Research Paper for MSW | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Research Paper for MSW | 2025 Custom Writing

Hi!I have a research paper that is due on 11/8/2020 by 7PM.I have started the research paper, but please feel free to pick a topic of your choice.

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

PowerPoint week 10 | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

PowerPoint week 10 | 2025 Custom Writing

Attached  in document

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

Last minute Psych Discussion | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Last minute Psych Discussion | 2025 Custom Writing

In 100 words minimum and in your own words explain the teenage brain and why they react and behave the way they do. In your opinion, experience, and based on your reading on adolescent brain development.

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

SPSS, statistics | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

SPSS, statistics | 2025 Custom Writing

Help with translation of SPSS data

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

Research methods | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Research methods | 2025 Custom Writing

null and alternative hypotheses

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

Wk 3, IOP 490: DR 1 | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Wk 3, IOP 490: DR 1 | 2025 Custom Writing

Substantive responseAPA formatCite 2 reference175-265 wordsRespond to the following:Dean AthanassiadesThanks for responding and noting “…However, a great leader needs to behonoredand respected by his subordinates…”. What would be observable behaviors that would indicate “honoring” an organization leader?

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

Peer Responses | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Peer Responses | 2025 Custom Writing

see word document attached

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

case study 1 public human resource | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

case study 1 public human resource | 2025 Custom Writing

You are the new HR manager for a large, 100-year old company.  The company has several diversity-oriented groups and promotes growing the number of supervisors/managers that are non-white and women.  When you were hired, you noticed that leadership in the operational roles were only white men, while women and people of color were in “soft skilled” roles, supporting the operational areas.  When higher level positions became available, you noticed women and people of color were denied promotions for lacking operations experience.  You are also having concerns about possible hostile working environment conditions and how such incidents have been resolved by HR employees.You have been the HR manager for six months and was presented with the below incident:In one of the 24-hour groups, the entire leadership team consists of white men.  All of the leadership team is over 50 years old and the average tenure with the company is 30 years.The rank-in-file employees of the team are diverse, with women and people of color.On the morning shift, you received an anonymous complaint that the leadership team is sending around emails that appear to be racist.  The email contained the below interaction:Supervisor 1: Rick (a black male) is doing a lot of work.  It looks like he is going to beat his goal.Supervisor 2: Good.  Then that will help to bring up the numbers so we can meet our goals as a group.Supervisor 1: Yeah, we just need to get more silver-backs like him.The anonymous employee also typed a note stating that this is not the first time Supervisor 1 referred to black people as monkeys or gorillas – that Supervisor 1 has used such terms in front of and to the black people in the group.You talked with Supervisor 1’s manager.  The manager stated that Supervisor 1 has worked with the company for a long time and is not used to working with black people.  The manager insisted that Supervisor 1 is a good person.You talked with Supervisor 1.  Supervisor 1 stated he did not know that calling a black person a silver-back was offensive.  You asked Supervisor 1 about other comments referring to black people as monkeys or gorillas.  Supervisor 1 said that the problem with diversity is that people are so sensitive.You make a recommendation to Manager that Supervisor 1 should be formally disciplined including taking diversity classes.The manager did not accept your recommendation.  The manager stated he will talk with Supervisor 1.As the HR manager, what should happen next?  Provide 3-5 recommendations to senior leadership to address this situation as well as to address your observations and concerns about diversity in the company.  Explain the reason for each recommendation and explain why/how these recommendations could improve the culture and work environment.Paper should be 3-4 pageshttps://open.lib.umn.edu/humanresourcemanagement/part/chapter-7-retention-and-motivation/https://open.lib.umn.edu/humanresourcemanagement/part/chapter-8-training-and-development/

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

reply to posts on PSY 7610 | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

reply to posts on PSY 7610 | 2025 Custom Writing

reply to the next 2 discussions (make sure to include at least a question to your peers)15 hours agoCarrie Langston ValidityCOLLAPSEIn our reading this week I learned about the Trinitarian model of validity which includes the criterion related validity, content validity, and construct validity. We can use these to forecast and measure what the end result of a test will be. We must examine what the total purpose and response will be for a test. What the subject matter is, what is required and what we wish to accomplish when the test is complete. The reading also states that we use this to compare test measurements that are identical to a set of goals, and the quality of an instruments used, and the construct of interest (Guion, 1980). The difference in the unitary model is that there are not three separate areas as in the Trinitarian model. Messick states that the unitary models stands on the appropriateness, meaningfulness, and usefulness of score-based inferences and are inseparable” (Messick, 1995). It would seem that the unitary model is a better fit because you can accomplish more and find more accurate results. In both cases the goal is a valid and reliable testing procedure. This is what I understand the Trinitarian and unitary model to be.1 day agoDianna Spence U4D1COLLAPSEA Trinitarian view of validity focuses on three aspects of validity, criterion-related, content, and construct. Guion examined each from a dual perspective aiding in the understanding of construct and establishing a basis for comparison between evaluations of the validity of measurement and evaluations of the validity of a hypothesis (Guion, 1980). Trinitarian approaches to validity assessment are not mutually exclusive, as each of the three conceptions of validity provides evidence that, with other evidence, contributes to a judgment concerning the validity of a test (Cohen & Swerdlik, 2018). Disadvantage of this theory is having to choose which tests to apply this concept. Tests in math and sciences are applicable but those in social sciences may have difficulty (Guion, 1980).Messick’s approach to validity is critical of and differs from Guion’s approach. Messick provides validity measurements for all tests on the basis of six aspects of construct validity: “content, substantive, structural, generalizability, external, and consequential aspects of construct validity” (Messick, 1995). The new unified concept of validity interrelates these issues as fundamental aspects of a more comprehensive theory of construct validity that addresses both scores meaning and social values in test interpretation and test use (Messick, 1995). In his critic of the Trinitarians view of validity, Messick called for a unitary view of validity, one that takes into account everything from the implications of test scores in terms of societal values to the consequences of test use (Cohen & Swerdlik, 2018).Messick’s approach is more valid for determining the validity of a test as it has multiple aspects of construct validity to apply. Test users can run into difficultly when determining test validity of test measure based on one certain criterion.

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

For anyone NEED ASAP | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

For anyone NEED ASAP | 2025 Custom Writing

Is the clavicular head of the pectoralis major more or less active when using a wide versus a narrow grip on the flat bench press? 5 sentencesCan anyone describe an experiment where you had to gain someone’s trust to establish your credibility with them

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com