NR451-13805 Week 5 Assignment: iCARE Paper (graded) 2025

This assignment will be uploaded automatically to Turnitin upon submission to verify this is your original work and no parts were copied from another student. Turnitin is now more closely integrated with Canvas. Overall, you will find Turnitin assignments easier to use, but the steps to submit an assignment have changed somewhat. Directions are as follows: 1. Click the orange “Submit Assignment” button at the top of the page to open the upload window. 2. Click on “Choose File” to select your assignment file you want to upload. 3. Check the box to agree to the Turnitin End-User License Agreement. 4. Click “Submit Assignment.” 5. Your Turnitin report will be visible in the “Grades” section of your course. Please refer to the pages below for more information about these changes. • Turnitin Submitting a Paper (Links to an external site.) explains how to submit a file. • Turnitin Assignment Student View (Links to an external site.) lets you submit a paper, then view feedback on the file you have submitted. • Turnitin Viewing Instructor Feedback (Links to an external site.) helps you view your instructor feedback. Please contact your instructor if you have any questions. Purpose The purpose of the iCARE Paper assignment is to explore the concept of interprofessional teams and patient outcomes. Nursing supportive actions of compassion, advocacy, resilience, and evidence-based practice will serve as a way to apply care concepts. Course Outcomes This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes: CO1: Applies principles of nursing, theories, and the care philosophies to self, colleagues, individuals, families, aggregates and communities throughout the healthcare system. (PO#1) CO6: Plans clinical practice activities that integrate professional nursing standards in accordance with the Nursing Code of Ethics and the American Nurses’ Association (ANA) standards of practice. (PO#6) Directions Please review the infographic as way to guide you in getting started with your assignment: Developing an Assignment with Integrity (Links to an external site.) View a short tutorial with tips for completing this assignment: iCARE Paper Tutorial (Links to an external site.) Getting Started: Interprofessional teams are part of practice trends we see developing in all aspects of care delivery. Consider you own work environment (or recent clinical setting). For this assignment, consider the concept of interprofessional teamwork and patient outcomes. Look to your current workplace as an example. (If you are not currently employed, look to a past workplace or clinical practice area.) Apply the components of the iCARE concept to interprofessional teams in a short paper. (Body of the paper to be 3 pages, excluding the title page and references page) iCARE components are: C ompassion A dvocacy R esilience E vidence-Based Practice (EBP) How could you contribute to an interprofessional team and patient outcomes through nursing actions of: compassion, advocacy, resilience, and evidence-based practice? Select one scholarly nursing article from CINAHL as a resource for your paper. Additional scholarly sources can be used but are optional. When searching in the CINAHL database, please limit your search word to one component of the paper you wish to emphasize, such as ‘Resilience’. Searching for the term iCARE will not produce the results you need. Elements of iCARE paper Title page Below are the headings to be used for this assignment. Introduction: (No heading needed here in APA) Explain the type of work setting you are discussing and whether interprofessional teams are currently present. If interprofessional teams are present, indicate a team function that could be improved. If interprofessional teams are NOT present, indicate what type of team you think might be possible in the setting. Describe a nursing action item for each component below that could contribute to: interprofessional team support ; how this might impact the culture of your unit or organization ; and possible impact on patient outcomes . Compassion Advocacy Resilience Evidence-Based Practice Summary: Include a summary statement of how iCARE components can support interprofessional teams and patient outcomes. Address how you may be able to influence this process of support for interprofessional teams overall in your unit or organization. References : List any references used in APA format. Templates The prepared paper template is RECOMMENDED for this assignment. iCare Assignment Template (Links to an external site.) – APA 6th edition iCare Assignment Template (Links to an external site.) – APA 7th edition Best Practices Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page. The template provided is recommended. Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission. Use the rubric as a final check prior to submission to ensure all content is clearly addressed. Scholarly Sources and Citations Use APA format for citations and references. Please paraphrase throughout. One short quote is permitted. **Academic Integrity** Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments. By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment. Week 5 iCARE Paper Grading Rubric Week 5 iCARE Paper Grading Rubric CriteriaRatingsPts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroductionThe type of work setting and interprofessional team features are described (improvement or type of team). 25.0 ptsIntroduction thoroughly describes the work setting and features of the interprofessional team. 22.0 ptsIntroduction describes the work setting and features of the interprofessional team. 20.0 ptsOne element from the first column is missing or lacks detail. 10.0 ptsTwo elements from the first column are missing and lack detail. 0.0 ptsThe introduction is missing. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompassionNursing action related to compassion is described in support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes. 25.0 ptsThe nursing action related to compassion was clearly identified and support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes were thoroughly explained. 22.0 ptsThe nursing action related to compassion was identified and satisfactorily supported the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes. 20.0 ptsThe nursing action related to compassion was identified and one of the elements of support from the first column were missing or lacked detail. 10.0 ptsThe nursing action related to compassion lacked more than two elements of support or lacked detail. 0.0 ptsNo Marks 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdvocacyNursing action related to advocacy is described in support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes. 25.0 ptsThe nursing action related to advocacy was identified and support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes were thoroughly explained. 22.0 ptsThe nursing action related to advocacy was identified and satisfactorily supported the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes. 20.0 ptsThe nursing related to advocacy was identified and one of the elements of support from the first column were missing or lacked detail. 10.0 ptsThe nursing action related to advocacy lacked more than two elements of support or lacked detail. 0.0 ptsThe nursing action and support elements were missing. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResilienceNursing action related to resilience is described in support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes. 25.0 ptsThe nursing action related to resilience was identified and support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes were thoroughly explained. 22.0 ptsThe nursing action related to resilience was identified and satisfactorily supported the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes. 20.0 ptsThe nursing action related to resilience was identified and one of the elements of support from the first column were missing or lacked detail. 10.0 ptsThe nursing action related to resiliency lacked more than two elements of support or lacked detail. 0.0 ptsThe nursing action and support elements were missing. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence-Based PracticeNursing action related to EBP is described in support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes. 25.0 ptsThe nursing action related to EBP was identified and support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes were thoroughly explained. 22.0 ptsThe nursing action related to EBP was identified and satisfactorily supported the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes. 20.0 ptsThe nursing action related to EBP was identified and one of the elements of support from the first column were missing or lacked detail. 10.0 ptsThe nursing action related to EBP was not sufficiently identified or one of the elements of support from the first column were missing or lacked detail. 0.0 ptsThe nursing action and support elements were missing. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummaryExplain how nursing actions of the iCARE components can support interprofessional teams and patient outcomes. Address how you can influence support for interprofessional teams on your unit or area of practice. 35.0 ptsKey points regarding nursing actions and support for interprofessional teams and patient outcomes; and, nursing supportive influence are thoroughly described. 31.0 ptsMost key points regarding nursing actions and support for interprofessional teams and patient outcomes; and, nursing supportive influence are described. 28.0 ptsSome key points regarding nursing actions and support for interprofessional teams and patient outcomes; and, nursing supportive influence are described 13.0 ptsSummary lacks details of key points. 0.0 ptsSummary is missing. 35.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and OrganizationThe discussion is well organized and logical. The structure is clear and compelling to the reader. Paragraphs are linked together logically, and main ideas stand out 20.0 ptsExcellent mechanics and organization with minimal errors of the following: Well organized and logical, correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling, professional wording is used, uses complete sentences, paragraphs are linked together logically, and main ideas expressed clearly. 18.0 ptsGood mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the column A. Few errors noted. 16.0 ptsFair mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the column A. Some errors noted. 8.0 ptsPoor mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the column A. Many errors noted. 0.0 ptsVery poor mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the column A such that it is difficult to follow or understand. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAAPA format is used throughout. 20.0 ptsExcellent APA formatting with minimal errors of the following: All sources cited in the text -all references listed on the reference page using basics of APA format -title page in general APA format -headings present and follow APA format -12-point font, double spaced, 1 inch margins, paragraphs indented -used only one short quote and body of the paper is approximately 3 pages 18.0 ptsGood formatting considering the elements listed in column A. 16.0 ptsFair formatting considering the elements listed in column A. Some APA errors noted. 8.0 ptsPoor formatting considering the elements listed in column A. Many APA errors noted. 0.0 ptsVery poor formatting such that paper is difficult to read. Numerous APA errors noted. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of CINAHL article as Required Source from CCN Library 0.0 pts0 points deducted Used CINAHL article from CCN Library 0.0 pts20 points (10%) deducted Required article source of CINAHL not used resulting in point deduction 0.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction 0.0 pts0 points deducted Submitted on time 0.0 ptsNot submitted on time – Points deducted 1 day late = 10 deduction; 2 days late = 20 deduction; 3 days late = 30 deduction; 4 days late = 40 deduction; 5 days late = 50 deduction; 6 days late = 60 deduction; 7 days late = 70 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

week5 principle of assessment 2025

TASK Post your initial response to one of the scenarios below. Musculoskeletal and Neurologic System Using the South University Online Library, the Internet, and your textbook research the conditions affecting the musculoskeletal and the neurologic systems. Scenario 1 A 58-year-old female is admitted for a work up for a complaint of neck and low back pain. During admission, you discover that she underwent a renal transplant six years ago. The patient also had blood work collected. When you review the findings, you notice that her serum calcium is elevated at 13.9 (Normal values range from 8.5 to 10.2 mg/dl), her CBC shows a hematocrit of 33%, and hemoglobin of 11.1 g/dl (normal adult female hematocrit Range: 37-47%, normal adult female hemoglobin range: 12-16 g/dl). What could be the underlying cause of her pain and her abnormal lab values? What other assessments would be helpful? What interventions might be considered? Scenario 2 A 33-year-old Hispanic male is admitted and complains of a tingling sensation in his left leg, vertigo, and loss of balance. When you begin to perform intake history, you notice that his speech is slurred, his teeth are in need of repair, and he seems to be very drowsy. What other findings may you find in this individual? What would you think is the underlying cause of this patient’s complaint? How would you proceed with your assessment specifically for this patient? Response has to be in APA style

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Robbing the Dead: Is Organ Conscription Ethical? 2025

Assessment 4 Instructions: Robbing the Dead: Is Organ Conscription Ethical? Write a 2-3 page paper that examines the moral and ethical considerations of organ conscription policies and theories. Scarcity of Medical Resources For this assessment, you will continue your survey of ethical principles in health care. Especially in our contemporary world, where needs for health care outstrip available resources, we regularly face decisions about who should get which resources. There is a serious shortage of donor organs. Need vastly outstrips supply, due not only to medical advances related to organ transplantation, but also because not enough people consent to be cadaveric donors (an organ donor who has already died). Munson (2014) points out that in the United States, approximately 10,000 patients die each year because an organ donor was not available, which is three times the number of people killed in the terrorist attacks on 9/11. But what is an efficient and morally sound solution to this problem? The policy of presumed consent, where enacted, has scarcely increased supply, and other alternatives, such as allowing donors to sell their organs, raise strong moral objections. In light of this, some have advocated for a policy of conscription of cadaveric organs (Spital & Erin, 2002). This involves removing organs from the recently deceased without first obtaining consent of the donor or his or her family. Proponents of this policy argue that conscription would not only vastly increase the number of available organs, and hence save many lives, but that it is also more efficient and less costly than policies requiring prior consent. Finally, because with a conscription policy all people would share the burden of providing organs after death and all would stand to benefit should the need arise, the policy is fair and just. Demonstration of Proficiency By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria: Competency 1: Articulate ethical issues in health care. Articulate the moral concerns surrounding a policy of organ conscription. Articulate questions about the fairness and justness of organ conscription policy. Explain the relevance and significance of the concept of consent as it pertains to organ donation. Evaluate alternative policies for increasing available donor organs. Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with health care professionals. Exhibit proficiency in clear and effective academic writing skills. References Munson, R. (2014). Intervention and reflection: Basic issues in bioethics (concise ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth. Spital, A., & Erin, C. (2002). Conscription of cadaveric organs for transplantation: Let’s at least talk about it. American Journal of Kidney Disease, 39 (3), 611–615. Instructions Do you consider the policy of organ conscription to be morally sound? Write a paper that answers this question, defending that answer with cogent moral reasoning and supporting your view with ethical theories or moral principles you take to be most relevant to the issue. In addition to reviewing the suggested resources, you are encouraged to locate additional resources in the Capella library, your public library, or authoritative online sites to provide additional support for your viewpoint. Be sure to weave and cite the resources throughout your work. In your paper, address the following: On what grounds could one argue that consent is not ethically required for conscription of cadaveric organs? And on what grounds could one argue that consent is required? Is the policy truly just and fair, as supporters claim? Explain. Do you consider one of the alternative policies for increasing available donor organs that Munson discusses to be preferable to conscription? Explain why or why not. Submission Requirements Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message. APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines. Length: 2–3 typed, double-spaced pages. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point. SCORING GUIDE Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Discussion post research question/problem using PICOT format 2025

Explain the importance of a research question/problem. Create a clinical research question related to a clinical experience you have encountered at work/school. Use the PICOT format to create your question. Select a topic/area of interest to you as this will be your topic you will use for the remaining semester to develop a research protocol.TOPIC OF MY INTEREST DIABETES COMPLIANCE. Requirements for this post: Read the PICOT article attached BELOW Word count: Max 500 words APA format

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

W4 DQ ANP 650 2025

Instructions for Answer to 2 Question 1- After Each DQ (question), write down references 2- 300 minimum words for every DQ, you can go up to 800 words but answer should be complete. 3- 2-3 Peer Reviewed/ scholarly references for each question 4- References should be within 4 years 5- I am in acute care nurse practitioner program. 6- The response to the DQ is expected to be a minimum of 300 words. A minimum of two peer reviewed/ scholarly resources are expected. These need to be appropriate for a clinical professional to guide decisions about patient care. If a textbook is used for one of these responses, the other needs to be journal or professional-level website. The references need to be correctly formatted, as do the citations for those references. “ Question words” don’t count towards 300 minimum count”

Nursing Assignment Help 2025