Health Care 2025
Questions are no more than 140 words for each question. Discuss what impact technology and finance have on a health care manager. · Explain what impact finance has on a health care manager. · Explain what impact the federal and state government in health care have on health care and the health care manager.
Nursing Assignment Help 2025
For martinodhi 2025
you will write the final 2 reports, referring to the departments of Endocrinology and Neurology and use them as your script for your Week 5 Oral Report. Your writing section for this assignment will include 2 paragraphs for each department. In order to earn the maximum credit for the written report you need to incorporate at least 20 medical terms for each department, using them in a manner that demonstrates your knowledge of their meaning. Include the major or most common diseases or conditions seen in each department. Include at least three of the principal procedures that are relevant to each department. Highlight pertinent laboratory and radiological diagnostic services relevant to each department. Limit your analysis of each department to two paragraphs.
Nursing Assignment Help 2025
Please see below and contact 2025
Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the Topic 1, 2, and 3 assignments and the guidelines below. PICOT Statement Revise the PICOT statement you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment. The final PICOT statement will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study). Research Critiques In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique. Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of the study by making appropriate revisions. The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT statement. Refer to “Research Critique Guidelines.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper. Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change Discuss the link between the PICOT statement, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. NRS-433V-RS-Research-Critique-Guidelines.docx
Nursing Assignment Help 2025
teacher Charles 2025
Course Project: Health Policy Paper Health policy unfolds daily and drives clinical practice in the U.S. You will investigate current policies or legislation underway for a specific health-related issue and develop a scholarly, APA-formatted paper supported by evidence. The policy paper rubric: Introduction to population or problem (incidence, prevalence, epidemiology, cost burden, etc.) Description of how the policy is intended for a specific population, program, or organization Specific legislators involved in the policy development and dissemination Identify the role of the APRN in assisting with the policy or refuting the policy – this requires the evidence to support opinion, ideas, and/or concepts Discuss how the policy influences clinical practice and is used to promote best outcomes Examine how the policy can be used by the interprofessional team to ensure coordinated and comprehensive care for the specific population Conclusion – summarize findings APA format – use of primary peer-reviewed references as much as possible
Nursing Assignment Help 2025
Week 8 DQ 1: Story about Genetic or Genomic Technology 2025
Choose one recent ( within last 2 years ) news story about genetic or genomic technology. Describe the issue presented. From the perspective as an RN or APRN, describe the ethical, cultural, religious, legal, fiscal, and societal implication. Include two references in APA style. NB: Be sure to provide the link for the news story on the references. RN stands for Registered Nurse, etc.
Nursing Assignment Help 2025
EXCEPTIONAL GENIUS ONLY 2025
1.Click this link to complete the Learning Theories Interactive Case Study following the readings and presentation for this week. Associate what you have learned about the theories to this case study, and then see the instructions below to complete a journal entry about your experience. Click the Learning Theories Journal link above. Once opened, select the Learning Theories Case Study Reflective Journal and follow the instructions listed within the journal. This is your your last case study for the course. Each journal entry reflection should be a minimum of five to six paragraphs. ** 2 pages per person** TOTAL 6 pages 2. The purpose of this assignment is to draft and submit a comprehensive and complete rough draft of your Nursing Theory Comparison paper in APA format. Your rough draft should include all of the research paper elements of a final draft, which are listed below. This will give you an opportunity for feedback from your instructor before you submit your final draft during week 7. Based on the reading assignment ( McEwen & Wills, Theoretical Basis for Nursing, Unit II: Nursing Theories, chapters 6–9), select a grand nursing theory. After studying and analyzing the approved theory, write about this theory, including an overview of the theory and specific examples of how it could be applied in your own clinical setting. Based on the reading assignment ( McEwen & Wills, Theoretical Basis for Nursing, Unit II: Nursing Theories, chapters 10 and 11), select a middle-range theory. After studying and analyzing the approved theory, write about this theory, including an overview of the theory and specific examples of how it could be applied in your own clinical setting. The following should be included: An introduction, including an overview of both selected nursing theories Background of the theories Philosophical underpinnings of the theories Major assumptions, concepts, and relationships Clinical applications/usefulness/value to extending nursing science testability Comparison of the use of both theories in nursing practice Specific examples of how both theories could be applied in your specific clinical setting Parsimony Conclusion/summary References: Use the course text and a minimum of three additional sources, listed in APA format The paper should be 8–10 pages long and based on instructor-approved theories. It should be typed in Times New Roman with 12-point font, and double-spaced with 1″ margins. APA format must be used, including a properly formatted cover page, in-text citations, and a reference list. The proper use of headings in APA format is also required. – For this work I will give you the topics you will be talking about. I had to choose them last time. ** 9 PAGES per person** total 27 PAGES 3. Create a pamphlet using any type of publisher software you choose to educate clients on a current patient safety issue; for example, a currently aging adult and how to care for his/herself at home, medication-polypharmacy and how a patient can not make a self medication error, or other appropriate safety issues. If you have a question about a specific topic, check with your instructor. Your pamphlet must include the following items: Include at least 5 tips for preventive care for the patient. Include information that should be shared with family or caregivers. Include local resources in the community that might be available for this type of safety concern. Include at least 3 current (published less than 5 years ago) references, in APA format. ** 2 PAGES per person** TOTAL 6 pages
Nursing Assignment Help 2025
NURS 6231: HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS AND QUALITY OUTCOMES – Discussion 6 (Grading Rubic and Media Attached) 2025
Discussion: Defining and Measuring Quality in Health Care Organizations Quality is never an accident. It is always the result of intelligent effort. —John Ruskin Quality is multidimensional and involves the perspectives of various stakeholders, including patients and families. As noted in this week’s Learning Resources, defining quality is not a simple, straightforward task. Yet, it provides an essential foundation for being able to measure and assess quality, and, ultimately, to improve it. In this Discussion, you consider definitions and measurements of quality. As you proceed, think about why it is important for organizations to be able to quantify quality and compare current performance to previous performance, to a set of standards, and/or to performance in other organizations. To prepare: Review the information in the Learning Resources, especially the chapters in the Sadeghi, Brazi, Mikhail, and Shabot course text, focusing on how quality is or could be defined and measured. Think about a health care organization with which you are familiar. It may be the same organization you are focusing on for your Course Project, or a different one. How do you think various stakeholders in this organization would define quality? How would you define quality as it relates to this organization? Review the information on quality standards and / or aims in the Learning Resources, and consider the following: Which outcomes related to quality are currently being monitored in the organization that you have selected? How is related data collected and evaluated? Does the organization use health information technology in this regard? If so, how? How is quality-related information (e.g., data, needs for improvement) communicated throughout the organization? What do you consider to be the strengths and weaknesses of the current approach to quality in this organization? Post a definition of quality for your selected organization. Describe at least one quality-related measure that is currently being monitored within the organization. Summarize the data collection process for this measure, and explain how this information is communicated to or among the staff. Identify at least one strength and one weakness related to how quality is defined, measured, and/or monitored within the organization. Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses. Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days using one or more of the following approaches: Compare the organizations’ definitions of quality. Share an insight about how your colleague’s data and information could be used to formulate a quality initiative. Suggest additional options for tracking data. Provide an additional resource to assist a colleague with his or her plan for keeping staff informed and engaged. Use the below link: http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/ScienceofImprovementEstablishingMeasures.aspx Required Readings Hickey, J. V., & Brosnan, C. A. (2017). Evaluation of health care quality in for DNPs (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company. Chapter 6, “Evaluating of Health Care Information Systems and Patient Care Technology” (pp. 143-170) This chapter examines federally mandated use of health information technology to improve health care and care delivery. Sadeghi, S., Barzi, A., Mikhail, O., & Shabot, M. (2013). Integrating quality and strategy in health care organizations. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. Review Chapter 3, “General Concepts in Quality” (pp. 45–82) (assigned in Week 4) The authors discuss historical perspectives of quality in various industries, and explain the multifaceted nature of defining quality in health care settings. Chapter 4, “Current State of Quality Measurement: External Dynamics” (pp. 83–98) This chapter describes many of the government, nonprofit, and for-profit groups / organizations that contribute to the establishment quality standards and support research to improve the quality of health care. Chapter 5, “Current State of Quality Measurement: Internal Dynamics” (pp. 99–110) This chapter focuses on mandatory and voluntary quality measurement in organizations. Chapter 6, “Measuring Quality of Inpatient Care” (pp. 111–132) This chapter explains the terminology use in quality measurement (e.g., measures, indicators, metrics), and notes that measurement is a critical foundation for the ultimate aim of creating effective changes to improve quality. Chapter 8, “Quantifying the Quality Performance Gaps” (pp. 161–177) This chapter addresses how to quantify current performance and set targets. Epstein, J. N., Langberg, J. M., Lichtenstein, P. K., Kolb, R. C., & Stark, L. J. (2010). Sustained improvement in pediatricians’ ADHD practice behaviors in the context of a community-based quality improvement initiative. Children’s Health Care, 39(4), 296–311. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. Researchers evaluate a quality improvement project on pediatric care of ADHD patients and the sustainability of the improvement over a two-year period. Gardner, K., Bailie, R., Si, D., O’Donoghue, L., Kennedy, C., Liddle, H., . . . Beaver, C. (2011). Reorienting primary health care for addressing chronic conditions in remote Australia and the South Pacific: Review of evidence and lessons from an innovative quality improvement process. The Australian Journal of Rural Health, 19(3), 111–117. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. The authors review data from continuous quality improvement projects, and also discuss key features of continuous quality improvement projects and requirements for supporting an initiative on a larger scale. Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. This report outlines the Institute of Medicine’s (IOM’s) six aims to improve the quality of health care. Knox, L. M., & Aspy, C. B. (2011). Quality improvement as a tool for translating evidence based interventions into practice: What the youth violence prevention community can learn from healthcare. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48(1-2), 56–64. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. This article discusses evidenced-based practice, how it can be used to not only improve healthcare, but also performance in other fields such as youth and family services. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (2011). Science of improvement: Establishing measures. Retrieved from http://www.ihi.org/knowledge/Pages/HowtoImprove/ScienceofImprovementEstablishingMeasures.aspx This piece outlines central tenets of measurement for improvement purposes. Document: Evidence Matrix (Word document)
Nursing Assignment Help 2025
nutritonal 2025
You will choose 1 article from a peer reviewed journal related to a topic that aligns with the course objectives. Please review the posted link in the project tab on Blackboard to determine where to locate peer reviewed journal articles. You may want to avoid systematic reviews, literature reviews, meta-analyses or qualitative studies as these will not lend well to the critique process. You will critically review 1 peer reviewed article related to nutrition . Critique Instructions: Address all points clearly and concisely to stay within the page limit. When submitting this you will also need to attach the original article that you are reviewing. Use the drop off link to attach both files. At minimum your critique should address these elements: 0.5 pt – APA citation of article Section 1 – Elements influencing the believability of the research: 0.5 pt – Writing Style – describe the writing style 0.5 pt – Author(s), credibility of the author(s) 0.5 pt – Report title – does the title match the report? length? attracting? 1.5 pts – Abstract – does the abstract summarize the research question, methods, data analysis, results and conclusion? Section 2 – Elements influencing the robustness of the research: 2.5 pts – Purpose/research problem – What is the research problem or research hypothesis? Is the problem clearly identified? Is the significance of the problem noted and described? Does the paper clarify the aim of the study? Is there a clear link between the conceptual theory and the research question? Is the study practical? 1 pts – Logical consistency – is there good flow? Organization? Are ideas presented clearly and well defined? 2.5 pts – Literature review – Describe the review of the literature. Are the references up to date? How is the literature organized? Do previous studies lead toward the study or research question? Is the rationale and direction for the study indicated in the lit review? 1.5 pts – Theoretical Framework – Are any models, theories, constructs used or presented in the development of the framework for this study? Is it logical? 1.5 pts – Aims/objectives – are the aims of the study well established? Does this align with the theoretical framework? 2 pts – Sample – who, sample size, exclusion criteria, inclusion criteria, generalizability to the population 2 pts – Ethical Consideration – does the study describe ethical concerns? IRB approval, steps described? 1 pts – Operational Definitions – are new terms, definitions clearly defined in a logical manner for the reader? 3 pts – Methodology – what were the methods? Can you reproduce this study? Are there any concerns with the methods? 2 pts – Data analysis/results – describe the data analysis procedures and results – were any results significant? 2 pts – Discussion/Conclusion – does the discussion add to the topic and the results section? Does this include implications for further research? Does the conclusion discuss limitations of the study? 0.5 pt – References – were references up to date, from credible source
Nursing Assignment Help 2025
Discussion: Validity in Quantitative Research Designs 2025
Discussion: Validity in Quantitative Research Designs Validity in research refers to the extent researchers can be confident that the cause and effect they identify in their research are in fact causal relationships. If there is low validity in a study, it usually means that the research design is flawed and the results will be of little or no value. Four different aspects of validity should be considered when reviewing a research design: statistical conclusion validity, internal validity, construct validity, and external validity. In this Discussion, you consider the importance of each of these aspects in judging the validity of quantitative research. To prepare: Review the information in Chapter 10 of the course text on rigor and validity. Read the method section of one of the following quasi-experimental studies (also located in this week’s Learning Resources). Identify at least one potential concern that could be raised about the study’s internal validity. Metheny, N. A., Davis-Jackson, J., & Stewart, B. J. (2010). Effectiveness of an aspiration risk-reduction protocol. Nursing Research, 59 (1), 18–25. Padula, C. A., Hughes, C., & Baumhover, L. (2009). Impact of a nurse-driven mobility protocol on functional decline in hospitalized older adults. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 24 (4), 325–331. Yuan, S., Chou, M., Hwu, L., Chang, Y., Hsu, W., & Kuo, H. (2009). An intervention program to promote health-related physical fitness in nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18 (10), 1,404–1,411. Consider strategies that could be used to strengthen the study’s internal validity and how this would impact the three other types of validity. Think about the consequences of an advanced practice nurse neglecting to consider the validity of a research study when reviewing the research for potential use in developing an evidence-based practice. Post the title of the study that you selected and your analysis of the potential concerns that could be raised about the study’s internal validity. Propose recommendations to strengthen the internal validity and assess the effect your changes could have with regard to the other three types of validity. Discuss the dangers of failing to consider the validity of a research study.
Nursing Assignment Help 2025
Professional Development Objectives 2025
Professional Development Objectives In Week 1, you developed your practicum professional development objectives. How have your experiences thus far in the practicum contributed to your growth as nurse leader-manager or nurse informaticist? What difficulties, if any, have you experienced, and how might this affect the achievement of your objectives? In this Discussion, you assess your progress toward fulfilling your practicum professional development objectives and consider how you could enhance or alter your activities to achieve your aims. To prepare: Reflect on the practicum professional development objectives you developed and outlined in your Practicum Professional Experience Plan in Week 1. Keeping in mind the practicum activities you have engaged in thus far, consider the following questions: How have these activities helped to promote your professional development? Are you satisfied with your progress toward meeting your objectives? If not, what will you do to ensure you achieve them before the end of your Practicum Experience? As a reminder, you must complete all of your practicum hours on or before Day 5 of Week 11. What challenges or unexpected opportunities have arisen at your practicum site? How has this affected your professional development? Think about the experiences you may have in the forthcoming weeks. Do you foresee any particular challenges on the horizon? If so, what is your plan for addressing those challenges? Think about the time you have spent with your Preceptor. How has this time enhanced or changed your understanding of the role and functions of the nurse leader-manager or nurse informaticist?
Nursing Assignment Help 2025