2025 Week 5 Discussion Discussion TopicTop of Form Bottom of Form Guidelines Support your responses with scholarly

Week 5 discussion 2025

Week 5 Discussion Discussion TopicTop of Form Bottom of Form Guidelines: Support your responses with scholarly academic references (added at the end) using APA style format. Assigned course readings and online library resources are preferred. Weekly lecture notes are designed as overviews to the topic for the respective week and should not serve as a citation or reference. In your discussion question response, provide a substantive response that illustrates a well-reasoned and thoughtful response; is factually correct with relevant scholarly citations, references, and examples that demonstrate a clear connection to the readings. Discussion Question Considering your role specialization (nurse educator, nurse informatics, nurse administrator, and family or adult-gerontology NP), identify the top three current trends or issues that you believe to be most important with regard to your chosen role and the impact the role has one patient outcomes. Synthesize knowledge from values theory, ethics and legal regulatory statutes, and develop your personal philosophy for a career as an advanced practice nurse in DQ1. Incorporate the content of Week 5 ( audio-visuals) . Note : Review South University’s Online Participation Policy, Helpful Tips, and Late Work Guidelines available by clicking on the South University Policy and Guidelines navigation tab under Course Home. The late policy applies to late discussion question responses. Week 5 Article and Videos Read the following peer reviewed article. Incorporate key points in your DQ 1 and any other assignment. A Day in the Life: Nurse Johnson & Johnson Nursing Campaign Mystery Box Unboxing ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgojAOyPvfk&list=PLU05He9EuwhlRCO5iVPgjeA7-K1lE3Y8X ) Strech, S., & Wyatt, D. A. (2013). Partnering to lead change: Nurses’ role in the redesign of health care. Association of Operating Room Nurses.AORN Journal, 98 (3), 260-6. doi:http://dx.doi.org.southuniversity.libproxy.edmc.edu/10.1016/j.aorn.2013.07.006 A Day in the Life: Nurse Educator A Day in the Life – Susan, Nurse Educator, MSN, RN, Ph.D. Candidate ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_sG4GRtP-o ) A Day in the Life: Family Nurse Practitioner A Day in the Life – Steve (Family Nurse Practitioner) ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-kL1OFbCC8 ) A Day in the Life: Palliative Care NP A Day in the Life – Lauren (Nurse Practitioner- Palliative Care) ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYvL_KhG_YM ) What is Nurse Informatics? Nursing Informatics in Two Minutes ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scY_9w-p0y4 ) Nurse administrator talks about leadership in a hospital system Meet Clarian Health Chief Nurse Executive ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oi1oCcnxvio ) The Role of the Midwife The role of a midwife – 24/7 case loading midwife and what they do. ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XVcI168IeI ) CRNA Career Profile – Nurse Anesthetist ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AygysDUSMfk )

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 APA format SOAP note format 3 peer refences In this Discussion you will consider case studies that describe abnormal findings

Need initial discussion for below 2025

APA format SOAP note format 3 peer refences. In this Discussion, you will consider case studies that describe abnormal findings in patients seen in a clinical setting. By Day 1 of this week, your Instructor will have assigned you to one of the following specific case studies for this Discussion. Also, your Discussion post should be in the Episodic/Focused SOAP Note format, rather than the traditional narrative style Discussion posting format. Refer to Chapter 2 of the Sullivan text and the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template in the Week 5 Learning Resources for guidance. Remember that all Episodic/Focused SOAP notes have specific data included in every patient case. Case 3: Drooping of Face A 33-year-old female comes to your clinic alarmed about sudden “drooping” on the right side of the face that began this morning. She complains of excessive tearing and drooling on her right side as well. To prepare: With regard to the case study you were assigned: Review this week’s Learning Resources, and consider the insights they provide about the case study. Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient in the case study you were assigned. Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis? Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient. Case 3: Drooping of Face A 33-year-old female comes to your clinic alarmed about sudden “drooping” on the right side of the face that began this morning. She complains of excessive tearing and drooling on her right side as well. To prepare: With regard to the case study you were assigned: Review this week’s Learning Resources, and consider the insights they provide about the case study. Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient in the case study you were assigned. Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis? Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 The purpose of this assignment is to create an educational program that supports the implementation of

Educational Program on Risk Management – Part One: Outline of Topic 2025

The purpose of this assignment is to create an educational program that supports the implementation of risk management strategies in a health care organization. In this assignment, you will develop an outline for an “in‐service”‐style educational risk management program for employees of a particular health care organization that will then form the basis for a PowerPoint presentation in Topic 5. Select your topic for this educational session from one of the proposed recommendations or changes you suggested in the Risk Management Program Analysis – Part One assignment to enhance, improve, or secure compliance standards in your chosen risk management plan example. Create a 500‐750-word comprehensive outline that communicates the following about your chosen topic: Introduction : Identify the risk management topic you have chosen to address and why it is important within your health care sector. Rationale : Illustrate how this risk management strategy is lacking within your selected organization’s current risk management plan and explain how its implementation will better meet local, state, and federal compliance standards. Support : Provide data that indicate the need for this proposed risk management initiative and demonstrate how it falls under the organization’s legal responsibility to provide a safe health care facility and work environment. Implementation : Describe the steps to implement the proposed strategy in your selected health care organization. Challenges : Predict obstacles the health care organization may face in executing this risk management strategy and propose solutions to navigate or preempt these potentially difficult outcomes. Evaluation : Outline your plan to evaluate the success of the proposed risk management program and how well it meets the organization’s short-term, long-term, and end goals. Opportunities : Recommend additional risk management improvements in adjacent areas of influence that the organization could or should address moving forward. You are required to incorporate all instructor feedback from this assignment into Educational Program on Risk Management Part Two ‐ Slide Presentation assignment in Topic 5. To save time later in the course, consider addressing any feedback soon after this assignment has been graded and returned to you. It may be helpful to preview the requirements for the Topic 5 assignment to ensure that your outline addresses all required elements for submission of the final presentation. You are required to support your statements with a minimum of six citations from appropriate credible sources. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 No plagiarism Please Anticipatory Guidance for Neonates to Adolescents Table Anticipatory guidance helps family

MN580 Anticipatory Guidance for Neonates to Adolescents Table 2025

No plagiarism Please Anticipatory Guidance for Neonates to Adolescents Table Anticipatory guidance helps family, caregivers, and others know what to expect according to the child’s growth and development. The guidance is done through collaboration between the healthcare provider and the caregiver. It is sometimes thought of as a type of counseling. Nurse practitioners working in pediatric primary care need to be experts on anticipatory guidance. There are excellent resources available and these are being updated as technologies and environments change. This Assignment will demonstrate your ability to describe age-specific anticipatory guidance for the child and the family. Additionally, you will then have a reference table for quick glance created by you for future encounters with pediatric individuals and their families. This assignment has a template that you will use to fill in the relevant elements of the anticipatory guidance per age group. The columns provide guidance to the specific areas such as safety and immunizations. If there is an area that is not applicable, such as oral health in infancy-newborn group, then place N/A in the box.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Case Study Chapter 10 Mandatory Minimum Staffing Ratios A nurse manager is attending a national convention and is

Case Study, Chapter 10, Mandatory Minimum Staffing Ratios (DQ6) 2025

Case Study, Chapter 10, Mandatory Minimum Staffing Ratios A nurse manager is attending a national convention and is attending a concurrent session on staffing ratios. Minimum staffing ratios are being discussed in the nurse manager’s own state. The nurse manager has a number of questions about staffing ratios that the session is covering. The nurse manager knows that evidence exists that increasing the number of RNs in the staffing mix leads to safer workplaces for nurses and higher quality of care for patients. 1. What are the three general approaches recommended by the American Nurses Association (2017) to maintain sufficient staffing? 2. Summarize the findings that are often cited as the seminal work in support of establishing minimum staffing ratio legislation at the federal or state level. 3. Analyze what proponents and critics say about whether mandatory minimum staffing ratios are needed.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Compare at least two evidence based treatment plans for adults diagnosed with schizophrenia with evidence based treatment

Nursing 2025

Compare at least two evidence-based treatment plans for adults diagnosed with schizophrenia with evidence-based treatment plans for children and adolescents diagnosed with schizophrenia. Explain the legal and ethical issues involved with forcing children diagnosed with schizophrenia to take medication for the disorder and how a PMHNP may address those issues.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Do you believe you have the traits to be an effective leader Perhaps you

Your Leadership Profile 2025

Do you believe you have the traits to be an effective leader? Perhaps you are already in a supervisory role, but as has been discussed previously, appointment does not guarantee leadership skills. How can you evaluate your own leadership skills and behaviors? You can start by analyzing your performance in specific areas of leadership. In this Discussion, you will complete Gallup’s StrengthsFinder assessment. This assessment will identify your personal strengths, which have been shown to improve motivation, engagement, and academic self-conference. Through this assessment, you will discover your top five themes—which you can reflect upon and use to leverage your talents for optimal success and examine how the results relate to your leadership traits. To Prepare: To take the Assessment, visit http://walden.gallup.com. Using the Guidance Document Resource(s) for the Strengths Finder assessment, follow the instructions for setting up an account. If the link does not work, please copy and paste the link into your web browser. Please Note: This Assessment will take roughly 30 minutes to complete. Once you have completed your assessment, you will receive your “Top 5 Signature Themes of Talent” on your screen. Click the Download button below Signature Theme Report, and then print and save the report. We also encourage you to select the Apply tab to review action items. NOTE: Please keep your report. You will need your results for future courses. Technical Issues with Gallup: If you have technical issues after registering, please contact the Gallup Education Support group by phone at +1.866-346-4408. Support is available 24 hours/day from 6:00 p.m. Sunday U.S. Central Time through 5:00 p.m. Friday U.S. Central Time. Reflect on the results of your Assessment, and consider how the results relate to your leadership traits. By Day 3 of Week 5 Post a brief description of your results from the StrengthsFinder assessment. Then, briefly describe two core values, two strengths, and two characteristics that you would like to strengthen based on the results of your StrengthsFinder assessment. Be specific. Please find the attached result from strengh finder

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 As a nurse embarking on an advanced degree you are developing the characteristics

Week 3 6001 Discussion 2025

As a nurse embarking on an advanced degree, you are developing the characteristics of a scholar-practitioner, which includes strong communication skills. Writing in a scholarly manner involves supporting your thoughts with evidence from the literature and appropriately using APA formatting. One of the challenges of scholarly writing is paraphrasing the thoughts of others in your work. Paraphrasing, and correctly citing the original author for his or her ideas, allows you to take the ideas of others, summarize them, and incorporate them into your own writing. When summarizing the ideas of others, it is important to avoid plagiarizing (copying the words and ideas of others as though they were your own). In addition to expanding your knowledge of APA, this week’s Learning Resources help you to distinguish between paraphrasing and plagiarizing. To prepare: Think about the sometimes subtle difference between plagiarizing and paraphrasing. Read the following paragraphs, which were written by Patricia O’Conner: A good writer is one you can read without breaking a sweat. If you want a workout, you don’t lift a book—you lift weights. Yet we’re brainwashed to believe that the more brilliant the writer, the tougher the going. The truth is that the reader is always right. Chances are, if something you’re reading doesn’t make sense, it’s not your fault—it’s the writer’s. And if something you write doesn’t get your point across, it’s probably not the reader’s fault—it’s yours. Too many readers are intimidated and humbled by what they can’t understand, and in some cases that’s precisely the effect the writer is after. But confusion is not complexity; it’s just confusion. A venerable tradition, dating back to the ancient Greek orators, teaches that if you don’t know what you’re talking about, just ratchet up the level of difficulty and no one will ever know. Don’t confuse simplicity, though, with simplemindedness. A good writer can express an extremely complicated idea clearly and make the job look effortless. But such simplicity is a difficult thing to achieve because to be clear in your writing you have to be clear in your thinking. This is why the simplest and clearest writing has the greatest power to delight, surprise, inform, and move the reader. You can’t have this kind of shared understanding if writer and reader are in an adversary relationship. (pp. 195–196) Source: O’Conner, P. (2003). Woe is I: The grammarphobe’s guide to better English in plain English. New York: Riverhead Books. Paraphrase this passage from O’Conner using no more than 75–100 words. Remember that paraphrasing means summarizing the essence of the original text. It does not mean creating a thesaurus-based revision of the author’s original words or copying the piece, or any part of it, word for word. For this activity, do not use any direct quotes. Turn your paraphrase into Grammarly and SafeAssign. Review your reports. Review the other tools, resources, and services available to you through the Walden Writing Center that support your growth as a scholarly writer. Consider which of these resources you find to be most useful. Review learning resources on APA formatting rules and information within the Walden Writing Center on APA Post a description of your experience of using Grammarly and SafeAssign and share at least one insight you gained about paraphrasing and avoiding plagiarism as a matter of academic integrity. Recommend at least one other online resource that supports scholarly writing, and explain your rationale. Lastly, share two APA formatting rules with the class and a specific page number in the APA manual where this rule can be located Support your Discussion assignment with specific resources used in its preparation using APA formatting. You are asked to provide a reference for all resources, including those in the Learning Resources for this course.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 1 Deductive arguments are top down working from general principles to specific cases Inductive reasoning on

Critical Reasoning 2025

1 – Deductive arguments are top-down, working from general principles to specific cases. Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, is bottom-up, working from specific observations and looking for patterns that lead to a general conclusion. Your career path in healthcare and health-related fields will present many problems that will require critical reasoning. Think about potential issues or even issues you have already encountered. Determine what type of critical reasoning – inductive or deductive – best suits the situation – or do you need both? If you are short on ideas, use one of these scenarios as a starting point: · Suppose you are on a committee that has to decide whether to cut nursing staff or social services staff. How would you approach the problem? · Suppose your hospital suddenly sees an enormous increase in emergency room patients, and you are on a committee to investigate the problem and relieve pressure on the ER. How would you approach the problem? 2 – Deductive categorical reasoning is demanding. Its forms are rigid, but they are rigid with a reason; deductive categorical arguments are intended to prove the conclusion. If the premises are true and the conclusion logically follows, you have no choice but to accept the argument. The categorical syllogism is like a piece of machinery, the parts working together to produce a result – in the case of the categorical syllogism, the truth of the conclusion. For the initial post, address all of the following: · Explain how the machinery of the categorical syllogisms works. o Why two premises and one conclusion? o Why only three terms? o Why only four standard forms? o When and where, in your private life or your work life, would you want to use this type of reasoning? · Look at “One Step Further” at the end of Chapter 6 or choose from Exercise 6.22, examples 1, 5 or 7. Translate one of the arguments there into a categorical syllogism. Reference For the examples Jackson, D. & Newberry, P. (2016). Critical thinking: A user’s manual (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth: Cengage Learning. 3 – Read the following argument examples in this activity. Argument 1 Dick and Jane have insured their house and cars with Farmer’s Mutual for 10 years. During this time, they filed only one claim for $500, and the premiums have risen 100%. Two weeks ago, while backing out of the garage, Jane damaged the right fender. They didn’t fix it, and yesterday, while Jane was parked at the supermarket, someone hit the right side of the car, damaging everything but the right fender. When Jane checks the insurance policy, she discovers that while the supermarket accident is covered, the damaged right fender is not. Jane says, “Let’s claim that all the damage happened at the supermarket. It’s only fair. The insurance company has made thousands of dollars from our premiums alone, not to mention all the other people they insure, so they’ll hardly miss the few thousands that their repairs will cost. Many of their friends have done the same – included items that were not part of actual collision damage. It’s unlikely that they we will be discovered, because the fender could easily have been damaged in the collision.” Argument 2 In a world where medical resources are in ever-shorter supply, allocation of those resources is becoming an issue. Critical care units (ICU) put heavy demand on hospital resources. Adult medical intensive care units (MICU’s) are often occupied by elderly patients in the final stages of chronic illnesses. Neonatal ICU’s, however, are reserved for premature infants that need critical care in the first few days of life. Surveys of mortality rates in relation to amount of care for both units show that on a cost/benefit basis, outcomes for NICU patients are statistically better than those for MICU patients. Since hospitals should prioritize outcomes, it is clear that resources should be allocated more heavily to the NICU. Using the examples in the introduction of this activity, address the following: 1. Briefly analyze each argument as follows: o State the issue and the conclusion. o For each argument, analyze the argument: § State if it is deductive or inductive. § Explain how the argument follows the form of an inductive or deductive argument. o Reference words, phrases, the structure of the argument, or any other facts or observations you believe support your claim. 2. Diagram the argument. Writing Requirements (APA format) · Length: 1-2 pages total (not including title page or references page) · 1-inch margins · Double spaced · 12-point Times New Roman font · Title page

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Part 4A Critical Appraisal of Research Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer reviewed articles you selected and

Critical Appraisal of Research 2025

Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tools document. Be sure to include: An evaluation table A levels of evidence table An outcomes synthesis table Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025