Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation – 2025 There are 2 parts to this assignment Part 1 is template and Part 2 is the paper

Nursing Assignment Help

Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation – 2025

There are 2 parts to this assignment. Part 1 is template and Part 2 is the paper. 

Everything has to be APA format, no direct citations from the references. Please see all attachments for everything that you will need. I have listed the instructions for the template and the assignement. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcomes for the populations they serve. Program/policy evaluation answers basic questions about program/policy effectiveness. It involves collecting and analyzing information about program/policy activities, characteristics, and outcomes. This information can be used to ultimately improve program services or policy initiatives.

Nurses can play a very important role assessing program/policy evaluation for the same reasons that they can be so important to program/policy design. Nurses bring expertise and patient advocacy that can add significant insight and impact. In this Assignment, you will practice applying this expertise and insight by selecting an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation and reflecting on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program/policy.

Ethics In Nursing – 2025 1 Search the internet and learn about the cases of nurses Julie Thao and Kimberly Hiatt 2

Nursing Assignment Help

Ethics In Nursing – 2025

1.  Search the internet and learn about the cases of nurses Julie Thao and Kimberly Hiatt. 

2.  List and discuss lessons that you and all healthcare professionals can learn from these two cases.

3.  Describe how the principle of beneficence and the virtue of benevolence could be applied to these cases.

4.  In addition to benevolence, which other virtues exhibited by their colleagues might have helped Thao and Hiatt?

5.  Discuss personal virtues that might be helpful to second victims themselves to navigate the grieving process.

Select articles from nursing journals that address ethical issues. Do not use RN, or Nursing 2019.  It is most be in APA format and at least one or two professional references.

Capstone Project Change Proposal Presentation for Faculty Review and Feedback – 2025 Create a professional presentation of your evidence based intervention and change proposal to be

Nursing Assignment Help

Capstone Project Change Proposal Presentation for Faculty Review and Feedback – 2025

 

Create a professional presentation of your evidence-based intervention and change proposal to be disseminated to an interprofessional audience of leaders and stakeholders. Include the intervention, evidence-based literature, objectives, resources needed, anticipated measurable outcomes, and how the intervention would be evaluated. 

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guideline.

Empathy map – 2025 To create your Empathy map simply draw four quadrants on a piece of paper

Nursing Assignment Help

Empathy map – 2025

To create your Empathy map, simply draw four quadrants on a piece of paper. Each quadrant represents a different aspect of yourself, the quadrants are as follows;

Seeing; The See quadrant explores what you see from the situation and how that impacts what you then do.

Doing; The Does quadrant explores the actions the Individual takes

Thinking; The Thinks quadrant captures what the Individual is thinking throughout the experience

Feeling. The Feels quadrant is the Individuals emotional state

Next, consider the following case study of Rosie and her family, explore the emotion in you. In each quadrant, write down the relevant aspects of each perspective. Your word count for this assessment is 500 words. Whilst APA referencing is not required for the purpose of this assessment as this work is based on your own personal knowledge you are required to submit a Bibliography which is not included in your word count. 

Case Study

Rosie is a 28-year-old single mother to Sam, her 6-year-old son. Sam was diagnosed with Neuroblastoma which is a form of cancer that is made up of cells that are found in nerve tissues of the body at the age of 4 and has been receiving a variety of known treatment options throughout this time inclusive of Chemotherapy which Sam is currently undergoing. Rosie has no current contact with any of her family members due to her traumatic childhood.

This has been a long journey for their family and Rosie has consistently struggled with watching Sam decline health wise throughout treatment and constantly analyses Sam’s quality of life. Sam cannot play sport of any kind, at times due to his level of unwellness he cannot hold a book at bedtime, he has not commenced school due to his treatment therefore has minimal friends to support him throughout this time period. Sam became extremely unwell during his last round of treatment which again provoked Rosie to assess how this medical intervention was helping her son.

Following Sam’s last round of treatment, scans took place which concluded the Neuroblastoma had again spread throughout Sam’s body however Doctors were confident that Sam would be eligible for a new drug trial. Following Rosie’s assessment of Sam who is undernourished and unwell from the impact of chemotherapy she has declined any further treatment for Sam and has requested support to prepare for Sam’s death with the inclusion of the Palliative care team.

NR534 week BA – 2025 Description of the Assignment The assignment provides an opportunity for the student to

Nursing Assignment Help

NR534 week BA – 2025

 

Description of the Assignment

The assignment provides an opportunity for the student to:

  • Develop and leadership profile based on leadership style and personality profile
  • Apply their leadership profile to advanced communication situations
  • Develop strategies that will improve and/enhance advanced communication skills
  • Engage in reflective practice through writing

IV. Preparing the Assignment

Preparing the Assignment

  1. Address all components of the Advanced Communication in Systems Leadership paper as outlined under “Assignment Directions and Criteria”.
  2. The paper is graded on quality and completeness of information, depth of thought, organization following outline provided, substantive narrative, use of citations, use of standard English, and writing conventions.
  3. Format:
    1. American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (current ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Is the source used for this paper
      1. Required elements
        1. Title page, reference page
        2. Use Microsoft Word
        3. Page numbers, running head, doubles-spaced, times new roman, 12pt font, 1″ margins, level 1 headings
        4. Paper length: 6 maximum, excluding reference page, title page, and assessment tool
    2. Scholarly sources
      1. Minimum of four (4) scholarly resources no older than 5 years
    3. Proof-reading
      1. Use spell check and grammar check and correct all errors
      2. Compare final draft to detailed outline directions to ensure all required elements included
      3. Submitting the paper
        1. Submit to Week 2 Assignment portal by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT
        2. Must achieve TII score < 24% to be graded

Final submission only will be graded

DIRECTIONS AND ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA

This paper is a reflective practice experience that requires you to describe selected communication experiences, analyze them through the lens of your newly developed leadership profile, and describe implications for future experiences. You will need to draw on knowledge of advanced communication skills as well as past experiences and knowledge in certain communication situations. Scholarly inquiry into the specified communication types will be needed from at least one (1) peer reviewed journal per situation. Use the detailed outline found in the Assignment Guidelines with Scoring Rubric document above to organize your paper. The headings included in that document should be used for your paper and represent what is included in a completed paper. 

HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH PROTECTION – 2025 ASSIGNMENT IS DUE TOMORROW AT 12 PM This assessment requires you to visit

Nursing Assignment Help

HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH PROTECTION – 2025

ASSIGNMENT IS DUE TOMORROW AT 12 PM

This assessment requires you to visit the The Research Clinic: 

https://ori.hhs.gov/TheResearchClinicVideo/

You will click to play Jan Klein, RN. Work your way through the brief videos, choosing the best response as the RN assisting in research. 

Upon completing the videos, you will submit a Word file that summarizes the essential elements of informed consent, special populations that require special legal and ethical research considerations, and the nurse’s role in advocating for the patient in research situations. 

Your summary should be between 200-300 words. Provide a minimum of 2 references, in APA format, supporting your summary.

Case Study: Mrs. J. – 2025 It is necessary for an RN BSN prepared nurse to demonstrate an enhanced understanding

Nursing Assignment Help

Case Study: Mrs. J. – 2025

 

It is necessary for an RN-BSN-prepared nurse to demonstrate an enhanced understanding of the pathophysiological processes of disease, the clinical manifestations and treatment protocols, and how they affect clients across the life span.

Evaluate the Health History and Medical Information for Mrs. J., presented below.

Based on this information, formulate a conclusion based on your evaluation, and complete the Critical Thinking Essay assignment, as instructed below.

Health History and Medical Information

Health History

Mrs. J. is a 63-year-old married woman who has a history of hypertension, chronic heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Despite requiring 2L of oxygen/nasal cannula at home during activity, she continues to smoke two packs of cigarettes a day and has done so for 40 years. Three days ago, she had sudden onset of flu-like symptoms including fever, productive cough, nausea, and malaise. Over the past 3 days, she has been unable to perform ADLs and has required assistance in walking short distances. She has not taken her antihypertensive medications or medications to control her heart failure for 3 days. Today, she has been admitted to the hospital ICU with acute decompensated heart failure and acute exacerbation of COPD.

Subjective Data

  1. Is very anxious and asks whether she is going to die.
  2. Denies pain but says she feels like she cannot get enough air.
  3. Says her heart feels like it is “running away.”
  4. Reports that she is exhausted and cannot eat or drink by herself.

Objective Data

  1. Height 175 cm; Weight 95.5kg.
  2. Vital signs: T 37.6C, HR 118 and irregular, RR 34, BP 90/58.
  3. Cardiovascular: Distant S1, S2, S3 present; PMI at sixth ICS and faint: all peripheral pulses are 1+; bilateral jugular vein distention; initial cardiac monitoring indicates a ventricular rate of 132 and atrial fibrillation.
  4. Respiratory: Pulmonary crackles; decreased breath sounds right lower lobe; coughing frothy blood-tinged sputum; SpO2 82%.
  5. Gastrointestinal: BS present: hepatomegaly 4cm below costal margin.

Intervention

The following medications administered through drug therapy control her symptoms:

  1. IV furosemide (Lasix)
  2. Enalapril (Vasotec)
  3. Metoprolol (Lopressor)
  4. IV morphine sulphate (Morphine)
  5. Inhaled short-acting bronchodilator (ProAir HFA)
  6. Inhaled corticosteroid (Flovent HFA)
  7. Oxygen delivered at 2L/ NC

Critical Thinking Essay

In 750-1,000 words, critically evaluate Mrs. J.’s situation. Include the following:

  1. Describe the clinical manifestations present in Mrs. J.
  2. Discuss whether the nursing interventions at the time of her admissions were appropriate for Mrs. J. and explain the rationale for each of the medications listed.
  3. Describe four cardiovascular conditions that may lead to heart failure and what can be done in the form of medical/nursing interventions to prevent the development of heart failure in each condition.
  4. Taking into consideration the fact that most mature adults take at least six prescription medications, discuss four nursing interventions that can help prevent problems caused by multiple drug interactions in older patients. Provide a rationale for each of the interventions you recommend.
  5. Provide a health promotion and restoration teaching plan for Mrs. J., including multidisciplinary resources for rehabilitation and any modifications that may be needed. Explain how the rehabilitation resources and modifications will assist the patients’ transition to independence.
  6. Describe a method for providing education for Mrs. J. regarding medications that need to be maintained to prevent future hospital admission. Provide rationale.
  7. Outline COPD triggers that can increase exacerbation frequency, resulting in return visits. Considering Mrs. J.’s current and long-term tobacco use, discuss what options for smoking cessation should be offered.

You are required to cite to a minimum of two sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. 

Research 6 – 2025 Assignment Evidence Based Practice Model and Change Model Create a PowerPoint presentation that addresses each of

Nursing Assignment Help

Research 6 – 2025

Assignment:

Evidence-Based Practice Model and Change Model

Create a PowerPoint presentation that addresses each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Use clear headings that allow your professor to know which bullet you are addressing on the slides in your presentation. Support your content with at least three (3) sources using APA citations throughout your presentation. Make sure to cite the sources using the APA writing style for the presentation. Include a slide for your references at the end. Follow best practices for PowerPoint presentations related to text size, color, images, effects, wordiness, and multimedia enhancements. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

Identify an evidence based practice model and change model that has been defined in Chapters 13 and 14 of the textbook (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2015). Describe in detail how you would utilize the practice model and change model to implement an evidence-based practice change in your clinical practice environment, related to your research topic.

  1. Title Slide (1 slide)
  2. Objective Slide (1 slide)
  3. Identify an evidence-based practice model and change model that has been defined in Chapters 13 and 14 of the textbook (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2015). (2-3 slides).
  4. Describe in detail how you would utilize the practice model and change model to implement an evidence-based practice change in your clinical practice environment, related to your research topic. (6-8 slides)
  5. References (1 slide)

Assignment Expectations: 

Length: 8-14 slides
Structure: Include a title slide, objective slide, content slides, reference slide in APA format. Title/Objective/Reference slides do not count towards the minimum slide count for this assignment.
References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. A minimum of three (3) scholarly sources are required for this assignment.
Rubric: This assignment uses a rubric for scoring. Please review it as part of your assignment preparation and again prior to submission to ensure you have addressed its criteria at the highest level.

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.CriteriaDoes Not Meet 0%Approaches 60%Meets 70%Exceeds 100%Content Weight: 40%0 points

Article is not from a peer-reviewed journal. Analysis paper does not address assignment requirements.

24 points

Paper provides little detail and minimal analysis of the topic, lacks some of the requirements of the assignment.

28 points

Article is evaluated and provides sufficient attention to detail and analysis of the topic. Paper adequately addresses all of the requirements of the assignment.

40 points

In-depth analysis evident; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts is demonstrated in information presented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details.

40 / 40Logic/Critical Thinking Weight: 25%0 points

Demonstrates little or no critical thinking for the claims and thoughts within paper; analysis is weak or illogical and is not supported by evidence.

15 points

Demonstrates some critical thinking although there is a lack of logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the paper; analysis may be superficial. Some evidence is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

17.5 points

Demonstrates critical thinking and logical reasoning for the analysis within the paper. Evidence reveals patterns, differences, or similarities in the articles.

25 points

Demonstrates exemplary use of critical thinking and logical reasoning for the analysis within the paper. Synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities in the articles.

25 / 25Organization Weight: 15%0 points

Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction. Conclusion lacks a summary, or is missing or irrelevant.

9 points

Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; flow is sometimes choppy. Basic introduction is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary without final concluding ideas, and/or may inappropriately introduce new information.

10.5 points

Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework. Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains acceptable summary with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information.

15 points

Exceptionally clear, logical, and sophisticated organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; introduction grabs interest of reader. Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader.

Wk 4 Assignment Part 1 & 2 – 2025 For this Assignment review the resources for this week and the Case Study Assignment document

Nursing Assignment Help

Wk 4 Assignment Part 1 & 2 – 2025

For this Assignment, review the resources for this week and the “Case Study Assignment” document. Reflect on the issues presented in the Case Study assigned and consider how you might approach the case as a health care administration leader.

The Assignment—Part 1:

Individual Case Study Analysis (1–2 pages):

  • Create an individual Case Study Analysis that includes:
    • A summary of the facts associated with the case, including the primary leaders
    • A description of skills and traits of the primary leaders in this case

The Assignment—Part 2:

Group Case Study Analysis (2–3 pages):

  • Then, using your Individual Case Analysis for the Case Study, collaborate with your colleagues to create a Group Case Study Analysis that includes:
    • A summary of possible shortcomings of the skills and traits of the primary leaders in the Case Study
    • A description of systemic issues and strategies for system improvement applying systems thinking

MSN FP 6212 – 2025 Write a 300 words analysis of your care setting that supports the development of a strategic plan and

Nursing Assignment Help

MSN FP 6212 – 2025

 

Write a  300 words analysis of your care setting that supports the development of a strategic plan and includes both the discovery and dream phases of an appreciative inquiry (AI) project and a strengths,  weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis of the care setting.

Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.