EBP Project – Finding the Evidence 2025

This paper is only 8 paragraphs. Since each paragraph is only 3-4 well written sentences long, this is do-able. EACH paragraph description in the rubric states what is expected. FOLLOW THE RUBRIC. Want to do your best? Follow these tips: Answer the topic in the first sentence of each paragraph, then add 3-4 sentences to support your response. Read each rubric section to be sure you have correct content for each paragraph. Examples Paragraph 1: Paragraph one facts are NOT from your main article. Include a source related to your topic to cite the facts in your introductory paragraph showing why your research question is relevant (this paragraph is where you include your PICO question). Paragraph 2: Introduce the main article and give facts as described on the rubric. Paragraph 3: Define reliability and be sure to include what type of reliability was used (see your text). If not addressed, critique this and add what type would be appropriate. Paragraph 4: Define validity and be sure to include what type of validity was used (see your text). If not addressed, critique this and add what type would be appropriate. Paragraph 5: Identify two strengths and/or weaknesses of the main article. DO NOT REPEAT discussion of reliability and validity. Strengths and weaknesses cannot be quoted from the authors—they need to be your analysis. Paragraph 6: See rubric to give facts from a Clinical Practice Guideline source. Research to learn what Clinical Practice Guidelines entail. Be sure to include the web site used. Paragraph 7: See rubric to introduce facts from a fourth source. This can be a how-to article or any related source, as long as it is current. Paragraph 8: Conclusion. Repeat the PICO question and answer it based on your research. Cite sources. Many students forget to do this. See the rubric and don’t lose points. 5. APA: Make sure you use correct in-text citations for all paraphrasing and page numbers for direct quotes. However, direct quotes are discouraged for this paper and limited to two, if necessary. 1 point off for each direct quote over two. DO NOT USE FIRST PERSON! “I think” “we believe”, etc. are not allowed in scholarly writing. 6. Double space, and double space ONLY, the entire paper–title page, headings, paragraphs, references, etc. APA does not vary. Pay attention to APA—it is worth up to 15 points on this assignment. more tips below. 7. Read the rubric. I am looking for no more and no less than stated. You will not receive more points for having five facts about your article than if you put the required three. Information must be in the correct paragraph. If your statistics are not in paragraph one, you will not receive credit for facts listed in paragraph one Upload your PICO(T ) question draft to the student discussion board for peer review. APA TIPS Title Page: Use the CONHI example to be sure you have all requirements on the title page. Running head format and page numbers must be correct. There is no heading before the introduction paragraph. The title belongs there. This paper does not require an abstract. Common Journal Listing errors: · Do not add credentials to the reference page for authors. List: Surname, first initial · Alphabetize by author surname · Do use ampersands for more than one author · Do NOT capitalize all words of the article title: Only the first word and proper nouns · Italicize the journal name and use upper and lower case · Italicize the volume number Do NOT write Vol. · Parenthesize the issue number-regular font. Do NOT write Issue or No. · Use numbers only for page numbers. Do NOT write p. or pp. · ALWAYS include an electronic source. Use the doi or website for the actual article (not the search engine) · Remove the hyperlink: You do this by right-clicking on the link, which will open a menu with the option to Remove Hyperlinks · For more than 7 authors on the reference list, use the multiple author format

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

IOM Future of Nursing Report and Nursing 2025

IOM Future of Nursing Report and Nursing Review the IOM report, “The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health,” and explore the “Campaign for Action: State Action Coalition” website. In a 1,000-1,250 word paper, discuss the influence the IOM report and state-based action coalitions have had on nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing workforce development, and how they continue to advance the goals for the nursing profession. Include the following: Describe the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report, “Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health.” Outline the four “Key Messages” that structure the IOM Report recommendations. Explain how these have transformed or influenced nursing practice, nursing education and training, nursing leadership, and nursing workforce development. Provide examples. Discuss the role of state-based action coalitions. Explain how these coalitions help advance the goals specified in the IOM report, “Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health.” Research the initiatives on which your state’s action coalition is working. Summarize two initiatives spearheaded by your state’s action coalition. Discuss the ways these initiatives advance the nursing profession. Describe barriers to advancement that currently exist in your state and explain how nursing advocates in your state overcome these barriers. You are required to cite to a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. IOM and Future of Nursing Report and Nursing Profession No of Criteria: 10 Achievement Levels: 5 CriteriaAchievement LevelsDescriptionPercentageUnsatisfactory0.00 %Less Than Satisfactory75.00 %Satisfactory79.00 %Good89.00 %Excellent100.00 %Content80.0 Robert Wood Foundation Committee Work and IOM Report10.0A description of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is omitted.An incomplete description of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented.A summary of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented. There are inaccuracies or misinterpretations.A description of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented. There are slight inaccuracies.A clear and accurate description of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented.Key Messages Transforming Nursing15.0The four key messages are omitted.Fewer than four key messages are presented, and the messages contain inaccuracies. An incomplete discussion on how they transformed nursing is presented.The four key messages that structure the IOM report are generally outlined. A summary of how these transformed some aspects of nursing is presented, but there are some inaccuracies.The four key messages that structure the IOM report are outlined. A description of how these transformed key aspects of nursing is presented.The four key messages that structure the IOM report are clearly outlined. A description of how these transformed nursing practice, nursing education and training, nursing leadership, and nursing workforce development are thoroughly discussed.State-Based Action Coalitions and Their Help in Advancing Goals form IOM Report15.0The role of state-based action coalitions is omitted.The role of state-based action coalitions is incomplete. It is unclear how these advance the goals in the IOM report.The role of state-based action coalitions is summarized. A summary of how they help advance the goals in the IOM report is presented.The role of state-based action coalitions is discussed. A discussion of how they help advance the goals in the IOM report is presented.The role of state-based action coalitions is thoroughly discussed. A detailed and accurate discussion of how they help advance the goals in the IOM report is presented.State Action Coalition Initiatives Advancing Nursing Profession20.0Initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition are omitted.Only one initiative spearheaded by a state action coalition is presented. The narrative contains omissions and inaccuracies. How these initiatives advance the nursing profession are incomplete.Two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition are summarized. How these initiatives advance the nursing profession are generally discussed. There are some inaccuracies.Two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession are discussed.Two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession are thoroughly discussed. The discussion demonstrates a clear understanding of the state action committee and the role in advancing the nursing profession.Barriers to Advancement20.0Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are omitted. How nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is omitted.Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are unclear. How nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is incomplete.Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are presented. How nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is summarized. There are inaccuracies, or more information is needed.Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers are described.Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are thoroughly explored and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers are thoroughly described. Organization, Effectiveness, and Format20.0 Thesis Development and Purpose5.0Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.Argument Logic and Construction5.0Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5.0Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)2.0Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)3.0Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Total Percentage 100

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Using Technology in the Healthcare Industry /Discussion post 2025

DUE WEDNESDAY 7/16/19 minimum 350 words Some have argued that the data-to-wisdom continuum cannot be used to define the scope of clinical practice because computers cannot process wisdom. Identify and describe whether this is a fallacy. Some have argued that the data-to-wisdom continuum cannot be used to define the scope of clinical practice because computers cannot process wisdom. Identify and describe whether this is a fallacy.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Discuss Topic 1: Based on how you will evaluate your EBP project, which independent and dependent variables do you need to collect? Why? 2025

Discuss Topic 1: Based on how you will evaluate your EBP project, which independent and dependent variables do you need to collect? Why? This is a discussion post, ABOUT 250 WORDS , tittle page not require In- text citation is required original work please, scholarly references are required for this assignment, website source strongly preferred . QUESTION 1 Based on how you will evaluate your EBP project, which independent and dependent variables do you need to collect? Why?

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Data Analysis and Quality Improvement Initiative Proposal 2025

Prepare an 8-10 page data analysis and quality improvement initiative proposal based on a health issue of interest. Include internal and external benchmark data, evidence-based recommendations to improve health care quality and safety, and communication strategies to gain buy-in from all interprofessional team members responsible for implementing the initiative. Health care providers are perpetually striving to improve care quality and patient safety. To accomplish enhanced care, outcomes need to be measured. Next, data measures must be validated. Measurement and validation of information support performance improvement. Health care providers must focus attention on evidence-based best practices to improve patient outcomes. Health informatics, along with new and improved technologies and procedures, are at the core of all quality improvement initiatives. Data analysis begins with provider documentation, researched process improvement models, and recognized quality benchmarks. All of these items work together to improve patient outcomes. Professional nurses must be able to interpret and communicate dashboard information that displays critical care metrics and outcomes along with data collected from the care delivery process. For this assessment, use your current role or assume a role you hope to have. You will develop a quality improvement (QI) initiative proposal based on a health issue of professional interest. To create this proposal, analyze a health care facility’s dashboard metrics and external benchmark data. Include evidence-based recommendations to improve health care quality and safety relating to your selected issue. Successful QI initiatives depend on the support of nursing staff and other members of the interprofessional team. As a result, a key aspect of your proposal will be the communication strategies you plan to use to get buy-in from these team members. Demonstration of Proficiency By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria: Competency 1: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to adverse events and near-miss analyses. Determine whether any adverse event or near-miss data needs to be factored in to outcomes and recommendations. Competency 2: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to routine data surveillance. Develop a QI initiative proposal based on a selected health issue and supporting data analysis. Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures. Analyze data to identify a health care issue or area of concern. Competency 4: Integrate interprofessional perspectives to lead quality improvements in patient safety, cost-effectiveness, and work-life quality. Communicate QI initiative proposal based on input of the interdisciplinary team to improve patient safety and quality outcomes and work-life quality. Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care. Determine communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care. Communicate QI initiative proposal in a professional, effective manner, writing clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style. Preparation To develop the QI initiative proposal required for this assessment, you must analyze a health care facility’s dashboard metrics. Choose Option 1 or 2 according to your ability to access dashboard metrics for a QI initiative proposal. Option 1 If you have access to dashboard metrics related to a QI initiative proposal of interest to you, complete the following: Analyze data from the health care facility to identify a health care issue or area of concern. You will need access to reports and data related to care quality and patient safety. For example, in a hospital setting, you would contact the quality management department to obtain the needed data. It is your responsibility to determine the appropriate resource to provide the necessary data in your chosen health care setting. If you need help determining how to obtain the needed information, consult your faculty member for guidance. Include in your proposal basic information about the health care setting, size, and specific type of care delivery related to the identified topic. Please abide by Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliance standards. Option 2 If you do not have access to a dashboard or metrics related to a QI initiative proposal: Use the hospital data set provided in Vila Health: Data Analysis . You will analyze data to identify a health care issue or area of concern. Include in your proposal basic information about the health care setting, size, and specific type of care delivery related to the identified topic. Instructions Use your current role or assume a role you would like to have. Choose a quality improvement initiative of professional interest to you. Your current organization is probably working on quality improvement initiatives that can be evaluated, so consider starting there. To develop your proposal you will: Gather internal and external benchmark data on the subject of your quality improvement initiative proposal. Analyze data you have collected. Make evidence-based recommendations about how to improve health care quality and safety relating to your chosen issue. Remember, your initiative’s success depends on the interprofessional team’s commitment to the QI initiative. Think carefully about these stakeholders and how you plan to include them in the process, as they will help you develop and implement ideas and sustain outcomes. Also, remember how important external stakeholders, such as patients and other health care delivery organizations, are to the process. As you are preparing this assessment, consider carefully the communication strategies you will employ to include the perspectives of all internal and external stakeholders in your proposal. The following numbered points correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide. The bullets below each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be sure that your proposal addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understand the performance levels related to each grading criterion. Analyze data to identify a health care issue or area of concern. Identify the type of data you are analyzing from your institution or from the Vila Health activity. Explain why data matters. What does data show related to outcomes? Analyze the dashboard metrics. What else could the organization measure to enhance knowledge? Present dashboard metrics related to the selected issue that are critical to evaluating outcomes. Assess the institutional ability to sustain processes or outcomes. Evaluate data quality and its implications for outcomes. Determine whether any adverse event or near-miss data needs to be factored in to outcomes and recommendations. Examine the nursing process for variations or performance failures that could lead to an adverse event or near miss. Identify trends, measures, and information needed to critically analyze specific outcomes. Specify desired outcomes related to prevention of adverse events and near misses. Analyze which metrics indicate future quality improvement opportunities. Develop a QI initiative proposal based on a selected health issue and supporting data analysis. Determine benchmarks aligned to existing QI initiatives set by local, state, or federal health care policies or laws. Identify any internal existing QI initiatives in your practice setting or organization related to the selected issue. Explain why they are insufficient. Evaluate external national or international QI initiatives on the selected health issue with existing quality indicators from other facilities, government agencies, and nongovernmental bodies on quality improvement. Define target areas for improvement and the processes to be modified to improve outcomes. Propose evidence-based strategies to improve quality. Analyze challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for a health care organization and the interprofessional team. Communicate QI initiative proposal based on interdisciplinary team input to improve patient safety and quality outcomes and work-life quality. Define interprofessional roles and responsibilities relating to data and the QI initiative. Explain how to ensure all relevant interprofessional roles are fully engaged in this effort. Identify how outcomes will be measured and data used to inform interprofessional team performance related to specific tasks. Reflect on the impact of the proposed initiative on work-life quality of the interprofessional team. Describe how the initiative enhances work-life quality due to improved strategies supporting efficiency. Determine communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care. Identify interprofessional communication strategies that will help to promote and ensure the success of the QI initiative. Identify communication models, such as SBAR and CUS, to include in your proposal. SBAR stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation. CUS stands for “I am C oncerned about my resident’s condition; I am U ncomfortable with my resident’s condition; I believe the S afety of the resident is at risk.” Consult this resource for additional information about these fundamental evidence-based tools to improve interprofessional team communication for patient handoffs: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). (n.d.). Module 2: Communicating change in a resident’s condition . Retrieved from https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/systems/long-term-care/resources/facilities/ptsafety/ltcmod2ap.html Communicate QI initiative proposal in a professional, effective manner, writing clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style. Example Assessment: Refer to QI Initiative Proposal Exemplar [PDF] for an idea of what an assessment given a proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like. Additional Requirements Submission length: 8–10 typed, double-spaced pages of content plus title and reference pages. Font : Times New Roman, 12 points. Number of references: Cite a minimum of 5 current scholarly and/or authoritative sources to support your QI initiative proposal. Current means no older than 5 years unless a seminal work. APA formatting: Citations and references need to adhere to APA style and formatting guidelines. Consult these resources for an APA refresher: APA Style & Format . APA Module . American Psychological Association. (n.d.). APA style . Retrieved from https://www.apastyle.org/

Nursing Assignment Help 2025