Categorical Perception: Identification and Discrimination | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Categorical Perception: Identification and Discrimination | 2025 Custom Writing

Categorical Perception: Identification and DiscriminationAcross the United States and the world, people speak English with many different accents. How is it that we can understand what is being said whether one speaks with a Southern “drawl,” a New England “clip,” or a Western “twang?” Categorical perception may be one of the ways that our perceptual processes help us understand words spoken with different accents.Access the following CogLab demonstrations and follow the instructions to complete both demonstrations (these are listed under the Speech & Language tab).Categorical Perception: IdentificationCategorical Perception: DiscriminationUsing the textbook and module readings, the Argosy University online library resources, and the Internet, research the effect of training on one’s ability to make perceptual discriminations.Based on the demonstrations and your research, address the following:Define categorical perception. Differentiate between identification and discrimination.Explain whether your personal experimental results for both demonstrations follow patterns similar to the predicted experimental results.In many situations, you may be forced to make categorical judgments. Name a job in which someone has to categorize people or things that actually fall on a continuum. Describe the categorization this person would have to make.Describe your views on why it is useful to have categorical speech perception.Experience and training can affect your ability to make perceptual discriminations. Explain whether you agree or disagree with this statement.Support your answers with adequate reasoning and scholarly research and references.Write a 2–3-page paper in Word format. Be sure to include a title page and a reference page. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.Assignment 2 Grading CriteriaMaximum PointsDefined categorical perception and differentiated between identification and discrimination.8Explained whether your personal experimental results for both demonstrations follow patterns similar to the predicted experimental results.12Identified a job that requires categorization of people or things that actually fall on a continuum and described the categorization that has to be made.20Described your opinion on why it is useful to have categorical speech perception.20Explained your opinion on whether experience and training can affect your ability to make perceptual discriminations.20Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.20Total:100

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

due in 24 hours/ no plag | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

due in 24 hours/ no plag | 2025 Custom Writing

Details:A local shelter that receives funding from the National Institute of Health and Mental Health is upgrading its website. Along with several upgrades to the website, the web developer/consultant makes a suggestion that the shelter add a testimonial page where local citizens can describe their positive interactions with the shelter and its services. Since the web developer/consultant want to get that page up and running first, the developer suggests using some positive ratings and responses from Angie’s List® and other similar ratings sites that already have positive stories and experiences with the shelter.The director of the shelter loves the idea of a testimonial page. She thinks it would really add to the community feel of the shelter. However, knowing her funding source, she researches the APA Ethics Code and believes the shelter would be acting inappropriately. To discuss the matter in further detail, the director of the shelter calls you for an ethics consult.Adapted from: http://www.ethicalpsychology.com/2012/06/vignette-14-psychology-of-advertizing.htmlIn 500-750 words, explain the advice you would give:Describe the ethical issues involved in this situation.Discuss any other concerns about the web developer/consultant’s strategies.Explain some recommendations that you would make to the shelter.Use two to three scholarly sources to support your claims.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prio

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

Where do people tend to find their health information? ? | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Where do people tend to find their health information? ? | 2025 Custom Writing

Where do people tend to find their health information? What are some websites they rely on? Why does this matter to health psychologists?

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

Grant Proposal – Peer Reviews (WEEK 5) | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Grant Proposal – Peer Reviews (WEEK 5) | 2025 Custom Writing

I have attached  two de-identified grant proposals to review for this assignment . You will play the role of a grant reviewer by reading and giving feedback to two other students’ grant proposals (proposals will be assigned at random).The Grant Proposal – Peer ReviewsMust be three to six double-spaced pages in length (not including the title or reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in theAshford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..Must address the following areas of the proposal you are reviewing:Specific Aims: Does the proposed study seem adequate to achieve these specific aims?Background: Does the literature review justify the need for the study? Are there any gaps or missing data in the literature review?Significance: Does the proposed study improve scientific knowledge, technical capability and/or clinical practice?Proposed Study: Does the proposed study methodology answer the hypotheses listed in the Background section? Is the proposed methodology sufficient to achieve the stated specific aims?Must include a separate title page with the following:Title of paper you are reviewingReviewer’s  nameCourse name and numberInstructor’s nameDate submittedMust use at least one peer-reviewed source in addition to the course text.Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.Carefully review theGrading Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

FOR PHILLY’S YOUNG ONLY | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

FOR PHILLY’S YOUNG ONLY | 2025 Custom Writing

IF YOU NEED THE WORK YOU DID FOR ME IN PAST WEEKS LET ME KNOW, I THINK YOU WILL NEED THEM TO COMPLETE THIS ASSIGNMENT. I NEED THIS BY SUNDAY NIGHT SO I CAN SUBMIT IT ON MONDAY. THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH..AssignmentAssignment 2: RA 2: Written ReportYou have completed your assessment of the employee and have the required information about the employee. You also have the information about three other predictors you reported in M4 Assignment 1. You have also administered a risk assessment instrument, and the employee has been classified to be at moderate risk for assaultive behavior in the next five years.On the basis of the results of your investigation, in a mock report format based on the module readings and vignette data for the assignment tasks of the previous modules, create a 10- to 12-page report addressing the following:The results of the interview with the employee (a description of your mock interaction with and the mental status examination of the employee)A specific review of the employee’s predictors of violence factorsAn analysis of the validity and reliability of risk assessment instruments for making predictions of violence appropriate for the employee’s assessmentThe mock conclusions you arrived at about the employee’s potential for showing violence, while explaining reasons for such conclusionsSome cautionary statements about the tenuousness of your conclusions, given the low base rate of violence in the employeeIn addition, in your report, identify at least one potential victim of the employee. Make a recommendation for action by the company to protect that victim. Prepare your findings and recommendations in such a way that the employee cannot effectively sue the company for slander. An axiom of law is that negative statements do not constitute slander if they can be supported. Your job is to write the report in such a way (with supportable conclusions) that the company can establish that its actions were prudent.Submission Details:Assignment 2 Grading CriteriaMaximum PointsDescribed clearly the results of the interview with the employee.56Provided a logical review of the employee’s predictors of violence.56Analyzed the validity and reliability of the risk assessment instrument for making predictions on violence.48Provided conclusions about the employee’s potential for showing violence.48Provided relevant cautionary statements about the tenuousness of your conclusions.36Identified at least one potential victim of the employee and recommended an action by the company to protect that individual.36Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.20Total:300

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

Psy quiz plz complete it ASAP (1:30 hours due) | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Psy quiz plz complete it ASAP (1:30 hours due) | 2025 Custom Writing

Psy quiz plz complete it ASAP (1:30 hours due)

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

psy 363 | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

psy 363 | 2025 Custom Writing

if any question or better communication email me at [email protected]

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

week 4a | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

week 4a | 2025 Custom Writing

Select one of the eating disorders, the Paraphilias, or neurocognitive disorders from the Film List.Use the Research Analysis Job Aid to complete this assignment.Prepare a 1,050- to 1,500-word paper that discusses research-based interventions to treat psychopathology.Review and differentiate the characteristics of the selected disorder and discuss the research about intervention strategies for the disorder by completing the following:Evaluate three peer-reviewed research studies using the Research Analysis. Please see the posted Announcement concerning how to write about research studies.Conceptualize the disorder using the biopsychosocial or diathesis-stress models. In order to receive full credit for this objective you will need to demonstrate how each element of the model causes or exacerbates the disorder you have selected. For example, how do the elements of biology, psychology, and sociology interact to create and/or make the disorder worse? Addressing each of these in regards to how they independently create and or make the disorder worse does not fulfill this requirement. The diathesis-stress model is, in general, easier to explain for most disorders you will write about for this course.Discuss the treatments or interventions that have been shown to be the most effective for your selected disorder. Why?Cite at least three peer-reviewed sources for the first objective and one each for the second and third objectives. These five peer-reviewed sources should not be repeated in the paper.Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

Principles of Sound Reasoning PHI paper 1 | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Principles of Sound Reasoning PHI paper 1 | 2025 Custom Writing

Paper topic 1Contrast the notions of validity and truth in terms of the following two syllogisms(a) Some arguments with mood and figure IAI-3 are not valid for no arguments with mood and figure OAO-3 ae valid(b) No arguments with mood and figure IEO-4 are valid and some arguments with mood and figure IEO-4 are not sound so we know that some valid arguments are not soundPut both arguments in standard logical form and provide their mood and figure. Determine the validity of each argument by both a Venn diagram and by Salmon’s rules (provide every single one of Salmon’s rules. You do not need to discuss Salmon’s rules, just apply them.) Explain why each statement in each argument is true or false. Is either argument sound?READ THE HINTS. If you ignore some piece of information that is discussed in the hints, YOU WILL BE MARKED DOWN.Paper hints:1. You must put these arguments in standard logical form as categorical syllogisms. This means that you must use the variables S,P. and M. You must also provide a dictionary or instance along with the form. I want to know what the S,P, and M designate.2. S,P, and M may be fairly long. You will be using terms such as these: arguments with true premises and a false conclusion, arguments with mood and figure AOO-2, etc. These are a bit longer than terms such as ‘dogs’ and ‘cats’.3. When you discuss IAI-3, OAO-3, and IEO-4, provide the forms. I want to see that you can provide the form of the argument when you are given the mood and figure. DO NOT DISCUSS THESE FORMS UNTIL YOU DISCUSS THE RELEVANT PREMISES IN THE ARGUMENT. You should not start out your paper by presenting these forms.4. Remember, in this class, enthymemes are always valid. If you have an invalid form for syllogism (a), you made a mistake.5. When you discuss why each premise and conclusion is true, give a paragraph to each statement. This way, you are less likely to skimp on your discussion. Don’t discuss every statement in an argument in one paragraph. It is too easy to jumble points together if you discuss everything in one paragraph.6. I expect to see examples when they are relevant. If you do not provide examples, you are marked down. In many cases, examples are the actual proof or evidence that you need to prove a statement is true or falseFor this paper, THE EXAMPLES MUST BE CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS.7. While you need to prove that arguments (a) and (b) are valid or invalid by both Salmon’s rules and a Venn diagram, you can prove that IAI-3. OAO-3 and IEO-4 are valid or invalid by just one technique. You can use Salmon’s rules (use all the rules) or a Venn diagram.8. You are given a sample paper and an outline for this paper. It is a good idea to look at these. But these are not religious documents. Follow these documents intelligently.9. In your paper, arguments should be single-spaced and indented. Other than this, I don’t care if you single-space or double-space your paper.10. Good writing counts. You will be graded on how well the paper is organized and written. The material you learned in your composition classes hasn’t become obsolete just because you are discussing arguments.I must need A grade and I have attached sample paper and all reading material.

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

SCIENTIFIC MERIT | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

SCIENTIFIC MERIT | 2025 Custom Writing

SCIENTIFIC MERIT PAPERResources· Scientific Merit Paper Scoring Guide.· APA Style and Format.· Capella Library.· Capella Writing Center.· Persistent Links and DOIs.Using the research study you selected in the Unit 2 assignment, along with the course assignments for which you deconstructed your research study, write a scientific merit paper. In your paper, address the following:· Evaluate how a research study advances the scientific knowledge base of an identified field of study.· Evaluate how a specific research study contributes to research theory and the field of study.· Evaluate how the scientific methods of inquiry are applied to a specific research study.· Evaluate the validity and reliability of a selected research study.· Assess strategies for addressing ethical concerns in the design of a research study.· Apply the terminology of research.· Demonstrate both the depth and the breadth of your understanding of scientific research and scientific merit by including relevant examples and supporting evidence.Requirements· The paper should be 10–12 pages long, not counting references, block quotes, or title page. Neither an abstract nor table of content is required, and would not count in the paper length.· Minimum of seven scholarly resources. It is expected that one of these resources will be the study you selected for the Unit 2 assignment, and another will be the required textbook for the course, by Leedy and Ormrod.· Use APA style and formatting, including correct in-text citations, proper punctuation, double-spacing throughout, proper headings and subheadings, no skipped lines before headings and subheadings, proper paragraph and block indentation, no bolding, and no bullets.· Include the permalink to your article on the title page of your paper.Refer to the project description and the assignment scoring guide to make sure you meet the requirements of this assignment.Submit your file in the assignment area.

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com