heritage assessment paper – 2025 Heritage Assessment Tool Instructions Interview an older member of your family Use the Heritage Assessment Tool

Nursing Assignment Help

heritage assessment paper – 2025

 

Heritage Assessment Tool

Instructions:

  1. Interview an older member of your family
  2. Use the Heritage Assessment Tool found in Appendix B, page 276 of your textbook as a starting point for your interview. SEE ATTCH
  3. Summarize what practices your family member used to maintain, protect and restore health. (Include one example)
  4. Your paper should be:
    • One (1) page
    • Typed according to APA style for margins, formating and spacing standards 
      • See NUR3045 – Library (located on left-side on menu) for tutorial Using APA Style
    • Typed into a Microsoft Word document, save the file, and then upload the file

HQ3 – 2025 Before submitting your Assessment carefully review the rubric This is the same rubric the assessor will use to

Nursing Assignment Help

HQ3 – 2025

 

Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the assessor will use to evaluate your submission, and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively.

All submissions must follow the conventions of scholarly writing. Properly formatted APA citations and references must be provided, where appropriate. Submissions that do not meet these expectations will be returned without scoring.

W#11 Health Promo – 2025 This discussion will allow you to examine several different preventive guidelines related to vaccinations Please read the following four scenarios

Nursing Assignment Help

W#11 Health Promo – 2025

This discussion will allow you to examine several different preventive guidelines related to vaccinations. Please read the following four scenarios and choose ONE for your initial post; be sure to address all the questions posed by the scenario and include at least three scholarly sources within your initial post.

Immunizations 

1. Patient #1: Two five-year-old girls are on your schedule for a kindergarten physical. The foster parent of one of the children indicates she received all her immunization from birth to one year of age, but after that the child has not had any further vaccines. The second child appears to have been vaccinated per the CDC schedule. 

–  Is there a difference in the immunization plan you will initiate today for these two patients? Why or why not? 

– What immunizations will you be ordering for each of these two patients today? 

2. Patient #2: Today you have two patients on your schedule for the HPV vaccine. One is a 27-year-old female. In taking her health history, you find that she is sexually active and that she had a splenectomy when she was 17. The second patient is an eleven-year-old female whose mother is concerned and wants to discuss the vaccine further before consenting. She feels that by giving the child the vaccine she is giving her permission to be sexually active. 

– What type of immunizations will you recommend and why for each of these patients? 

– What type of counseling will you provide in each of these scenarios related to their immunization needs? 

3. Patient #3: The following two patients present for their yearly physicals before going to spend the holidays with their grandchildren, who are two months, 18 months, and seven years of age. The 72-year-old male states he “doesn’t want a flu shot” because he’s afraid he will just get sick like his neighbor who got her shot last week; however, his 67-year-old wife, who you are also seeing for a follow-up related to shingles she had a month ago, states, “I want the flu vaccine, but I don’t need the shingles vaccine now since I’ve already had it.” 

– How will you counsel these individuals? Are there risks related to the children from either party? – 

– What adult immunizations should be recommended for these patients? 

4. Patient #4: Your final patient of the day is a three-month-old baby. The nurse states that the mom is refusing vaccinations today even though though the baby’s records show she is up to date on her immunizations. Mom explains that she feels like her baby is getting “too many” shots and since everyone else is being vaccinated then they can skip a few of the vaccines and her baby will be just fine. 

– What is herd immunity and how can this help protect individuals who are not vaccinated? What are the rates for your state related to immunizations, and how could this affect herd immunity?

– What immunizations should this patient receive today, and is there any leeway in the schedule to help alleviate some of the mom’s concerns?

INSTRUCTIONS

– Please include at least 3 scholarly sources within your initial post.

– APA style.

– Turnitin Assignment (No plagiarism)

Note: My background for you to have as a reference: I am currently enrolled in the Psych Mental Health Nurse Practitioner Program, I am a Registered Nurse. I work in a Psychiatric Hospital.

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research – 2025 Assignment Evidence Based Project Part 4 Critical Appraisal of Research Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals conducted using appraisal tools to assign market

Nursing Assignment Help

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research – 2025

  

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research

Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.

Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.

In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.

To Prepare:

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.

· Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.

Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.

Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research

Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

_Assignment_Rubric

· Grid View

· List View

   

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

 

Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research
 

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed   articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tool   Worksheet Template. Be sure to include:
 

·   An Evaluation Table

45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

The critical   appraisal accurately and clearly provides a detailed evaluation table. The   responses provide a detailed, specific, and accurate evaluation of each of   the peer-reviewed articles selected.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

The critical   appraisal accurately provides an evaluation table. The responses provide an   accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected with some   specificity.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

The critical   appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate or vague. The   responses provide an inaccurate or vague evaluation of each of the   peer-reviewed articles selected.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

The critical   appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate and vague or is   missing.

 

Part 4B: Evidence-Based Best Practices
 

Based on your appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges   from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying   your proposal with APA citations of the research.

32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

The responses   accurately and clearly suggest a detailed best practice that is fully aligned   to the research reviewed.
 

  The responses accurately and clearly explain in detail the best practice,   with sufficient justification of why this represents a best practice in the   field. The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two   outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained. The response fully   integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific   resources that fully support the responses provided.
 

  Accurate, complete, and full APA citations are provided for the research   reviewed.

28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

The responses   accurately suggest a best practice that is adequately aligned to the research   reviewed.
 

  The responses accurately explain the best practice, with adequately   justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. The   responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource   reviewed on the best practice explained. The response integrates at least one   outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support   the responses provided.
 

  Accurate and complete APA citations are provided for the research reviewed.

25 (25%) – 27 (27%)

The responses   inaccurately or vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the   research reviewed.
 

  The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the best practice, with   inaccurate or vague justification for why this represents a best practice in   the field. The responses provide a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside   resources reviewed on the best practice explained. The response minimally   integrates resources that may support the responses provided.
 

  Inaccurate and incomplete APA citations are provided for the research   reviewed.

0 (0%) – 24 (24%)

The responses   inaccurately and vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the   research reviewed or are missing.
 

  The responses inaccurately and vaguely explain the best practice, with   inaccurate and vague justification for why this represents a best practice in   the field, or are missing. A vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside   resources reviewed on the best practice explained is provided or is missing.   The response fails to integrate any resources to support the responses   provided.
 

  Inaccurate and incomplete APA citations are provided for the research   reviewed or is missing.

 

Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and   Organization:
 

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed   ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are   carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.   A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided   which delineates all required criteria.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and   sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
 

  A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is   provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and   sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of   the time.
 

  Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is   brief and not descriptive.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and   sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79%   of the time.
 

  Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off   topic.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and   sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less   than 60% of the time.
 

  No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

 

Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:
 

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct   grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (one   or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several   (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (five   or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the   reader’s understanding.

 

Written Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct   APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations,   page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference   list.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA   format with no errors.

Self-Directed Learning Plan (SDLP) final – 2025 Self Directed Learning Plan SDLP Purpose It s important to develop your professional goals and how you

Nursing Assignment Help

Self-Directed Learning Plan (SDLP) final – 2025

Self-Directed Learning Plan (SDLP)

Purpose:

It’s important to develop your professional goals and how you achieve them in this course and your chosen program.

Directions:

To prepare your SDLP, complete the steps outlined below.

After exploring the course description, course outcomes, and unit themes and outcomes, complete your SDLP for your professional objectives.

What did you expect to learn in this course and what do you expect to learn in your program that will help you achieve your academic and professional goals? You are encouraged to reflect earnestly about how the course content and experience might serve your goals, as well as about what you might proactively do in throughout your program to develop in your target areas.

If you have determined there are additional areas from which you would benefit, or areas you would like to replace, this is a good time to do so. Remember, this is your learning plan, so design it to help you achieve your unique goals.

  1. Identify your anticipated nursing role.
  2. List your professional goals (3–5 years from now).
  3. Identify the Knowledge, Skills, and Accomplishments needed for the advanced nursing role that you have identified above. A minimum of three items should be listed for each of the Knowledge, Skills, and Accomplishments.
  4. Discuss at least three Strengths to Leverage. Complete steps 1, 2, and 3 of the template for Strengths to Leverage.
  5. Discuss at least one Area to Develop. Complete steps 1, 2, and 3 of the template for Areas to Develop.
  6. Write a reflection that discusses what you learned in this course and expect to learn in your program that will help you achieve your academic and professional goals. Provide an evaluation of how your SDLP can provide for lifelong learning. The reflection should be a minimum of 300 words.

You must submit the Unit 10 SDLP Assignment using the SDLP Template. You should not submit a written paper for the Unit 10 SDLP Assignment. If you have references to support your SDLP then you should add a heading References at the end of the SDLP Template and add the references in APA format. You do not need to have a title page for this assignment.

This Assignment will be graded based on evidence of thoughtful development of your SDLP.

To view the Grading Rubric for this Assignment, please visit the Grading Rubrics section of the Course Resources.

Assignment Requirements:

Before finalizing your work, you should:

  • be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above);
  • consult the Grading Rubric (under the Course Resources) to make sure you have included everything necessary; and
  • utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors.

Your writing Assignment should:

  • follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.);
  • be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful;
  • display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and
  • use APA 6th Edition format.
  • Please see the Writing Center located in the student portal for assistance with writing, APA, and online communication.

Aging Adult Case Study – 2025 Aging Adult Case Study A 68 year old client lives alone and is independent with

Nursing Assignment Help

Aging Adult Case Study – 2025

 

Aging Adult Case Study

A 68-year-old client lives alone and is independent with all ADLs, has no restrictions for mobility, and is competent, and oriented x4. The client is on a fixed income, but has enough to manage a modest lifestyle. The client has family and social supports but is very independent and is proud of her self-reliance. The client’s height is 5’ 6”, weight is 210 lb. / 95.25 kg.

Please answer the following:

  • What is the client’s BMI?
  • Identify what screening tools you would use to assess nutritional and exercise knowledge, and why?
  • Identify two client outcomes that are reasonable, measurable and realistic
  • Identify 3 nursing interventions for each client outcome and give rationales
  • Identify what weakness in the client’s life and supports may be impacting the client’s activity and diet?
  • What referrals would you make and why?
  • Identify your references in APA format. Use references not just opinion.

Assignment Expectations:

Length: 1500 to 1750 words in length

Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA format.  These do not count towards the minimum word count for this assignment. Your essay must include an introduction and a conclusion.

References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. A minimum of two (2) scholarly sources are required for this assignment.

Rubric: This assignment uses a rubric for scoring. Please review it as part of your assignment preparation and again prior to submission to ensure you have addressed its criteria at the highest level.

Format: Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word document (.doc or .docx) 

Protected Health Information (PHI): Privacy, Security, and Confidentiality Best Practices – 2025 Assessment 2 Instructions Protected Health Information PHI Privacy Security and Confidentiality Best

Nursing Assignment Help

Protected Health Information (PHI): Privacy, Security, and Confidentiality Best Practices – 2025

 

Assessment 2 Instructions: Protected Health Information (PHI): Privacy, Security, and Confidentiality Best Practices

Prepare a 2-page interprofessional staff update on HIPAA and appropriate social media use in health care.
As you begin to consider the assessment, it would be an excellent choice to complete the Breach of Protected Health Information (PHI) activity. The will support your success with the assessment by creating the opportunity for you to test your knowledge of potential privacy, security, and confidentiality violations of protected health information. The activity is not graded and counts towards course engagement.
Health professionals today are increasingly accountable for the use of protected health information (PHI). Various government and regulatory agencies promote and support privacy and security through a variety of activities. Examples include:

  • Meaningful use of electronic health records (EHR).
  • Provision of EHR incentive programs through Medicare and Medicaid.
  • Enforcement of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) rules.
  • Release of educational resources and tools to help providers and hospitals address privacy, security, and confidentiality risks in their practices.
  • Technological advances, such as the use of social media platforms and applications for patient progress tracking and communication, have provided more access to health information and improved communication between care providers and patients.
    At the same time, advances such as these have resulted in more risk for protecting PHI. Nurses typically receive annual training on protecting patient information in their everyday practice. This training usually emphasizes privacy, security, and confidentiality best practices such as:
  • Keeping passwords secure.
  • Logging out of public computers.
  • Sharing patient information only with those directly providing care or who have been granted permission to receive this information.
  • Today, one of the major risks associated with privacy and confidentiality of patient identity and data relates to social media. Many nurses and other health care providers place themselves at risk when they use social media or other electronic communication systems inappropriately. For example, a Texas nurse was recently terminated for posting patient vaccination information on Facebook. In another case, a New York nurse was terminated for posting an insensitive emergency department photo on her Instagram account.
    Health care providers today must develop their skills in mitigating risks to their patients and themselves related to patient information. At the same time, they need to be able distinguish between effective and ineffective uses of social media in health care.
    This assessment will require you to develop a staff update for the interprofessional team to encourage team members to protect the privacy, confidentiality, and security of patient information.
    Demonstration of Proficiency
    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
  • Competency 1: Describe nurses’ and the interdisciplinary team’s role in informatics with a focus on electronic health information and patient care technology to support decision making.
    • Describe the security, privacy, and confidentially laws related to protecting sensitive electronic health information that govern the interdisciplinary team.
    • Explain the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to safeguard sensitive electronic health information.
  • Competency 2: Implement evidence-based strategies to effectively manage protected health information.
    • Identify evidence-based approaches to mitigate risks to patients and health care staff related to sensitive electronic health information.
    • Develop a professional, effective staff update that educates interprofessional team members about protecting the security, privacy, and confidentiality of patient data, particularly as it pertains to social media usage.
  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication to facilitate use of health information and patient care technologies.
    • Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for citations and references.
    • Create a clear, concise, well-organized, and professional staff update that is generally free from errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
  • Preparation
    To successfully prepare to complete this assessment, complete the following:
  • Review the infographics on protecting PHI provided in the resources for this assessment, or find other infographics to review. These infographics serve as examples of how to succinctly summarize evidence-based information.
    • Analyze these infographics, and distill them into five or six principles of what makes them effective. As you design your interprofessional staff update, apply these principles. Note: In a staff update, you will not have all the images and graphics that an infographic might contain. Instead, focus your analysis on what makes the messaging effective.
  • Select from any of the following options, or a combination of options, the focus of your interprofessional staff update:
    • Social media best practices.
    • What not to do: Social media.
    • Social media risks to patient information.
    • Steps to take if a breach occurs.
  • Conduct independent research on the topic you have selected in addition to reviewing the suggested resources for this assessment. This information will serve as the source(s) of the information contained in your interprofessional staff update. Consult the BSN Program Library Research Guide for help in identifying scholarly and/or authoritative sources.
  • Instructions
    In this assessment, assume you are a nurse in an acute care, community, school, nursing home, or other health care setting. Before your shift begins, you scroll through Facebook and notice that a coworker has posted a photo of herself and a patient on Facebook. The post states, “I am so happy Jane is feeling better. She is just the best patient I’ve ever had, and I am excited that she is on the road to recovery.”
    You have recently completed your annual continuing education requirements at work and realize this is a breach of your organization’s social media policy. Your organization requires employees to immediately report such breaches to the privacy officer to ensure the post is removed immediately and that the nurse responsible receives appropriate corrective action.
    You follow appropriate organizational protocols and report the breach to the privacy officer. The privacy officer takes swift action to remove the post. Due to the severity of the breach, the organization terminates the nurse.
    Based on this incident’s severity, your organization has established a task force with two main goals:
  • Educate staff on HIPAA and appropriate social media use in health care.
  • Prevent confidentiality, security, and privacy breaches.
  • The task force has been charged with creating a series of interprofessional staff updates on the following topics:
  • Social media best practices.
  • What not to do: Social media.
  • Social media risks to patient information.
  • Steps to take if a breach occurs.
  • You are asked to select one of the topics, or a combination of several topics, and create the content for a staff update containing a maximum of two content pages. When distributed to interprofessional team members, the update will consist of one double-sided page.
    The task force has asked team members assigned to the topics to include the following content in their updates in addition to content on their selected topic(s):
  • What is protected health information (PHI)?
    • Be sure to include essential HIPAA information.
  • What are privacy, security, and confidentiality?
    • Define and provide examples of privacy, security, and confidentiality concerns related to the use of the technology in health care.
    • Explain the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to safeguard sensitive electronic health information.
  • What evidence relating to social media usage and PHI do interprofessional team members need to be aware of? For example:
    • How many nurses have been terminated for inappropriate social media usage in the United States?
    • What types of sanctions have health care organizations imposed on interdisciplinary team members who have violated social media policies?
    • What have been the financial penalties assessed against health care organizations for inappropriate social media usage?
    • What evidence-based strategies have health care organizations employed to prevent or reduce confidentiality, privacy, and security breaches, particularly related to social media usage?
  • Notes
  • Your staff update is limited to two double-spaced content pages. Be selective about the content you choose to include in your update so that you are able to meet the page length requirement. Include need-to-know information. Leave out nice-to-know information.
  • Many times people do not read staff updates, do not read them carefully, or do not read them to the end. Ensure your staff update piques staff members’ interest, highlights key points, and is easy to read. Avoid overcrowding the update with too much content.
  • Also supply a separate reference page that includes 2–3 peer-reviewed and 1–2 non-peer-reviewed resources (for a total of 3–5 resources) to support the staff update content.
  • Additional Requirements
  • Written communication: Ensure the staff update is free from errors that detract from the overall message.
  • Submission length: Maximum of two double-spaced content pages.
  • Font and font size: Use Times New Roman, 12-point.
  • Citations and references: Provide a separate reference page that includes 2–3 current, peer-reviewed and 1–2 current, non-peer-reviewed in-text citations and references (total of 3–5 resources) that support the staff update’s content. Current mean no older than 5 years.
  • APA format: Be sure your citations and references adhere to APA format. Consult the APA Style and Format page for an APA refresher.
  • Portfolio Prompt: Save your presentation to your ePortfolio. Submissions to the ePortfolio will be part of your final capstone course.
  • SCORING GUIDE
    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.
    VIEW SCORING GUIDE

Clinical Question Search Assignment . ” 10 Pages in APA format : – 2025 PICOT idea URINARY TRACT INFECTION I M GOING TO PUT MY 2 PREVIOS ASSIGMENT WITH THE

Nursing Assignment Help

Clinical Question Search Assignment . ” 10 Pages in APA format : – 2025

PICOT idea : URINARY TRACT INFECTION . I’M GOING TO PUT MY 2 PREVIOS ASSIGMENT WITH THE SAME PICOT QUESTION 

Purpose:

The purpose of this Assignment is to give you a practical application to implement your PICOT idea, supported by the evidence-based research you have obtained in during your systematic review. You will apply evidence-based research findings discovered from your clinical question, and then integrate those to support your suggested change in nursing practice.

Directions:

  1. Identify your refined PICOT question.
  2. Using PubMed and the Cochrane collaboration database, do a systematic review of your clinical question.
  3. Describe your systematic review and include an errors analysis.
  4. Determine an evidence-based quantitative article from the search that contains an evidence-based randomized control trial.
  5. Summarize the case study selected.
  6. Describe the study approach, sample size, and population studied.
  7. Apply the evidence from this review to your practice specifically in your overview.
  8. Evaluate the outcomes, identifying the validity and reliability.
  9. Discuss if the study contained any bias.
  10. Determine the level of evidence identified in the review.
  11. The length should be no less than 10 Pages in APA format.

Discussion: – 2025 Unit 1 1 Discussion Community Health Sim 1 Discussion Identify the community strengths and risks based on your survey

Nursing Assignment Help

Discussion: – 2025

Unit 1.1 Discussion: Community Health Sim 1

Discussion Identify the community strengths and risks based on your survey information

  • Compare and contrast the community strengths and risks to what other students found in their surveys.
  • Discuss what you discovered about social determinants that impact health disparities in downtown Promise Heights.
  • Discuss the implications of these community strengths and risks with respect to improving the health of a community in the future.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

internal and external validity of research designs PICOT question – 2025 1 300 words Compare and contrast internal and external validity of research

Nursing Assignment Help

internal and external validity of research designs PICOT question – 2025

  

1. (300 words) Compare and contrast internal and external validity of research designs. 

2. (300 words) What is the pros and cons to internal and external validity of research designs. 

3. (300 words) How can internal and external validity of research designs benefit evidence base practice and the healthcare industry? 

4. (500 words)  Find a study evidence base practice study related to the PICOT question below, and examine it to see which of the threats to internal and external validity is present in that study and why?

Use APA 7th edition and at least four reference including the text book. 

For immobile post-surgical client who are at an increased risk for deep venous thrombosis (P) how effective is the application of sequential compression devices (SCDs) (I) in comparison to leg exercises (C) in reducing the prevalence of deep vein thrombosis (O) within one month time (T)?