2025 Select a health care setting you want to focus on for your sustainability initiative e g local

by

Assignment: Sustainability Initiative, Part 1 2025

Select a health care setting you want to focus on for your sustainability initiative (e.g., local hospital, veterans hospital, ambulance service, urgent care, nursing home, etc.). Analyze the setting you have selected and break it down to the main departments, employee roles, operating activities, etc. While doing so, brainstorm opportunities to reduce costs or eliminate waste while improving patient care or outcomes. Review the list of sustainable initiatives from the list below, and select one that you want to promote for your course project: Energy efficiency Lighting IR scanning Cogeneration Kanban Inventory Device exchange CR pack reformation Device reprocessing Red bag waste reduction Blue wrap recycling Note : Ensure that the opportunity you select correlates with the setting you select. Additionally, if you want to complete a sustainable initiative that is not on the list, obtain approval from your instructor before completing the assignment. Identify data sources you might need to collect and analyze for your initiative. Consider contacting people in the industry and at your organization who may be able to help. Write a 525- to 700-word proposal of the sustainability initiative you want to promote at the health care setting you selected. Your proposal should: Create a clear vision or mission statement that defines the scope of the initiative and would generate buy-in. Define what outcomes you expect to achieve over time. Be specific with what you can realistically deliver. Cite 3 reputable references to support your assignment (e.g., trade or industry publications, government or agency websites, scholarly works, or other sources of similar quality). Format your assignment according to APA guidelines. Submit your assignment. For additional help, check out the ULTRA: Access your assignments page.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Please read the complete instructions on attached document and use the

by

Assignment week 7 2025

** Please read the complete instructions on attached document and use the attached Template for the analysis** The Assignment: Using the “Module 4 | Part 4” section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template (Attached Document), conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following: Your topic of interest. – Psychiatry A correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details. Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article. Analysis of the article using the “Research Analysis Matrix” section of the template Write a 1-paragraph justification stating whether you would recommend this article to inform professional practice. Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following: Describe your  approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. Identify at  least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in  finding peer-reviewed research. Identify at  least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed  research. ** AT LEAST 3 REFERENCES**

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 After reviewing The Invisible Patients documentary define describe in detail an ethical dilemma that was experienced by the NP

by

The Invisible patient 2025

After reviewing The Invisible Patients documentary , define/describe in detail an ethical dilemma that was experienced by the NP. Please note, there are several ethical issues, so there should be diversity in the responses. Explain how you would have handled the situation. How is the NP in the documentary a Disruptive Innovator? Discuss if there is a relationship between your personal beliefs and values and this ethical dilemma/barrier. Describe at least one mechanism to overcome the barrier discussed. Examine the potential cost and benefits to this barrier. Remember there is no right or wrong answer for this ethical question. Suggested reference Look at the Nuremburg Code (US Department of Health & Human Services, 2005; Washington, 2012) as it was the major start of ethics in research and that can carry over to nursing practice.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Appraising Qualitative Research 33 unread replies 44 replies Download the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool

by

Appraising Qualitative Research using the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool. 2025

Appraising Qualitative Research 33 unread replies.44 replies. Download the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool and the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool (ARE ATTACHED). Select one of the eight practice problems that burden the overall health of the United States. Conduct a library search for one qualitative research study addressing this problem. Appraise the qualitative research study using the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool. (These eight practice problems include obesity; diabetes; heart disease; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; mental illness; cancer; addiction, which includes alcohol and opioids; and patient safety, which includes any event in which an individual is harmed under our care). *I like addiction, but you can use any other. After appraising and determining the Level of Evidence and Grade of Quality for your selected qualitative study, summarize your findings. Transfer your findings to the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool. Complete each column including specific details about the qualitative study. Include your completed Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool and your qualitative research study as an attachment with your initial post. Also, include a permalink for your selected qualitative research study with your initial discussion post. Confirm the link allows access to the full-text study article. Our faculty team will review both your research study and Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool and provide guidance. Analyze the evidence summary of the selected qualitative research study to address the following. Does the research design answer the research question? Explain your rationale. Were the study sample participants representative? Why or why not? Compare and contrast the study limitations in this study. Based on this evidence summary, would you consider this qualitative research study as support for your selected practice problem? Explain your rationale. Helpful Hints when appraising your selected research study, begin with the John Hopkins Research Appraisal Tool. This tool guides you in a thorough critique and appraisal that leads to determining the level of evidence and grade of evidence for each individual study. Once you are finished with the Johns Hopkins Individual Research Appraisal Tool, transfer your findings to the Johns Hopkins Evidence Summary Tool. Please note that you will add to this tool each week and this document is REQUIRED as part of your Week 6 paper. IMPORTANT: Do NOT alter this tool in any way whatsoever. For example, do not change this tool into portrait mode (keep it in landscape). Changing the design of this tool will cause you to lose unnecessary points in your weekly scores and also will affect your Week 6 paper grade . Some tips for completing the Johns Hopkins Evidence Summary Tool include: in column #2 insert the selected research study in APA format; in Column #3 state the specific type of qualitative research design used (in week 1 you want to state whether this qualitative research study is grounded theory, phenomenology, descriptive, etc.); describe in detail the sample and study findings in the appropriate columns, and in the last column please insert both the level of evidence and grade of evidence. Articles selected for appraisal in this course must be current – within the past five years. If you are unsure if an article meets the research design requirement (qualitative research for week 1), please feel welcome to run it by me to make sure. I will be happy to help! At the end of your appraisal, if you do not think the research study will inform your selected practice problem, you will need to substitute the publication with another study that does before Week 6. This is required for the Week 6 paper. When you are ready to upload your initial post, please upload your completed Johns Hopkins Evidence Summary Tool along with a permalink to your two selected qualitative research studies. A permalink is a full URL. If a permalink is not familiar to you here is a link to a tip sheet in Chamberlain’s Library: https://library.chamberlain.edu/HowToSearch/Permalinks (Links to an external site.) The other option is to upload your qualitative research study as a PDF. I will carefully read each of your studies along with reviewing your complete Johns Hopkins Evidence Summary Tool. Finding Permalinks – How to Search the Library – Home at Chamberlain University – Home – Chamberlain Library Home – Home at Chamberlain University (Links to an external site.) Step by Step Instructions. Permalinks in the OVID database are a little bit hidden, but you can find them by doing the following: 1. Go to the article in OVID, and look for Tools on the right-hand side of the page.. 2. library.chamberlain.edu Please Upload the JH Evidence Summary Tool. Students are expected to follow proper APA formatting in each discussion and the Week 6 written assignment. Y ou required to use APA 7th edition for all in-text citations and references, no exceptions.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Select a patient that you examined during the last three weeks With

by

NURS 6551 Week 3 SOAP Note 2025

Select a patient that you examined during the last three weeks. With this patient in mind, address the following in a SOAP Note: Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding her personal and medical history? Objective: What observations did you make during the physical assessment? Assessment: What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses. List them from highest priority to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis and why? Plan: What was your plan for diagnostics and primary diagnosis? What was your plan for treatment and management, including alternative therapies? Include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters, as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan. Reflection notes: What would you do differently in a similar patient evaluation?

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Analyze the subjective portion of the note List additional information that should be included in the

by

Assignment: Lab Assignment: Assessing the Genitalia and Rectum 2025

Analyze the subjective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation. Analyze the objective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation. Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or why not? Would diagnostics be appropriate for this case, and how would the results be used to make a diagnosis? Would you reject/accept the current diagnosis? Why or why not? Identify three possible conditions that may be considered as a differential diagnosis for this patient. Explain your reasoning using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 AssAssignment Disorders of the Veins and Arteries Advanced practice nurses often treat

by

6501 Assignment 2 2025

AssAssignment: Disorders of the Veins and Arteries Advanced practice nurses often treat patients with vein and artery disorders such as chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT). While the symptoms of both disorders are noticeable, these symptoms are sometimes mistaken for signs of other conditions, making the disorders difficult to diagnose. Nurses must examine all symptoms and rule out other potential disorders before diagnosing and prescribing treatment for patients. In this Assignment, you explore the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical presentation of CVI and DVT. To Prepare Review the section “Diseases of the Veins” (pp. 598-599) in Chapter 23 of the Huether and McCance text. Identify the pathophysiology of chronic venous insufficiency and deep venous thrombosis. Consider the similarities and differences between these disorders. Select a patient factor different from the one you selected in this week’s Discussion: genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, or behavior. Think about how the factor you selected might impact the pathophysiology of CVI and DVT. Reflect on how you would diagnose and prescribe treatment of these disorders for a patient based on the factor you selected. Review the “Mind Maps—Dementia, Endocarditis, and Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)” media in the Week 2 Learning Resources. Use the examples in the media as a guide to construct two mind maps—one for chronic venous insufficiency and one for venous thrombosis. Consider the epidemiology and clinical presentation of both chronic venous insufficiency and deep venous thrombosis. To Complete Write a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following: Compare the pathophysiology of chronic venous insufficiency and deep venous thrombosis. Describe how venous thrombosis is different from arterial thrombosis. Explain how the patient factor you selected might impact the pathophysiology of CVI and DVT. Describe how you would diagnose and prescribe treatment of these disorders for a patient based on the factor you selected. Construct two mind maps—one for chronic venous insufficiency and one for deep venous thrombosis. Include the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical presentation, as well as the diagnosis and treatment you explained in your paper.ignment: Disorders of the Veins and Arteries

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Select a bill that has been proposed not one that has been enacted using the congressional

by

Legislation Comparison Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement 2025

Select a bill that has been proposed (not one that has been enacted) using the congressional websites provided in the Learning Resources. The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid; 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement) Part 1: Legislation Comparison Grid Based on the health-related bill (proposed, not enacted) you selected, complete the Legislation Comparison Grid Template. Be sure to address the following: Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed. Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill. Identify the target populations addressed by the bill. Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees? Part 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement Based on the health-related bill you selected, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement that addresses the following: Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position. Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 This is a discussion post ABOUT 250 WORDS tittle page not require In text citation is required

by

QUESTION 1: Core Principles & Values of Effective Team-Based Health 2025

This is a discussion post, ABOUT 250 WORDS , tittle page not require In- text citation is required original work please, scholarly references are required for this assignment, website source strongly preferred . QUESTION 1: Core Principles & Values of Effective Team-Based Health In the assigned article, “Core Principles & Values of Effective Team-Based Health Care”( https://www.nationalahec.org/pdfs/VSRT-Team-Based-Care-Principles-Values.pdf ) the authors state that “the incorporation of multiple perspectives in health care offers the benefit of diverse knowledge and experience; however, in practice, shared responsibility without high-quality teamwork can be fraught with peril.” Describe the perils that the authors say lead to uncoordinated care and unnecessary waste and cost. How do communication and interdisciplinary collaboration prevent adverse events? A minimum of THREE academic references from credible sources are required for this assignment

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Identifying Research Components Week 4 Tasks Use the Week 4 research template to complete

by

nursing research 2025

Identifying Research Components Week 4 Tasks Use the Week 4 research template to complete the following assignment tasks. Choose the assigned research articles from W2 Project. Describe the sample with demographics, data collection process, and identification of variables; sampling design; instruments, tools, or surveys. Summarized the discussion about the validity and reliability of the instruments, tools, or surveys. Discussed legal/ethical concerns. NOTE: If a component is absent, student receives a zero for that component. Submission Details Cite all sources in APA format. Name your document SU_NSG3029_W4_Project_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025