Adults Soap note of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Rubric Attached No Plagiarism 2025

Students must post one interesting case that he/she has seen in the clinical The case should be an unusual diagnosis, or a complex case that required in-depth evaluation on the student’s part. The case should be posted in the SOAP format, with references for the patient diagnosis, differential diagnoses (there should be at least 3), and the treatment plan.  In order to receive grade points for SOAP notes, the notes must be approved by the deadlines specified on the course assignments page. The posting does not have to be written in APA format, but should be written with correct spelling and grammar. References should be in APA format. The selected references should reflect current evidence –dated within the past 5 years.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Advanced Pathophysiology x 2 (Due: 24 hours) 2025

Requirements Format: 1) **********minimum 6 full pages (3 page each document) ( not words)**************************** ( cover or reference page not included) 2)¨**********APA norms (All paragraphs must be narrative and cited in the text- each paragraphs) 3)********** It will be verified by Turnitin and SafeAssign 4) References not older than 5 years 5) Each answer must be identified according to the question number. Check the list of questions. Your answer should start objectively answering the question Question: 1)………… 2)………… 3)………… Answer: 1)………… 2)………… 3)………… _______________________________________________________ Requirements submission You must answer (3) question2 times. You must submit 2 documents (each one 1 page). Copy and paste will not be admitted. You should address the questions with different wording , different references , but always, objectively answering the questions _____________________________________________________________ Case: Alterations of Cardiovascular Function Charles Bennington, a 55-year-old carpenter, develops severe crushing substernal chest pain with dyspnea, dizziness, diaphoresis, and nausea while unloading plywood from a truck. He is admitted to the emergency department and states that his symptoms have not resolved in the 40 min since they began, and that they are still severe. He indicates that he has had milder episodes of chest pain in the past, especially in conjunction with strenuous work. Questions: 1. What is the pathophysiology behind Mr. Bennington’s prolonged chest pain? 2. Mr. Bennington’s blood pressure is low, he is tachycardic, and you hear crackles in his lungs. What is the pathophysiology behind these findings? 3. Mr. Bennington has acute coronary syndrome. Which two conditions does this diagnosis include? 4. Why is it important to obtain an ECG for Mr. Bennington as soon as possible? 5. Which blood studies could confirm the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction? 6. As you examine Mr. Bennington after his ECG, why should you look for diminished pedal pulses and bruits? 7. Why is myocardial infarction more likely to occur in the left ventricle than in the right ventricle? 8. Mr. Bennington says, “Why did I get dizzy? The FNPs are focusing on my heart. Is there something wrong in my head also?” How should you respond? 9. Mr. Bennington was diagnosed with unstable angina. He asks, “What is unstable angina? How is that different from a heart attack?” How should you respond? 10. Why is it important for you to teach Mr. Bennington how to modify his risk factors for atherosclerosis?

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

h-6 2025

Submit the third milestone of your final project. Project on – Venice Family Clinic Item budget proposal – Electronic Health Record (EHR) Systems Prompt: After reviewing your proposal outline, your boss has strongly recommended that you identify options for implementing your capital proposal. Wanting to submit a successful proposal and earn a $2,500 bonus, you plan to do just that. Previously, you created a departmental budget that considered the costs and revenue associated with your capital budget item. For Milestone Three, you’ll go one step further and research the options for implementing your capital budget item(s). This research will culminate in a short paper identifying the capital item(s) you are proposing, describing: I. Impacts and Justification Short-Term Impact : What short-term impact will this request have on the overall financial statements used for decision making and on financial planning? Long-Term Impact : What long-term impact will this request have on the overall financial statements used for decision making and on financial planning? Cost-Benefit : What is the percentage increase in financial need? How does this balance with the potential value added by your requests? What is the cost-benefit of these requests? Strategic Planning : Provide an explanation for each budget request in your proposal, taking into consideration strategic plans. How do your budget requests show strategic planning and forethought? Conflicts : Describe the strategic impact and any potential ways in which your recommendations might conflict with the overall strategic vision. When discussing the benefits, indicate whether your proposal will affect each of the key healthcare operating indicators and why the proposal will or will not have that affect. Requirements of submission: Your paper must be submitted as a two- to three-page document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, using APA for citations. For additional details, please refer to the Milestone 3 guidelines and rubric. PLEASE FOLLOW ALLL INSTRUCTIONS WITHIN RUBRIC! Excel Budget attached below with milestone 2. Please read before moving forward to milestone 3

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Write a 2-3 page paper that explains and defends your view on the issue of whether or not patients with no other treatment options have a moral right to unproven drugs. 2025

Introduction Many doctors, nurses, medical technicians, and other health care workers are involved in medical research. The field of medicine is not limited to the direct treatment of patients but also involves the continued expansion of medical research. A large part of such research is clinical research, which puts patients into the role of experimental subjects. This raises a number of challenging questions for health care ethics, many of which follow from the fact that physicians, nurses, and others involved in clinical research have a dual role. As researchers, they are committed to generating new knowledge about diseases, developing new treatments and drug therapies, and, in general, helping to improve the welfare of human beings by eliminating or controlling diseases and increasing longevity. However, researchers involved in clinical research must also be committed to the highest quality care for individual patients taking part in research studies. This assessment explores some of the ethical issues that clinical research raises and some of the safeguards in place to protect the interests of patients involved in research. Demonstration of Proficiency By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Articulate ethical issues in health care. Explain how the principle of informed consent is relevant to these issues. Explain the costs and benefits of offering unapproved experimental drugs to patients. Competency 2: Apply sound ethical thinking related to a health care issue. Identify relevant ethical theories and moral principles. Articulate arguments using examples for and against offering pre-approved drugs to wider pools of patients. Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with health care professionals. Exhibit proficiency in clear and effective academic writing skills. Preparation When a new drug is undergoing clinical trials to be approved for treatment, it must pass through a number of distinct phases of testing. These phases require rigorous study and evidence to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of new treatments. Passing through these phases and achieving approval takes many years for some trials. Before approval, patients not part of a clinical trial have limited or no access to experimental drugs, even though these drugs could be helpful and potentially save their lives. There are various groups pushing for greater patient access to drugs still in the experimental stage. In recent years, the FDA has made it somewhat easier to receive treatment with experimental drugs, but according to advocacy groups there are still too many restrictions (Munson, 2014). This leads to a potential quandary when early stages of research on a drug sometimes suggest that the drug could be effective in treating a certain disease. On one hand, offering easier access to early stage trial drugs could help individuals suffering with a medical condition. However, on the other hand, making early access to experimental drugs easier could limit the pool of patients available to participate in clinical trials that establish whether or not the drug is truly effective and safe. This is an important consideration, as the vast majority of experimental drugs turn out to be completely ineffective or could have very dangerous side effects that will only show up over time and across a wider test population. When completing this assessment, it is important to keep in mind the ethical arguments that are relevant to both views regarding the right to experimental drugs. It may be useful to review the suggested resources and conduct additional independent research while you are planning your assessment submission. Instructions Do patients with no other treatment options have a moral right to unproven drugs? Write a paper that explains and defends your view on this issue. In addition to reviewing the suggested resources, you are encouraged to locate additional resources in the Capella library, your public library, or authoritative online sites to provide additional support for your viewpoint. Be sure to weave and cite the resources throughout your work. In your paper, address the following points: Identify relevant ethical theories and moral principles. Explain how the principle of informed consent is relevant to the issue. Explain the costs and benefits of making unproven, unapproved experimental drugs widely available to patients. Consider the costs and benefits not only to the individual patients who take these drugs but also potential costs and benefits to other patients. Explain arguments using examples for and against offering pre-approved drugs to wider pools of patients. Support your view using ethical theories or moral principles (or both) that you find most relevant to the issue. Additional Requirements Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message. APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines. Length: 2–3 typed, double-spaced pages. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point. Reference Munson, R. (2014). Intervention and reflection: Basic issues in bioethics (concise ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025