EXPERT_RESEARCHER 2nd Class 2025

Assignment 1: Discussion Questions Directions: Discussion Question Response : By Friday, October 7, 2016 , post your response to the assigned discussion questions in the appropriate threads in the Discussion Area . Participation Responses : No later than Saturday, October 8, 2016 , review and comment on the discussion question responses posted by at least two of your peers. Guidelines: Support your responses with scholarly academic references using APA style format. Assigned course readings and online library resources are preferred. Weekly lecture notes are designed as overviews to the topic for the respective week and should not serve as a citation or reference. In your discussion question response, provide a substantive response that illustrates a well-reasoned and thoughtful response; is factually correct with relevant scholarly citations, references, and examples that demonstrates a clear connection to the readings. In your participation responses to your peers, comments must demonstrate thorough analysis of postings and extends meaningful discussion by building on previous postings. Note: Review South University’s Substantive Participation Policy Criteria , Helpful Tips , and Late Policy available by clicking on the South University Policy and Guidelines navigation tab. The late policy applies to late discussion question responses. Grading Criteria Maximum Points Discussion Question Responses : Displays an understanding of the course materials and the underlying concept discussed. Includes course materials and additional scholarly resources to support important points. 15 Participation Responses : Displays an understanding of topic under discussion by affirming statements, asking a related question, or making an oppositional statement. Position must be supported with related evidence. Responds to a minimum of two peers per question. 10 Professional Practice Connection : Demonstrates reflective thought pertaining to personal perspectives and professional development. Reflective statements include a theoretical rationale. 10 Quality of Academic Writing : Written responses are free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. Citations and references are included and written in the correct APA Style. 10 Total: 45 Select a discussion question from the drop down menu below and click Go to begin. Use the Respond link to post responses and materials that pertain to that question. To respond to an existing posting use the Respond link beneath it. Topics Topic Discussion Question 1 Discussion Question 2 Discussion Question 3 Discussion Question 4 Discussion Question 1 Debate the utility of the knowledge of nursing theories and associated theoretical concepts in the process of assessing patient’s needs and implementing appropriate care. Discussion Question 2 Analyze the effectiveness of contemporary nursing theories in relation to your healthcare setting and comment whether theories shape your practice. Discussion Question 3 Theory critique and development serve as the underpinning for the progress of professional nursing. Justify. Discussion Question 4 Do you think that theories need to be further operationalized and simplified so as to make them more usable and applicable to clinical settings? Substantiate your viewpoint with appropriate examples.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

EXPERT_RESEARCHER 2nd Class 2025

It is the same assignment, but we were suppose to start working on it since week 1 here is the description for the Assignment Concept Synthesis Paper on Personal Nursing Philosophy Overview You are required to submit a scholarly paper in which you will identify, describe, research, and apply the concepts that underlie your personal philosophy for professional nursing practice. This will help you identify your own values and beliefs about the established metaparadigms and metatheories of the discipline. It will also help you identify and articulate concepts relevant to your specific practice. This paper is intended to be an exercise in clarification and organization of your professional foundation. You are also required to provide a list of assumptions from personal nursing practice that illustrate the concepts and framework of your theory. Your paper should follow a format that includes: Nursing Autobiography: A brief (1 page) discussion of your background in nursing. The Four Metaparadigms: Identification, discussion, and documentation from the literature of your perspective on the basic four metaparadigms/concepts of patient, nurse, health, and environment. Two Practice-Specific Concepts: Identification, discussion, and documentation from the literature of your perspective on at least two other concepts specific to your own practice. List of Propositions: A numbered list of at least five propositions or assumption statements that clearly connect the concepts described. Each week, you will complete various segments of your Concept Synthesis Paper and submit it to the W1: Assignment 3 Dropbox for facilitator feedback when necessary. Your paper should integrate these discrete elements and reflect your personal nursing philosophy. Your Concept Synthesis Paper on your Personal Nursing Philosophy is due i n Week 3 . However, it is recommended that you begin working on your paper from Week 1 onwards and complete the various components related to the paper week wise as you progress through the course. The suggested tasks for each week are: Week 1: Nursing Biography and The Four Metaparadigms of Nursing Week 2: Two Practice-specific Concepts, and List of Propositions/Assumptions Week 3: Due: Concept Synthesis Paper on Personal Nursing Philosophy Consider the following questions as you complete your various tasks related to this assignment. 1. How do I define and employ the four basic metaparadigms of nursing theory in my professional practice? 2. What are the major concepts I employ that are unique to my professional practice? 3. What philosophies and theories from the literature of nursing and other disciplines/domains are consistent with these concepts? 4. How are the concepts of transcultural nursing, the health promotion model, skill acquisition, role theory, and change theory specifically integrated into my philosophy and practice? 5. What research supports these theories and concepts? 6. How do I integrate role and change theory into my professional practice and how may these theories be applied to the organization in which I practice? The paper is to be thoroughly researched and well documented , with relevant material from the nursing theorists presented incorporated into the paper. Use the current edition of the APA Manual throughout the paper. Sources should focus on references from nursing theory but may also include conceptual and theoretical material from other professional domains. The paper, excluding references or appendices, is to be limited to 6-10 pages . Writing should be succinct and well organized, as it is impossible for the facilitator to evaluate form and content separately. Your philosophy/framework is to be given a title that is appropriate to its content and emphasis. Grading of the paper will be based on the following: Grading Criteria: Maximum Points Nursing Autobiography The nursing autobiography included personal experiences in the field of nursing. 8 Provided an account of the current professional role of the student. 8 Included factors that guided decision making. 8 Quality of Essay Enlisted the four metaparadigms. 8 The essay included a definition of the four metaparadigms of nursing with reference to professional practice. 8 The essay mentioned how the metapardigms were employed in nursing practice. 8 The essay enlisted two practice-specific concepts. 8 The essay included clinical examples for each of the chosen concepts. 8 The clinical examples illustrated the concepts in a manner, which further clarified the students’ use of the conceptual material. 8 The essay demonstrated consistency between concepts, assumptions, and clinical application. 8 The essay identified and discussed students’ perspective on two other concepts specific to their practice. 8 The essay included a numbered list of at least 5 propositions or assumptions. 8 The concepts were connected and integrated to reveal a meaningful sequence. 8 The essay demonstrated clarification and organization of the students’ professional foundation. 8 The essay demonstrated evidence of critical thinking in analysis and response. 8 The essay demonstrated understanding and integration of lecture material, reading assignments, and sources consulted. 8 Essay was well written, well organized, and articulate. 8 Presentation Criteria The paper clearly demonstrated understanding of theoretical principles (i.e., concept development, definitions, assumptions, etc.) 3 The paper revealed clarity, organization, and articulation of ideas. 3 The paper showed that ideas were well-documented. 3 The paper revealed the breadth of research effort. 2 The paper demonstrated appropriate use of APA format in references and citations. 3 Total 150 Format Your project paper should be in Microsoft Word 2010. Follow the current APA style. Your paper should be double-spaced, Times New Roman, and in 12 pt. font. Concept Synthesis Paper on Personal Nursing Philosophy Your Concept Synthesis Paper is due this week. By Tuesday, September 20, 2016 , submit your scholarly paper, in which you have identified, described, researched and applied the concepts that underlie your personal philosophy for professional nursing practice. Collate the work that you have done so far from Weeks 1–3 , and submit your paper in the prescribed format to the W3: Assignment 2 Dropbox . Your paper should include: Nursing Autobiography: A brief (1 page) discussion of your background in nursing. The Four Metaparadigms: Identification, discussion, and documentation from the literature of your perspective on the four metaparadigms of patient, nurse, health, and environment. Two Practice-Specific Concepts: Identification, discussion, and documentation from the literature of your perspective on at least two concepts specific to your own practice. List of Propositions: A numbered list of at least five propositions or assumption statements that clearly connect the concepts described. Your paper should integrate these discrete elements and reflect your personal nursing philosophy. The paper should be thoroughly researched and well documented , with relevant material from the nursing theorists presented incorporated into the paper. The current APA Manual is to be used throughout the paper. Sources should focus on references from nursing theory but may also include conceptual and theoretical material from other professional domains. The paper, excluding references or appendices, is to be limited to 6-10 pages . Writing should be succinct and well organized, as it is impossible for the facilitator to evaluate form and content separately. Your philosophy/framework is to be given a title that is appropriate to its content and emphasis. Grading Criteria: Maximum Points Nursing Autobiography The nursing autobiography included personal experiences in the field of nursing. 8 Provided an account of the current professional role of the student. 8 Included factors that guided decision making. 8 Quality of Essay Enlisted the four concepts of the nursing metaparadigm. 8 The essay included a definition of the four concepts of the nursing metaparadigm with reference to professional practice 8 The essay mentioned how the four concepts of the nursing metapardigm were employed in nursing practice. 8 The essay enlisted two practice-specific concepts. 8 The essay included a numbered list of at least 5 propositions or assumptions. 8 The assumptions illustrated the concepts in a manner, which further clarified the students’ use of the conceptual material. 8 The essay demonstrated consistency between concepts and assumptions. 8 The concepts were connected and integrated to reveal a meaningful sequence. 8 The essay demonstrated clarification and organization of the students’ professional foundation. 8 The essay demonstrated evidence of critical thinking in analysis and response. 8 The essay demonstrated understanding and integration of lecture material, reading assignments, and sources consulted. 8 Essay was well written, well organized, and articulate. 8 Presentation Criteria The paper clearly demonstrated understanding of theoretical principles (i.e., concept development, definitions, etc.) 5 The paper revealed clarity, organization, and articulation of ideas. 5 The paper showed that ideas were well documented. 5 The paper revealed the breadth of research effort. 5 Written responses are free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. Citations and references are included and written in the correct APA Style. 10 Total 150

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

EXPERT_RESEARCHER 2025

Assignment 1: Discussion Questions Complete as directed by the facilitator. By Saturday, September 17, 2016 , go to the Discussion Area and post responses to one discussion question as assigned by the facilitator. All responses should be posted to the appropriate topic in this Discussion Area . It is important to support what you say with relevant citations from both the course materials and outside resources. Include the South University Online Library in your research activities utilizing not only the nursing resource database, but also those pertaining to education, business, and human resources. By Wednesday, September 21, 2016 , comment on at least two of your peers’ responses. You can ask technical questions or respond generally to the overall experience of attempting the question. Be objective, clear, and concise. Always use constructive language. All comments should be posted to the appropriate topic in this Discussion Area . Select a discussion question from the topics menu below and click the question to begin. Use the Respond link to post responses and materials that pertain to that question. Use the Respond link beneath any existing postings to respond to it. Discussion Question 1 Since the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report, there have been many opportunities to look at quality and errors within health care. Health Grades is an organized system devoted to looking at some of this data. Look at their most current report and review the content. Identify at least two major issues described in the report and discuss the implications to the APN. https://d2dcgio3q2u5fb.cloudfront.net/56/90/e07df9f64a5fb741ab59924a9e0d/2013-american-hospital-quality-outcomes-2014-healthgrades-report-to-the-nation.pdf

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Workflow Issues 2025

Discussion: Workflow Issues Have you ever carefully edited a paper you have written and then, when it is proofread by someone else, he or she finds a glaring typo? Sometimes we get so close to a project that we may fail to notice important details. The complexity of health care processes means that there can be a number of different gaps and varied areas of inefficiency in a single workflow. This is why it can be beneficial to get an outsider’s perspective on workflow issues you are investigating. In this Discussion , you outline the workflow issue ( Incomplete Medication Reconciliation ) you plan to use for Part 1 of the Course Project in order for your colleagues to provide their perspectives and feedback. This Discussion serves as an opportunity for you to refine you workflow issue before submitting Part 1 of the Course Project in Week 5. It also builds on the Week 3 Discussion, which provided you with general information about meaningful use and its ties to common workflow issues in health care. You will apply that knowledge in this Discussion by critically analyzing your colleague’s selected workflow issues, which will assist you in gaining a stronger grasp of the Course Project. The Instructor in this course will also respond to your preliminary workflow issue and provide guidance for any necessary revisions or refinements you should make to better meet the requirements for the Course Project. To prepare: Reflect on the workflow issue that you are planning to use for Part 1 of your Course Project ( Incomplete Medication Reconciliation ) . Consider the inefficiencies and gaps based on your preliminary knowledge about the workflow. Examine how the workflow issue ( Incomplete Medications Reconciliation ) relates to electronic health records (EHRs). How could the workflow issue be addressed through either the implementation or optimization of an EHR system ? Identify one or more specific meaningful use objectives that connect to your workflow issue ( Incomplete Medication Reconciliation ). Refer to the Learning Resources in Week 3 for a review of the meaningful use objectives. Review your initial thoughts on how you will conduct a gap analysis (your Gap Analysis Plan paper). What information will you need to obtain about the current-state workflow? How will you gather this information, and who will you consult in your organization? With these thoughts in mind: Post in 24 hour, a minimum of 550 words essay in APA format, and a minimum of 3 references which include: 1) A description of the workflow issue you plan to use for your Course Project. The workflow issue I plan to use is “Incomplete Medication Reconciliation”. 2) Describe where the inefficiencies lie based on your current knowledge about the workflow, and identify the meaningful use objective(s) related to the workflow issue. 3) Provide a brief overview of your plans for conducting a gap analysis, including your data-collection methods and who you will contact in the organization. Note: As you write your initial posting, keep in mind that you will revisit this workflow issue throughout the Course Project, so you are not expected to have a perfectly structured and finalized workflow issue. It is understandable that your workflow issue may evolve throughout later weeks of this course as you gain new knowledge and gather more information about the workflow. This is the reality of the systems development life cycle (SDLC)—it is an iterative process in which later steps often help to inform and clarify earlier efforts in the process. Consider your workflow issue a living, developing element that has the potential for later growth and change. Required Readings McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2015). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning. Chapter 15, “The Electronic Health Record and Clinical Informatics” This chapter explores the components of electronic health records and explains their significance in patient care. The authors evaluate the political facets of implementing these records and project how their implementation will benefit health care as a whole. Dennis, A., Wixom, B. H., & Roth, R. M. (2015). Systems analysis and design (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Chapter 3, “Requirements Determination” (pp. 81–115) Adherence to business requirements is important during a project. It is integral to plan the project with said requirements in mind. In this chapter, the authors demonstrate the processes of familiarizing one’s self with requirements and implementing them in the project plan. Helmers, S. (2011). Microsoft Visio 2010 step by step . Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly. Chaper 1, “A Visual Orientation to a Visual Product” (pp. 1–36) This introductory chapter walks the user through the basic desktop and tools necessary to get started in using Microsoft Visio. It provides instructions on the Visio ribbon, explores the drawing window, and offers tips on using and manipulating the variety of shapes available. Chapter 2, “Creating a New Drawing” (pp. 37–68) This chapter outlines the steps necessary for actually creating a drawing, and covers such topics as selecting the correct shape, connecting shapes, and using the Auto features. Bayer, S., Petsoulas, C., Cox, B., Honeyman, A., & Barlow, J. (2010). Facilitating stroke care planning through simulation modelling. Health Informatics Journal, 16 (2), 129–143. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. This article provides an example of how workflow can be used to improve the level of health care being provided. In this particular case, data analysis and modeling were used to determine the optimal workflow for dealing with stroke patients. Campbell, E. M, Guappone, K. P., Sittig, D. F., Dykstra, R. H., & Ash, J. S. (2009). Computerized provider order entry adoption: Implications for clinical workflow. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24 (1), 21–26. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. This article assesses the impact of computerized provider order entry (CPOE) on clinical workflow. The mass adoption of advanced data capture and access methods can effect change in both positive and negative ways, so care needs to be taken in the design phase to provide a user friendly system. Crosson, J. C., Etz, R. S., Wu, S., Straus, S. G., Eisenman, D., & Bell, D. S. (2011). Meaningful use of electronic prescribing in 5 exemplar primary care practices. Annals of Family Medicine, 9 (5), 392–397. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. One benefit of the widespread use of electronic health records (EHRs) is the opportunity to have electronic prescription capabilities. This article suggests practices that will help ensure e-prescribing that is high quality, efficient, and safe. Effken, J. A., & Carrington, J. (2011). Communication and the electronic health record: Challenges to achieving the meaningful use standard. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics, 15 (2). Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. Transitioning into a heavier use of health IT requires the adoption of more effective means of applying and deriving meaning from the data available. This article addresses the optimal relationship between user/IT communication and proper use of EHRs for achieving high-quality patient care. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.). Workflow assessment for health IT toolkit. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://healthit.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit This web page provides a number of resources that examine how to plan, design, implement, and use workflows and how to analyze current systems to ensure optimum workflow. Optional Resources There are a wide variety of online tutorials available to assist you with using Visio. Below are two you might consider, as needed: Microsoft. (2011). The Visio 2010 MVP sessions. Retrieved from http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/visio/ This free resource, developed by Microsoft, provides video tutorials in the use of all aspects of Visio 2010. Edson, D. (2011). Visio 2010 essential training . Retrieved from http://www.lynda.com/Visio-2010-tutorials/Essential-Training/75921-2.html This series of videos provides detailed instruction on all aspects of Visio use. This resource requires a paid subscription.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

HCA 421 Final 2025

For your Final Paper, choose one of the following health care organizations: Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) Tenet Health System Mayo Clinic Henry Ford Health System Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Children’s Miracle Network Deborah Heart and Lung Center Medtronic Veterans Health Administration (VHA) National Institutes of Health (NIH) Planned Parenthood Indian Health Service (IHS) Health Markets Conduct an evaluation of the organization based on strategic planning analysis, which includes the strengths and/or weaknesses that are internal to the organization and opportunities and/or threats external to the organization. Your strategic plan analysis must include at least three strengths and three weaknesses that are internal to the organization and at least three opportunities and three threats that are external to the organization. You must utilize at least five valid sources in your analysis. Examples of valid sources include organizational websites, annual reports, personal interviews with organizational leadership, investigative reports, government reports, and conference transcripts. Your Final Paper must address at least five key areas, concepts, and strategies that are outlined in the course text. These include: Internal and external assessments Competitive marketing analysis Identification of stakeholders Overview and assessments of services provided Competencies and resource Public entities and regulatory requirements Demographics served Strategic financial planning Financial and operational outcomes Current and future direction of the organization of choice Writing the Final Paper The Final Paper: Must be 8 to 10 double-spaced pages in length, excluding the title and references pages, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a title page with the following: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought. Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis. Must use at least five scholarly sources, including a minimum of two from the Ashford University Library. Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025