Originally you did the attached work see attached. 

Please read instructions carefully NO PLAGIARISM 

 

To Prepare:

• Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources for this Module in support of academic style, integrity, and scholarly ethics.
• Reflect on the connection between academic and professional integrity.

The Assignment:

Part 3, Section 1: Writing Sample: The Connection Between Academic and Professional Integrity

Using the Academic and Professional Success Development Template you began in Module 1 and expanded in Module 2, write a 2- to 3-paragraph analysis that includes the following:

• Explanation for the relationship between academic integrity and writing
• Explanation for the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics
• Cite at least two resources that support your arguments, being sure to use proper APA formatting.
• Use Grammarly and SafeAssign to improve the product.
• Explain how Grammarly, Safe Assign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity.

Part 3, Section 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work

Expand on your thoughts from Section 1 by:

• identifying and describing strategies you intend to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of your: (1) academic work as a student of the MSN program and (2) professional work as a nurse throughout your career. Include a review of resources and approaches you propose to use as a student and a professional.

Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Module 1 Assignment, which was built from the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.

 

1) Minimum 6 full pages  (Follow the 3 x 3 rule: minimum three paragraphs per part)

             Part 1: Minimum 1 page

             Part 2: minimum 3 pages

             Part 3: Minimum 1 page

             Part 4: Minimum 1 page

Part 2: Education Teaching Practicum

Audience: Newl  

             Part 4: minimum 1 page

Submit 1 document per part

2)¨******APA norms

          All paragraphs must be narrative and cited in the text- each paragraphs

          Bulleted responses are not accepted

          Dont write in the first person 

          Dont copy and pase the questions.

          Answer the question objectively, do not make introductions to your answers, answer it when you start the paragraph

Submit 1 document per part

3)****************************** It will be verified by Turnitin (Identify the percentage of exact match of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks) 

********************************It will be verified by SafeAssign (Identify the percentage of similarity of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks)

4) Minimum 3 references per part not older than 5 years

5) Identify your answer with the numbers, according to the question. Start your answer on the same line, not the next

Example:

Q 1. Nursing is XXXXX

Q 2. Health is XXXX

6) You must name the files according to the part you are answering: 

Example:

Part 1.doc 

Part 2.do

__________________________________________________________________________________

Part 1: Pharmacology

Anemias

M.W. is a 69-year-old African American man and was referred to clinic for evaluation of increasing shortness of breath.

Past medical history 

Chronic renal insufficiency

Hypertension

Congestive heart failure

Diabetes mellitus type 2, poor control

Deep vein thrombosis

Alcohol abuse

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with respiratory failure

Family history

Noncontributory

Physical examination

Height 69 inches, weight 205 lb

Blood pressure: 138/88

Pulse 86 beats/min, regular

Lungs clear, neck supple negative for jugular venous distention

Lower extremities +1 edema

Laboratory findings

Scr = 2.8 K+ = 5.1

BUN = 56

Na+ = 147

WBC = 5.0

Hb = 8.2

Hct = 24.6

Serum ferritin 189 mg/dL

Social history

Tobacco: 52 pack-years

Alcohol: distant past

Diagnosis: Anemia Of Ckd: Answer the following questions in full sentences using APA citations. 

1. List specific goals of treatment for M.W.

2. What drug therapy would you prescribed? Why?

3. What are the parameters for monitoring success of therapy?

4. Discuss specific patient education based on the prescribed therapy.

5. List one or two adverse reactions for the selected agent that would cause you to change therapy.

6. What over-the-counter and/or alternative medications would be appropriate for M.W.?

7. What dietary and lifestyle changes would you recommended for M.W.?

Part 2: Education Teaching Practicum

Audience: Newly recruited nurses in the pediatric ICU

Topic: Coping strategies for the death of patients in the pediatric ICU

Theory: Elisabeth Kuebler Ross

Pupose:Encourage adequate strategies in nurses to face the death of pediatric patients.

Make an outline for a lesson that will be taught in the future. 

Provide headings to delineate the topics

1. The objectives (4) and standards of the lesson (include QSEN). 

2. Describe the nursing theory that will guide this lesson (Elisabeth Kuebler Ross).

3. Describe the student audience (Novice nurses-Newly recruited)

4. Learning level: 

a. What are the demographics of the students (30-40 YO, nurses, men, and women-Nicklaus Children’s Hospital). 

b. what, if any, interventions may be needed to account for varied learning styles? (VARK Model)

5. Make a road map for presenting the concepts and content: 

a. How will you present the information to the student

b. What visuals will you source, and how will you relay the content clearly and concisely?

6. Preliminary ideas for assessing students, both informally during the lesson and a summative component that can be administered upon completion of the lesson or unit

7. A list of materials that you will reference or hand out during your lesson

Part 3: Womens health

 

Topic

Chronic pelvic pain can be caused by any number of conditions. In primary care, nurse practitioners should be able to outline the basic approach to initial evaluation of and management of these disorders. As you have learned in this unit, there are many causes of chronic pelvic pain.

 

1. Select one of the causes of chronic pelvic pain and describe the symptoms. 

2. Why would you refer this patient for consultation, and to whom? 

3. What are the steps to writing a referral, and what is the NP’s responsibility in follow-up?

Part 4:  Advanced Primary Care of Family Practicum 

 

Check: 

http://www.aanp.org/imag es/documents/publication s/ContractNegotiations.pdf

State of Florida Example ARNP protocol

http://floridasnursing.gov/f orms/arnp-protocolformat.pdf

https://www.aanp.org/practice/practice-management/employment-negotiations

1.What are the main questions, you need to ask your employer during negotiation meeting? 

2.What could be some problems you might encounter during contract negotiation? 

3. How would you approach those problems?

In a 2- to 4-page paper, create an interview transcript of your responses to the following interview questions:

• Tell us about a healthcare program, within your practice. What are the costs and projected outcomes of this program?
• Who is your target population?
• What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples?
• What is your role as an advocate for your target population for this healthcare program? Do you have input into design decisions? How else do you impact design?
• What is the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation? How does this role vary between design and implementation of healthcare programs? Can you provide examples?
• Who are the members of a healthcare team that you believe are most needed to implement a program? Can you explain why?

 wk4/ disc/ k

The learning experience I had was both good and bad. I was helping care for a 32 year old female that came into the emergency room for vomiting blood. Before getting her labs back the patient had to pee, so I put her in a wheelchair and assisted her to the bathroom. She ended up passing out while sitting on the toilet and at that point I knew she was pretty sick. She initially didn’t present that bad but things changed quickly. After getting her back in bed and settled, I was able to look at her labs. She had a very low hemoglobin and that explained it all. Not knowing the patients religion preference, I went into the room with the provider to explain what was going on and that she needed a blood transfusion. The patient then explained that she was a jehovah witness and cannot receive blood or blood products. I was so upset and kind of mad at her refusal. This patient was an alcoholic, which is forbidden in her religion, and she didn’t have a problem drinking. She explained to me that it’s an addiction she’s been trying to fight, but not receiving blood is very important to her. “Furthermore, they claim that anyone who unrepentantly accepts a blood transfusion does so at the peril of losing eternal life. Thus, faithful Jehovah’s Witnesses accept death, rather than break the Watchtower’s policy against blood transfusions” (4Jehovah, 2013 para. 2). I was initially upset about not being able to help make her better, but I honored her wishes and admitted her to the ICU with a signed refusal for blood. A few days later I learned that this patient had passed away. During her stay the patient was intubated and her family members were trying to push for blood products to be administered. However, because the patients wishes were granted by us in the emergency department she was able to pass away honoring her religion. 

  

Evaluation of an Evidence-Based Project 

 

Think about the details expressed in your DNP Project Proposal, which was submitted during NURS 8410. In that document, you described your plan for evaluating your DNP Project. Which evaluation method(s) did you select for your project? What new insights associated with the evaluation of your DNP Project have you gained since you developed your DNP Project Proposal?

For this Discussion, you examine your identified evaluation methods and consider how appropriate they now seem for your DNP Project. As you do this, think about principles of evidence-based practice and appropriate theoretical frameworks that relate to this assessment of your evaluation plan. If there are circumstances that prevent you from assessing your DNP Project evaluation plan, you may complete this Discussion using a different evidence-based project.

To prepare:

• Review      the examples of evaluation presented in the Miake-Lye et al. and McNabney      et al. articles listed in the Learning Resources. Also, consider the      evaluation strategies suggested by Dr. Mauk in the Weeks 4 and 5 media      presentation.
• Analyze      the evaluation plan you developed as part of your DNP Project Proposal.      Which evaluation method(s) did you identify for your project?
• If      you have already concluded the evaluation phase of your DNP Project, what      would you do differently—specific to the evaluation plan—if you could?
• If      possible, compare your project with similar evidence-based projects      presented in other articles from your review of the literature.      Specifically, look at others who had a similar research question or      intervention but evaluated it differently. Consider similarities and      differences in outcomes of these projects. What insights related to your      project does this analysis provide?
• For      this Discussion, you may also consider the evaluation of other      evidence-based projects implemented in your practicum setting. Discuss      this topic with individuals in your practicum setting to strengthen your      understanding of the evaluation of these projects.

By tomorrow Wednesday 6/19, write a minimum of 550 words essay in APA format and at least three scholarly references (see list of required readings below) that includes the level one headers as numbered below:

Post a cohesive response that addresses the following:

1) Describe the strengths and limitations of the evaluation plan for your DNP Project or another evidence-based project. 

2) Share insights and opportunities for improvement that can inform future evidence-based projects.

Required Readings

Oermann, M. H., & Hays, J. C. (2016). Writing for publication in nursing (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.

• Chapter      12, “References” 

In this chapter, the authors focus on citing references for a manuscript and preparing a reference list.

• Chapter      13, “Tables and Figures” 

Chapter 13 supplies guidelines for when to prepare tables and figures and how to develop them.

Continue reading this text as you work on your DNP Project scholarly product for dissemination.

Christenbery, T. L. (2011). Manuscript peer review: A guide for advanced practice nurses. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 23(1), 15–22.  

This article describes the peer review process and supplies suggestions for reviewing research-based manuscripts. Use this article as you prepare for Weeks 8 and 9, which focus on disseminating findings through publications.

Miake-Lye, I. M., Amulis, A., Saliba, D., Shekelle, P. G., Volkman, L. K., & Ganz, D. A. (2011). Formative evaluation of the telecare falls prevention project for older veterans. BMC Health Services Research, 11(1), 119–127.  

This article details the results of a theory-driven program that was implemented to reduce fall rates at a health care facility.

McNabney, M. K., Willging, P. R., Fried, L. P., & Durso, S. C. (2009). The “continuum of care” for older adults: Design and evaluation of an educational series. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 57(6), 1088–1095.  

In this article, the authors detail a 9-week educational series designed to review the evidence-based and practical aspects of implementing key services in the care of older adults.

Required Media

Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2012c). Evaluating an evidence-based practice project. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 4 minutes.

How do you evaluate an evidence-based practice project? In this media segment, Dr. Kris Mauk shares how she evaluated her DNP Project outcomes and provides insights and thought-provoking questions to guide the evaluation process.