Moral Theory 2025

Instructions Now that you have had an opportunity to explore ethics formally, create a reflective assessment of your learning experience and the collaborations you engaged in throughout this session. You will submit both of the following: A written reflection An oral presentation using a PowerPoint narrated slide show. For the written reflection, address Jane Doe’s and respond to the following: Articulate again your moral theory from week eight discussion (You can revise it if you wish). What two ethical theories best apply to it? Why those two? Apply to Jane Doe’s case your personal moral philosophy as developed in week eight discussion and now. Use it to determine if what Jane Doe did was ethical or unethical per your own moral philosophy. Consider if some of these examples are more grave instances of ethical transgressions than others. Explain. Propose a course of social action and a solution by using the ethics of egoism, utilitarianism, the “veil of ignorance” method, deontological principles, and/or a theory of justice to deal with students like Jane. Consider social values such as those concerning ways of life while appraising the interests of diverse populations (for instance, those of differing religions and economic status). For the oral presentation, briefly summarize your feelings about taking a course in Ethics and explore your process of transformation in this course. Discuss your experiences of the course, your beginnings, and where you are now. Consider your interaction in discussions. Should health care workers be required to take a course in Ethics? Why or why not

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

CP – Week 8 Discussion 2nd REPLY 2025

Reply to the following discussion by challenging the post. You will want to focus on their point of view, asking pertinent questions, adding to the responses by including information from other sources, and respectfully challenging a point of view, supported by references to other sources. Be objective, clear, and concise. Always use constructive language. It is important to support what you say with relevant citations in the APA format from both the course materials and outside resources. JO Discussion: PICOT Question: In young persons aged 18-24 years (P), can innovative communication and proactive health care delivery (I), compared to not providing sexual health education (C), increase the awareness of sexually transmitted diseases and encourage sexual decisiveness from the interventions provided to reduce the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases (O), within 6 months (T)? The following is the plan for evaluating the effectiveness of sexually transmitted disease educational interventions and decreasing the rate of diagnosis in clinical practice. Clarifying the objectives and goals – The main objectives are to reduce the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases in the target population through proactive health care delivery and use of innovative communication through social media platforms. This will be accomplished by providing interventional education to patients in the clinic. For the purpose of this project, I have chosen to focus on ‘young people’ aged 18-24 years, as this group accounts for over 50% of newly diagnosed sexually transmitted diseases in the United States. Focus of the evaluation – The stakeholders will be identified and assigned roles accordingly. Stakeholder needs will be identified in part of the evaluation process. Developing evaluation questions – The following questions will be addressed: How have participant behaviors changed as a result of the program? Do the participants feel positive perception with the utilization of social media for sexual health communication with peers and healthcare providers? Are participants satisfied with the experience? Were there any negative results from participation in the program? Developing evaluation design methods – An STD-Knowledge Questionnaire (STD-KQ), comprised of 27 close-ended questions aimed at identifying behavioral risks and knowledge deficits pertaining to sexually transmitted diseases (Jaworski & Carey, 2007). For this particular a dichotomous “yes/no” option will be used to organize responses vertically with ample space between responses to decrease the risk for error. The nominal measurement will consist of the presence or absence of sexually transmitted diseases. Statistical conclusion validity will be used to conclude variances and associations drawn from studies to correctly reproduce reality (Gray et al., 2017). The sample size will be comprised of 152 patients, 18-24 years of age. The sample size was calculated by 250 patient population, 95% sampling confidence level, and 5% margin of error (SurveyMonkey, 2021). The sampling strategy for the study will be stratified random sampling, the participants will be divided into subgroups based on gender. Stratified random sampling offers proper representation of the sample populations characteristics and can be divided into subgroups based on gender (Scribbr, 2020). Establishing a timeline for evaluation activities – The participants will receive the STD-KQ questionnaire at the beginning of the program, and will receive a second questionnaire at the end of a six-month time period. The independent variable pertaining to this project is innovative communication. The dependent variable is the rate of sexually transmitted diseases being diagnosed. Data on the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases prior to and after the interventional program will be collected and documented in the participants electronic medical record. Given the nature of the program, descriptive data will be used. According to Gray and colleagues (2017), prevalence and incidence suggest a descriptive research design with the intent of appropriately and methodically defining populace, characteristics, tendencies, groupings, and incidences. Data analysis will incorporate the use of a Chi-square test of independence, which is a non-parametric inferential statistic focused on nominal variables (Bhandari, 2020). References Bhandari, P. (2020). An introduction to inferential statistics. Retrieved from https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/inferential-statistics/ Gray, J., Grove, S., & Sutherland, S. (2017). Burns & Grove’s the Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence . [South University]. Retrieved from https://digitalbookshelf.southuniversity.edu/#/books/9780323377584/ Jaworski, B. C., & Carey, M. P. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of a self-administered questionnaire to measure knowledge of sexually transmitted diseases. AIDS and behavior , 11 (4), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-006-9168-5 Scribbr. (2020). How to use stratified sampling. Retrieved from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/stratified-sampling/ SurveyMonkey. (2021). Calculate your sample size. Retrieved from https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/sample-size-calculator/

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

ADVOCACY THROUGH LEGISLATION 2025

Nurses often become motivated to change aspects within the larger health care system based on their real-world experience. As such, many nurses take on an advocacy role to influence a change in regulations, policies, and laws that govern the larger health care system. For this assignment, identify a problem or concern in your state, community, or organization that has the capacity for advocacy through legislation. Research the issue and use the “Advocacy Through Legislation” template to complete this assignment. You are required to cite to a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Attachments NRS-440VN-RS4-AdvocacyThroughLegislation.docx

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

TEST BANK FOR PRIMARY CARE ART AND SCIENCE OF ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSING – AN INTERPROFESSIONAL APPROACH 5TH EDITION DUNPHY(533 Pages) 2025

1. A nurse has conducted a literature review in an effort to identify the effect of handwashing on the incidence of nosocomial (hospital-acquired) infections in acute care settings. An article presented findings at a level of significance of <0.01. This indicates that A) the control group and the experimental group were more than 99% similar. B) the findings of the study have less than 1% chance of being attributable to chance. C) the effects of the intervention were nearly zero. D) the clinical significance of the findings was less than 1:100. Ans: B Feedback: The level of significance is the level at which the researcher believes that the study results most likely represent a nonchance event. A level of significance of <0.01 indicates that there is less than 1% probability that the result is due to chance. 2. A nurse has read a qualitative research study in order to understand the lived experience of parents who have a neonatal loss. Which of the following questions should the nurse prioritize when appraising the results of this study? A) How well did the authors capture the personal experiences of these parents? B) How well did the authors control for confounding variables that may have affected the findings? C) Did the authors use statistical measures that were appropriate to the phenomenon in question? D) Were the instruments that the researchers used statistically valid and reliable? Ans: A Feedback: Qualitative studies are judged on the basis of how well they capture and convey the subjective experiences of individuals. Statistical measures and variables are not dimensions of a qualitative methodology. 3. A nurse has expressed skepticism to a colleague about the value of nursing research, claiming that nursing research has little relevance to practice. How can the nurses colleague best defend the importance of nursing research?A) The existence of nursing research means that nurses are now able to access federal grant money, something that didnt use to be the case. B) Nursing research has allowed the development of masters and doctoral programs and has greatly increased the credibility of the profession. C) The growth of nursing research has caused nursing to be viewed as a true profession, rather than simply as a trade or a skill. D) The application of nursing research has the potential to improve nursing practice and patient outcomes. Ans: D Feedback: The greatest value of nursing research lies in the potential to improve practice and, ultimately, to improve patient outcomes. This supersedes the contributions of nursing research to education programs, grant funding, or the public view of the profession. 4. Tracy is a nurse with a baccalaureate degree who works in the labor and delivery unit of a busy urban hospital. She has noticed that many new mothers abandon breast-feeding their babies when they experience early challenges and wonders what could be done to encourage more women to continue breast-feeding. What role is Tracy most likely to play in a research project that tests an intervention aimed at promoting breast-feeding? A) Applying for grant funding for the research project B) Posing the clinical problem to one or more nursing researchers C) Planning the methodology of the research project D) Carrying out the intervention and submitting the results for publication Ans: B Feedback: A major role for staff nurses is to identify questions or problems for research. Grant applications, methodological planning, and publication submission are normally carried out by nurses who have advanced degrees in nursing. 5. A patient signed the informed consent form for a drug trial that was explained to patient by a research assistant. Later, the patient admitted to his nurse that he did not understand the research assistants explanation or his own role in the study. How should this patients nurse respond to this revelation? A) Explain the research process to the patient in greater detail. B) Describe the details of a randomized controlled trial for the patient.C) Inform the research assistant that the patients consent is likely invalid. D) Explain to the patient that his written consent is now legally binding. Ans: C Feedback: Just as the staff nurse is not responsible for medical consent, the staff nurse is not responsible for research consent. If patients who have agreed to participate exhibit ambivalence or uncertainty about participating, do not try to convince them to participate. Ask the person from the research team who is managing consents to speak with concerned patients about the study, even after a patient has signed the consent forms. Multiple Selection 6. A nurse leader is attempting to increase the awareness of evidence-based practice (EBP) among the nurses on a unit. A nurse who is implementing EBP integrates which of the following? (Select all that apply.) A) Interdisciplinary consensus B) Nursing tradition C) Research studies D) Patient preferences and values E) Clinical expertise Ans: C, D, E Feedback: Fineout-Overholt, Melnyk, Stillwell, and Williamson define EBP as a problem-solving approach to the delivery of healthcare that integrates the best evidence from studies and patient care data with clinician expertise and patient preferences and values. Multiple Choice 7. Mrs. Mayes is a 73-year-old woman who has a diabetic foot ulcer that has been extremely slow to heal and which now poses a threat of osteomyelitis. The wound care nurse who has been working with Mrs. Mayes applies evidence-based practice (EBP) whenever possible and has proposed the use of maggot therapy to debride necrotic tissue. Mrs. Mayes, however, finds the suggestion repugnant and adamantly opposes this treatment despite the sizable body of evidence supporting it. How should the nurse reconcile Mrs. Mayes views with the principles of EBP? A) The nurse should explain that reliable and valid research evidence overrides the patients opinion. B) The nurse should explain the evidence to the patient in greater detail.C) The nurse should integrate the patients preferences into the plan of care. D) The nurse should involve the patients family members in the decision-making process. Ans: C Feedback: Patient preferences should be integrated into EBP and considered alongside research evidence and the nurses clinical expertise; evidence does not trump the patients preferences. The family should be involved, but this is not an explicit dimension of EBP. Similarly, explaining the evidence in more detail is not a demonstration of EBP. Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Discussion 4 2025

Your literature review sets the stage for everything else that you do in your Doctoral Study. It is through this review that you determine the research that has been conducted in your area of interest and the gaps that exist where research is still needed. The literature review also helps support hypotheses that you might have generated and the choices that you will make in your research. As you proceed, you will review numerous articles that are applicable to your topic. Managing your search of the literature, as well as your findings, is a key part of the Doctoral Study process. Think about strategies you have used in the past to organize research you have conducted. What was effective and what was not? How might you improve your strategies? How will you keep track of the articles you have reviewed and how will you save those that you intend to use in your literature review? What will you do to ensure that you have saved and backed up critical documents? What specific tools will you use? Keep these questions in mind as you determine how you can best manage the many resources that will inform your literature review. By Day 4 Post the strategies you plan to use to manage the resources for your Doctoral Study. Include steps for tracking your search techniques. Describe your strategies for storing and backing up your resources and the tools you will use or have found to be useful. Be specific. Support your Discussion with citations and specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You are asked to provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the resources for this course.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025