2025 I NEED A POSITIVE COMMENT BASED IN THIS ARGUMENT BETWEEN 120 150 WORDS First I would need to find

comment karan 2025

I NEED A POSITIVE COMMENT BASED IN THIS ARGUMENT..BETWEEN 120-150 WORDS First I would need to find evidence-based research that supported my idea and the need for practice change. Ultimately supporting how this would improve patient care (Huber, 2014). Selling an idea to higher upper management can be intimidating and difficult but not impossible. The key to selling an idea is effectively communicating and making your statement clear, simple, and quick. To sell the idea the presenter must be creative and find common ground that can help relay the message across. The idea must first be presented in an informal manner to see what feedback can be attained before the formal presentation. This type of technique can help the presenter anticipate some questions that might come up when formally selling the idea to upper management. The formal presentation should consist of a power point and handout. Lab Manager suggests the following when selling an idea to upper management (Lab Manager, 2010). 1. Summarize the idea 2. Define the need for the idea. What problem will it solve? 3. Explain how the idea will make money for the company. Are there other benefits as well? 4. Define the resources needed. What will be needed to develop and commercialize the idea? How much money will it cost? How much time will it take? 5. Request a commitment. Following up on your presentation may be required to get a definite, timely decision on whether it will be funded. References Lab Manager. (2010). Selling ideas to upper management. Retrieved from http://www.labmanager.com/business-management/2010/02/selling-ideas-to-upper-management?fw1pk=2#.Vl-w-HarTIU Huber, D. (2014). Leadership and nursing Care Management (5 th ed.). Maryland Heights, MO: Saunders Elsevier. ISBN-13: 9781455740710

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 The area of interest I selected is hand washing with soap and water more effective in Prevent Central Line

Peer Response 2025

The area of interest I selected is hand washing with soap and water more effective in Prevent Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) in ICU at Memorial Hospital West than washing hands with hand sanitizer (Latif et al., 2015). The program track for my specialty is Family Nurse Practitioner. My chosen area of interest is indeed consistent with my selected program track since it equips me with clinical experiences and practical skills on how to deal with Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections. Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections is one of the widespread problems being recorded at the ICU and has resulted in deaths of many patients every year. Therefore, hand washing with soap and water will not only help curb these deaths, but also help reduce the billions of dollars currently spent on healthcare system in the United States (Anderson, 2015). This intervention will be administered to all ICU staff at the hospital. The unit’s staff members include licensed practical nurses, registered nurses, health unit coordinators, and nurse externs. I do not want or wish to alter my area of interest. I believe my area of interest is fundamental toward preventing infections in the ICU and enhancing the optimal safety of patients (Eggers et al., 2015). As a nurse practitioner, I would like to find out how hand washing with soap and water helps safeguard patients against contracting new-fangled infections. The area of interest is vital to the program specialty track. Washing hands with soap and water helps increase patient safety as well as avert Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections. As a Family Nurse Practitioner, I will passionately advocate hand washing using soap and water since such intervention makes the patients’ immune system less vulnerable and promotes patient safety (Anderson, 2015). The area of interest will also increase my competency as a nurse practitioner. APA One Reference From Peer reviewed nursing journal within the last five years 150 words one page

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Review the following scenarios Scenario 1 Medical coding in a physician s practice Imagine you work in

HCS335 Ethical Health Care Scenarios 2025

Review the following scenarios. Scenario 1: Medical coding in a physician’s practice Imagine you work in a high-pressure cardiology physician’s office and you are one of two medical coders. Your supervisor is very focused on the greatest reimbursement to satisfy revenue projections for the practice. As a result, you are asked to “up-code” billing. How can the pressure of acquiring the maximum repayment for services lead to manipulating or falsifying documentation? Scenario 2: Administration of patient medications in the hospital setting Imagine you are a new graduate nurse working nights on a busy medical unit. You just received a new patient who needs to be admitted to your unit and you just finished medicating a patient with a narcotic injection with a dose greater than ordered. Clearly understanding medication errors may lead to patient injury and even death, explain why a clinician may choose not to report the incident. Scenario 3: Not hiring a qualified individual because of discrimination Imagine you are a new human resources director in a nonprofit organization and have been pressured not to hire Middle Eastern candidates by the organization’s CEO. In the United States, discrimination against people based on their ethnicity, race, or cultural orientation is strictly forbidden under federal and state laws. Ethical discrimination may result in the breeding of ill feelings at work, as well as reduced productivity. To eliminate these ramifications, organizations need to put forth increased effort in curbing ethical discrimination in the employment sector. What are some interventions organizations can put in place to prevent discrimination? Write a 150- to 350-word response for each ethical scenario. Include a title page with your name and your responses. Format your assignment according to APA guidelines. Include a title page, an introduction, headings, in text citations, a conclusion and a separate reference page.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 WEEK 10 Discuss two different types of comfort interventions that can be utilized by

discussion nursing 2025

WEEK 10 Discuss two different types of comfort interventions that can be utilized by the advanced practice nurse in the clinical setting as per Katharine Kolcaba’s Theory of Comfort. Identify one MSN Essential that most relates to application of this theory in practice and explain your choice. **As a reminder, all questions must be answered to receive full credit for this discussion . please include your name in the title bar of the discussion. Discussion posts must be minimum of 250 words and reply posts minimum 100 words. Also, make sure to use scholarly sources to support your discussion.**

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 For this assignment develop a scholarly paper that includes the following criteria 2 3 pages LESS THAN 7 TURNIITIN SCORE 1

Nursing Evidence based paper_sr 2025

For this assignment develop a scholarly paper that includes the following criteria: 2-3 pages. LESS THAN 7% TURNIITIN SCORE 1. Select a relevant clinical practice based problem/topic. 2. Describe the current clinical practice based problem/topic and include · Population of interest · Background information 3. Search the literature for four (4) evidence-based interventions on the problem/topic of interest. The literature can be individual studies or systematic reviews. A systematic review counts as one (1) intervention. If using a systematic review, report on the review, not on the studies identified in the review. The studies must be within the discipline of nursing (not medicine). All of the studies MUST be intervention studies. Review what constitutes an intervention study. identify the databases (e.g., CINAHL, Medline) and key terms used in initiating the collective search for all of the studies (not each study) · Describe evidence found in the literature 4. Write the PICOT question in sentence form using the following format. The question must reflect an issue or intervention within the discipline of nursing (not medicine). This means the question must be about something nurses have authority over, not something that is prescribed and/or carried out by physicians or another discipline. Interdisciplinary interventions are encouraged. An example of a PICOT Question and PICOT template can be found on Appendix A or the accompanying Melynk & Fineout-Overholt (2014) 3rd edition text online. · P = Population –who does this problem primarily effect (i.e. Nurses, patients, families, etc.)? · I = Intervention or issue interest –what is the proposed intervention identified in the literature as best practice? · C = Comparison intervention or comparison group –what is the current practice? Compare the best practice intervention identified in the literature with the current practice. · O= Outcome –how would you determine if the change/implementation has been effective? · T = Time –how long would the new change/intervention need to be in effect before you anticipate evaluating the outcome? 5. 2-3 pages 6. Include level 1 and level 2 headings, an introductory paragraph, purpose statement and a conclusion. 7. Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’). 8. Four (4) references from professional peer-reviewed nursing journals to support the paper. References should be from scholarly peer-reviewed journals (review in Ulrich Periodical Directory) and be less than five (5) years old. 9. APA 6 th edition format is required (attention to spelling/grammar, a title page, a reference page, and in-text citations)

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 150 words and 1 reference nursing journals This is a response to peers Anxiety is an emotional and at times

Nursing response 2-Peer 2025

150 words and 1 reference (nursing journals). This is a response to peers Anxiety is an emotional and at times a physiological response which is a common experience among patients coping with any cancer diagnosis. Anxiety can range from normal reactions to extreme dysfunction. Anxiety also has tremendous influence over a patient’s decision-making capabilities, treatment adherence, as well as their quality of life and function (Smith, Cope, Sherner, & Walker, 2014). The following articles, where choses to evaluate the validity, reliability, and applicability as to the effectiveness of certain interventions in alleviating anxiety for those afflicted with cancer. The first article chosen Mei-Fen et al. (2015), utilized the highest level of research logistics level 1 or meta-analysis and systematic review. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions for relieving anxiety and depression in people with any form of cancer. Inclusion criteria for the study involved adult participants diagnosed with cancer and receiving mindfulness-based therapeutic intervention and reported changes in anxiety and depression levels. Studies that did not evaluate anxiety or depression levels were not included. The final number of studies included totaled 7 with 888 participants: 469 intervention group and 419 control group (Mei-Fen et al., 2015). The meta-analysis results yielded statistically significant improvements in anxiety and depression levels post mindfulness-based therapy intervention compared to control. Inferred limitations to the study appeared to be lack of mindfulness-based therapeutic consistency, variation of cancers and relatively small number of studies to evaluate. However, this leaves room for future evaluation and scientific inquiry. Overall it can be concluded that this study proves there is an evidence base practicality in the adoption of mindfulness-based interventions for relieving anxiety and depression in people with any form of cancer. However, further studies should be conducted since the research limitations leave room for greater scientific augmentation. The second article chosen by Goerling, Foerg, Sander, Schramm, & Schlag (2011) explored the influence of psycho-oncologic intervention on the psychological condition of anxiety and depression patients regarding patients with cancer. Like the previous article it to actualized the strongest level for the hierarchy rating system level1utilizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs). For this study participants were categorized according to high or low risk and then randomly placed into either a psycho-oncologic support or control group. The sample was composed of 131 participants with all types of cancer represented and by the end of the study statistical findings showed a reduction of anxiety and depression in high-risk patients who had undergone psycho-oncologic intervention (Goerling, Foerg, Sander, Schramm, & Schlag, 2011). Some of the limitations incurred throughout this study was the fact that the time frame was short of only 12 months and only 49 of the total participants completed the full study. Therefore, it can be concluded that while psycho-oncologic intervention does support anxiety and depression reduction amongst cancer patients further research on a larger scale over a longer period is needed to observe its truest beneficial effects on patient care and wellbeing. Based on the statistical documentation both articles researched clearly implemented quantitative methodology. This is further evident by the fact that quantitative studies tend to produce knowledge about very precise topics, creating a need for multiple studies over multiple years before conclusive knowledge is yielded. The most common quantitative designs used in health care research are survey, needs assessment, experimental, quasi-experimental, methodologic, meta-analysis, and secondary analysis (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2014 p 439). Although the qualitative methodology was not applied within the context of these articles it is still a well-founded research tool. For example, qualitative research is a method of research designed for discovery rather than verification. It is used to explore little-known or ambiguous phenomena. Interviewing is the main technique used in qualitative methods to explore the meaning of certain experiences to individuals. This method is time consuming and costly and uses small samples; therefore, generalizations cannot be made from findings (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2014 p 476).

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 For this assignment develop a scholarly paper that includes the following criteria 2 3 pages LESS

Nursing Evidence based paper_sr 2025

For this assignment develop a scholarly paper that includes the following criteria: 2-3 pages. LESS THAN 7% TURNIITIN SCORE 1. Select a relevant clinical practice based problem/topic. 2. Describe the current clinical practice based problem/topic and include · Population of interest · Background information 3. Search the literature for four (4) evidence-based interventions on the problem/topic of interest. The literature can be individual studies or systematic reviews. A systematic review counts as one (1) intervention. If using a systematic review, report on the review, not on the studies identified in the review. The studies must be within the discipline of nursing (not medicine). All of the studies MUST be intervention studies. Review what constitutes an intervention study. identify the databases (e.g., CINAHL, Medline) and key terms used in initiating the collective search for all of the studies (not each study) · Describe evidence found in the literature 4. Write the PICOT question in sentence form using the following format. The question must reflect an issue or intervention within the discipline of nursing (not medicine). This means the question must be about something nurses have authority over, not something that is prescribed and/or carried out by physicians or another discipline. Interdisciplinary interventions are encouraged. An example of a PICOT Question and PICOT template can be found on Appendix A or the accompanying Melynk & Fineout-Overholt (2014) 3rd edition text online. · P = Population –who does this problem primarily effect (i.e. Nurses, patients, families, etc.)? · I = Intervention or issue interest –what is the proposed intervention identified in the literature as best practice? · C = Comparison intervention or comparison group –what is the current practice? Compare the best practice intervention identified in the literature with the current practice. · O= Outcome –how would you determine if the change/implementation has been effective? · T = Time –how long would the new change/intervention need to be in effect before you anticipate evaluating the outcome? 5. 2-3 pages 6. Include level 1 and level 2 headings, an introductory paragraph, purpose statement and a conclusion. 7. Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’). 8. Four (4) references from professional peer-reviewed nursing journals to support the paper. References should be from scholarly peer-reviewed journals (review in Ulrich Periodical Directory) and be less than five (5) years old. 9. APA 6 th edition format is required (attention to spelling/grammar, a title page, a reference page, and in-text citations)

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 250 words must have in text citations and references must match them Review the Rating System for

Week 2 DB nursing-SR 2025

250 words must have in text citations and references must match them. Review the Rating System for the Hierarchy of Evidence for Intervention/Treatment Questions (see below link) https://www.ons.org/practice-resources/pep • Review and become knowledgeable about the hierarchy of research logistics. The “lowest to highest” ranking order of the evidence/research. • Select two different peer-reviewed nursing research articles. • Identify and summarize the levels of evidence/research presented in selected articles (i.e. Student’s selected articles). • Discuss how an advanced practice nurse critically evaluates evidence/research through either a “quantitative methodology” – e.g. ANOVA, Pair t Test, or (Logistic/Multiple) Regession; OR a “qualitative methodology” – e.g. validity, reliability, and applicability in practice. Include each selected article’s reference information in the initial discussion post (i.e. APA format required).

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 250 words 2 nursing references within 5 years MUST HAVE IN TEXT CITATIONS Choose a workplace

Nursing DB week 3_sr 2025

250 words, 2 nursing references within 5 years. MUST HAVE IN TEXT CITATIONS Choose a workplace data collected quality improvement project associated with practice guidelines and discuss its congruency with an established published guideline by a reliable database (e.g. standardize regulatory organizations, certification boards, professional organizations, etc.). Discuss how the published reliable database guideline gathered its data (e.g. quantitative – survey; correlational research; treend analysis; exploratory research; descriptive research; experimental research and newest “observational-interventional research, etc.” in comparison to the workplace quality improvement project data collection. Remember not to identify the health organization by name or provide guidelines with organization’s name.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Max Points 120 Details A SWOT analysis can help to identify internal and external factors that can

HLT-665 Week 7 Assignment SWOT Analysis 2025

Max Points: 120 Details: A SWOT analysis can help to identify internal and external factors that can help or hinder organization or program success. A SWOT analysis organizes the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats of an organization or program. The identification of weaknesses and threats indicates factors that have a negative impact to the organization or program and need to be addressed. Strengths and opportunities are factors that have a positive impact on the organization or program and should be maintained. For this assignment, you will complete a SWOT analysis for your practicum site/organization or program using the “SWOT Analysis” template provided APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025