CWV 101 Week 1 Personal Commitments Assessment 2025

In this assignment, you will examine your worldview using the seven personal commitments described in chapter 2 of the textbook. This may be the first time you have thought deeply about what you believe, so give yourself time to reflect on each question. You will also have the opportunity to examine your worldview according to a test given in the textbook and to express what you think the Christian faith is all about. Follow the directions in the “Personal Commitments Assessment.” GCU style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Assignment, Effective Approaches in Leadership and Management (Benchmark Assessment) 2025

Assignment, Effective Approaches in Leadership and Management (Benchmark Assessment) In this assignment, you will be writing a 1,000-1,250-word essay describing the differing approaches of nursing leaders and managers to issues in practice. To complete this assignment, do the following: Select an issue from the following list: nursing shortage and nurse turn-over, nurse staffing ratios, unit closures and restructuring, use of contract employees (i.e., registry and travel nurses), continuous quality improvement and patient satisfaction, and magnet designation. Compare and contrast how you would expect nursing leaders and managers to approach your selected issue. Support your rationale by using the theories, principles, skills, and roles of the leader versus manager described in your readings. Identify the approach that best fits your personal and professional philosophy of nursing and explain why the approach is suited to your personal leadership style. Use at least two references other than your text and those provided in the course. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

RES-861 Module 5 Literature Review: Body 2025

Details: In the previous assignment, you created an outline of the literature review (Chapter 2) for your dissertation. The next step is to draft the body of the literature review. The body of the literature review is its primary segment. It is here that the actual review of the literature takes place. In this assignment, you will construct a draft of the body of the literature review (Chapter 2) for your proposal and dissertation. General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: Refer to the most recent dissertation prospectus template in the DC (dc.gcu.edu) for details and criteria for the literature review (Chapter 2).Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center. Directions: Prepare a draft literature review (Chapter 2) of 1,750-2,000 words for your dissertation. You will not address all of the themes in your outline in this assignment. Select two of the major themes from the outline of your dissertation literature review that you created in the previous assignment.For each major theme, identify at least three empirical or scholarly articles (six articles total) related to the theme.For each empirical article, state the article title, the author, the research question(s), the research sample, the research methodology, the gaps in the study (what questions does the study raise?), and the research findings of the study. For scholarly, non-empirical articles, state the article title and author, and provide a brief contextual summary of the article.Identify at least three sub-themes that relate to each theme (six sub-themes total). Identify at least three empirical or scholarly articles related to each sub-theme (18 articles total).At least one article must demonstrate a quantitative methodology. For each empirical article, state the research question(s), the research sample, the research methodology, the gaps in the study (what questions does the study raise?), and the research findings of the study. For scholarly, non-empirical articles, state the article title and author, and provide a brief contextual summary of the article.Select one of the quantitative empirical articles used in the sub-themes section of this assignment and identify the following elements:Alternative and null hypotheses associated with the research question.Sampling method (How were the participants recruited?).Variables and the type of scale for each variable.Inferential statistical tests for hypothesis testing (used to determine if the null hypothesis is retained or rejected).Level of significance set by the researcher to test the hypothesis.Results of the statistical tests performed (Was the result of each statistical test significant or not?).Descriptive statistics for the sample or the data (mean, median, etc.).Procedures taken to ensure reliability and validity of the data.Write statements that synthesize the three studies of each sub-theme based on the information you stated above. You will write six synthesis statements.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

HLT 540 Week 3 Assignment 1 2025

Coyne and Messina Articles, Part 1 Analysis Details: In a paper (1,000-1,250 words), compare and contrast the major elements of the reports by Coyne et al. and Messina et al., listed in the Module 2 Readings. Complete the “Coyne and Messina Articles Analysis.” Study the information in the right-side column related to the Coyne, et al. study, which identifies the required elements as found in the reading. Complete the information for the Messina et al. article by identifying the required elements from the article. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. Coyne and Messina Articles Analysis As an example guideline, review the study components in the left-side column of the table below. Read the study by Messina et al., and build the data in the right-side column with the key components in that study. Research Question: Coyne: Do size and ownership type make a difference in the efficiency and cost results of hospitals in Washington state? (Highlight p.164, second column, starting 15 lines from bottom to seven lines from bottom.) Messina: How did the research question emerge from the review of literature in the article? Coyne: Built on an earlier study by Coyne on performance differences between multi-facility systems and independent hospitals using two cost measures. Cited studies that used a range of variables to measure differences in hospital performance, and noted that prior findings have been inconclusive in regard to hospital size, although economies of scale were found. Messina: Independent Variables Type: Coyne: Hospital size and hospital ownership structure. Categorical Messina: Dependent Variables Type: Coyne: Efficiency measures – continuous variables. Cost measures – continuous variables. Messina: Design Elements 1. Quantitative vs. Qualitative 2. Sample Size 3. Method of sample selection 4. Experimental vs. control group? 5. Reliable and valid data instruments? Coyne: Quantitative 96 Picked all hospitals in state, except investor owned hospitals. No Used data that are commonly used to measure hospital efficiency and performance with high degrees of accuracy (reliable), and data that are historically used and make sense to other hospital users (valid). Messina: Describe analysis. What statistics were used? Coyne: Two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Messina: Did the researchers’ conclusions make sense, did they answer the research question, and did they appear to flow from the review of the literature? Did they explore control of extraneous variables? Coyne: They concluded that size and ownership type make a difference in reported levels of efficiency. Not for profits seem to achieve higher performance levels, and medium and large not for profits operate more efficiently than industry average. The same results were found for cost levels, in that size and ownership type do make a difference, with medium sized hospitals reporting lower costs than large or small hospitals. Yes, when they called for national studies that controlled for case mix, scope of services, and payer mix, all of which could have affected the results in this study in an unmeasured way.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025