Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal 

Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.

This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).

In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below.  In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.

1. New practice approaches
2. Interprofessional collaboration
3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
4. Ethical considerations in health care
5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
7. Population health concerns
8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
9. Health policy
10. Leadership and economic models
11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Health promotion is the act of empowering clients to take control over and achieve their optimal level of health. Utilizing the topics listed below and evidence-based practice, you will write a scholarly paper on health promotion including the following:

• Introduction to the topic (select one of the topics below)
• Description of the disease process (topic) selected
• Implement 4 health promotion measures involved in the prevention and care of
  client with the disease process (topic) selected from the textbook, nursing journal
  articles, and evidence-based practice, including complementary therapies.
• Analyze how health promotion can improve the client’s overall health and avoid
  complications (include modifiable and non-modifiable factors such as age, gender, ethnicity, and lifestyle). Be sure to compare/contrast what happens to patients if they implement health promotion strategies and what could happen if these activities are not implemented.
• Reflection on what you learned from the assignment and how it will impact your practice in the future

 Reflections: With the reflections: Make sure to discuss the key points of the argument by both presenters in the scenario. Discuss what side you take on the argument, then discuss the strong points the other side makes as well. Present evidence for both pro and con arguments. Then follow-up with an ethical theory on to support how your ethical stance is valid. Ethical theories include- Kant, Act Utilitarianism, Rule Utilitarianism, Care Ethics, Virtue Ethics, and social contract. 1 page.

 In the scenario assignments below, you are asked to reflect on responses to the presented scenario. It should not just be writing down your first reaction or what you already know.Reflection involves critical thinking, which means rethinking your existing knowledge and previously held opinions in light of what we have learned about theories of ethics, logic, and reasoning. You will need to question your current knowledge and beliefs.Discuss the main points of the debate, what stance you take, support that stance, and discuss the opposing argument. Also discuss an ethical theory that would apply to defend your view.To complete each scenario assignment:

1. Complete the entire scenario.
2. Compose your reflection in a Word document and be sure to address, at a minimum, the following questions:
   • Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented?
   • Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is the most ethical and why?
3. Support your conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend your stance.
4. Your reflection must be 1-2 pages in length and follow APA formatting and citation guidelines as appropriate UPDATED 7TH APA FORMAT THROUGHOUT PAPER

BELOW IS UPLOAD PICTURES IN THE FILE OF THE TWO DOCTORS ONE OPPOSED TO ABORTIONS AS THE ACT OF MURDER AND OTHER WITH DIFFERENT OPINIONS TOWARDS ABORTION. 

This course is designed to prepare investigators involved in the design and/or conduct of research involving human subjects to understand their obligations to protect the rights and welfare of subjects in research. The course material presents basic concepts, principles, and issues related to the protection of research participants. 

Evidence-based research involving human subjects requires that researchers be cognizant of and adhere to the important tenets necessary to protect subjects from abuse, harm, injury, and/or other undesirable outcomes resulting from the research process.  Based on this fact, write a minimum of 2 pages (Title page and Reference not included in page count) of an APA formatted paper answering the following questions with a minimum of 3 “short” sentences for each question:

1. Historical background of human subjects protection? 
2. Find and discuss at least one historical incident of human subjects abuse in research and what human right was violated. 
3. What steps will you take to minimize risks on human subjects? 
4. What populations are considered vulnerable populations and why? 
5. What are appropriate ways to recruit subjects? 
6. How would you properly obtain consent? 
7. What are the elements of a properly executed consent? 
8. What committees are responsible for monitoring the protection of human subjects? 

The ethical theories called RELATIVISM and SITUATION ETHICS seem to be rampant in our society today many times overwhelming people with who have a well developed sense of CONSCIENCE.

• Define these terms
• Do you agree or disagree with the above statement and WHY?
• Defend your position with some examples
• Your post should be at least Three Paragraphs in length