2025 You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending refuting correcting

by

Reply 1 Dis 4 415 2025

You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible. Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric. As decisions are made to address changes in reimbursement in your workplace, how are these changes shared with the nursing staff? What suggestions do you have that could increase nurses’ awareness of health care financing issues? According to Harrington (2019), after an in-depth analysis of the current and the past state of activities in the healthcare sector, changes in healthcare reimbursement are still expected in the future. Several variables influence healthcare reimbursement, and some of them include the insurance payer, the hospital, and the state. To meet the requirements of universal healthcare and the demands in healthcare, some necessary changes are being made in the healthcare reimbursement. Some of these changes include the introduction and implementation of new policies such as ACO (Accountable Care Organizations) and ACA (Affordable Care Act). Accountable Care Organizations policy was adopted to lower the healthcare costs while at the same time, improving the quality of care. The Affordable Care Act was established to promote value-based reimbursement and initiative-based performance. This paper will, therefore, concentrate on how these changes are being shared with the nursing staff and provide suggestions on how to increase the nurses’ awareness of health care financing issues. Organizations are highly concerned about the changes in reimbursement, and therefore several decisions are being made in their actions. In the healthcare setting, making effective decisions emphasizes sharing the reimbursements challenges to the core stakeholders in the organization who include the nursing staff. In my workplace, shared governance is one of the instrumental approaches being used to share the changes with the nursing staff. This approach entails involving the nursing staff, which, in the process, promotes nurses’ engagement and accountability in the implementation of new reimbursement changes. The technique of shared governance is also helping to keep the nurses informed about the financial goals of the organization. Another technique that my workplace is using to share the new reimbursement changes with the nursing staff includes the buy-ins. The nursing staff buy-in help in supporting change through innovation, creating more opportunities, and responding to the external and internal threats (French-Bravo & Crow, 2015). My workplace is using this technique through creating awareness on the expected changes and therefore developing a sense of urgency. After this step of raising awareness, the nursing leaders are now used to communicate the nursing staff. In this case, the nursing leaders are selected based on the level of influence that they have on the nursing staff. The nurses are then expected to give their feedback, whereby their opinions are considered in the implementation of changes. There are several suggestions on some of the ways that can be instrumental in increasing nurses’ awareness of health care financing issues. One of the suggestions is putting more emphasis on the effectiveness of healthcare budgeting. The efficiency of the healthcare budgeting can be enhanced through empowering the nurses in the health care budgeting decision making. This will significantly help in motivating the nursing staff to put more effort into the effectiveness of healthcare budgeting, which helps to prevent financial losses. Another suggestion includes the healthcare organization offering training and development to the nursing staff. This will help in providing the nurses with more skills and information associated with financial management and healthcare financing. In conclusion, to effectively address the reimbursement changes, it calls for a requirement to share these changes with the nursing staff. They can be shared through the use of techniques like share governance and buy-ins. While these changes are being addressed, nurses are supposed to be engaged in the decision-making process. This kind of empowerment also significantly helps in addressing the financial issues in the healthcare organization. Also, to increase nurses’ awareness of health care financing issues, it is recommendable to offer training and development services to the nursing staff for them to gain instrumental skills in healthcare financing and financial management. Reply 2 Increase Nurses’ Awareness of Health Care Financing Issues Notable alterations in healthcare recompense are being felt to cushion the elevating healthcare challenges and attain universal healthcare. At the national position, several policies address reimbursement matters have been entrenched. One such strategy is the Affordable Care Act that prompts most healthcare agencies to adopt initiative-based achievement and value based on reimbursement policies. The incorporation of the latest changes in healthcare reimbursement is a switch from the fee-for-service set-up of compensation to the achievement-based refund. A related change in the reimbursement entails the initiation of Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) that aim at fostering care quality while decreasing the cost of care. Based on ACO, reimbursement of care occurs through fixed remission, varied upfront payment, or even varying monthly payments (Mechanic, 2016). To address the reimbursement changes, decisions are being made in my organization. In my opinion, effective decision making necessitates sharing the changes to the vital organizational stakeholders who include the nursing staff. One of the approaches being used by the organization to share these changes is through shared governance. The shared governance offers a set of guidelines regarding nurses` involvement in making organizational decisions. The nursing staff’s engagement in shared governance has promoted accountability and nurses` participation in the implementation of the new changes about reimbursement. Notably, shared governance has increased the level of nurses` awareness concerning organizational financial goals. This increase is well communicated through having clear financial goals that tend to guide all stakeholders in the organization. Equally, changes regarding reimbursement are being shared with the nursing staff through the development of team-based care. Perse, team-based care puts the nursing staff at the center of healthcare reimbursement to ensure that nurses offer comprehensive and cost-effective care. Subsequently, the establishment of buy-ins is another tactic used to share changes to the nursing staff regarding healthcare reimbursement decisions. The establishment of nursing staff buy-in begins by raising awareness regarding the anticipated change and involves creating a sense of urgency. Adjustments are then communicated to the nursing staff mainly through the nursing leaders who have a high level of influence on the nursing staff. Nurses` opinions are then sought to ensure that implemented changes are based on shared decisions. Nursing leaders need to assess both emotional buy-in and intellectual buy-in among the nursing staff (Kowalski, Cherry, & Yoder-Wise, 2013). Nurses` awareness regarding healthcare financing issues can be improved through varied approaches. First, nursing staff training and development should occur at the organizational level. Through the training, nurses would become knowledgeable regarding healthcare financing and develop essential skills in financial management. Similarly, there is a need to encourage nurses to promote quality improvement that targets offering quality and cost-effective care to their patients. Issues of innovative thinking that reward nurses for showcasing exemplary roles in ineffective financial management to cut down healthcare costs are vital. Besides, there is a need to emphasize on effective healthcare budgeting whereby nurses are empowered to make financial decisions through healthcare budgeting. This emphasis would ensure that nurses put efforts to meet the budgets to prevent financial losses.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Assess the culture of the organization for potential challenges in incorporating the nursing practice intervention Use this assessment

by

nursing capstone 2025

Assess the culture of the organization for potential challenges in incorporating the nursing practice intervention. Use this assessment when creating the strategic plan. Write a 150-250 word strategic plan defining how the nursing practice intervention will be implemented in the capstone project change proposal. APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Students must post one interesting case that he she has seen in the clinical The case should be an unusual

by

Soap note Systemic lupus erythematosus Rubric Attached No Plagiarism (Adults) 2025

Students must post one interesting case that he/she has seen in the clinical The case should be an unusual diagnosis, or a complex case that required in-depth evaluation on the student’s part. The case should be posted in the SOAP format, with references for the patient diagnosis, differential diagnoses (there should be at least 3), and the treatment plan.  In order to receive grade points for SOAP notes, the notes must be approved by the deadlines specified on the course assignments page. The posting does not have to be written in APA format, but should be written with correct spelling and grammar. References should be in APA format. The selected references should reflect current evidence –dated within the past 5 years.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 The purpose of this assignment is to create an educational program that supports the implementation of risk management strategies in

by

Educational Program on Risk Management – Part One: Outline of Topic 2025

The purpose of this assignment is to create an educational program that supports the implementation of risk management strategies in a health care organization. In this assignment, you will develop an outline for an “in‐service”‐style educational risk management program for employees of a particular health care organization that will then form the basis for a PowerPoint presentation in Topic 5. Select your topic for this educational session from one of the proposed recommendations or changes you suggested in the Risk Management Program Analysis – Part One assignment to enhance, improve, or secure compliance standards in your chosen risk management plan example. Create a 500‐word comprehensive outline that communicates the following about your chosen topic: Introduction : Identify the risk management topic you have chosen to address and why it is important within your health care sector. Rationale : Illustrate how this risk management strategy is lacking within your selected organization’s current risk management plan and explain how its implementation will better meet local, state, and federal compliance standards. Support : Provide data that indicate the need for this proposed risk management initiative and demonstrate how it falls under the organization’s legal responsibility to provide a safe health care facility and work environment. Implementation : Describe the steps to implement the proposed strategy in your selected health care organization. Challenges : Predict obstacles the health care organization may face in executing this risk management strategy and propose solutions to navigate or preempt these potentially difficult outcomes. Evaluation : Outline your plan to evaluate the success of the proposed risk management program and how well it meets the organization’s short-term, long-term, and end goals. Opportunities : Recommend additional risk management improvements in adjacent areas of influence that the organization could or should address moving forward. You are required to incorporate all instructor feedback from this assignment into Educational Program on Risk Management Part Two ‐ Slide Presentation assignment in Topic 5. To save time later in the course, consider addressing any feedback soon after this assignment has been graded and returned to you. It may be helpful to preview the requirements for the Topic 5 assignment to ensure that your outline addresses all required elements for submission of the final presentation. You are required to support your statements with a minimum of six citations from appropriate credible sources. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, This assignment uses a rubric . Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion . RUBRIC 1. An introduction is comprehensive. The submission incorporates analysis of supporting evidence as to why increased attention to the proposed risk management strategy is needed and provides specific examples of why it is important within the specified health care sector. Level of detail is appropriate. 2. A rationale is comprehensive. The submission provides specific examples of where the proposed risk management strategy is lacking in the selected plan and provides insightful supporting evidence as to how its implementation will better meet compliance standards. Level of detail is appropriate. 3. Support data are comprehensive. The submission incorporates an analysis of how the data indicate a need for the proposed risk management initiative. Level of detail is appropriate. 4. Implementation strategies are comprehensive. The submission provides specific actionable steps by which the selected health care organization can implement the proposed risk management initiative. Level of detail is appropriate. 5. Possible challenges to the risk management implementation are comprehensive. The submission provides specific relevant examples of solutions for navigating or preempting predicted obstacles. Level of detail is appropriate. 6. Evaluation strategies are comprehensive. The submission provides specific examples of how the evaluation plan will assess alignment with the short-term, long-term, and end goals of the risk management program. Level of detail is appropriate. 7. Additional risk management opportunities are described comprehensively, with detailed support for the recommended changes. Level of detail is appropriate. 8. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 9. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 10. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 11. All format elements are correct. 12. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Research and citations are supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Part two: POWERPOINT Topic: Educational Program on Risk Management Part Two – Slide Presentation The purpose of this assignment is to create an educational risk management presentation. Building upon the outline for an educational session you created in the Educational Program on Risk Management Part One: Outline of Topic 2 assignment, develop a 12-15 slide PowerPoint presentation that expands in greater detail on how and why your organization should implement your proposed risk management strategy. Incorporate any instructor feedback from the Topic 2 assignment into this presentation and include talking points in the speaker notes section of each slide. Keep in mind that the PowerPoint is meant to serve as a visual aide to bolster your presentation and is intended to highlight main ideas and key points. Do not use dense blocks of text or more than 7 bullet points of text per slide. However, you may include supplementary images, graphs, and data where relevant. To successfully complete this assignment, include the following sections as per your outline from Topic 2 from 500 words paper, though you may include any additional sections as needed: Introduction Rationale Support Implementation Challenges Evaluation Opportunities You are required to support your statements with a minimum of six citations from appropriate credible sources. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. RUBRIC 1. Introduction slides are informative and thorough in explaining why increased attention to the proposed risk management strategy is needed. Specific examples are provided where appropriate. 2. Rationale slides are informative and thorough in explaining why the proposed risk management strategy is lacking in the selected plan. Specific examples are provided as to how its implementation will better meet compliance standards. 3. Support data slides are informative and thorough in showing how the data indicate a need for the proposed risk management initiative. Specific examples are provided where appropriate. 4. Implementation slides are informative and thorough in explaining the specific actionable steps by which the selected health care organization can implement the proposed risk management initiative. 5. Challenges slides are informative and thorough in explaining potential obstacles to the risk management implementation. Slides also provide specific examples of solutions for navigating or preempting predicted obstacles. 6. Evaluation strategy slides are informative and thorough in providing specific examples of how the evaluation plan will assess alignment with the short-term, long-term, and end goals of the risk management program. 7. Opportunities slides are informative and thorough in providing additional risk management improvements along with detailed support for the recommended changes. 8. Incorporation of instructor feedback from previous assignment is comprehensive. 9. The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. 10. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. 11. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. 12. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English. 13. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Research and citations are supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. 300 WORDS PAPER TOPIC : Reflective Analysis: Risk Management and the Role of Managed Care The purpose of this assignment is to analyze the role of managed care organizations within health care and risk management programs. Reflect on and evaluate the role that the managed care organization (MCO) plays in today’s health care environment by developing a 300word response that addresses the following: What is a health care organization’s administrative role in executing risk management policies and ensuring compliance with managed care organization (MCO) standards? What value do the regulatory statutes of a typical MCO provide to a health care organization? Consider how strategies pertaining to policies such as conflict resolution and risk management affect patients as well as employees and employers. What MCO responsibilities relevant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) and Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) focus on fraud, waste, and abuse laws? In addition to your textbook, you are required to support your analysis with a minimum of two peer‐reviewed references. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. RUBRIC 1. An assessment of the administrative role of a health care organization in ensuring compliance with MCO risk management standards is comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. 2. An explanation of the value MCO regulatory statutes provide to a health care organization is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. 3. A description of the MCO responsibilities relative to the ACA and CMS focus on fraud, waste, and abuse laws are comprehensive. The submission further incorporates the analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. The level of detail is appropriate. 4. The thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. The thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 5. A clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 6. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 7. All format elements are correct. 8. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Sister Mary is a patient in Level 2 Emergency Department She must have a neural examination physical assessment

by

Ideal Course of Patient Education 2025

Sister Mary is a patient in Level 2 Emergency Department. She must have a neural examination, physical assessment, radiographs of her facial bones, and a computed tomography scan of the head. Taking into consideration that she is a Roman Catholic nun, what would be the ideal course of patient education as this woman progresses from department to department?

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Develop a training plan for one of the role groups in the organization that will be responsible for implementing practice

by

Training Session for Policy Implementation 2025

Develop a training plan for one of the role groups in the organization that will be responsible for implementing practice guidelines under the new organizational policy you presented in Assessment 3. Prepare an agenda for a two-hour workshop, and summarize your strategies for working with this group, the expected outcomes of the training, and why you chose this group to pilot the change. Introduction Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented. Training and educating those within an organization who will be responsible for implementing and working with changes in organizational policy is a critical step in ensuring that prescribed changes have their intended benefit. A leader in a health care profession needs to be able to apply effective leadership, management, and educational strategies to ensure that colleagues and subordinates will be prepared to do the work that is asked of them. As a master’s-level health care practitioner, you may be asked to design training sessions to help ensure the smooth implementation of any number of initiatives in your health care setting. The ability to create an agenda that will ensure your training goals will be met, and will fit into the time you are allotted, is a valuable skill for preparing colleagues to be successful in their practice. This assessment offers you an opportunity to develop and implement such strategies. Demonstration of Proficiency By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 2: Analyze relevant health care laws and regulations and their applications and effects on processes within a health care team or organization. Explain an institutional policy or practice guidelines that will be implemented. Competency 3: Lead the development and implementation of ethical and culturally sensitive policies that improve health outcomes for individuals, organizations, and populations. Justify the importance of an institutional policy or practice guidelines to improve the quality of care or outcomes related to a specific group. Develop materials that support learning and skill development to enable a group to be successful in applying a policy or practice guidelines to its work. Competency 5: Develop strategies to work collaboratively with policy makers, stakeholders, and colleagues to address environmental (governmental and regulatory) forces. Develop strategies for engaging with a specific group to ensure buy in, support, and preparedness to implement changes in policy and practice guidelines. Advocate for the importance of the role a specific group will play in implementing changes in policy and practice guidelines. Competency 6: Apply various methods of communicating with policy makers, stakeholders, colleagues, and patients to ensure that communication in a given situation is professional, clear, efficient, and effective. Interpret complex policy considerations or practice guidelines for a specific group with respect and clarity. Write clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Preparation Your policy proposal presentation secured buy in and support from the stakeholder group you addressed. They are enthusiastic about implementing your proposed policy and practice guidelines. In an effort to help ensure a smooth rollout and implementation of your proposal, senior leaders have asked you to create and lead a training session for one of the role groups in the organization that will be responsible for enacting the new policy and practices. In addition, senior leaders have asked you to develop and submit a training plan for review and approval before conducting the requested training session. They have also requested that you cite 2–4 credible sources that support your proposed training strategies, your intended approach to generating buy in and support from the group, and your plans for working with the group to facilitate implementation of the policy and practice changes. As outcomes of this training session, participants are expected to: Understand the organizational policy and practice guidelines to be implemented. Understand the importance of the policy to improving health care quality or outcomes. Understand that, as a group, they are key to successful implementation. Possess the necessary knowledge and skills for successful implementation. It may also be useful to have worked through the Organizational Ethics Decision-Making Process in Health Care | Transcript activity. It may give you some ideas about strategies for ensuring your policy and implementation ideas are incorporating ethical considerations. You may also find it useful to have checked your knowledge in the Training Session Best Practices activity before completing your assessment. Instructions Before conducting your training session, you have been asked to submit two items: The first is a brief summary that lays out your strategies for working with your chosen trainee group, how this training session will help prepare that group to succeed in implementing your proposed institutional policy and practice guidelines, and why you chose this group to pilot your proposal. The second is an annotated agenda and training plan for a two-hour workshop for your chosen group. Part 1: Brief of Strategies For this part, create an approximately 1 page brief that lays out the strategies you will employ throughout the training session to ensure your audience’s buy in and preparedness. Your brief should address the following: Develop strategies for engaging with the selected role group to ensure the group’s buy in, support, and preparedness to implement the changes in policy and practice guidelines. In a brief summary: Describe your evidence-based strategies for engaging with the group during the training session. Explain how you will ensure the group’s buy in, support, and preparedness. Explain why you chose this group to pilot your proposal. Part 2: Training Agenda For this part you develop an annotated training agenda for your chosen target group. This agenda should layout the activities and information that will be delivered over a two-hour session. It should also include notes regarding best practices, literature support, or other important justifications for specific training strategies and the likelihood of achieving desired outcomes. Your training agenda should address: Identify the training activities and materials needed support learning and skill development and to prepare the group to successfully apply the new policy or practice guidelines to their work. Create an annotated agenda and outline for a two-hour training workshop. Explain how each proposed activity and individual item of training material in your workshop will support learning and skill development. Describe the policy and practice guidelines changes to be implemented. How will these changes affect the group’s daily work routines and responsibilities? What examples, activities, or materials could you provide to help illustrate or clarify the nature and scope of the changes in policy and practice guidelines? Justify the importance of the changes in policy or practice guidelines to improving the quality of care or outcomes that are related to this role group. Why are these changes important? How will these changes help improve the quality of care or outcomes? How could you help to illustrate the importance of improved quality of care or outcomes for the role group you will be training? Advocate for the importance of the role the group will play in implementing the changes in policy and practice guidelines. Why is the group’s buy in and support important in implementing the changes? Why is this group’s work important in implementing the changes? How could you help the group feel empowered by their involvement in implementing the changes? Interpret complex policy considerations or practice guidelines for the role group with respect and clarity. Does your training plan clearly lay out the expected outcomes of training for this role group? Address Throughout Assessment Please be sure to address the following scoring guide criteria related to the quality and format of you communication throughout your assessment: Communicate your strategies for engaging and training the role group in a professional and persuasive manner. Write clearly and logically, using correct grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. Integrate relevant sources to support your arguments, correctly formatting source citations and references using current APA style. Did you cite an additional 2–4 credible sources to support your strategies for engaging and training the role group? Additional Requirements Length of submission : 2–5 double-spaced, typed pages. Your brief and agenda should be succinct yet substantive. Please include a title page and a reference list in addition to your 2–5 page submission. Please ensure that your submission clearly identifies your Brief of Strategies and your Training Agenda. Number of references : Cite a minimum of 2–4 sources of scholarly, professional, or policy evidence to support your plans and strategies. APA formatting : Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style. You may wish to refer to the following APA resources to help with your structure, formatting, and style: APA Style and Format . APA Paper Tutorial . APA Paper Templa Grading Rubric 1. Develop strategies for working with a specific group to ensure buy in and preparedness to implement a policy and apply practice guidelines. Passing Grade: Develops strategies for working with a specific group to ensure buy in and preparedness to implement a policy and apply practice guidelines; suggests early indicators to measure success of strategies. 2. Explain an institutional policy or practice guidelines that will be implemented. Passing Grade: Explains an institutional policy or practice guidelines that will be implemented; anticipates and addresses possible objections that might be raised by the specific group. 3. Justify the importance of an institutional policy or practice guidelines to improve the quality of care or outcomes that are related to a specific group Passing Grade: Justifies the importance an institutional policy or practice guidelines to improve the quality of care or outcomes that are related to a specific group, and includes details that will appeal to the specific group. 4. Advocate for the importance of the role a group will play in implementing an institutional policy or practice guidelines. Passing Grade: Advocates for the importance of the role a group will play in implementing an institutional policy or practice guidelines, and suggests a future vision highlighting the positive contribution of the group. 5. Develop materials that support learning and skill development to enable a group to be successful in applying a policy or practice guidelines to its work. Passing Grade: Develops materials that support learning and skill development to enable a group to be successful in applying a policy or practice guidelines to its work, showing insight to the work of the role group and the needed changes. 6. Interpret complex policy considerations or practice guidelines for a specific audience with respect and clarity. Passing Grade: Interprets complex policy considerations or practice guidelines for a specific audience with respect and clarity; identifies assumptions on which the proposed changes are based. 7. Write content clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Passing Grade: Writes content clearly, logically, and persuasively; grammar, punctuation, and spelling are without errors. 8. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Passing Grade: Integrates relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Citations are free from all errors.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Draft a 6 page report on outcome measures issues and opportunities for the executive

by

Outcome Measures, Issues, and Opportunities 2025

Draft a 6-page report on outcome measures, issues, and opportunities for the executive leadership team or applicable stakeholder group. Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented. SHOW LESS As a nurse leader, you may be called upon to submit a detailed report to your executive leadership team and key stakeholders that describes a quality or safety problem and its effects on outcomes, fully supported by relevant and credible data. This assessment provides an opportunity to draft such a report in which you can call attention to quality and safety issues and opportunities, effectively support your position, and lay out a plan for change. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Analyze quality and safety outcomes from an administrative and systems perspective. Identify typical quality and safety outcomes and their associated measures. Competency 3: Determine how specific organizational functions, policies, processes, procedures, norms, and behaviors can be used to build reliability and high-performing organizations. Analyze organizational functions, processes, and behaviors in high-performing organizations. Determine how organizational functions, processes, and behaviors support and affect outcome measures for an organization. Identify performance issues or opportunities associated with particular organizational functions, processes, and behaviors and the quality and safety outcomes they affect. Competency 4: Synthesize the various aspects of the nurse leader’s role in developing, promoting, and sustaining a culture of quality and safety. Outline a strategy for ensuring that all aspects of patient care are measured and that knowledge is shared with the staff. Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards. Write coherently and with purpose, for a specific audience, using correct grammar and mechanics. Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style. Questions to Consider As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment. Organizational functions, processes, and behaviors can include leadership practices, communications, quality processes, financial management, safety and risk management, interprofessional collaboration, strategic planning, using the best available evidence, and questioning the status quo on all levels. What are some examples of organizational functions, processes, and behaviors related to the outcome measures and performance issues discussed in your executive summary? How would you implement change in addressing particular issues and opportunities? In what ways do stakeholders support outcome success? Assessment Instructions This assessment is based on the executive summary you prepared in the previous assessment. Preparation Your executive summary captured the attention and interest of the executive leadership team, who have asked you to provide them with a detailed report addressing outcome measures and performance issues or opportunities, including a strategy for ensuring that all aspects of patient care are measured. Note: Remember that you can submit all or a portion of your draft report to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service. Requirements Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Outcome Measures, Issues, and Opportunities Scoring Guide. Be sure that your written analysis addresses each point, at a minimum. You may also want to read the Outcome Measures, Issues, and Opportunities Scoring Guide and Guiding Questions: Outcome Measures, Issues, and Opportunities (linked in the Resources) to better understand how each criterion will be assessed. Drafting the Report Analyze organizational functions, processes, and behaviors in high-performing health care organizations or practice settings. Determine how organizational functions, processes, and behaviors affect outcome measures associated with the systemic problem identified in your gap analysis. Identify the quality and safety outcomes and associated measures relevant to the performance gap you intend to close. Create a spreadsheet showing the outcome measures. Identify performance issues or opportunities associated with particular organizational functions, processes, and behaviors and the quality and safety outcomes they affect. Outline a strategy, using a selected change model, for ensuring that all aspects of patient care are measured and that knowledge is shared with the staff. Writing and Supporting Evidence Write coherently and with purpose, for a specific audience, using correct grammar and mechanics. Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style. Additional Requirements Format your document using APA style. Use the APA paper template linked in the resources. Be sure to include: A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required. A running head on all pages. Appropriate section headings. Properly-formatted citations and references. Your report should be 6 pages in length, not including the title page and reference page. Add your Quality and Safety Outcomes spreadsheet to your report as an addendum. Grading Rubric: 1- Analyze organizational functions, processes, and behaviors in high-performing organizations. Passing Grade: Analyzes organizational functions, processes, and behaviors in high-performing organizations, and identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty (where further information could improve the analysis). 2- Determine how organizational functions, processes, and behaviors support and affect outcome measures for an organization. Passing Grade: Determines how organizational functions, processes, and behaviors support and affect outcome measures for an organization, and identifies assumptions and reasons on which determination is based. 3- Identify typical quality and safety outcomes and their associated measures. Passing Grade: Identifies typical quality and safety outcomes and their associated measures, and evaluates the quality of the data. 4- Identify performance issues or opportunities associated with particular organizational functions, processes, and behaviors and the quality and safety outcomes they affect. Passing Grade: Identifies performance issues or opportunities associated with particular organizational functions, processes, and behaviors and the quality and safety outcomes they affect, and identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty. 5- Outline a strategy for ensuring that all aspects of patient care are measured and that knowledge is shared with the staff. Passing Grade: Outlines a strategy, using a selected change model, for ensuring that all aspects of patient care are measured and that knowledge is shared with the staff, highlighting opportunities for interprofessional collaboration. 6- Write coherently and with purpose, for a specific audience, using correct grammar and mechanics. Passing Grade: Writes coherently and with purpose. Grammar and mechanics are error-free. 7- Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style. Passing Grade: Integrates relevant, credible, and convincing sources of evidence to support assertions. Sources are current, and citations and references are error-free.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 TOPIC Comprehensive Assessment Part One Competency Matrix The DNP comprehensive assessment provides learners

by

DNP- LEADERSHIP FOR ADVANCED NURSING PRACTICE 2025

TOPIC: Comprehensive Assessment Part One: Competency Matrix The DNP comprehensive assessment provides learners the opportunity to demonstrate their achievement of core and specialty DNP competencies. It is also an appraisal of learners’ ability to integrate and synthesize knowledge within the context of their scholarly and practice interests and their readiness to complete the DPI project. The two-part comprehensive assessment includes evaluation of work completed throughout the program and a final synthesis and self-reflection demonstrating achievement of programmatic outcomes. In Part One of the assessment, learners are required to collect and review coursework deliverables and practice immersion hours completed in the program thus far. In Part Two, learners will be required to synthesize and reflect on their learning and prioritize work for their DPI project. General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: Use the DNP-840 MODULE 4 ASSIGNMENT “Comprehensive Assessment Part One: Competency Matrix” to complete the Assignment (ATTACHED) Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. Directions: To complete Part One of the DNP Comprehensive Assessment: Use the “Comprehensive Assessment Part One: Competency Matrix” to collect evidence from your completed program coursework to demonstrate how you have met selected competencies of the DNP program. Coursework to review includes: Programmatic Coursework: Reflective Journals Case Reports Scholarly Activities (DNP 810, DNP-820, DNP-830, and DNP-840) 10 Strategic Points (DNP-820) DPI Project Draft Prospectus (DNP-830) Literature Review (DNP-830) Course-based assignments from prior courses (DNP-805 through DNP-840) eligible for Practice Immersion Hours. As you complete the matrix, be sure to select key, specific evidence from your coursework and briefly summarize (no more than 1-2 sentences) how selected assignments demonstrate your achievement of program competencies. As you review your work, take time to review your instructor feedback regarding areas that may have been weak or lacking, or where points were not fully addressed or supported in your submission. You will need this information for a discussion question in Topic 4. Your completed matrix will provide you with a “road map” to focus and direct you in the completion of Comprehensive Assessment Part Two. Before you begin Part Two, take time to note any “blank spaces” in the matrix; these spaces indicate competencies left unmet by your coursework to-date. You will need this information for a discussion question in Topic 4 as well. Resources Nurses Making Policy: From Bedside to Boardroom Read chapters 1 and 2. URL: http://gcumedia.com/digital-resources/springer-publishing-company/2014/nurses-making-policy_from-bedside-to-boardroom-custom_ebook_1e.php Camargo Jr., K., & Grant, R. (2015). Public health, science, and policy debate: Being right is not enough. American Journal of Public Health, 105 (2), 232-235. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302241 URL: https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ofs&AN=100375771&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 See attachment document with complete instructions THIS DISCUSSION IS DIVIDE IN TWO PARTS

by

Discussion week 7 2025

** See attachment document with complete instructions** **THIS DISCUSSION IS DIVIDE IN TWO PARTS – 1. MAIN DISCUSSION POST BY TUESDAY 01/12/2021 BEFORE 8:00 PM EST 2. TWO REPLIES BY FRIDAY 01/15/2021 BEFORE 8:00 PM EST Discussion: Evidence Base in Design When politics and medical science intersect, there can be much debate. Sometimes anecdotes or hearsay are misused as evidence to support a particular point. Despite these and other challenges, however, evidence-based approaches are increasingly used to inform health policy decision-making regarding causes of disease, intervention strategies, and issues impacting society. One example is the introduction of childhood vaccinations and the use of evidence-based arguments surrounding their safety. In this Discussion, you will identify a recently proposed health policy and share your analysis of the evidence in support of this policy.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 ABDOMINAL ASSESSMENT Subjective CC My stomach hurts I have diarrhea and nothing seems

by

Episodic Note Case Study 2025

ABDOMINAL ASSESSMENT Subjective: CC: “My stomach hurts, I have diarrhea and nothing seems to help.” HPI: MT, 45 yo WM, complains of having generalized abdominal pain that started 3 days ago. He has not taken any medications because he did not know what to take. He states the pain is a 5/10 today but has been as much as 9/10 when it first started. He has been able to eat, with some nausea afterwards. PMH: HTN, Diabetes, hx of GI bleed 4 years ago Medications: Lisinopril 10mg, Amlodipine 5 mg, Metformin 1000mg, Lantus 10 units phs Allergies: NKDA FH: No hx of colon cancer, Father hx DMT2, HTN, Mother hx HTN, Hyperlipidemia, GERD Social: Denies tobacco use; occasional etoh, married, 3 children (1 girl, 2 boys) Objective: VS: Temp 99.8; BP 160/86; RR 16; P 92; HT 5’10”; WT 248lbs Heart: RRR, no murmurs Lungs: CTA, chest wall symmetrical Skin: Intact without lesions, no urticaria Abd: soft, hyperactive bowel sounds, pos pain in the LLQ Diagnostics: None Assessment: Left lower quadrant pain Gastroenteritis Directions for assignment ( all aspects of instructions to be included). 1. Analyze the subjective portion of the note. 2. List additional information that should be included in the documentation. 3. Analyze the objective portion of the note. 4. List additional information that should be included in the documentation. 5. Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or why not? 6. What diagnostic tests would be appropriate for this case, and how would the results be used to make a diagnosis? 7. Would you reject/accept the current diagnosis? Why or why not ? Identify five possible conditions that may be considered as a differential diagnosis for this patient. 8. Explain your reasoning using at least four different references from current evidence-based literature. 9. Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025