CONVERSATION RECAP 2025

INTRODUCTION Communication requires both parties to make choices. These choices determine if the conversation will create value or create waste. These choices mostly consist of recognizing when a bioreaction occurs, how it impacts listening, and being aware of listening differently. REQUIREMENTS Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide. You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course. Select a conversation where you had a disagreement that had an impact on you and triggered a bioreaction. The conversation could have been a long time ago or recently. A. Explain what happened during the disagreement by answering the following questions: • Describe the situation that led to the conversation. • When did you realize that there was a disagreement during the conversation? • Describe a bioreaction(s) that was experienced during the disagreement. • How did the conversation end? B. Analyze the conversation by answering the following questions: • Using the four levels of the conversation meter, what level were you listening at, and what level was the other person listening at? • Give examples of two factors that describe how you and they were listening in at these levels in the conversation meter: feelings, behaviors, language, or tone. • What were your points of alignment or disagreement? C. Reflect on how the conversation encouraged you to listen differently by answering the following questions: • How could you have listened differently moving up the conversation meter, and what effect would that have had on the disagreement? • How could you incorporate listening for needs, purpose, or concern to create value in the conversation (including describing what that would look like)? • What have you learned about accuracy and authenticity that could be used to improve the conversation? D. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Ethics Week 2 Discussion 2 2025

Apply the framework of The Five R’s approach to ethical nursing practice from this week’s reading to answer the questions about values and choices. FIVE (R)ULES BOX 2-6 The Five Rs Approach to Ethical Nursing Practice 1. Read: Read and learn about ethical philosophies, approaches, and the ANA’s Code of Ethics for Nurses . Insight and practical wisdom are best developed through effort and concentration. 2. Reflect: Reflect mindfully on one’s egocentric attachments—values, intentions, motivations, and attitudes. Members of moral communities are socially engaged and focus on the common good. This includes having good insight regarding life events, cultivating and using practical wisdom, and being generous and socially just. 3. Recognize: Recognize ethical bifurcation (decision) points, whether they are obvious or obscure. Because of indifference or avoidance, nurses may miss both small and substantial opportunities to help alleviate human suffering in its different forms. 4. Resolve: Resolve to develop and practice intellectual and moral virtues. Knowing ethical codes, rules, duties, and principles means little without being combined with a nurse’s good character. 5. Respond: Respond to persons and situations deliberately and habitually with intellectual and moral virtues. Nurses have a choice about their character development and actions. What are values? Q. What are your personal values? Q. Why do you value them? Q. What are the values in your society? Q. How do you make choices? Q. Are your choices based on your values? Q. What values are useful in society? What are the limits to personal choice? Q. Who limits your choices? Q. Are limits to choices good? Q. Do you limit other people’s choices? Q. Should the health care organization or the government limit people’s choices? If so, how, and under what circumstances? In your responses to peers, feel free to agree, disagree, question, compare, and discuss each other’s responses in a way that fosters thoughtful and respectful dialog. You may also address the following: Did any responses surprise you? If so, how? Did reading your peers’ responses to the questions expand your own view of ways to answer questions? Finally, consider this: A common idea in health care is that if you are drawn to health care as a profession, you are inherently guided by an inner compass that is composed of a strong moral framework. Why is this a dangerous assumption?

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

DPI Project Proposal Chapter 2 – Literature Review 2025

DPI Project Proposal Chapter 2 – Literature Review Chapter 2 of the DPI Project Proposal is entitled “Literature Review” and expands upon work you completed in DNP-820 in the Develop a Literature Review assignment. Synthesis of the literature in the Literature Review (Chapter 2) defines the key aspects of the learner’s scholarly project, such as the problem statement, population and location, clinical questions, hypotheses or phenomena (if relevant to the project), methodology and design, purpose statement, data collection, and data analysis approaches. The literature selected must illustrate strong support for the learner’s practice change proposal. General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: • Locate the “DPI Proposal Template” in the PI Workspace of the DC Network. • Locate the Develop a Literature Review assignment you completed in DNP-820. • Locate the “Research Article Chart” resource in the Topic Materials. • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center. • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. • You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Directions: Use the “DPI Proposal Template” and the Develop a Literature Review assignment from DNP-820 to develop a draft of a literature review (Chapter 2) for your DPI Project Proposal. The literature review (Chapter 2) is required to be a minimum of 30 pages. You have already completed some of this review in previous courses. No less than 85% of the articles must have been published in the past 5 years. Articles selected must further provide strong, relatable support for the proposal. Use the following guidelines to create your draft Literature Review (Chapter 2): 1.Using the PICOT question format, identify at least three empirical or scholarly articles (25 articles total) related to the theme in the PICOT question. 2. Use the “Research Article Chart” resource located in the Topic Materials as a guide to: (a) analyze and synthesize the literature into your paper, (b) state the article title, (c) identify the author, (d) state the research question(s), (e) identify the research sample, (f) explain the research methodology, (g) identify the limitations in the study, (h) provide the research findings of the study, and (i) identify the opportunities for practice implementation. For scholarly, nonempirical articles, state the article title and author, and provide a brief contextual summary of the article. 3. Identify at least three subthemes that relate to each theme (six subthemes total). 4. Identify at least three empirical or scholarly articles related to each subtheme (18 articles total). At least one article must demonstrate a quantitative methodology. Write statements that synthesize the three studies for each subtheme based on the information you stated above. You will write six synthesis statements.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Nursing Case Study 2025

Please make sure you include a title page and that you answer each question with a detailed rationale as well as credible sources to back up your answers. Make sure you use your textbook, peer reviewed journals or reliable websites like those ending in .edu, .gov and .org. There can be more than one correct answer to the multiple choice questions. They are choose all that apply. Mr. Charles Lamont is a 45-year-old patient who is visiting his primary care physician for his an annual checkup. His wife is waiting for him in the lobby; she is hoping that Mr. Lamont will tell the physician about his recent bout of coughing and shortness of breath. Mr. Lamont works for a construction company as a heavy machine operator. He smokes 1½ packs of cigarettes per day. His wife has been encouraging Mr. Lamont to stop, but he has not showed any interest in quitting. Laura, the registered nurse, takes Mr. Lamont to an examination room. Laura asks him about his overall health and he tells her about a nagging cough and how he sometimes feels short of breath. He then denies any other health problems. Laura takes Mr. Lamont’s vital signs and gets the following results: blood pressure 156/94 mm Hg, temperature 99.8° F orally, apical pulse 104 beats/min, respirations 25 breaths/min and regular, and pulse oximetry 95%. Mr. Lamont asks Laura if everything is normal. Before she answers, she reviews the results and determines which of the results are abnormal. What are Laura’s findings? What would be normal for any of these that are not normal? The primary care physician examines Mr. Lamont and tells him he should quit smoking. He gives him an antihypertensive medication to help lower his blood pressure. Mr. Lamont asks Laura if she can teach his wife how to take his blood pressure. Laura agrees and brings Mrs. Lamont in to explain the process. Laura decides that she will use demonstration to teach Mrs. Lamont the procedure, but she also wants to explain some important concepts. What should she include? Select all that apply. A. Choose a cuff that is the right size. B. Ensure that the patient is sitting or lying. C. Support the extremity. D. Ensure proper cuff application. Mr. Lamont tells Laura that he doesn’t understand how smoking could influence his blood pressure. How should Laura respond? Mr. Lamont tells his wife that the physician told him his respiratory rate was increased. Mrs. Lamont asks Laura what could cause him to breathe faster. What factors could cause his increased respirations? Select all that apply. A. Smoking B. Medications C. Increased activity D. Pain

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Week 10 assignment: Ethical Perspective 2025

Part I Define the following ethical perspectives in your own words. A minimum of three sources must be utilized and cited properly with in-text citations and a reference list. Avoid using direct quotes. If you summarize or paraphrase information in your own words, you must cite sources to provide credit for the ideas and concepts. A = Rule utilitarianism B = Kantian ethics C = Virtue ethics D = Care ethics E = Social contract ethics F = Subjective relativism G = Cultural relativism H = Divine command theory I = Act utilitarianism Part II Determine which ethical perspective above is primarily reflected in each of the ten arguments below and explain why. A minimum of three sources must be utilized and cited properly with in-text citations and in the reference list. Avoid using direct quotes. If you summarize or paraphrase information in your own words, you must cite sources to provide credit for the ideas and concepts. Arguments: Although many societies have practiced human sacrifice, human sacrifice was not considered wrong, even though we believe it is wrong in our culture. Therefore, human sacrifice within those cultures was not really wrong. Same-sex marriage is right because the Constitution offers equal protection under the law and society has agreed to follow the laws set forth in that document. “And the pig, though it has a split hoof completely divided, does not chew the cud; it is unclean for you. You must not eat their meat or touch their carcasses; they are unclean for you.” (Leviticus 11:7–8) Your neighbor runs into her house screaming, blood dripping down her arm. Five minutes later a man with a bloody machete comes running down the street and stops and asks you where she went. You answer honestly “in her house.” Margarita spoke with her family and they all agreed that they would let her take the medication that would allow her to die peacefully instead of in pain. Souerette watched over the children in the daycare meticulously. She knew which children she could trust alone because of their behaviors with each other. He does not have the right character and temperament to be a state governor. He avoided service by faking a medical condition, he rarely tells the truth, he eats and drinks too much, and he has little patience with people. Patient autonomy and free choice are morally correct. I believe that it is perfectly fine to lie about some things. Wearing a mask when engaging with the public is the right decision because it protects the welfare of those in your community.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025