Topic: Ethical Issues When Counseling Different Ethnic Populations | 2025

by

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Topic: Ethical Issues When Counseling Different Ethnic Populations | 2025 Custom Writing

Read, analyze, and critique the code of ethics found in the Reading & Study folder.Then, follow these instructions:Listed below is a situation that may or may not violate codes of ethics when working with families. Study the scenario carefully and then go to the codes of ethics for AAMFT, IAMFC, AACC, and ACA to find the ethical answers to the dilemmas presented. Be sure to record the code location on each ethical code where the violation or permission is given for the counselor to do what had been done (ex: AAMFT 2.2 or ACA B.7.2).You have been counseling a family of Korean origin for the past 5 weeks. Specific family members have been suffering from generalized anxiety disorder, which is connected to family discord and what you see as blurred boundary issues. In your fifth counseling session, the daughter tells you that Americans do not understand their cultural differences and how they affect family rules. Having worked with over a hundred clients struggling with anxiety, you feel she needs to set clear boundaries for her family members. You instruct her to exercise more independence from her family and seek to become self-actualized.As a competent Christian counselor, you also give her Mark 10:6–9 and Luke 14:26–27 and ask her to study them this week to see how individuals must distance themselves and become self-differentiated.Please follow all required instructions for the assignment. This is a Masters level course all work is to be completed in APA format, with citations, references. All work must be original is to require 300 wordsDue by 9/23/2018 8:00 am

 

Assignment Help Online, Last Minute Nursing Assingment Help, Nursing Assignment Help, timelynursingwriters.com

Urban Creatures – Humans & Senses | 2025

by

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Urban Creatures – Humans & Senses | 2025 Custom Writing

If human beings continue to be urban creatures for the next few million years, in what ways might our sensory systems evolve or change?

 

Assignment Help Online, Last Minute Nursing Assingment Help, Nursing Assignment Help, timelynursingwriters.com

FOR NICOHWILLIAM ONLY WK 3 Q1 | 2025

by

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

FOR NICOHWILLIAM ONLY WK 3 Q1 | 2025 Custom Writing

Question #1 Review the Trauma Case Study.  Does Maryam demonstrate diagnostic criteria for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder or Acute Stress Disorder?  Justify your answer.Trauma Case StudyReason for ReferralMaryam is a 17-year-old Caucasian female university student who was referred to your agency by her physician Dr. Jaffee. Maryam presented in her doctor’s office complaining of lack of sleep. Dr. Jaffee did not give her medication as Maryam has reported drinking three to four glasses of vodka and orange juice per night to sleep. Dr. Jaffee’s report indicates the patient is sleeping 2-4 hours per night and often awakens with nightmares. Blood tests were normal with the exception of slightly elevated liver enzymes. Blood pressure was 130/94. Patient was scheduled for a follow-up appointment in two weeks.Behavioral ObservationsMaryam arrived on time for her appointment. She was driven to the appointment by her university roommate. The client appeared anxious, had circles under her eyes, and was tearful during the intake. Maryam was oriented to time, place, and person. Client vocabulary was above average. Client appeared tired and despondent evidenced by low voice, soft speech, and flat affect.Presenting ProblemMaryam states “I can’t drive a car. I am too afraid that someone will hit me or I will hit someone else. I can’t sleep so I don’t get up to go to class in the morning.” Client states, “I am afraid to drive.” She goes on to state, “I made such a horrible mistake; I don’t deserve to live. I am so stupid.”Client states that she was involved in a three car accident two months ago. Client reports one person was critically injured and the other was treated and released at the hospital. Client reports she received a citation, as she turned in front of two oncoming cars at a red light.Support SystemClient reports that she lives in student housing on the campus of a local university. She has one roommate who brought her to today’s appointment.Legal: Client is facing legal problems due to the accident.Family Support: Maryam’s family lives out of state. She has no relatives that live locally.

 

Assignment Help Online, Last Minute Nursing Assingment Help, Nursing Assignment Help, timelynursingwriters.com

PSY110 Learning Styles and Motivation Reflection | 2025

by

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

PSY110 Learning Styles and Motivation Reflection | 2025 Custom Writing

Please read carefully to answer all questions and follow requirements for minimum words per question.1. After reading the section, “Discovering Your Learning Styles” in Ch. 1 of P.O.W.E.R. Learning and taking the Connect quiz, answer the following in 50 to 175 words: What is your preferred receptive learning style? Do you agree or disagree with the results? What tips does the textbook offer to help you study better or learn new skills at work?2. After reading Ch. 8 of P.O.W.E.R. Learning, answer the following in 50 to 175 words: What strategies can you use to make good decisions and problem solve in your personal life, at school, at work, finding a job, buying a car, etc.?3. Based on information in Carol Dweck’s video, how can understanding growth and fixed mindsets impact your learning? Respond in 50 to 175 words by providing details and examples of what you can do in your daily studies. (If you would like additional information on these terms, feel free to read the Week 2 Electronic Reserve Readings.)https://portal.phoenix.edu/medialibrary/videodetails.02-VIDEO-569445e8357d188fc252934a.html

 

Assignment Help Online, Last Minute Nursing Assingment Help, Nursing Assignment Help, timelynursingwriters.com

Tests and Measurements | 2025

by

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Tests and Measurements | 2025 Custom Writing

Posting for Dr Candice_2547InstructionsIn 2002, Boholst constructed a   Life Position Scale for the purpose of finishing his dissertation. The   construct life position was one of the variables he studied in his doctoral   dissertation titled, The Influence of Life Scripts and Life Positions on   Psychopathology and Positive Mental Health: A Structural Equation Modeling. He   had to construct this scale because there was no available one at the time.   In 2005, he and two other authors wrote another article that found modest   correlations between Life Positions and Attachment Styles—validating the   scale by establishing the relationship between life positions and a variable   that was theoretically argued to have conceptual parallels or to be “similar”   with it. In 2012, Isgor and two other authors translated the Life Position   Scale into Turkish and established its reliability and validity.This is often a realistic scenario   where a tool slowly attains credibility by a gradual validation process   across the years—often by different authors. For example, in 2004, Weisner   wrote his doctoral dissertation in the University of North Texas on the   relationship between Affective Traits and Life Positions. Hadzi-Pesic and   others more recently (2014) validated the Life Position Scale and found   correlations with alcohol addicts’ personality.For this task, write a paper that addresses the following:Discuss the different types of   validity that have been employed—whether implicitly or explicitly to validate   the life position scale. It is ideal therefore to read articles in   chronological order starting with the A Life Position Scale, Life   Positions and Attachment: A Canonical Correlation Analysis, and Life   Positions Scale Language Equivalence, Reliability and Validity Analysis.Length: 7-10 pages, not including title and reference   pagesAll references MUST be scholarly and peer-reviewedYour assignment should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.Due: October 4, 2018 by 4pm EST

 

Assignment Help Online, Last Minute Nursing Assingment Help, Nursing Assignment Help, timelynursingwriters.com

Etiology and Treatment | 2025

by

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Etiology and Treatment | 2025 Custom Writing

LASA: Etiology and TreatmentIn M3 Assignment 2 RA, you reviewed a  case study about Jessica, made primary and secondary diagnoses, and  identified differential diagnoses for each principal and secondary  diagnosis. The skills you developed and the feedback you received after  completing this required assignment, will significantly help you in  completing the following LASA. For example, both assignments (RA and  LASA), require you to complete similar tasks such as identifying the  principal and secondary diagnoses, providing rationale for the  diagnoses, and offering differential (alternative) diagnoses.In this assignment, you will discuss the etiology and  treatment of your principal and secondary diagnoses for the following  case study using a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources on etiology and  a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources on treatment. Your paper should  have separate sections for the etiology of each principal and secondary  diagnosis, therapeutic modalities for each principal and secondary  diagnosis, justification of the selected therapeutic modalities for the  disorders, application of the treatment for the disorders, and a  reference page for your sources. Your citations and references should be  in APA style, and your paper should be 8–10 pages in length.Clickhereto read the second case study (Psychological Evaluation for Homer Brine).Once you read the case, complete the following tasks:Identify a principal and secondary diagnosis for the assigned case study with rationale for each diagnosis.Describe multiple elements of the etiology  for the principal and secondary diagnoses. Explain how the etiology  contributed to each (principal and secondary) diagnosis.Identify a specific therapeutic modality for each principal and secondary diagnosis.Apply therapeutic modality to treat each of the principal and secondary diagnoses in the case study.Identify at least one differential (alternate) diagnosis for the principal and secondary diagnoses.Discuss key cultural factors that may influence diagnosis and treatment.Write in a clear, concise, and organized manner;  demonstrate ethical scholarship in accurate representation and  attribution of sources; and display accurate spelling, grammar, and  punctuation. Include citations in text and at the end of the document in  the correct APA format.Submission Details:By the due date assigned, save your diagnoses as M5_A2_Lastname_Firstname.doc and submit the document to the Submissions Area.LASA is worth 300 points and will be graded according to the following rubric.Because this assignment is worth 30% of your overall  grade in the course, it is particularly important to view the rubric for  additional clarity on the requirements and point values for each  component of the assignment.Assignment Component   Proficient   Maximum Points    Identify a principal and secondary diagnosis for the assigned case study with rationale for each diagnosis. Identifies  at least one principal and one secondary diagnosis that are rationally  linked to the case provided. Provides detailed information about how  diagnoses were reached and how the client’s symptoms fit the diagnostic  criteria. Evidence is presented in a logical manner that builds a solid  case which supports diagnostic impressions.  48    Describe  multiple elements of the etiology for the principal and secondary  diagnoses. Explain how the etiology contributed to each (principal &  secondary) diagnosis. Presents  a clear understanding of the possible origins of the principal and  secondary diagnoses. Demonstrates ability to integrate and conceptualize  all of the information presented. Clearly states how the diagnoses/  presenting issue began (ETIOLOGY) and what may be maintaining them.  48    Identify a specific therapeutic modality for each principal and secondary diagnoses. Chooses  a viable therapeutic modality that has applications to the principal  and secondary diagnoses and is appropriate for the client.  48    Apply therapeutic modality to treat each of the principal and secondary diagnoses in the case study. Demonstrates  a clear application of the selected therapeutic modality for treatment  of the principal and secondary diagnoses of the person in the vignette.  48    Identify at least one differential (alternate) diagnosis for the primary and secondary diagnosis. Clearly  discusses other diagnoses (differential diagnoses) that were ruled-out  as well as specific reasons for eliminating these diagnoses.  32    Discussed key cultural factors that may influence diagnosis and treatment. Describes  cultural factors that may influence the diagnoses and identifies  cultural issues that may require additional exploration. Outlines how  the cultural factors influence treatment options.  48    Academic Writing   Writing  is generally clear and in an organized manner. It demonstrates ethical  scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and  generally displays accurate spelling, grammar, punctuation. Errors are  few, isolated, and do not interfere with reader’s comprehension.Citations in text and at the end of the document are in correct APA format. Writing  is generally clear and in an organized manner. It demonstrates ethical  scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and  generally displays accurate spelling, grammar, punctuation. Errors are  few, isolated, and do not interfere with reader’s comprehension.Citations in text and at the end of the document are in correct APA format.  28    Total:    300       Due DateOct 8, 2018 11:59 PM Hide RubricsRubric Name: FP6005_M5A2_Grading_RubricThis  table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The  first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a  numeric scoring method.CriteriaMaximum PointsGR1 Identify a principal and secondary diagnosis for the assigned case study with rationale for each diagnosis.48 points/ 48GR2  Describe multiple elements of the etiology for the principal and  secondary diagnoses. Explain how the etiology contributed to each  (principal & secondary) diagnosis.48 points/ 48GR3 Identify a specific therapeutic modality for each principal and secondary diagnoses.48 points/ 48GR4 Apply therapeutic modality to treat each of the principal and secondary diagnoses in the case study.48 points/ 48GR5  Clearly discusses other diagnoses (differential diagnoses) that were  ruled-out as well as specific reasons for eliminating these diagnoses.32 points/ 32GR6  Describes cultural factors that may influence the diagnoses and  identifies cultural issues that may require additional exploration.  Outlines how the cultural factors influence treatment options.48 points/ 48GR7  Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical  scholarship in the accurate representation and attribution of sources;  and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.28 points/ 28Total— / 300Rubric Name: FP6005_M5A2_LASA RubricThis  table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The  first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a  numeric scoring method.MAFP_PO1_Psychological Theory & PracticeLevel 1 UnsatisfactoryLevel 2 EmergingLevel 3 ProficientLevel 4 ExemplaryC1 Principal & Secondary Diagnosis (PO1).Neglects to identify a principal or secondary diagnosis and neglects to rationally link the diagnosis to the case study.Neglects to identify a principal or secondary diagnosis or neglects to rationally link the diagnosis to the case study.Identifies  at least one principal and one secondary diagnosis that are rationally  linked to the case provided. Provides detailed information about how  diagnoses were reached and how the client’s symptoms fit the diagnostic  criteria. Evidence is presented in a logical manner that builds a solid  case which supports diagnostic impressions.Identifies  one or more principal and secondary diagnoses that are rationally  linked to the case provided and supported by references. Provides  detailed information about how diagnoses were reached and how the  client’s symptoms fit the diagnostic criteria. Evidence is presented in a  logical manner that builds a solid case which supports diagnostic  impressions.C2 Etiology of Diagnoses (PO1).Either lacks a description of elements of etiology of one or more diagnoses or description is inaccurate and incomplete.Provides  a description of elements of etiology of one or more diagnoses but at  least one of the descriptions is inaccurate and incomplete.Presents  a clear understanding of the possible origins of the principal and  secondary diagnoses. Demonstrates ability to integrate and conceptualize  all of the information presented. Clearly states how the diagnoses/  presenting issue began (ETIOLOGY) and what may be maintaining them.Presents  a clear understanding of the possible origins of the principal and  secondary diagnoses based on empirical research. Demonstrates ability to  integrate and conceptualize all of the information presented. Clearly  states how the diagnoses/ presenting issue began (ETIOLOGY) and what may  be maintaining them.C3 Therapeutic Modality (PO1).Neglects to identify an appropriate therapeutic modality.Identifies a specific therapeutic modality but neglects to articulate how it was appropriate for the diagnoses identified.Chooses  a viable therapeutic modality that has applications to the principal  and secondary diagnoses and is appropriate for the client.Chooses  a viable therapeutic modality that has applications to the principal  and secondary diagnoses and is appropriate for the client and supported  by research literature.C4 Therapeutic Modality Txt Application (PO1).Neglects to apply or erroneously applies a therapeutic modality to treat the diagnosis.Identifies a specific therapeutic modality but neglects to articulate how it was appropriate for the diagnoses identified.Chooses  a viable therapeutic modality that has applications to the principal  and secondary diagnoses and is appropriate for the client.Chooses  a viable therapeutic modality that has applications to the principal  and secondary diagnoses and is appropriate for the client and supported  by research literature.C5 Differential Diagnosis (PO1).Neglects to identify any alternative diagnosis for either the primary or secondary diagnosis.Identifies one alternative diagnosis, but neglects to articulate rationale for the diagnosis and why it was ruled out.Clearly  discusses other diagnoses (differential diagnoses) that were ruled-out  as well as specific reasons for eliminating these diagnoses.Clearly  discusses other diagnoses (differential diagnoses) that were ruled-out  as well as specific reasons for eliminating these diagnoses. Articulates  any assessments or additional information to rule out and alternative  diagnosis.This  table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The  first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a  numeric scoring method.MAFP_PO5_Multicultural CompetenceLevel 1 UnsatisfactoryLevel 2 EmergingLevel 3 ProficientLevel 4 ExemplaryC6 Cultural Factors (PO5).There was no opinion provided on the defendant’s risk of dangerousness or insanity.The opinion provided was vague and not well connected to the case vignette.Describes  cultural factors that may influence the diagnoses and identifies  cultural issues that may require additional exploration. Outlines how  the cultural factors influence treatment options.Describes  cultural factors that may influence the diagnoses and identifies  cultural issues that may require additional exploration. Outlines how  the cultural factors influence treatment options supported by  appropriate research literature.Associated Learning ObjectivesMAFP_PO1_Psychological Theory & PracticeAssessment Method:  Score on Criteria – C1 Principal & Secondary Diagnosis (PO1).Required Performance:  Level 3 ProficientMAFP_PO1_Psychological Theory & PracticeAssessment Method:  Score on Criteria – C2 Etiology of Diagnoses (PO1).Required Performance:  Level 3 ProficientMAFP_PO1_Psychological Theory & PracticeAssessment Method:  Score on Criteria – C3 Therapeutic Modality (PO1).Required Performance:  Level 3 ProficientMAFP_PO1_Psychological Theory & PracticeAssessment Method:  Score on Criteria – C5 Differential Diagnosis (PO1).Required Performance:  Level 3 ProficientMAFP_PO1_Psychological Theory & PracticeAssessment Method:  Score on Criteria – C4 Therapeutic Modality Txt Application (PO1).Required Performance:  Level 3 ProficientMAFP_PO5_Multicultural CompetenceAssessment Method:  Score on Criteria – C6 Cultural Factors (PO5).Required Performance:  Level 3 Proficient

 

Assignment Help Online, Last Minute Nursing Assingment Help, Nursing Assignment Help, timelynursingwriters.com

700 WORD ESSAY | 2025

by

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

700 WORD ESSAY | 2025 Custom Writing

Details:Complete your treatment plan template for Eliza based on the previous assignments findings and any feedback received from your instructor. Additionally, write and submit a 700-1,050-word essay that includes the following:The treatment theory you would use and why.A description of how you would address any mental health, medical, legal, and substance use issues that the client exhibits in the case study through the lens of your counseling theory of choice.Include at least three scholarly sources in your paper.Submit the paper and the treatment plan to your instructor.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.This assignment assesses the following programmatic competency: 1.5: Assess a client and provide a justifiable diagnosis.This assignment meets the following CACREP Standards:2.F.5.j. Evidence-based counseling strategies and techniques for prevention and intervention.5.C.2.b. Etiology, nomenclature, treatment, referral, and prevention of mental and emotional disorders.5.C.3.b. Techniques and interventions for prevention and treatment of a broad range of mental health issues.This assignment meets the following NASAC Standards:45) Match treatment activities and community resources with prioritized client needs, in a manner consistent with the client’s diagnosis and existing placement criteria.52) Arrange referrals to other professionals, agencies, community programs, or other appropriate resources to meet client needs.55) Evaluate the outcome of the referral.56) Initiate collaboration with referral sources.61) Coordinate all treatment activities with services provided to the client by other resources.62) Summarize the client’s background, treatment plan, recovery progress, and problems inhibiting progress for the purpose of assuring quality of care, gaining feedback, and planning changes in the course of treatment.78) Work with the client to establish realistic, achievable goals consistent with achieving and maintaining recovery

 

Assignment Help Online, Last Minute Nursing Assingment Help, Nursing Assignment Help, timelynursingwriters.com

Simon Memory Game | 2025

by

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Simon Memory Game | 2025 Custom Writing

Step 1:Access the internet and go to the Simon Memory Game website athttp://www.freegames.ws/games/kidsgames/simon/simon.htm(opens in a new window).Complete the Simon Memory Game and write down your score (your score indicates how many color steps you were able to remember at once before making a mistake).Step 2:Thoroughly discuss the following:How many color steps could you remember?  How does this compare with the capacity of short term memory (7 +/- 2 bits of information)?What strategies did you use during the game to remember the colors?How could you improve your memory of the colors?Important guidelines to follow:Write at least a 300-word, well-developed and well-written response.  Use APA Formatting Guide to create accurate citations and documentation to give credit for any resource material used in your response. Your assignment is due October 8 in class.

 

Assignment Help Online, Last Minute Nursing Assingment Help, Nursing Assignment Help, timelynursingwriters.com

short answer (letter form) 500-550 words | 2025

by

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

short answer (letter form) 500-550 words | 2025 Custom Writing

IntroductionThat Descartes! You hired him as your personal tutor. You are Queen Christina of Sweden and he should be happy with that position. But his argument with Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia is causing a diplomatic mess. In a series of highly public letters, she has argued against his substance dualism, which she claims is unable to accommodate the obvious fact that minds interact with bodies. He has responded vigorously and now even the King of France has taken an interest. He’s far too powerful to ignore, so you decide to write a letter to him to explain Elisabeth’s objection.TaskWrite a letter–it should have an address, salutation, etc.— to the King of France in which you do the following:Explain substance dualism. Make sure to explain the basic concept of a substance as well as explain what it means to say that there are both mental and physical substances.Explain Princess Elisabeth’s argument against substance dualism.

 

Assignment Help Online, Last Minute Nursing Assingment Help, Nursing Assignment Help, timelynursingwriters.com

repost week3 | 2025

by

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

repost week3 | 2025 Custom Writing

Resources for this week’s question, please incorporate resources into answer.Babbie, E. (2017). Basics of social research (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.· Chapter 15, “Reading and Writing Social Research”· Laureate Education (Producer). (2016b). Literature review [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.·· Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 8 minutes.·· Dr. Patton speaks about the role of literature in the research process.·· Accessible player  –Downloads– Download Video w/CC Download Audio Download TranscriptBrown, M. (2013). Developing social problems into research problems for graduate study [Online webcast]. Retrieved from Evaluating Use of Literature and Problem StatementResearchers use scholarly literature for various purposes in their work, such as, but not limited to, establishing the need for and importance of their study or describing a theory. The problem statement is typically tied to the literature, and for this reason, these two components of research are presented together this week; this connection among research components will be a recurring theme throughout this course.For this Discussion, you will evaluate the use of literature and problem statements in assigned journal articles in your discipline to understand what it means for a research study to be justified, grounded, and original. You will use the Use of Literature Checklist, the Problem Statement Checklist, and the Litmus Test as guides for your post.With these thoughts in mind, refer to the Journal Articles document for your assigned articles for this Discussion. If your last name starts with A through L, use Article A. If your last name starts with M through Z, use Article B. Follow the prompt below for your program.Master’s and research doctorate (PhD) studentsBy Day 4Post a critique of the research study in which you:· Evaluate the authors’ use of literature using the Use of Literature Checklist as a guide· Evaluate the research problem using the Problem Statement Checklist as a guide· Explain what it means for a research study to be justified and grounded in the literature; then, explain what it means for a problem to be original using the Litmus Test as a guideBe sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.Stedman-Smith, M., DuBois, C. L., & Grey, S. F. (2015). Hand hygiene performance and beliefs among public university employees. Journal of Health Psychology, 20(10), 1263–1274. doi: 10.1177/1359105313510338By Day 4Post a critique of the research study in which you:Evaluate the authors’ use of      literature using the Use of Literature Checklist as a      guide.Evaluate the problem using      the Problem Statement Checklist as a guide.Explain what it means for a      research study to be justified and grounded in      the literature; then, explain what it means for a problem to be original using      the Litmus Test as a guide· https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udfldYXvUxw&feature=youtu.beProblem Statement Checklist Use the following criteria to evaluate an author’s problem statement:• Is a problem identified that leads to the need for this study?• Is a rationale or justification for the problem clearly stated?• Is the problem framed in a way that is consistent with the research approach?• Does the statement convey how the study will address the problem?• Are the citations to literature current (i.e., within the past 5 years with the exception of seminal works)?Use of Literature ChecklistUse the following criteria to evaluate an author’s use of literature.• Look for indications of the following ways the author used literature:• Introduce a problem• Introduce a theory• Provide direction to the research questions and/or hypotheses• Compare results with existing literature or predictions• Did the author mention the problem addressed by the study?• Is the purpose of the study stated?• Are key variables in the study defined?• Is information about the sample, population, or participants provided?• Are the key results of the study summarized?• Does the author provide a critique of the literature?• Are sources cited to support points?• Are the citations to recent literature (within the past 5 years with the exception of seminal works)?• Does the literature justify the importance of the topic studied?Litmus Test for a Doctoral-Level Research ProblemBackground on these “litmus test” questions· The distinguishing characteristic ofdoctoral-level research(as opposed to masters level) is that it must make anoriginal contribution to the field. However, students may struggle to identify what will authentically contribute to their field or discipline.· The most critical step in making such a contribution is to first identify a research problem with the4 doctoral hallmarks below. Identifying a doctoral-level research problem is “necessary, but not sufficient,” to produce doctoral-level capstone.REQUIRED DOCTORAL HALLMARKS OF THE RESEARCH PROBLEMIn   Walden’s scholar-practitioner model, a research problem shows promise of   contributing meaningfully to the field ONLY if the answer to ALL of the   following questions is “yes.”YesNo1. JUSTIFIED?Is thereevidencethat this problem is significant to the professional field?There     must be relevant statistics (expressing an unjust inequality, financial     impact, lost efficiency, etc.), documentable discrepancies (e.g., two     models that are difficult to reconcile), and/or other scholarly facts that     point to the significance and urgency of the problem. The problem must be     an authentic “puzzle” that needs solving, not merely a topic that the     researcher finds interesting.2. GROUNDED IN THE   LITERATURE?Can the problem be   framed in a way that will enable the researcher to eitherbuild upon or   counter the previously publishedfindings on the topic?For     most fields, this involves articulating the problem within the context of atheoretical or conceptual framework. Although there are multiple     ways to ground a study in the scientific literature, the essential     requirement is that the problem is framed in such a way that the new     findings will have implications for the previous findings.3. ORIGINAL?For research   doctorates (Ph.D.):Does the problem reflect   a meaningfulgap in the research literature?For the professional   doctorates (Ed.D. and D.B.A.):Does   the problem describe a meaningfulgap in practice?4. AMENABLE TO   SCIENTIFIC STUDY?Can ascholarly,   systematic method of inquirybe applied to address the problem?The framing of the   problem should not reveal bias or present a foregone conclusion. Even if the   researcher has a strong opinion on the expected findings, scholarly   objectivity must be maximized by framing the problem in the context of a   systematic inquiry that permits multiple possible conclusions.

 

Assignment Help Online, Last Minute Nursing Assingment Help, Nursing Assignment Help, timelynursingwriters.com