2025 nstructions Research Proposal Draft By the due date assigned write a 1 page paper

by

Week mid-assignment 2025

nstructions Research Proposal Draft By the due date assigned, write a 1-page paper addressing the sections below of the research proposal. Theoretical Framework Overview and Guiding Propositions(s) Described in Theory Application of Theory to Your Study’s/Project’s Focus Submission Details: Post your assignment to the Submission Area Edit question’s body Edit question’s attachments

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 nstructions Research Proposal Draft By the due date assigned write a 1 page paper addressing

by

Week mid-assignment 2025

nstructions Research Proposal Draft By the due date assigned, write a 1-page paper addressing the sections below of the research proposal. Theoretical Framework Overview and Guiding Propositions(s) Described in Theory Application of Theory to Your Study’s/Project’s Focus Submission Details: Post your assignment to the Submission Area Edit question’s body Edit question’s attachments

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Locate and read three scholarly peer reviewed articles on standards and regulation for healthcare administrators such as medical

by

CT 4 Health Law 2025

Locate and read three scholarly peer-reviewed articles on standards and regulation for healthcare administrators such as medical privacy, HIPAA, HITECH, MMA, medical staff credentialing and privileges. Write a 3-4 page paper providing a brief summary of the key points in each article from a legal and ethical perspective, then compare and contrast the findings and recommendations from the perspective of a healthcare administrator or chief of medical staff. Your paper should meet the following requirements: Be 3-4 pages in length, not including the cover or reference pages. Be formatted according to APA Writing Requirements . Provide full APA citations for articles under review. Utilize headings to organize the content in your work.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Weighing the Evidence When conducting original research the final step researchers must complete is weighing the evidence and interpreting the

by

Essent of Evidence-Based Pract 2025

Weighing the Evidence When conducting original research, the final step researchers must complete is weighing the evidence and interpreting the meanings of their data, statistics, and analyses. This is the culmination of the research process in which all of the research methods and designs can be synthesized into a meaningful conclusion. In this stage, researchers should formulate explanations for what their data indicates, determine whether the data answers their initial research question, identify areas of uncertainty, and consider directions for further research. In this Discussion, you focus on one of the research articles that you identified for Part 2 of the Course Project (Literature Review). You then explore the process of how the researchers generated conclusions based on their data, consider other possible interpretations of their data, and formulate ideas for further research. To prepare: · Review this week’s Learning Resources, focusing on how researchers find meaning in their data and generate sound conclusions. Pay particular attention to Table 2 in the article, “Study Design in Medical Research.” · Revisit the 5 articles that you identified in Part 2 of the Course Project. Select one to consider for the purpose of this Discussion. · Read sections of the chosen article where the data is presented, analyzed, and interpreted for meaning. What reasoning process did the researchers use to formulate their conclusions? What explanation did they give to support their conclusions? Were there any weaknesses in their analysis or conclusions? · Consider possible alternate conclusions that the researchers could have drawn based on their data. · Examine the findings that the article presents and consider how well they addressed the researcher’s initial question(s). What additional research could be done to build on these findings and gain a fuller understanding of the question? Required Readings Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer. Review Chapter 2, Fig. 2.1 Chapter 29, “Systematic Reviews of Research Evidence: Meta-analysis, Metasynthesis, and Mixed Studies Review” This chapter focuses on the different types of systematic reviews. The chapter discusses the advantages of this type of analysis and the steps for conducting a meta-analysis or metasynthesis. Dingle, P. (2011). Statin statistics: Lies and deception. Positive Health, 180 , 1. In this article, the author outlines how misleading statistics are used to make false claims about the positive use of statin drugs in order to retain a market share of sales for pharmaceutical firms. Katapodi, M. C., & Northouse, L. L. (2011). Comparative effectiveness research: Using systematic reviews and meta-analyses to synthesize empirical evidence. Research & Theory for Nursing Practice, 25 (3), 191–209. The authors of this article assert that more comparative effectiveness research (CER) is necessary to accommodate the elevated demand for evidence-based health care practices. The article supplies a summary of methodological issues relevant to systematic reviews and meta-analyses used in the process of CER. Stichler, J. F. (2010). Evaluating the evidence in evidence-based design. Journal of Nursing Administration, 40 (9), 348–351. The quality of evidence used in EBP can vary considerably. This article highlights the necessity of critically appraising facility design research articles and using a hierarchical model to rate the strength of evidence. Bernd, R., du Prel, J.-B., & Blettner, M. (2009). Study design in medical research: Part 2 of a series on the evaluation of scientific publications. Deutsches Aerzteblatt International, 106 (11), 184–189. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695375/pdf/Dtsch_Arztebl_Int-106-0184.pdf This article provides guidance in evaluating the study design of scientific publications for reliability and credibility. The authors suggest that the most important elements to consider are the question to be answered, the study population, the unit of analysis, the type of study, the measuring technique, and the calculation of sample size. Walden University. (n.d.a). Paper templates. Retrieved July 23, 2012, from http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/57.htm This website provides you access to the School of Nursing Sample Paper , which will serve as a template for formatting your papers. Media Laureate Education (Producer). (2012g). Hierarchy of evidence pyramid . Baltimore, MD: Author. This multimedia piece explains the hierarchy of evidence pyramid. The piece offers definitions and key information for each level of the pyramid. Laureate Education (Producer). (2012n). Weighing the evidence . Baltimore, MD: Author. In this video, Dr. Kristen Mauk provides insight about how she analyzed her data and interpreted meanings of what the data showed. She describes how she drew conclusions based on the results and how she explained unexpected findings that were contrary to her initial hypotheses. ��0

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 1 Describe the health care beliefs of the Korean and Mexican heritage on how they are related to the delivery of

by

culture 2 2025

1. Describe the health care beliefs of the Korean and Mexican heritage on how they are related to the delivery of health care. 2. Is there any similarity between this two cultures. 3. Give your opinion on how the beliefs of the this two culture influence the delivery of health care. As always and stated in the syllabus present your assignment in an APA format word document on an Arial 12 font attached to the threat in the tab of the discussion question call “week 10 discussion questions”. A minimum of 2 evidence based references are required

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Compilation Summarize in 3 4 pages this assignment that provides information from Weeks 1 to 4 In addition to the

by

Compilation 2025

Compilation Summarize, in 3-4 pages, this assignment that provides information from Weeks 1 to 4 . In addition to the work you completed in the last four weeks, your assignment should also: Include an introduction and a conclusion. Implement the recommendations from the instructor. Describe the role of nursing informatics. Explain how nursing informatics or technology in health care will help or hinder your leadership. Support your responses with examples. On a separate references page, cite all sources using APA format. Use this APA Citation Helper as a convenient reference for properly citing resources. This handout will provide you the details of formatting your essay using APA style . You may create your essay in this APA-formatted template .

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Opioid Abuse topic is Health policy unfolds daily and drives clinical practice in

by

Opioid Abuse topic is: Health policy unfolds daily and drives clinical practice in the U.S 2025

Opioid Abuse topic is: Health policy unfolds daily and drives clinical practice in the U.S You will investigate current policies or legislation underway for a specific health-related issue and develop a scholarly, APA -formatted paper supported by evidence. The policy paper rubric: Introduction to population or problem (incidence, prevalence, epidemiology, cost burden, etc.) Description of how the policy is intended for a specific population, program, or organization Specific legislators involved in the policy development and dissemination Identify the role of the APRN in assisting with the policy or refuting the policy – this requires the evidence to support opinion, ideas, and/or concepts Discuss how the policy influences clinical practice and is used to promote best outcomes

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 I attached the published research It is about Patients Hand Washing and Reducing Hospital Acquired Infection I

by

Critical Analysis of Published Research 2025

I attached the published research. It is about ( Patients’ Hand Washing and Reducing Hospital- Acquired Infection ) I want you to use the following headings in the paper and address the questions below in the analysis. 1) Title & abstract a. Appropriate title? b. Specific enough title? c. Purpose of the study clearly stated in abstract? d. Brief overview of the methodology employed? e. Key findings mentioned? f. Clearly and concise abstract? 2) Literature review a. Importance of this topic was presented? b. Several quality articles mentioned? c. Key terms clearly defined? d. Current articles used? e. Logical flow of ideas? f. Clearly written? 3) Hypotheses a. The hypotheses were clearly identified? b. The hypotheses logically flowed from the literature review? c. The variables of interest were clearly identified in the hypotheses? d. Appropriate number of hypotheses? e. Clearly written? 4) Data collection a. The subjects were appropriate based on the hypotheses? b. The number of subjects seems sufficient? c. The sampling approach was clear and appropriate? d. The time frame for data collection was clear and appropriate? e. The demographics of the sample were described? f. Any problems with data collection were mentioned (e.g., response rates)? g. Overall the quality of the data collection process? 5) Instrumentation/measurement tools a. The independent and dependent variables were clearly defined? b. The measurement tools for each variable was clearly stated? c. Examples of items for variables were provided? d. The quality of instruments used was mentioned? e. Reliability and validity data was referred to? f. Overall, the instruments used seem appropriate for the hypotheses? 6) Results section a. The findings corresponding to each hypothesis were clearly presented? b. Tables, charts, graphs etc. were used to summarize key results? c. Interpretation of the data seems correct? d. The author(s) connected the results to the hypotheses? e. Overall, the results section was clear and complete? 7) Discussion section a. The author correctly generalized findings from this research? b. The author connected this research to other published articles? c. The author presented the implications of this research? d. The author acknowledged limitations of this study? e. Suggestions for future research were indicated? f. Overall this section was clear and complete? g. Final thoughts on the overall value of this paper? * The analysis should be a Word file and be between 5 to 7 pages long (12-point font, double-spaced, normal margins). * Each section mentioned above will be scored on a 1 to 10 scale in which a 10 indicates: Ø This section addressed all of the questions mentioned in this document Ø The student correctly used course material in his/her analysis of this section Ø The section is written effectively (clear, no typos/grammatical errors, organized) *I attached example for a critical analysis to help you understand what I want.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Each student will choose a PICO question on a clinical nursing topic of interest

by

Hourly rounding in the workplace 2025

Each student will choose a PICO question on a clinical nursing topic of interest and develop a critical appraisal of the literature for application to nursing practice. The PICO question will first be approved by the professor; then 5-8 references will be submitted for review (a minimum of 5 must be peer reviewed research articles from professional nursing journals); followed by individual summaries and critiques of the references; then, submission of the final paper with Professor’s feedback incorporated into the final version. Each student will post a brief summary power point presentation of their findings on the assigned day and respond to classmate remarks. Detailed grading criteria will be provided for the presentation. This 5-6 page paper must be completed in APA format (1” margins, double spaced, 12 font) including a cover page and reference page with a minimum of 5-8 references (not included in page number). No abstract is required. Criteria Possible  Points I. Identified Clinical  Question (PICO) 8 Clinical question was clearly  identified by: a. P roblem 2 b. I ntervention 2 c. C omparison 2 d. O utcome 2 II. Review of Evidence 30 • Identify  scientific evidence to help inform the treatment decision or  intervention to be implemented 15 • Synthesis  of the 5-8 research articles (minimum of 5 from nursing) 15 III. Implication for  Nursing Practice 30 Detail discussion of how these  findings can or should be implemented in your clinical practice or  established as a standard of care: a. Evidence provided to  support decision 5 b. Discuss  or describe the nursing role 5 c. Discuss  patient teaching related to the intervention 5 d. Discuss  how current care would be changed or improved 5 e. Discuss  or explain why this would be good to implement if supported by  evidence. (i.e. decrease hospital stay, decrease use of pain meds) or Discuss  or explain why this would not be good to implement if supported  by evidence. (i.e. too costly, not safe) 5 f. The  need or justification for future research if indicated 5 VI. Quality of Writing 12 1. Organization  & Flow (use of headings) 5 2. Grammar  & spelling 2 3. Proper  sentence structure 2 4. Succinct  & concise (Adhered to page limit; not to exceed 6 pages) 3 V. APA formatting 20 1. Cover  page: Running head; Title, name, & affiliation is centered 1 2. First  page: Title; Page numbering 1 3. Proper  use of APA within text 5 4. Citations  within the body of the paper (references, quotes, author, year) 5 5. Citations  in body of paper matc h reference list, reference list matches  citations in text 1 6. Reference  page: (title centered, hanging indent & spacing) 2 7. Formatting  of references (alphabetical order, author, year, lowercase, italicized, right  type, doi) 5

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Coding of Qualitative Data Analyzing qualitative data after it has been collected

by

Coding of Qualitative Data 2025

Coding of Qualitative Data Analyzing qualitative data after it has been collected begins with a process known as coding . This involves reviewing the data that was collected and identifying important passages and information. The researcher can then group those passages according to their respective topics and develop specific themes about those topics that are supported by the data. This process involves careful thought and a great deal of discipline. It is easy for researchers to manipulate passages and themes to support their hypotheses and expectations. This is problematic for several reasons: It promotes biased results, it limits the scope and depth of the analysis, and it makes the discussion and defense of the researcher’s techniques rather difficult. This Discussion allows you to experience the processes of coding and analyzing qualitative data. In doing so, you should gain a deeper understanding of these techniques and their challenges. To prepare: Select at least five of your classmates’ Introduction posts from the Class Café to code and analyze (See attached file). Using the strategies presented in the Smith and Firth article (see attached file) , code your five selected postings by removing identifying information, coding the information, and identifying specific themes. As you begin the process, keep in mind that there is no right or wrong way of coding; however, your categories and associated data should—without heavy explanation—make sense to someone unfamiliar with your research. When you have completed coding the data, reflect on your experience of analyzing this type of data. Ask yourself: How can qualitative research methods promote evidence-based practice? By tomorrow Thursday November 2, 2017 write an essay of minimum of 550 words in APA format with at least 3 references. Include the level one headings as numbered below: Post a cohesive response that addresses the following: 1) Identify the overall themes you selected from coding the posts. Justify why you chose these particular themes. Try to be as scholarly as possible and remember that researchers try to refrain from directly identifying the subjects of their qualitative studies. 2) Formulate a brief analysis and conclusion about your classmates’ Introduction posts based on the themes you identified. 3) Discuss what you gained from your experiences with coding and analyzing qualitative data and how qualitative research can promote evidence-based practice. Required Media Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2011). Research methods for evidence-based practice: Qualitative research. Baltimore, MD: Author. Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 9 minutes. In this week’s video, the presenter discusses the purpose of qualitative research and explains how it differs from, yet complements, quantitative research. Required Readings Gray, J.R., Grove, S.K., & Sutherland, S. (2017). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier. Chapter 12, “Qualitative Research Methods” (pp. 251-274) This section of Chapter 12 details key qualitative research data collection and analysis methods. Bradley, E. H., Curry, L. A., & Devers, K. J. (2007). Qualitative data analysis for health services research: Developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Services Research, 42(4), 1758–1772. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x This article outlines practical approaches to qualitative data with a specific emphasis on methods useful for generating taxonomy, themes, and theory with regard to the health care field. Smith, J., & Firth, J. (2011). Qualitative data analysis: The framework approach. Nurse Researcher, 18(2), 52–62. (See attached file). This article outlines the framework approach to qualitative data, in which researchers follow detailed objectives and goals to collect and manage data. This approach is in direct contrast to inductive approaches, including grounded theory, which allows for a more fluid qualitative research process governed by the nature of the data. Optional Resources Lockwood, C. (2008). Cochrane qualitative research methods group. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (4). http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=chh&AN=CE000142&site=ehost-live&scope=site Nicholls, D. (2009). Qualitative research: Part three—Methods. International Journal of Therapy & Rehabilitation, 16(12), 638–647. Taylor-Powell, E., & Renner, M. (2003). Analyzing qualitative data. University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension. Retrieved from http://learningstore.uwex.edu/assets/pdfs/g3658-12.pdf Vander Putten, J., & Nolen, A. (2010). Comparing results from constant comparative and computer software methods: A reflection about qualitative data analysis. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 5(2), 99–112. Walden University. (n.d.). Collecting qualitative data. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://streaming.waldenu.edu/hdp/researchtutorials/educ8106_player/educ8106_collecting_qualitative_data.html Walden University. (n.d.). Analyzing and interpreting qualitative data . Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://streaming.waldenu.edu/hdp/researchtutorials/educ8106_player/educ8106_analyzing_and_interpreting_qualitative_data.html

Nursing Assignment Help 2025