2025 Assignment Details For this assignment you will be given a case study about a young lady named Sarah Smith

by

Case Study 2025

Assignment Details For this assignment you will be given a case study about a young lady named Sarah Smith. Review the information provided and answer the questions following. Be sure to cite your references. Look at Sarah as if she is a patient in your office seeking care. What are your immediate concerns? What needs to be done for her? Be thorough and succinct in your responses. Case Study: Sarah Smith is a 28 y/o African American female who presents to the office with c/o wound to her left foot for the past few days. States she had tripped and fell while barefoot scraping the top of her foot on the pavement. She denies any other injury from the incident. Over the past 24 hours the wound has had “smelly” drainage. Has been experiencing generalized achiness, but denies fever and chills. Did not seek medical attention at the time of injury. Has been using hydrogen peroxide to clean her wound. Is unclear of her last tetanus vaccination. Patient PMHx significant for DM II. States that she takes her medications when she remembers, and does not always check her blood sugar. PMHx: Asthma: no hospitalizations for exacerbation. DM II PSHx: Denies SHx: Former tobacco user: ceased smoking 2 years ago. Had smoked 1ppd x 5 years ETOH: socially Illicit drugs: denies FHx: Significant for paternal DM, otherwise unremarkable Medications: Metformin: 500mg BID po – did not take the last few days Albuterol MDI: 2 puffs every 6 hours prn – last use just PTA Singulair: 10mg po daily Trinessa: 1 tab po daily – last taken this am Allergies: PCN: hives LNMP: 2 weeks ago. G0p0 ROS: General: denies any weight changes, fatigue or fever; + body aches Skin: denies any rashes; + wound to left foot HEENT: denies headache, head injury, dizziness, lightheadedness; Denies any vision changes Denies any hearing changes, tinnitus, vertigo, earache Denies any nasal congestion, discharge, nose bleeds or sinus tenderness Denies any sore throat, difficulty swallowing Neck: denies any swollen glands, pain Breasts: denies any pain, discharge Respiratory: denies any dyspnea; positive cough and wheezing CV: denies any chest pain, edema GI: denies any nausea/vomiting/diarrhea/constipation; denies bloody stools PV: denies claudication, swelling to LE GU: denies frequency, urgency, burning; Denies vaginal discharge, itching, sores Denies penile discharge, itching or sores MS: positive pain to left foot Psych: denies nervousness, depression Neuro: denies Headache, dizziness, vertigo, syncope, weakness; + numbness to right LE Heme: denies any easy bruising Physical Exam: Vital signs: 100.5 (tympanic), 162/88, 118, 22, O2 sat 95% on RA Height: 5’5” Weight: 250 lbs. Blood glucose: 230 (Fasting; states has not eaten yet today) patient awake, alert, oriented x 4 in NAD Skin: warm, dry, color WNL. 4 cm lesion noted to anterior left foot with crusting and purulent drng; + surrounding erythema extending up 7 cm proximally HEENT: head nontraumatic, normocephalic Pupils PERRLA, EOMs intact; disc margins sharp, without hemorrhages, exudates; no AV nicking noted Ears: bilateral TM with good cone of light and intact Nose: mucosa pink, septum midline; no sinus tenderness appreciated Mouth: mucosa pink, moist; tongue midline; tonsils 1+ without exudate Neck: supple; trachea midline; no LAD Resp: regular and unlabored; lungs with end expiratory wheezing throughout CV: RRR, S1 and S2 noted; no s3, s4 or murmur appreciated Abdomen: soft, non-distended; Bs + x 4; no tenderness with palpation; no CVA tenderness with percussion Genitalia: deferred Rectal: deferred Extremities: warm and without edema; calves supple, non-tender PV: no LE edema MS: + swelling to left foot; + tenderness of 2-4th left metatarsals; + left pedal pulse; CMS intact; Cap refill < 2 sec. Neuro: alert, cooperative; thought coherent; oriented x 4; cranial nerves II-XII intact Questions: 1. List your differentials for her current problems. Remember you should have at least three different differentials for each problem. Include rationale for each differential. 2. At this time what medical diagnoses are you most concerned about? Do they impact other diagnoses? If so, how? 3. What diagnostic images would you order? Provide your rationale. What are you trying to rule in or out? 4. What laboratory work would you order? What would you anticipate to be abnormal? Provide your rationale for each. 5. What is your comprehensive plan of care? Include your rationales. To view the Grading Rubric for this Assignment, please visit the Grading Rubrics section of the Course Resources. Assignment Requirements Before finalizing your work, you should: be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above) consult the Grading Rubric to make sure you have included everything necessary; and utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors. Your writing Assignment should: follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.); be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful; display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Health Organization Evaluation Research a health care organization or network that spans several states with in the United States United

by

Health Organization Evaluation 2025

Health Organization Evaluation Research a health care organization or network that spans several states with in the United States (United Healthcare, Vanguard, Banner Health, etc.). Assess the readiness of the health care organization or network you chose in regard to meeting the health care needs of citizens in the next decade. Prepare a 1,000-1,250 word paper that presents your assessment and proposes a strategic plan to ensure readiness. Include the following: Describe the health care organization or network. Describe the organization’s overall readiness based on your findings. Prepare a strategic plan to address issues pertaining to network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction. Identify any current or potential issues within the organizational culture and discuss how these issues may affect aspects of the strategic plan. Propose a theory or model that could be used to support implementation of the strategic plan for this organization. Explain why this theory or model is best. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. RUBRIC Attempt Start Date: 26-Aug-2019 at 12:00:00 AM Due Date: 01-Sep-2019 at 11:59:59 PM Maximum Points: 180.0 Health Organization Evaluation No of Criteria: 10 Achievement Levels: 5 CriteriaAchievement LevelsDescriptionPercentageUnsatisfactory0.00 %Less Than Satisfactory65.00 %Satisfactory75.00 %Good85.00 %Excellent100.00 %Content80.0 Health Care Organization or Network15.0Health care organization or network is not described.Health care organization or network is partially presented. There are significant omissions and inaccuracies.Health care organization or network is summarized. Some information is needed. There are minor inaccuracies related to the representation of the organization or network.Health care organization or network is described. Some detail is needed for clarity.Health care organization or network is clearly and accurately described.Assessment of Overall Organizational Readiness15.0Assessment of overall organizational readiness is omitted.Assessment of overall organizational readiness is partially presented. There are significant omissions. Degree of organizational readiness is not established.Assessment of overall organizational readiness is summarized. Degree of organizational readiness is partially established. More information, rationale, and support are needed.Assessment of overall organizational readiness is described. Degree of organizational readiness is generally established. Some evidence or rationale is needed for support.Assessment of overall organizational readiness is described in detail. Degree of organizational readiness is established. Strong evidence and rationale support the assessment.Strategic Plan20.0Strategic plan is omitted.Strategic plan is partially presented. Plan contains major omissions. The plan fails to address issues outlined in the assignment criteria.The strategic plan generally addresses network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction. More information, rationale, and support are needed.The strategic plan addresses network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction. Some evidence or rationale is needed for support.The strategic plan is well developed. Network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction are addressed in detail. The plan is supported with strong evidence and rationale.Identification of Current or Potential Issues in Organizational Culture and Impact of These to Strategic Plan15.0Current or potential issues in the organizational culture and the impact of these to strategic plan are omitted.Current or potential issues in the organizational culture are partially summarized. The potential impact of these on the strategic plan is unclear. There are omissions and inaccuracies throughout.Current or potential issues in the organizational culture are generally discussed. The impact of these on the strategic plan is summarized. Evidence and rationale are needed to support claims.Current or potential issues in the organizational culture and the potential impact of these on the strategic plan are discussed. Some evidence or rationale is needed.Current or potential issues in the organizational culture are clearly identified. The potential impact of these on the strategic plan is thoroughly described and supported with evidence and rationale.Theory or Model to Support Implementation of Strategic Plan15.0Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is omitted.Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is partially described. It is unclear how the theory or model would support implementation of strategic plan for the organization.Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is proposed. The theory or model demonstrates some support for implementation of the strategic plan for the organization. It is unclear why this theory or model is the best choice. More information is needed.Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is proposed. The theory or model demonstrates support for implementation of the strategic plan for the organization. General rationale is provided for why the theory or model is the best choice.Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is proposed. The theory or model demonstrates strong support for implementation of the strategic plan for the organization. Compelling rationale supports why the theory or model is the best choice. Organization, Effectiveness, and Format20.0 Thesis Development and Purpose5.0Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.Argument Logic and Construction5.0Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5.0Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)2.0Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)3.0Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Total Percentage 100

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Croke E 2006 Nursing malpractice determining liability elements for negligent acts Journal of Legal Nurse Consulting

by

Week 4 Article Summary and Review Essay Ethics 2025

Croke, E. (2006). Nursing malpractice: determining liability elements for negligent acts. Journal of Legal Nurse Consulting, 17(3), 3. Link: Nursing malpractice: determining liability elements for negligent acts (PDF format attached here) Essay Prompt: Identify primary problems that led to the malpractice suits (Croke, 2006), and identify the role the nurse played and what the nurse did wrong. Your 1-2 page paper should include adhere to APA formatting and references/ citations for the article. Additional sources are optional.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 For this assignment you will analyze an Episodic note case study that describes abnormal findings in patients seen in

by

Special Examinations—Breast, Genital, Prostate, and Rectal GENITALIA ASSESSMENT 2025

For this assignment, you will analyze an Episodic note case study that describes abnormal findings in patients seen in a clinical setting. You will consider what history should be collected from the patients, as well as which physical exams and diagnostic tests should be conducted. You will also formulate at least 5 differential diagnosis with several possible conditions. Please remember to pretend that this is an actual patient and gives as much detail as possible! CASE STUDY: Subjective: • CC: “I have bumps on my bottom that I want to have checked out.” • HPI: AB, a 21-year-old WF college student reports to your clinic with external bumps on her genital area. She states the bumps are painless and feel rough. She states she is sexually active and has had more than one partner during the past year. Her initial sexual contact occurred at age 18. She reports no abnormal vaginal discharge. She is unsure how long the bumps have been there but noticed them about a week ago. Her last Pap smear exam was 3 years ago, and no dysplasia was found; the exam results were normal. She reports one sexually transmitted infection (chlamydia) about 2 years ago. She completed the treatment for chlamydia as prescribed. • PMH: Asthma •Medications: Symbicort 160/4.5mcg •Allergies: NKDA •FH: No hx of breast or cervical cancer, Father hx HTN, Mother hx HTN, GERD •Social: Denies tobacco use; occasional etoh, married, 3 children (1 girl, 2 boys) Objective: • VS: Temp 98.6; BP 120/86; RR 16; P 92; HT 5’10”; WT 169lbs •Heart: RRR, no murmurs • Lungs: CTA, chest wall symmetrical • Genital: Normal female hair pattern distribution; no masses or swelling. Urethral meatus intact without erythema or discharge. Perineum intact. Vaginal mucosa pink and moist with rugae present, pos for firm, round, small, painless ulcer noted on external labia • Abd: soft, normoactive bowel sounds, neg rebound, neg murphy’s, negMcBurney •Diagnostics: HSV specimen obtained Assessment: • Chancre REQUIRED READINGS Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2019). Seidel’s guide to physical examination: An interprofessional approach (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby. · Chapter 17, “Breasts and Axillae” This chapter focuses on examining the breasts and axillae. The authors describe the examination procedures and the anatomy and physiology of breasts. · Chapter 19, “Female Genitalia” In this chapter, the authors explain how to conduct an examination of female genitalia. The chapter also describes the form and function of female genitalia. · Chapter 20, “Male Genitalia” The authors explain the biology of the penis, testicles, epididymides, scrotum, prostate gland, and seminal vesicles. Additionally, the chapter explains how to perform an exam of these areas. · Chapter 21, “Anus, Rectum, and Prostate” This chapter focuses on performing an exam of the anus, rectum, and prostate. The authors also explain the anatomy and physiology of the anus, rectum, and prostate. Dains, J. E., Baumann, L. C., & Scheibel, P. (2019). Advanced health assessment and clinical diagnosis in primary care (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby. Credit Line: Advanced Health Assessment and Clinical Diagnosis in Primary Care, 6th Edition by Dains, J.E., Baumann, L. C., & Scheibel, P. Copyright 2019 by Mosby. Reprinted by permission of Mosby via the Copyright Clearance Center. Chapter 5, “Amenorrhea” Amenorrhea, or the absence of menstruation, is the focus of this chapter. The authors include key questions to ask patients when taking histories and explain what to look for in the physical exam. Chapter 6, “Breast Lumps and Nipple Discharge” This chapter focuses on the important topic of breast lumps and nipple discharge. Because breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in women, it is important to get an accurate diagnosis. Information in the chapter includes key questions to ask and what to look for in the physical exam. Chapter 7, “Breast Pain” Determining the cause of breast pain can be difficult. This chapter examines how to determine the likely cause of the pain through diagnostic tests, physical examination, and careful analysis of a patient’s health history. Chapter 27, “Penile Discharge” The focus of this chapter is on how to diagnose the causes of penile discharge. The authors include specific questions to ask when gathering a patient’s history to narrow down the likely diagnosis. They also give advice on performing a focused physical exam. Chapter 36, “Vaginal Bleeding” In this chapter, the causes of vaginal bleeding are explored. The authors focus on symptoms outside the regular menstrual cycle. The authors discuss key questions to ask the patient as well as specific physical examination procedures and laboratory studies that may be useful in reaching a diagnosis. Chapter 37, “Vaginal Discharge and Itching” This chapter examines the process of identifying causes of vaginal discharge and itching. The authors include questions on the characteristics of the discharge, the possibility of the issues being the result of a sexually transmitted infection, and how often the discharge occurs. A chart highlights potential diagnoses based on patient history, physical findings, and diagnostic studies. Sullivan, D. D. (2019). Guide to clinical documentation (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis. · Chapter 3, “SOAP Notes” (Previously read in Week 8) Cucci, E., Santoro, A., DiGesu, C., DiCerce, R., & Sallustio, G. (2015). Sclerosing adenosis of the breast: Report of two cases and review of the literature. Polish Journal of Radiology, 80 , 122–127. doi:10.12659/PJR.892706. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4356184/ Sabbagh , C., Mauvis, F., Vecten, A., Ainseba, N., Cosse, C., Diouf, M., & Regimbeau, J. M. (2014). What is the best position for analyzing the lower and middle rectum and sphincter function in a digital rectal examination? A randomized, controlled study in men. Digestive and Liver Disease, 46 (12), 1082–1085. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2014.08.045 Westhoff , C. L., Jones, H. E., & Guiahi, M. (2011). Do new guidelines and technology make the routine pelvic examination obsolete? Journal of Women’s Health, 20 (1), 5–10. This article describes the benefits of new technology and guidelines for pelvic exams. The authors also detail which guidelines and technology may become obsolete. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/std/# This section of the CDC website provides a range of information on sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). The website includes reports on STDs, related projects and initiatives, treatment information, and program tools.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Assignment Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 3 Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics

by

Academic Success and Professional Development Plan 2025

Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 3: Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics Nurse-scholars have a significant obligation to their community as well. Their work must have academic and professional integrity. Their efforts are designed to add to the body of knowledge, advance the profession, and ultimately help in the care of patients. Work that lacks integrity is subject to quickly erode…or worse. Fortunately, there are strategies and tools that can help ensure integrity in academic and professional work. This Assignments asks you to consider these and how you might apply them to your own work. In this Assignment you will continue developing your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan by appending the original document you began in the previous assignment. To Prepare: · Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources for this week in support of academic style, integrity, and scholarly ethics. · Also reflect on the connection between academic and professional integrity. The Assignment: Part 3, Section 1: Writing Sample: The Connection Between Academic and Professional Integrity Using the Academic and Professional Success Development Template you began in Week 1 and continued working on in Week 2, write a 2- 3-paragraph analysis that includes the following: · Clearly and accurately explains in detail the relationship between academic integrity and writing. · Clearly and accurately explains in detail the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics. · Accurately cite at least 2 resources that fully support your arguments, being sure to use proper APA formatting. · Use Grammarly and SafeAssign to improve the product.y Clearly and accurately describe in detail how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity. Include sufficient evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were utilized to improve responses. Part 3, Section 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work Expand on your thoughts from Section 1 by: · Clearly identifying and accurately describing strategies you intend to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of your 1) academic work while a student of the MSN program, and 2) professional work as a nurse throughout your career. · Include a clearly developed review of resources and approaches you propose to use as a student and a professional. Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout. Name: NURS_6002_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric · Grid View · List View Excellent Good Fair Poor Part 1: Writing Sample: The Connection Between Academic and  Professional Integrity Using the Academic and Professional Success  Development Template you began, write a 2-3 paragraph analysis that includes  the following: ·  Explanation for the relationship between  academic integrity and writing. ·  Explanation for the relationship between  professional practices and scholarly ethics. ·  Cite at least 2 resources that support your  arguments, being sure to use proper APA formatting. ·  Use Grammarly and SafeAssign to improve the  product. Include sufficient evidence that these tools were utilized in  explanation on how these tools contribute to academic integrity. 32 (32%) – 35 (35%) The response clearly  and accurately explains in detail the relationship between academic integrity  and writing. The response clearly and accurately explains in detail the relationship  between professional practices and scholarly ethics. The response accurately cites at least two resources that fully support the  arguments explained. The response clearly and accurately describes in detail how Grammarly,  SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including  sufficient evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the  responses provided. 28 (28%) – 31 (31%) The response  partially explains the relationship between academic integrity and writing.  The response partially explains the relationship between professional  practices and scholarly ethics. The response partially cites at least two resources that partially support  the arguments explained. The response partially describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing  contributes to academic integrity, including some evidence that Grammarly and  SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided. 25 (25%) – 27 (27%) The response vaguely  explains the relationship between academic integrity and writing. The response vaguely explains the relationship between professional practices  and scholarly ethics. The response vaguely or inaccurately cites at least two resources that  vaguely support the arguments explained. The response vaguely or inaccurately describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and  paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including vague evidence that  Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided. 0 (0%) – 24 (24%) The response  explaining the relationship between academic integrity and writing is vague  and inaccurate, or is missing. The response explaining the relationship between professional practices and  scholarly ethics is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The response inaccurately cites at least two resources that inaccurately  support the arguments explained, or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign,  and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including no evidence  that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided. Part 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work Expand on your thoughts from Part 1 by: ·  Identifying and describing strategies you intend  to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of your 1) academic work while a  student of the MSN program, and 2) professional work as a nurse throughout  your career. Include a review of resources and approaches you propose to use  as a student and a professional. 45 (45%) – 50 (50%) The response clearly  identifies and accurately describes in detail strategies intended to pursue  to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program  and in professional work as a nurse. The response clearly reviews and accurately proposes in detail resources and  approaches to use as a student and professional. 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) The response  partially identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain  integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in  professional work as a nurse. The response partially reviews and proposes resources and approaches to use  as a student and professional. 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) The response vaguely  identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity  and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work  as a nurse. The response inaccurately reviews and vaguely proposes resources and  approaches to use as a student and professional. 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) The response vaguely  and inaccurately identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to  maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and  in professional work as a nurse, or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately reviews and vaguely proposes resources  and approaches to use as a student and professional, or is missing. Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and  Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed  ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are  carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.  A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided  which delineates all required criteria. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and  sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is  provided which delineates all required criteria. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and  sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of  the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is  brief and not descriptive. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and  sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79%  of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off  topic. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and  sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60%  of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct  grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2)  grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several  (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5)  grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s  understanding. Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings,  font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers,  parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA  format with no errors. 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2)  APA format errors. 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several  (3-4) APA format errors. 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5)  APA format errors. Total  Points: 100 Name: NURS_6002_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Assignment 2 Week 6 Practicum Journal Reimbursement Rates Reimbursement rates and medical coding can be almost as complicated as treating

by

WK 6 Practicum Journal 2025

Assignment 2: Week 6 Practicum Journal: Reimbursement Rates Reimbursement rates and medical coding can be almost as complicated as treating some mental illnesses. As a PMHNP, you will be faced with varying rates that may be different than other health care providers you may work with. In this Practicum Journal Assignment, you will analyze reimbursement rates for mental health treatments you will likely use in your practice and compare those rates to other provider rates. Learning Objectives Students will: Analyze reimbursement rates for mental health treatments To prepare for this Practicum Journal: Research reimbursement rates for various treatment modalities. Compare NP rates to other provider rates. For this Practicum Journal: Complete the Reimbursement Rate Template in your Learning Resources using the five types of services you are likely to use in your practice.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Journal From Issue to Persuasion GRADED Now that you ve spent some time writing down

by

enpart 1jor 2025

Journal: From Issue to Persuasion (GRADED) Now that you’ve spent some time writing down some potential issues for your project, it’s time to narrow the focus. Reviewing the Opposing Viewpoints database – that’s the link provided–> ( https://go-gale-com.ezproxy.snhu.edu/ps/browseCategory?userGroupName=nhc_main&inPS=true&prodId=OVIC&category=Health+and+Medicine and reviewing your brainstorming activity, select two potential issues that are related to your career of Nursing. Again, be sure you’re selecting and writing about two separate issues. As you work on the journal, remember to refer to the assignment guidelines and rubric below to make sure you’re fulfilling each critical element. Assignment Guidelines and Rubric Overview: The journal activity in this course is private between you and the instructor. This week, you spent some time reflecting on persuasion in your everyday life, and you shared some potential topic ideas with your peers and instructor. But why is persuasion so important? Let’s think about that a little bit in this journal assignment. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed: After exploring the Opposing Viewpoints Database and reviewing your brainstorming activity, identify two issues that are related to your career or degree: Write a fully developed paragraph for issue one (5–8 sentences each). Explain at least two clear arguable sides to the issue. Explain how the issue relates to your field or degree or potential field or degree. Write a fully developed paragraph for issue two (5–8 sentences each). Explain at least two clear arguable sides to the issue. Explain how the issue relates to your field or degree or potential field or degree. After exploring the arguments related to your issues, take a moment to consider the bigger picture. Then, briefly reflect (in 1 to 2 paragraphs) on the importance of persuasion for the issue you are most likely to write about. Be specific in your assignment; this information will help guide you as you work on your project in the coming weeks. Identify which side you might argue if you plan to pursue this issue in your final persuasive essay. Identify your potential audience and why your topic would be relevant to them. Guidelines for Submission: Save your work in a Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Then, check your writing for errors . Please use link provided above to retrieve your two separate issues and please also use reading attched called modle 1below as additional reference.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Explain how you would provide leadership for the implementation of the new system Include a description

by

Applying Leadership to Enable Staff Achievement 2025

· Explain how you would provide leadership for the implementation of the new system. Include a description of the leadership behaviors that would be most effective to position your staff for success based on their experience and needs. · Explain how this implementation plan relates to your Clifton Strengths Signature Theme Report, including how this leadership situation aligns with or differs from your leadership profile. · Explain your rationale for your choices and appropriately reference literature that supports your thinking.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 The ANA has stated Education for those in the health care professions must increase in depth and breadth as

by

Module 10 Discussion – How Can You, One Nurse, Educate Clients in Your Facility/Neighborhood/Community? 2025

The ANA has stated, “Education for those in the health-care professions must increase in depth and breadth as scientific knowledge expands” (Catalano, 2012, p.91) According to Catalano, there has been a lack of adequate preparation for educating clients with self-management concerns, particularly clients with chronic illnesses, and this lack of education is a serious violation of ethical responsibilities by health care providers. Do you agree or disagree with this statement and why? Is the failure to properly educate clients on the fault of the Nurse? Does the Nurse’s level of education matter? Why do you feel that way? Please provide in-text citation and references

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Post an explanation for how you think the cost benefit analysis in the statement from page 27 of Feldstein

by

Page 27 of Feldstein (2006) 2025

Post an explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in the statement from page 27 of Feldstein (2006) affected efforts to repeal/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses such as the one portrayed by the Feldstein statement may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress’ decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid).

Nursing Assignment Help 2025