Assignment Instructions  Overview  

What does it take to develop interprofessional collaborative teams?

Requirements  For this assignment, complete the following: 

•Explain from a nursing perspective what is meant by the term interprofessional collaboration. (Do not simply copy a definition from a dictionary or other resource!) 

•Describe the characteristics and qualities of effective interprofessional teams in terms of patient care and safety. 

•Describe the benefits and limitations of interprofessional teams for health care organizations, members of a team, and patients. 

•Identify the challenges of working in an interprofessional team. 

•Describe strategies to help people come together to function effectively as a collaborative team. 

•Explain how interprofessional teams define success. Consider how the definition might change based on the types of situations the team was formed to handle.  

Your completed assignment should be 3–4 pages in length, not including title page and reference page. Support your statements with references to and citations for at least 3 scholarly and professional journals in APA format. 

Be sure to follow APA guidelines for style and format. In addition: 

•Include a title page and reference page. 

•Use Times New Roman font, 12 point. 

•Double–space your paper.

Discussion #6

Discuss the use of Evidence-based Guidelines in Practice by Patient Provider, Healthcare Agency.

· 250-word minimum

· At least 1 outside scholarly reference is required besides the course textbook.

· Must answer the discussion question and address the topic in the reply

post.

Must respond to 1 other discussion question. Reply must be a minimum of 100 w

Turnit it similarity maximum 20%

hi dear,

can help me to finish this assignment with good quality and be on time please?

Please follow the instructor carefully. There are 2 Discussions ,your response to classmates should be at least one paragraph for each Discussion, address the discussion topic or question, be respectful, and add to the discussion. You may draw upon personal experience, course or scholarly references, citing appropriately. Restating the primary response, or agreeing or disagreeing without supporting statements will result in a lower grade. 

In reference to including a paragraph for both primary and peer responses, 4-5 sentences constitute a paragraph.

 Discussion one, 

  The Clean Air Act is a federal law that was created over 40 years ago in the United States. It helps to control air pollution nationally and protect citizens from air pollution that may be hazardous to their health. Globally it is one of the most comprehensive laws focusing on air quality. Currently congress is working to block the EPA’s efforts from protecting the health of the public and delaying their work in blocking life-threatening air pollution. I was able to submit a letter to senators via the APHA website in opposition of congress hindering the EPA’s abilities to enforce the Clean Air Act.The stakeholders in this issue are literally anyone in the United States who is breathing. While some individuals, such as those in higher pollution areas, are going to be more affected than those in rural areas, everyone is affected by the issue. By creating this page for citizens to speak up, a platform is being opened as well for those who may want to take further action than submitting a letter. Coalitions could be form in opposition of the actions congress is taking that are risking the health and lives of millions of individuals.

Discussion Two,

I selected the American Public Health Association. The APHA is an organization that is dedicated to improve the health and wellbeing of the public. They publish a journal and a newspaper to share the newest information in the public health world. Oftentimes this news includes current campaigns and legislative actions to urge readers to write and ask policymakers to vote and act of certain policies. Current polices that the APHA is hoping members voice their opinions are the opposition of Trump’s administration proposal on the current public health crisis, the Protect the Clean Air Act, support of paid sick leave, and many more. When a member clicks on one of the policies to voice their opinion, they are able to read more information on the topic, read a standard message to congresspersons, and then compose their own message to congress.

One method that the APHA utilizes to communicate the best possible message to congress members is by allowing members to send a tailored message (with the option to personalize the message) that states specifically what the APHA is backing on the policies. For instance the message for the Protect the Clean Air Act has a clear message that states that the APHA wants congress members to reject any measures that would not allow the EPA to protect the public from air pollution, then after the unchangeable message members are able to either personalize or send a standard message that supports or gives more research/opinion behind why congress should not hinder the EPA protecting the public from air pollution.

Thanks,

Professorr

How about our pediatric pt. Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis or JIA is a disease that is Idiopathic, or a disease that has no defined cause. And lastly, this is an Arthritic disease, or a condition that causes the inflammation of fluid fill joints. With the suspicion of possible JIA, as the nurse, what additional question should be asked during the health history, along with possible labs to order, to assist with r/o the possible diagnosis of JIA?  

 A local hospital publicly reported organization discharge data. The data were risk adjusted to control for pre-existing comorbidities to level the playing field with data reported from other hospitals. The report notes little risk adjustment for stroke mortality. Recently, the hospital received stroke center designation for following best practice protocols for stroke management. The DNP scholar and data analyst track stroke mortality data and note a spike in mortality for a given quarter, which explains why the state public report is unsatisfactory. Drilling into the data to examine the numerator deaths due to stroke, denominator and total patient population. The data analysts determines that the risk mortality has a score of one to four, with one being a minor risk of mortality. This explains why the hospital did not risk adjust well, because these patients did not appear to have risks associated with severe illness that would reasonably explain the associated mortalities. Next, the data analyst drills further into the detailed subject oriented data of actual patient records and then completes a full chart review to obtain the sweet spot to inform quality improvement. 

Consider the scenario above to address the following.

• Do you recommend that the data analyst examine aggregate data, detailed data, or both, to investigate this quality issue? Please explain your rationale.
• Do you recommend that the data analyst use a retrospective data warehouse, clinical data store, or both, to investigate the mortality rate? Please explain your rationale.
• What type of tools or analytic approaches is relevant for use by this analyst? Please explain your rationale.

Now, conduct a search for evidence. Select three scholarly sources of information describing the challenges of utilizing data in the clinical setting.

• Provide a brief overview of the findings of each source of evidence.

Instructions:

Use an APA 7 style and a minimum of 200 words. Provide support from a minimum of at least three (3) scholarly sources. The scholarly source needs to be: 1) evidence-based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) Sources should be no more than five years old (published within the last 5 years), and 4) an in-text citation. citations and references are included when information is summarized/synthesized and/or direct quotes are used, in which APA style standards apply. Include the Doi or URL link.

• Textbooks are not considered scholarly sources. 

• Wikipedia, Wikis, .com website or blogs should not be used.