WK 9 JOURNAL 2025

Practicum: Journal Entry ( 1 to 2 pages) Case study Patient is a 20 months old African American female who was  brought to the pediatric office by her mother with a chief complaint of diarrhea and vomiting for 3 days. Mother stated that her stools as liquid and foul smelling, with no mucous, slime or blood. Mother states that her baby is unable to keep anything down, vomiting after each feeding, including water. Her baby has had about 5 episodes of diarrhea and 4 episodes of vomiting a day. Mother reports that her baby is not feeding well and her activity level has decreased, she looks weak and tired to her . And in the last few hours, she has a decreased number of wet diapers. Mother reports that her last weight at 18 month check up was 24 pounds . Exam: VS T 37.0, P 110, RR 25, BP 100/75, weight 23 pound, HT 33.7 inches . She is alert, sitting on her mother’s lap , looks tired and cries sometimes during the exam. HEENT: anterior fontanel closed, minimal tears, lips dry, mucous membranes tacky, no oral lesions or erythema, TMs normal. Her neck is supple. Heart exam reveals mild tachycardia, no murmur. Lungs are clear. Abdomen is flat, soft, and non-tender with hyperactive bowel sounds. No wet diaper during the exam. Moves all Her extremities. No rashes present. Her capillary refill time is less than 3 seconds and her skin turgor is slightly diminished. Possible Diagnosis: Gastroenteritis and Dehydration Reflect on a this pediatric patient above who presented with gastrointestinal disorders during your Practicum clinical experience. Describe your experience in assessing and managing the patient and his or her family as their primary care practitioner. Include details of your “aha” moment in identifying the patient’s disorder as relates to your class reading and references. Then, explain how the experience connected your classroom studies to the real-world clinical setting. Class Reading /References Burns, C. E., Dunn, A. M., Brady, M. A., Starr, N. B., & Blosser, C. G. (2013). Pediatric primary care (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier. ◦Chapter 32, “Gastrointestinal Disorders” (pp. 739–788) •Diagnosis, management, and prevention of rotavirus gastroenteritis in children by Parashar, U.D., Nelson, E.A., Kang, G. in BMJ. 2013 Dec 30;347:f7204. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f7204. Copyright 2013 by BMJ Publishing Group. Reprinted by permission of BMJ Publishing Group via the Copyright Clearance Center. •Blackmer, A. B., & Farrington, E. A. (2010). Constipation in the pediatric patient: An overview and pharmacologic considerations. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 24(6), 385–399. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2003). Managing acute gastroenteritis among children: Oral rehydration, maintenance, and nutritional therapy. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 52(RR-16), 1–20. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/RR/RR5216.pdf

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Nursing 2025

Regardless of the system being evaluated, different stakeholders will want to garner different types of information from an evaluation. For example, an information technology professional may seek information about system errors, a staff manager may want information about time expenditures, and an accountant may want data related to a system’s cost-effectiveness. As the nurse informaticist who is conducting the system evaluations, you must be able to anticipate and cater to the informational demands of stakeholders to help guide the evaluation planning process and produce more meaningful evaluations. For this Discussion, you assume the perspective of both a funder and a hospital’s chief information officer (CIO) to generate questions on a colleague’s evaluation plan presentation. To prepare: Review the presentation to which you were assigned. Assuming the role of a funder, formulate three questions you would ask to gather more information about this project. Next, assuming the role of the CIO of a hospital, formulate three questions you would ask to gather more information on this project from an administrative viewpoint. Consider any insights you have gained through reviewing your colleague’s evaluation plan.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Evaluation tool 2025

In this part of the Evaluation Project, you construct an evaluation plan by aggregating all of your work on the project thus far into one cohesive document. The document should contain your PICO question, literature review (with summary table), evaluation methodology, and evaluation tool. To prepare: Consider the issues or concerns you might have when developing an evaluation plan. Reflect on the ethical issues you and your colleagues identified in the Week 9 Discussion. Reflect on potential limitations and opportunities (Note: This topic will be addressed in the Week 10 Discussion). To complete Part 6 of the Evaluation Project: In no more than 10 pages, aggregate all of your work on the Evaluation Project so far into a single document. This document should contain: Your PICO question An explanation of the goals of your evaluation plan Literature review (with summary table as an appendix) Evaluation methodology (including research design) Evaluation tool A description of any ethical issues or concerns you may have with implementing your plan and how you could handle them if they arose A summary of the criteria you will use to define the success of your plan and how you will disseminate findings An outline of limitations to the scope of the plan and opportunities resulting from your evaluation plan

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Evaluating the Planning Process 2025

To prepare: Review Chapter 11 of the Green and Tones text, as well as the articles in this week’s Learning Resources. Consider your group’s planning process for your community program project. Reflect on your group’s formative evaluation. Think about how you ensured that your process would be successful. Consider how this formative evaluation helped your group to refine and delineate the summative evaluation. Think about how you used these evaluations to improve the plan for your community program project. Post on or before Day 3 a description of your group’s planning process for implementing your community program for health promotion. Explain how your group conducted its formative evaluation, including the measures you took to ensure that your process would be successful and how you addressed any challenges that arose. Then, explain how this formative evaluation helped your group to refine and delineate the summative evaluation. Finally, explain the effectiveness of your program evaluation and how you used it to improve the plan for your community program project.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Evaluation tool 2025

In this part of the Evaluation Project, you construct an evaluation plan by aggregating all of your work on the project thus far into one cohesive document. The document should contain your PICO question, literature review (with summary table), evaluation methodology, and evaluation tool. To prepare: Consider the issues or concerns you might have when developing an evaluation plan. Reflect on the ethical issues you and your colleagues identified in the Week 9 Discussion. Reflect on potential limitations and opportunities (Note: This topic will be addressed in the Week 10 Discussion). To complete Part 6 of the Evaluation Project: In no more than 10 pages, aggregate all of your work on the Evaluation Project so far into a single document. This document should contain: Your PICO question An explanation of the goals of your evaluation plan Literature review (with summary table as an appendix) Evaluation methodology (including research design) Evaluation tool A description of any ethical issues or concerns you may have with implementing your plan and how you could handle them if they arose A summary of the criteria you will use to define the success of your plan and how you will disseminate findings An outline of limitations to the scope of the plan and opportunities resulting from your evaluation plan

Nursing Assignment Help 2025