Worksheet – 2025

Purpose

Collaborative identification and interpretation of practice problems is a requirement of professional practice (AACN, 2008).  Locating and summarizing findings using credible online databases is necessary for evidence-based nursing (AACN, 2008; QSEN, 2018).  This assignment provides a learning activity for students to experience a practice-based scenario and apply a process worksheet designed to assist in the identification of an independent nursing problem or concern, develop a PICOT clinical question, and search for evidence using credible online databases/sources.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes.

CO1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO 7)

CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 & 8)

CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs 4 & 8)

CO5: Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice. (POs 7 & 8)

Directions

  1. Read over each of the following directions.
  2. You must read the Assignment Practice Scenario below before completing the PPE Worksheet.
  3. Download and use the required PPE Worksheet (Links to an external site.).
  4. Review the information provided in our library of how to search for journal articles here (Links to an external site.).
  5. Review the information provided in our library of how to locate and copy a journal permalink (Links to an external site.).
  6. You are required to complete the worksheet using the productivity tools required by Chamberlain University, which is Microsoft Office Word 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the “.docx” format. Do NOT save as Word Pad. A later version of the productivity tool includes Office 365, which is available to Chamberlain students for FREE by downloading from the student portal at http://my.chamberlain.edu (Links to an external site.). Click on the envelope at the top of the page.
  7. Complete each section of the Problem/PICOT/Evidence (PPE) Worksheet. For the Clinical PICOT Question, use the NR439_Guide for writing PICOT Questions and Examples.N439_Guide for writing PICOT Questions and Examples (Links to an external site.) Use one of the templates/guides to write your Clinical PICOT Question using all of the PICOT elements. Be sure to include the PICOT letters in your question.
  8. Be sure to use the rubric to make certain you are meeting all grading criteria of the PPE Worksheet.
  9. Submit the completed PPE Worksheet on the Week 3 Assignment page.
  10. Students, A short tutorial with tips for completing the Week 3 Problem/PICOT/Evidence Search (PPE) worksheet assignment may be viewed here.