2025 In addition to the topic study materials use the chart you completed and questions you answered in

week 5 Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis 2025

In addition to the topic study materials, use the chart you completed and questions you answered in the Topic 3 about “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” as the basis for your responses in this assignment. Answer the following questions about a patient’s spiritual needs in light of the Christian worldview. In 200-250 words, respond to the following: Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James, or would that mean a disrespect of a patient’s autonomy? Explain your rationale. In 400-450 words, respond to the following: How ought the Christian think about sickness and health? How should a Christian think about medical intervention? What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James in relation to what is truly honoring the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence in James’s care? In 200-250 words, respond to the following: How would a spiritual needs assessment help the physician assist Mike determine appropriate interventions for James and for his family or others involved in his care? Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Rubric: 1. Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are analyzed from both perspectives with a deep understanding of the complexity of the principle of autonomy. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. 20% 2. Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are analyzed with deep understanding of the complexity of the Christian perspective, as well as with the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. 20% 3. How a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son is clearly analyzed with a deep understanding of the connection between a spiritual needs assessment and providing appropriate interventions. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. 30% 4. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 7% 5. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 8% 6. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 5% 7. All format elements are correct. 5% 8. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. 5% There are three different parts to this paper: · Part one deals with Mike’s decision-making capabilities. · Part two deals with how to think issues related to sickness and health. · Part three deals with a spiritual assessment. Read “Doing a Culturally Sensitive Spiritual Assessment: Recognizing Spiritual Themes and Using the HOPE Questions,” by Anandarajah, from AMA Journal of Ethics (2005). https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/doing-culturally-sensitive-spiritual-assessment-recognizing-spiritual-themes-and-using-hope/2005-05 Read “End of Life and Sanctity of Life,” by Reichman, from American Medical Association Journal of Ethics , formerly Virtual Mentor (2005). http://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/2005/05/ccas2-0505.html

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Soap note about chronic Disease in these case I selected Gastroesophageal Reflux

Soap note -Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease 2025

Soap note about chronic Disease in these case I selected: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. I attach an example to make more easy your work. Please put 2 references between 2015 to 2019. EXAMPLE: PATIENT INFORMATION Name: Mr. W.S. Age: 65-year-old Sex: Male Source: Patient Allergies: None Current Medications: Atorvastatin tab 20 mg, 1-tab PO at bedtime PMH: Hypercholesterolemia Immunizations: Influenza last 2018-year, tetanus, and hepatitis A and B 4 years ago. Surgical History: Appendectomy 47 years ago. Family History: Father- died 81 does not report information Mother-alive, 88 years old, Diabetes Mellitus, HTN Daughter-alive, 34 years old, healthy Social Hx: No smoking history or illicit drug use, occasional alcoholic beverage consumption on social celebrations. Retired, widow, he lives alone. SUBJECTIVE: Chief complain : “headaches” that started two weeks ago Symptom analysis/HPI: The patient is 65 years old male who complaining of episodes of headaches and on 3 different occasions blood pressure was measured, which was high (159/100, 158/98 and 160/100 respectively). Patient noticed the problem started two weeks ago and sometimes it is accompanied by dizziness. He states that he has been under stress in his workplace for the last month. Patient denies chest pain, palpitation, shortness of breath, nausea or vomiting. ROS: CONSTITUTIONAL : Denies fever or chills. Denies weakness or weight loss. NEUROLOGIC : Headache and dizzeness as describe above. Denies changes in LOC. Denies history of tremors or seizures. HEENT : HEAD: Denies any head injury, or change in LOC. Eyes: Denies any changes in vision, diplopia or blurred vision. Ear: Denies pain in the ears. Denies loss of hearing or drainage. Nose: Denies nasal drainage, congestion. THROAT: Denies throat or neck pain, hoarseness, difficulty swallowing. Respiratory : Patient denies shortness of breath, cough or hemoptysis. Cardiovascular : No chest pain, tachycardia. No orthopnea or paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. Gastrointestinal : Denies abdominal pain or discomfort. Denies flatulence, nausea, vomiting or diarrhea. Genitourinary : Denies hematuria, dysuria or change in urinary frequency. Denies difficulty starting/stopping stream of urine or incontinence. MUSCULOSKELETAL : Denies falls or pain. Denies hearing a clicking or snapping sound. Skin : No change of coloration such as cyanosis or jaundice, no rashes or pruritus. Objective Data CONSTITUTIONAL : Vital signs: Temperature: 98.5 °F, Pulse: 87, BP: 159/92 mmhg, RR 20, PO2-98% on room air, Ht- 6’4”, Wt 200 lb, BMI 25. Report pain 0/10. General appearance: The patient is alert and oriented x 3. No acute distress noted. NEUROLOGIC: Alert, CNII-XII grossly intact, oriented to person, place, and time . Sensation intact to bilateral upper and lower extremities. Bilateral UE/LE strength 5/5. HEENT: Head: Normocephalic, atraumatic, symmetric, non-tender. Maxillary sinuses no tenderness. Eyes: No conjunctival injection, no icterus, visual acuity and extraocular eye movements intact. No nystagmus noted. Ears: Bilateral canals patent without erythema, edema, or exudate. Bilateral tympanic membranes intact, pearly gray with sharp cone of light. Maxillary sinuses no tenderness. Nasal mucosa moist without bleeding. Oral mucosa moist without lesions,.Lids non-remarkable and appropriate for race. Neck: supple without cervical lymphadenopathy, no jugular vein distention, no thyroid swelling or masses. Cardiovascular: S1S2, regular rate and rhythm, no murmur or gallop noted. Capillary refill < 2 sec. Respiratory: No dyspnea or use of accessory muscles observed. No egophony, whispered pectoriloquy or tactile fremitus on palpation. Breath sounds presents and clear bilaterally on auscultation. Gastrointestinal: No mass or hernia observed. Upon auscultation, bowel sounds present in all four quadrants, no bruits over renal and aorta arteries. Abdomen soft non-tender, no guarding, no rebound no distention or organomegaly noted on palpation Musculoskeletal: No pain to palpation. Active and passive ROM within normal limits, no stiffness. Integumentary: intact, no lesions or rashes, no cyanosis or jaundice. Assessment Essential (Primary) Hypertension (ICD10 I10): Given the symptoms and high blood pressure (156/92 mmhg), classified as stage 2. Once the organic cause of hypertension has been ruled out, such as renal, adrenal or thyroid, this diagnosis is confirmed. Differential diagnosis: Ø Renal artery stenosis (ICD10 I70.1) Ø Chronic kidney disease (ICD10 I12.9) Ø Hyperthyroidism (ICD10 E05.90) Plan Diagnosis is based on the clinical evaluation through history, physical examination, and routine laboratory tests to assess risk factors, reveal identifiable causes and detect target-organ damage, including evidence of cardiovascular disease. These basic laboratory tests are: · CMP · Complete blood count · Lipid profile · Thyroid-stimulating hormone · Urinalysis · Electrocardiogram Ø Pharmacological treatment: The treatment of choice in this case would be: Thiazide-like diuretic and/or a CCB · Hydrochlorothiazide tab 25 mg, Initial dose: 25 mg orally once daily. Ø Non-Pharmacologic treatment : · Weight loss · Healthy diet (DASH dietary pattern): Diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and low-fat dairy products with reduced content of saturated and trans l fat · Reduced intake of dietary sodium: <1,500 mg/d is optimal goal but at least 1,000 mg/d reduction in most adults · Enhanced intake of dietary potassium · Regular physical activity (Aerobic): 90–150 min/wk · Tobacco cessation · Measures to release stress and effective coping mechanisms. Education · Provide with nutrition/dietary information. · Daily blood pressure monitoring at home twice a day for 7 days, keep a record, bring the record on the next visit with her PCP · Instruction about medication intake compliance. · Education of possible complications such as stroke, heart attack, and other problems. · Patient was educated on course of hypertension, as well as warning signs and symptoms, which could indicate the need to attend the E.R/U.C. Answered all pt. questions/concerns. Pt verbalizes understanding to all Follow-ups/Referrals · Evaluation with PCP in 1 weeks for managing blood pressure and to evaluate current hypotensive therapy. Urgent Care visit prn. · No referrals needed at this time. References Domino, F., Baldor, R., Golding, J., Stephens, M. (2017). The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2017 (25th ed.). Print (The 5-Minute Consult Series). Codina Leik, M. T. (2014). Family Nurse Practitioner Certification Intensive Review (2nd ed.). ISBN 978-0-8261-3424-0 Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Review this week s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide related

Focused Exam: Cough Assignment 2025

Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide related to ears, nose, and throat. Review the Shadow Health Resources provided in this week’s Learning Resources specifically the tutorial to guide you through the documentation and interpretation within the Shadow Health platform. Review the examples also provided. Review the DCE (Shadow Health) Documentation Template for Focused Exam: Cough found in this week’s Learning Resources and use this template to complete your Documentation Notes for this DCE Assignment. Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis? Review the Week 5 Focused Exam: Cough Rubric provided in the Assignment submission area for details on completing t Review the Shadow Health Resources provided in this week’s Learning Resources specifically the tutorial to guide you through the documentation and interpretation within the Shadow Health platform. Review the examples also provided. Review the DCE (Shadow Health) Documentation Template for Focused Exam: Cough found in this week’s Learning Resources and use this template to complete your Documentation Notes for this DCE Assignment. Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 At some point in every construction project efforts turn from design and the focus moves to

Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 6: Finalizing the Plan 2025

At some point in every construction project, efforts turn from design and the focus moves to actual construction. With the vision in place and the tools secured, the blueprint can be finalized and approved. Then it is time to put on hardhats and begin work. Throughout the course you have developed aspects of your Academic and Professional Development Plan. You have thought a great deal about your vision and goals, your academic and professional network of support, research strategies and other tools you will need, the integrity of your work, and the value of consulting the work of others. With your portfolio in place, it is now time to finalize your blueprint for success. Much as builders remain cognizant of the building standards as they plan and begin construction, nurses must remain mindful of the formal standards of practice that govern their specialties. A good understanding of these standards can help ensure that your success plan includes any steps necessary to excel within your chosen specialty. In this Assignment you will continue developing your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan by developing the final component–a review of your specialty standards of practice. You will also submit your final version of the document, including Parts 1–5. To Prepare: Review the standards of practice related to your chosen specialty- Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse practitioner. Download the Nursing Specialty Comparison Matrix. Examine professional organizations related to the specialization you have chosen and identify at least one to focus on for this Assignment. Reflect on the thoughts you shared in the Discussion forum regarding your choice of a specialty, any challenges you have encountered in making this choice, and any feedback you have received from colleagues in the Discussion. The Assignment: Complete the following items and incorporate them into the final version of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan. Complete the Nursing Specialty Comparison Matrix , comparing at least two nursing specialties that include your selected specialization and second-preferred specialization- Selected specialization is Psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner and the second -preferred specialization is Family nurse practitioner. Write a 2- to 3-paragraph justification statement identifying your reasons for choosing your MSN specialization. Incorporate feedback you received from colleagues in this Module’s Discussion forum. Identify the professional organization related to your chosen specialization for this Assignment, and explain how you can become an active member of this organization. – American psychiatric nurses association. Note: Your final version of the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan should include all components as presented the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan template. Complete the following items and incorporate them into the final version of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan: ·  Complete the Nursing Specialty Comparison Matrix comparing at least two nursing specialties, including your selected specialization and second-preferred specialization. ·  Write a 2-3 paragraph justification statement identifying your reasons for choosing your MSN specialization. Incorporate feedback you received from colleagues in this week’s Discussion Forum. ·  Identify the professional organization related to the specialization you have chosen to focus on for this Assignment and explain how you can become an active member of this organization.– Levels of Achievement: Excellent 77 (77%) – 85 (85%) Good 68 (68%) – 76 (76%) Fair 59 (59%) – 67 (67%) Poor 0 (0%) – 58 (58%) Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.– Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation– Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.– Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Professional Development Write a 500 word APA reflection essay of your experience with the Shadow Health virtual assignment s

GI A4: shadow health 2025

Professional Development Write a 500-word APA reflection essay of your experience with the Shadow Health virtual assignment(s). At least two scholarly sources in addition to your textbook should be utilized. Answers to the following questions may be included in your reflective essay: What went well in your assessment? What did not go so well? What will you change for your next assessment? What findings did you uncover? What questions yielded the most information? Why do you think these were effective? What diagnostic tests would you order based on your findings? What differential diagnoses are you currently considering? What patient teaching were you able to complete? What additional patient teaching is needed? Would you prescribe any medications at this point? Why or why not? If so, what? How did your assessment demonstrate sound critical thinking and clinical decision making?

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 one two paragraphs apa please include reference 1 Based on your understanding of nursing today discuss

health and wellness 2025

one-two paragraphs, apa , please include reference (1)Based on your understanding of nursing today, discuss how the Healthy People 2020 initiative could be used by you, as a nurse, to make a difference in the health and wellness of people in your area. http://www.healthypeople.gov/ (2)Using one of the theories, explain the importance of health and wellness models to professional nursing practice and the impact it has on individual nurses. I’ve attached the different model theories below.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Soap notes will be uploaded to Moodle and put through TURN It In anti Plagiarism program Turn it in Score

soap note “Hypertension” 2025

Soap notes will be uploaded to Moodle and put through TURN-It-In (anti-Plagiarism program) Turn it in Score must be less than 50% or will not be accepted for credit, must be your own work and in your own words. You can resubmit, Final submission will be accepted if less than 50%. Copy paste from websites or textbooks will not be accepted or tolerated. Please see College Handbook with reference to Academic Misconduct Statement. Example: PATIENT INFORMATION Name: Mr. W.S. Age: 65-year-old Sex: Male Source: Patient Allergies: None Current Medications: Atorvastatin tab 20 mg, 1-tab PO at bedtime PMH: Hypercholesterolemia Immunizations: Influenza last 2018-year, tetanus, and hepatitis A and B 4 years ago. Surgical History: Appendectomy 47 years ago. Family History: Father- died 81 does not report information Mother-alive, 88 years old, Diabetes Mellitus, HTN Daughter-alive, 34 years old, healthy Social Hx: No smoking history or illicit drug use, occasional alcoholic beverage consumption on social celebrations. Retired, widow, he lives alone. SUBJECTIVE: Chief complain : “headaches” that started two weeks ago Symptom analysis/HPI: The patient is 65 years old male who complaining of episodes of headaches and on 3 different occasions blood pressure was measured, which was high (159/100, 158/98 and 160/100 respectively). Patient noticed the problem started two weeks ago and sometimes it is accompanied by dizziness.He states that he has been under stress in his workplace for the last month. Patient denies chest pain, palpitation, shortness of breath, nausea or vomiting. ROS: CONSTITUTIONAL : Denies fever or chills. Denies weakness or weight loss. NEUROLOGIC : Headache and dizzeness as describe above. Denies changes in LOC. Denies history of tremors or seizures. HEENT : HEAD: Denies any head injury, or change in LOC. Eyes: Denies any changes in vision, diplopia or blurred vision. Ear: Denies pain in the ears. Denies loss of hearing or drainage. Nose: Denies nasal drainage, congestion. THROAT: Denies throat or neck pain, hoarseness, difficulty swallowing. Respiratory :Patient denies shortness of breath, cough or hemoptysis. Cardiovascular : No chest pain, tachycardia. No orthopnea or paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. Gastrointestinal :Denies abdominal pain or discomfort.Denies flatulence, nausea, vomiting or diarrhea. Genitourinary : Denies hematuria, dysuria or change in urinary frequency. Denies difficulty starting/stopping stream of urine or incontinence. MUSCULOSKELETAL : Denies falls or pain. Denies hearing a clicking or snapping sound. Skin : No change of coloration such as cyanosis or jaundice, no rashes or pruritus. Objective Data CONSTITUTIONAL : Vital signs: Temperature: 98.5 °F, Pulse: 87, BP: 159/92 mmhg, RR 20, PO2-98% on room air, Ht- 6’4”, Wt 200 lb, BMI 25. Report pain 0/10. General appearance: The patient is alert and oriented x 3. No acute distress noted. NEUROLOGIC: Alert, CNII-XII grossly intact, oriented to person, place, and time . Sensation intact to bilateral upper and lower extremities. Bilateral UE/LE strength 5/5. HEENT: Head: Normocephalic, atraumatic, symmetric, non-tender. Maxillary sinuses no tenderness. Eyes: No conjunctival injection, no icterus, visual acuity and extraocular eye movements intact. No nystagmus noted. Ears: Bilateral canals patent without erythema, edema, or exudate. Bilateral tympanic membranes intact, pearly gray with sharp cone of light. Maxillary sinuses no tenderness. Nasal mucosa moist without bleeding. Oral mucosa moist without lesions,.Lids non-remarkable and appropriate for race. Neck: supple without cervical lymphadenopathy, no jugular vein distention, no thyroid swelling or masses. Cardiovascular: S1S2, regular rate and rhythm, no murmur or gallop noted. Capillary refill < 2 sec. Respiratory: No dyspnea or use of accessory muscles observed. No egophony, whispered pectoriloquy or tactile fremitus on palpation. Breath sounds presents and clear bilaterally on auscultation. Gastrointestinal: No mass or hernia observed. Upon auscultation, bowel sounds present in all four quadrants, no bruits over renal and aorta arteries. Abdomen soft non-tender, no guarding, no reboundno distention or organomegaly noted on palpation Musculoskeletal: No pain to palpation. Active and passive ROM within normal limits, no stiffness. Integumentary: intact, no lesions or rashes, no cyanosis or jaundice. Assessment Essential (Primary) Hypertension (ICD10 I10): Given the symptoms and high blood pressure (156/92 mmhg), classified as stage 2. Once the organic cause of hypertension has been ruled out, such as renal, adrenal or thyroid, this diagnosis is confirmed. Differential diagnosis: Ø Renal artery stenosis(ICD10 I70.1) Ø Chronic kidney disease(ICD10 I12.9) Ø Hyperthyroidism (ICD10 E05.90) Plan Diagnosis is based on the clinical evaluation through history, physical examination, and routine laboratory tests to assess risk factors, reveal identifiable causes and detect target-organ damage, including evidence of cardiovascular disease. These basic laboratory tests are: · CMP · Complete blood count · Lipid profile · Thyroid-stimulating hormone · Urinalysis · Electrocardiogram Ø Pharmacological treatment: The treatment of choice in this case would be: Thiazide-like diuretic and/or a CCB · Hydrochlorothiazide tab 25 mg, Initial dose: 25 mg orally once daily. Ø Non-Pharmacologic treatment : · Weight loss · Healthy diet (DASH dietary pattern): Diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and low-fat dairy products with reduced content of saturated and trans l fat · Reduced intake of dietary sodium: <1,500 mg/d is optimal goal but at least 1,000 mg/d reduction in most adults · Enhanced intake of dietary potassium · Regular physical activity (Aerobic): 90–150 min/wk · Tobacco cessation · Measures to release stress and effective coping mechanisms. Education · Provide with nutrition/dietary information. · Daily blood pressure monitoring at home twice a day for 7 days, keep a record, bring the record on the next visit with her PCP · Instruction about medication intake compliance. · Education of possible complications such as stroke, heart attack, and other problems. · Patient was educated on course of hypertension, as well as warning signs and symptoms, which could indicate the need to attend the E.R/U.C. Answered all pt. questions/concerns. Pt verbalizes understanding to all Follow-ups/Referrals · Evaluation with PCP in 1 weeks for managing blood pressure and to evaluate current hypotensive therapy. Urgent Care visit prn. · No referrals needed at this time. References Domino, F., Baldor, R., Golding, J., Stephens, M. (2017). The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2017 (25th ed.). Print (The 5-Minute Consult Series). Codina Leik, M. T. (2014). Family Nurse Practitioner Certification Intensive Review (2nd ed.). ISBN 978-0-8261-3424-0 Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Task 1 Social Media Campaign Introduction Part of cultural competency is advocating for sensitive patient populations with

community health field experience. Topic Obesity in Adults 2025

Task 1: Social Media Campaign Introduction: Part of cultural competency is advocating for sensitive patient populations with regard to health issues or needed improvements in the community. A big part of advocacy is uncovering effective stories discovered in your community assessment. Equally important is understanding how to broadcast your discoveries to the larger community. In our society today, social media is a powerful leveraging tool to get a story out, build support, and demonstrate advocacy. Requirements: Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. Use the Turnitin Originality Report available in Taskstream as a guide for this measure of originality. You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course. Part 1: Field Experience Project Submission Note: Your timelog must be submitted with your assessment. If both are not submitted at the same time, your task may be returned to you without evaluation. A. Submit a completed “Community Health Field Experience Timelog” by doing the following: 1. Include the date of each activity. 2. Include a brief description of each activity. 3. Include the name of the contact person, a working phone number, and a full physical address. Note: If an email address is available for the contact person, you may choose to include it. 4. Include the number of hours spent on each activity (not including preparation time). 5. Describe how each activity relates to your selected Field Experience topic. 6. Record a total of 90 hours that meet each of the following requirements: ● 65 student planned activity hours based on the attached “Field Experience Activities List” ● a maximum of five individual interview hours (i.e., no more than five interviews, no more than one hour per interview) ● no prep time hours (i.e., prep time is not to be included in reported hours) Note: If your timelog is returned from evaluation, you are required to do an addendum. Please use the link below to access the DocuSign addendum document. Both the original timelog and the addendum timelog must be submitted with the task. Note: Random audits and verification of time log activities do occur. Violation of the WGU Code of Student Conduct or the Academic Authenticity Policy could result in disciplinary action. Part 2: Social Media Campaign Note: The “CDCynergy” web link provided in the web links section below may be useful in completing your social media campaign. The use of this web link is optional, i.e., not required. B. Write your community health nursing diagnosis statement. 1. Explain how the health concern from your community health nursing diagnostic statement is linked to a health inequity or health disparity within the target population. a. Discuss the primary community resources and primary prevention resources currently in place to address the health concern. b. Discuss the underlying causes of the health concern. 2. Discuss the evidence-based practice associated with the Field Experience topic. a. Identify data about the selected Field Experience topic from the local (e.g., county), state- Florida, and/or national level. C. Develop a community health nursing social media campaign strategy that will convey your health message and address the Field Experience topic by doing the following: 1. Describe your social media campaign objective. 2. Recommend two population-focused social marketing interventions and justify how each would improve the health message related to your selected Field Experience topic. 3. Describe a social media platform you would use that is appropriate for communicating with the target population-Adults a. Discuss the benefits of the selected social media platform in supporting preventative healthcare. 4. Discuss how the target population will benefit from your health message. D. Describe best practices for implementing social media tools for health marketing. E. Create a social media campaign implementation plan by doing the following: 1. Describe stakeholder roles and responsibilities in implementing the plan. 2. Discuss potential public and private partnerships that could be formed to aid in the implementation of your campaign. 3. Create a specific timeline for implementing your campaign. 4. Explain how you will evaluate the effectiveness of the campaign. 5. Discuss the costs of implementing your campaign. F. Reflect on how social media marketing supports the community health nurse’s efforts to promote healthier populations. 1. Reflect on how your social media campaign could apply to your future nursing practice. G. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. H. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Use the questions in the table in chapter 3 on page 101 of your textbook as a

Personal Philosophy Of Nursing Paper 2025

Use the questions in the table in chapter 3 on page 101 of your textbook as a guide as you write your personal philosophy of nursing. The paper should be three typewritten double spaced pages following APA style guidelines. The paper should address the following: Introduction that includes who you are and where you practice nursing Definition of Nursing Assumptions or underlying beliefs Definitions and examples of the major domains (person, health, and environment) of nursing Summary that includes: How are the domains connected? What is your vision of nursing for the future? What are the challenges that you will face as a nurse? What are your goals for professional development? Grading criteria for the Personal Philosophy of Nursing Paper: Introduction 10% Definition of Nursing 20% Assumptions and beliefs  20% Definitions and examples of domains of nursing 30% Summary  20% Total 100%

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Based on Case Study Fetal Abnormality and other required topic study materials write a 750 1 000 word reflection that answers the

Case study and Moral status 2025

Based on “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality” and other required topic study materials, write a 750-1,000-word reflection that answers the following questions: What is the Christian view of the nature of human persons, and which theory of moral status is it compatible with? How is this related to the intrinsic human value and dignity? Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? What from the case study specifically leads you to believe that they hold the theory you selected? How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendations for action? What theory do you agree with? Why? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action? Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Rubric Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible is clear, thorough, and explained with a deep understanding of the connection between them. Explanation is supported by topic study materials. 30% The theory or theories that are used by each person to determine the moral status of the fetus is explained clearly and draws insightful relevant conclusions. Rationale for choices made is clearly supported by topic study materials and case study examples. 15% Explanation of how the theory determines or influences each of their recommendations for action is clear, insightful, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the theory and its impact on recommendation for action. Explanation is supported by topic study materials. 15% Evaluation of which theory is preferable within personal practice along with how that theory would influence personal recommendations for action is clear, relevant, and insightful. 10% Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Here is a link to the Khan video on Moral Status. It will help explain the five theories discussed in the lecture: https://www.khanacademy.org/partner-content/wi-phi/wiphi-value-theory/wiphi-ethics/v/moral-status

Nursing Assignment Help 2025