2023 How healthy is your workplace You may think your current organization operates seamlessly or you

Nursing 2023 Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment,NURS 6053/NURS 6053N/NRSE 6053C/NURS 6053C/NURS 6053A/NRSE 6053A: Interprofessional Organizational And Systems Leadership

How healthy is your workplace You may think your current organization operates seamlessly or you 2023 Assignment

 

How healthy is your workplace?

You may think your current organization operates seamlessly, or you may feel it has many issues. You may experience or even observe things that give you pause. Yet, much as you wouldn’t try to determine the health of a patient through mere observation, you should not attempt to gauge the health of your work environment based on observation and opinion. Often, there are issues you perceive as problems that others do not; similarly, issues may run much deeper than leadership recognizes.

There are many factors and measures that may impact organizational health. Among these is civility. While an organization can institute policies designed to promote such things as civility, how can it be sure these are managed effectively? In this Discussion, you will examine the use of tools in measuring workplace civility.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
  • Review and complete the Work Environment Assessment Template in the Resources.

By Day 3 of Week 7

Post a brief description of the results of your Work Environment Assessment. Based on the results, how civil is your workplace? Explain why your workplace is or is not civil. Then, describe a situation where you have experienced incivility in the workplace. How was this addressed? Be specific and provide examples.

By Day 6 of Week 7

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by sharing ideas for how shortcomings discovered in their evaluations and/or their examples of incivility could have been managed more effectively.

#eduessaylab #assignmenthelp #nursingstudents #lawstudents #termpaperbuddy #savvyessaywriters #onlineprowriters #essaywriters4life #exclusivewritings #writinghub.net #collegerpapertutors #www.legalessaywriters.com # legalessaywriters  #nursingsavvywriters #nursingassignmenthelp #professionalessaybuddy.com #professionalessaybuddy #timelynursingwriters

We give our students 100% satisfaction with their assignments, which is one of the most important reasons students prefer us to other helpers. Our professional group and planners have more than ten years of rich experience. The only reason is that we have successfully helped more than 100000 students with their assignments on our inception days. Our expert group has more than 2200 professionals in different topics, and that is not all; we get more than 300 jobs every day more than 90% of the assignment get the conversion for payment.

PLACE ORDER NOW

 

2023 Case Study 1 Dolores Welborn a 28 year old attorney is pregnant with her first

Nursing 2023 Each student will be assigned a role: Narrator, Nurse Practitioner, Researcher, Patient, and Theorist. I AM THE RESEARCH. I need to describe my role in the case as a research.

Case Study 1 Dolores Welborn a 28 year old attorney is pregnant with her first 2023 Assignment

 

Case Study # 1

“Dolores Welborn,” a 28-year-old attorney, is pregnant with her first child. Lately she has been tiring easily and is often short of breath. She has also had periods of light-headedness, cramping in her legs, and a sore tongue.

Objectives: 

The structure of hemoglobin and the role played by iron in the transport of oxygen.

The means by which iron is transported and stored in the body.

The incidence and causes of IDA.

The red blood cell indices and how they are used to characterize anemia.

How IDA is prevented and treated.

#eduessaylab #assignmenthelp #nursingstudents #lawstudents #termpaperbuddy #savvyessaywriters #onlineprowriters #essaywriters4life #exclusivewritings #writinghub.net #collegerpapertutors #www.legalessaywriters.com # legalessaywriters  #nursingsavvywriters #nursingassignmenthelp #professionalessaybuddy.com #professionalessaybuddy #timelynursingwriters

We give our students 100% satisfaction with their assignments, which is one of the most important reasons students prefer us to other helpers. Our professional group and planners have more than ten years of rich experience. The only reason is that we have successfully helped more than 100000 students with their assignments on our inception days. Our expert group has more than 2200 professionals in different topics, and that is not all; we get more than 300 jobs every day more than 90% of the assignment get the conversion for payment.

PLACE ORDER NOW

 

2023 In a 5 page paper excluding title page and references critically evaluate a study instruction below

Nursing 2023 Nursing Research And Evidence-based Practice

In a 5 page paper excluding title page and references critically evaluate a study instruction below 2023 Assignment

 In a 5-page paper (excluding title page and references), critically evaluate a study. instruction below.

  The final project presents a culmination of nursing research and evidence-based practice (EBP)knowledge as students choose a qualitative or quantitative study to critically evaluate, including making a recommendation for utilization in EBP.   

In a 5-page paper (excluding title page and references), critically evaluate the study blow.

Staff Practice, Attitudes, and Knowledge/Skills Regarding Evidence-Based Practice Before and After an Educational Intervention 

Please choose one to critically evaluate qualitative or quantitative.

Evaluate the credibility of professional citation, research design, and procedures in a research article. Include a discussion on how this study contributes to EBP.  Use the Final Project Rubric provided below to help you develop and organize your final paper.  Please remember to follow APA 6th edition formatting for the title page, body of the paper, and reference page. 

Rubric or Grading Criteria: use each Competency as sub heading in the paragraph.

  

Competency

10.5 points

6 points

4 points

0 points

Total

 

Evaluates credibility of research article   the components of the appropriate evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

p. 23

Evaluates credibility of research article   using most of the components (Greater than 2/3) of the evaluation checklist   in Houser (2018).

Evaluates credibility of research article   using 2/3 of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).

Evaluates credibility of research article   using one-third or less of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

No paper submitted, content missing.

 /10.5

 

Evaluates the problem statement and research   design using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

Design p.23

Problem statement p. 104

 

Evaluates the problem statement and research   design using most of the components of the evaluation checklists in Houser   (2018).

Evaluates the problem statement and research   design using half of the components of the evaluation checklists in Houser   (2018).

Evaluates the problem statement and research   design using one-third or less of the evaluation checklists in Houser (2018).

No paper submitted, content missing.

 /10.5

 

Evaluates ethical issues in the study using   most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).  

p. 75

Evaluates ethical issues in the study using   most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). 

Evaluates ethical issues in the study using   half of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). 

Evaluates ethical issues in the study using   one-third or less of the  components  of the evaluation checklist   in Houser (2018).

No paper submitted, content missing.

 /10.5

 

Evaluates the purpose statement using most   of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) 

p.104

Evaluates the purpose statement using most   of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

Evaluates the purpose statement using half   of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

Evaluates the purpose statement using   one-third or less of the  components of the evaluation checklist in   Houser (2018)

No paper submitted, content missing.

 /10.5

 

Evaluates the literature review  using   most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) 

p.117

Evaluates the literature review  using   most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

Evaluates the literature review  using   half of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

Evaluates the literature review  using   one-third or less of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser   (2018)

No paper submitted, content missing.

 /10.5

 

Evaluates the sampling strategy using most   of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). 

p.179

Evaluates the sampling strategy using most   of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).  

Evaluates the sampling strategy using half   of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).  

Evaluates the sampling strategy using   one-third or less of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser   (2018).  

No paper submitted, or content missing.

 /10.5

 

Evaluates the measurement strategy and   validity in quantitative studies using most of the evaluation checklist in   Houser (2018).  

pp. 345,221

OR

Evaluates trustworthiness of data in   qualitative studies using most of the checklist components in Houser   (2018). 

pp. 411,437

Evaluates the measurement strategy in   quantitative studies using most of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

OR.  

Evaluates trustworthiness of data in   qualitative studies using most of the components in the checklist components   in Houser (2018). 

Evaluates the measurement strategy in   quantitative studies using half of the evaluation checklist in Houser   (2018).   

OR

Evaluates trustworthiness of data in   qualitative studies using half of the components of the checklist in Houser   (2018). 

Evaluates the measurement strategy in   quantitative studies using one-third of the evaluation checklist in Houser   (2018).  

OR

Evaluates trustworthiness of data in   qualitative studies using one-third or less of the components of the    checklist in Houser (2018). 

No paper submitted, content missing.

 /10.5

 

Evaluates how study results may (or may not)   be used to inform EBP.   

Evaluates how study results may (or may not)   be used to inform EBP.   

Discusses study results in general but not   how findings may or may not contribute to EBP. 

Does not discuss results or how study   findings can inform EBP.  

No paper submitted or content missing

 /10.5

 

Competency

7 points

5 points

2.5 points

0 points

#eduessaylab #assignmenthelp #nursingstudents #lawstudents #termpaperbuddy #savvyessaywriters #onlineprowriters #essaywriters4life #exclusivewritings #writinghub.net #collegerpapertutors #www.legalessaywriters.com # legalessaywriters  #nursingsavvywriters #nursingassignmenthelp #professionalessaybuddy.com #professionalessaybuddy #timelynursingwriters

We give our students 100% satisfaction with their assignments, which is one of the most important reasons students prefer us to other helpers. Our professional group and planners have more than ten years of rich experience. The only reason is that we have successfully helped more than 100000 students with their assignments on our inception days. Our expert group has more than 2200 professionals in different topics, and that is not all; we get more than 300 jobs every day more than 90% of the assignment get the conversion for payment.

PLACE ORDER NOW

 

2023 USE THIS FORMAT TO ADD TO EACH DRUG THEN AFTER EACH DRUG ENTER INFO YOU CAN FIND THIS INFORMATION

Nursing 2023 DRUG CARDS-EASY 32 DOLLARS

USE THIS FORMAT TO ADD TO EACH DRUG THEN AFTER EACH DRUG ENTER INFO YOU CAN FIND THIS INFORMATION 2023 Assignment

 USE THIS FORMAT TO ADD TO EACH DRUG.

THEN AFTER EACH DRUG ENTER INFO.

 YOU CAN FIND THIS INFORMATION ANYWHERE>

ENTER MEDICATION WITH INFO BELOW.

SHORT ANSWER. EACH SECTION CAN BE A SENTENCE OR SHORTER, NO NEED FOR PARAGRAPHS. 

Drug Name (generic, Trade Name): (FOR EXAMPLE : ATIVAN)

 

Classification: Anti anxiety, Benzodiazepine, Anticonvulsant

 

Action: Act on the brain and nerves (central nervous system) to produce a calming effect that relieve symptoms of anxiety.  

 

Available Forms: Tablet, Intravenous

 

 Diagnosis/indications:  It is indicated for the management of anxiety disorders or for the short-term relief of the symptoms of anxiety or anxiety associated with depressive symptoms.

 

Most Common Side Effects: Dizziness, Drowsiness, Nausea,Vomiting

 

Drug/Drug and/or Drug/food Interactions : This drug isn’t to be taken with other medications that can lower the blood pressure.

 

Nursing Interventions Needed When Giving This Medication: Explain to patient to not drive while taking this medication

 

Patient Education: Do not take this medication with other benzodiazepines

THESE ARE THE DRUGS BELOW:

  

1. Alprazolam (Xanax)

2. Amitriptyline (Elavil)

3. Amoxapine (Asendin)

4. Bupropion (Wellbutrin, Zyban)

5.  Buspirone ( Buspar)

6. Clomipramine (Anafranil)

7. Clonazepam (Klonopin)

8. Desipramine (Norpramine)

9. Desvenlafaxine (Pristiq)

10. Diazepam (Valium)

  

1. Doxepin (Adapin, Sinequan, Zonalon)

2. Duloxetine (Cymbalta)

3. Escitalopram (Lexapro)

4. Fluoxetine (Prozac)

5. Gabapentin (Neurontin)

6. Imipramine(Tofranil)

7. Isocarboxazid (Marplan)

8. Lamotrigine (Lamictal)

9. Lorazepam (Ativan)

10. Mirtazapine(Remeron)

11. Nortriptyline (Pamelor, Aventy)

  

1. Sertraline (Zoloft)

2. Topiramate(Topamax)

3. Tranylcypromine (Parnate)

4. Trazodone (Desyrel)

5. Venlafaxine (Effexor)

6. Isocarboxazid (Marplan)

7. Phenelzine (Nardil)

8. Tranlcypromine (Parnate)

9. Thioridazine (Mellaril)

10. Trifluopperazine (stelazine)

11. Fluphenazine (Prolixin)

12. Haloperidol (Haldol)

13. Molindone (Moban)

14. Clozapine (Clozaril)

#eduessaylab #assignmenthelp #nursingstudents #lawstudents #termpaperbuddy #savvyessaywriters #onlineprowriters #essaywriters4life #exclusivewritings #writinghub.net #collegerpapertutors #www.legalessaywriters.com # legalessaywriters  #nursingsavvywriters #nursingassignmenthelp #professionalessaybuddy.com #professionalessaybuddy #timelynursingwriters

We give our students 100% satisfaction with their assignments, which is one of the most important reasons students prefer us to other helpers. Our professional group and planners have more than ten years of rich experience. The only reason is that we have successfully helped more than 100000 students with their assignments on our inception days. Our expert group has more than 2200 professionals in different topics, and that is not all; we get more than 300 jobs every day more than 90% of the assignment get the conversion for payment.

PLACE ORDER NOW

 

2023 Write a 2 to 3 page paper that addresses the following Explain the ethical and legal implications

Nursing 2023 Ethical Implications – 2 Pages

Write a 2 to 3 page paper that addresses the following Explain the ethical and legal implications 2023 Assignment

Write a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:

  • Explain the ethical and legal implications of the scenario you selected on all stakeholders involved, such as the prescriber, pharmacist, patient, and patient’s family.
  • Describe strategies to address disclosure and nondisclosure as identified in the scenario you selected. Be sure to reference laws specific to your state.
  • Explain two strategies that you, as an advanced practice nurse, would use to guide your decision making in this scenario, including whether you would disclose your error. Be sure to justify your explanation. 
  • Explain the process of writing prescriptions, including strategies to minimize medication errors.

Scenario: During your lunch break at the hospital, you read a journal article on pharmacoeconomics. You think of a couple of patients who have recently mentioned their financial difficulties. You wonder if some of the expensive drugs you have prescribed are sufficiently managing the patients’ health conditions and improving their quality of life.

#eduessaylab #assignmenthelp #nursingstudents #lawstudents #termpaperbuddy #savvyessaywriters #onlineprowriters #essaywriters4life #exclusivewritings #writinghub.net #collegerpapertutors #www.legalessaywriters.com # legalessaywriters  #nursingsavvywriters #nursingassignmenthelp #professionalessaybuddy.com #professionalessaybuddy #timelynursingwriters

We give our students 100% satisfaction with their assignments, which is one of the most important reasons students prefer us to other helpers. Our professional group and planners have more than ten years of rich experience. The only reason is that we have successfully helped more than 100000 students with their assignments on our inception days. Our expert group has more than 2200 professionals in different topics, and that is not all; we get more than 300 jobs every day more than 90% of the assignment get the conversion for payment.

PLACE ORDER NOW

 

2023 Based on the required topic study materials write a reflection about worldview and respond to following In 250 300 words explain

Nursing 2023 nursing

Based on the required topic study materials write a reflection about worldview and respond to following In 250 300 words explain 2023 Assignment

 

Based on the required topic study materials, write a reflection about worldview and respond to following:

  1. In 250-300 words, explain the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism within health care.
  2. In 250-300 words, explain what scientism is and describe two of the main arguments against it.
  3. In 750-1,000 words, answer each of the worldview questions according to your own personal perspective and worldview: (a) What is ultimate reality? (b) What is the nature of the universe? (c) What is a human being? (d) What is knowledge? (e) What is your basis of ethics? (f) What is the purpose of your existence?

Remember to support your reflection with the topic study materials.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

#eduessaylab #assignmenthelp #nursingstudents #lawstudents #termpaperbuddy #savvyessaywriters #onlineprowriters #essaywriters4life #exclusivewritings #writinghub.net #collegerpapertutors #www.legalessaywriters.com # legalessaywriters  #nursingsavvywriters #nursingassignmenthelp #professionalessaybuddy.com #professionalessaybuddy #timelynursingwriters

We give our students 100% satisfaction with their assignments, which is one of the most important reasons students prefer us to other helpers. Our professional group and planners have more than ten years of rich experience. The only reason is that we have successfully helped more than 100000 students with their assignments on our inception days. Our expert group has more than 2200 professionals in different topics, and that is not all; we get more than 300 jobs every day more than 90% of the assignment get the conversion for payment.

PLACE ORDER NOW

 

2023 Discussion Forum Peer Review for Scientific and Mathematical Analytical Inquiry Draft Post a draft of your scientific and mathematical analytical

Nursing 2023 Caps Discussion W3

Discussion Forum Peer Review for Scientific and Mathematical Analytical Inquiry Draft Post a draft of your scientific and mathematical analytical 2023 Assignment

Discussion Forum: Peer Review for Scientific and Mathematical/Analytical Inquiry Draft

Post a draft of your scientific and mathematical/analytical inquiry paper for peer review. You should also post your level 1 and level 2 research questions. Identify any questions or challenges you faced with the assignment, or mention something new you learned about the research question and inquiry paper process. Pose specific questions you would like your peers to address.

#eduessaylab #assignmenthelp #nursingstudents #lawstudents #termpaperbuddy #savvyessaywriters #onlineprowriters #essaywriters4life #exclusivewritings #writinghub.net #collegerpapertutors #www.legalessaywriters.com # legalessaywriters  #nursingsavvywriters #nursingassignmenthelp #professionalessaybuddy.com #professionalessaybuddy #timelynursingwriters

We give our students 100% satisfaction with their assignments, which is one of the most important reasons students prefer us to other helpers. Our professional group and planners have more than ten years of rich experience. The only reason is that we have successfully helped more than 100000 students with their assignments on our inception days. Our expert group has more than 2200 professionals in different topics, and that is not all; we get more than 300 jobs every day more than 90% of the assignment get the conversion for payment.

PLACE ORDER NOW

 

2023 As you have discovered through this course nurses are influential members of the

Nursing 2023 000

As you have discovered through this course nurses are influential members of the 2023 Assignment

As you have discovered through this course, nurses are influential members of the community and the political system. Therefore, for the purposes of this assignment you will identify a problem or concern in your community, organization, etc. that has the capacity to be legislated. You will conduct research and state a proposal. Through the legislative process, your proposal for the problem or concern may influence an idea for change into a law. First, refer to the “How a Bill Becomes a Law” media. http://lc.gcumedia.com/zwebassets/courseMaterialPages/nrs440v_how-a-bill-becomes-a-law-v2.1.php/. Then, view the “Bill to Law Process” to watch the scenario. After viewing the scenario, refer to the “Legislative Assignment.” You will need to save the document first in order to use it. Submit the assignment to the instructor. You also reserve the right to submit your completed proposal to the respective government official. However, this is optional. If you select to submit your proposal as a part of the legislative process, refer to “Find Your Representative” or research the contact information on your own. APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

#eduessaylab #assignmenthelp #nursingstudents #lawstudents #termpaperbuddy #savvyessaywriters #onlineprowriters #essaywriters4life #exclusivewritings #writinghub.net #collegerpapertutors #www.legalessaywriters.com # legalessaywriters  #nursingsavvywriters #nursingassignmenthelp #professionalessaybuddy.com #professionalessaybuddy #timelynursingwriters

We give our students 100% satisfaction with their assignments, which is one of the most important reasons students prefer us to other helpers. Our professional group and planners have more than ten years of rich experience. The only reason is that we have successfully helped more than 100000 students with their assignments on our inception days. Our expert group has more than 2200 professionals in different topics, and that is not all; we get more than 300 jobs every day more than 90% of the assignment get the conversion for payment.

PLACE ORDER NOW

 

2023 Prepare this assignment as a 1 500 1 750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the

Nursing 2023 Revise The PICOT Question You Wrote In The Topic 1 Assignment Using The Feedback You Received From Your Instructor.

Prepare this assignment as a 1 500 1 750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the 2023 Assignment

 

Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the guidelines below.

PICOT Question 

Revise the PICOT question you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment using the feedback you received from your instructor.

The final PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).

Research Critiques

In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments, you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique on two articles for each type of study (4 articles total). Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of each study by making appropriate revisions.

The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT question.

Refer to “Research Critiques and PICOT Guidelines – Final Draft.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper.

Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change

Discuss the link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes.

General Requirements

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide

#eduessaylab #assignmenthelp #nursingstudents #lawstudents #termpaperbuddy #savvyessaywriters #onlineprowriters #essaywriters4life #exclusivewritings #writinghub.net #collegerpapertutors #www.legalessaywriters.com # legalessaywriters  #nursingsavvywriters #nursingassignmenthelp #professionalessaybuddy.com #professionalessaybuddy #timelynursingwriters

We give our students 100% satisfaction with their assignments, which is one of the most important reasons students prefer us to other helpers. Our professional group and planners have more than ten years of rich experience. The only reason is that we have successfully helped more than 100000 students with their assignments on our inception days. Our expert group has more than 2200 professionals in different topics, and that is not all; we get more than 300 jobs every day more than 90% of the assignment get the conversion for payment.

PLACE ORDER NOW

 

2023 4 There are various in which a person can be able to evaluate whether the evidence they have

Nursing 2023 2-Please answer based on these answers as they are listed, each one must be answered in APAform and not less than 150 words

4 There are various in which a person can be able to evaluate whether the evidence they have 2023 Assignment

  

4-There are various in which a person can be able to evaluate whether the evidence they have and are using in the practice is true or not. It is always important to evaluate evidence so as to be able to understand what type of information one is using. Two methods that one can be able to use to evaluate evidence in the nursing practice include systematic reviews and meta analyses (Melnyk, 2011). Systematic reviews are a form of literature review that involves the use of systematic methods to be able to collect and analyze secondary information presented in a document. The method involves trying to understand whether the data presented in the source has followed the right steps when being developed. Meta analyses on the other hand is a method through which the researcher is able to evaluate the credibility of data being presented in various quantitative sources. According to research, one cannot be able to use the results of one research activity to implement an intervention. There is need for them to use several sources. Meta analyses allows the research to combine the results of various sources to find the commonality in them.

One of the main difference in both methods is the focus the methods. Meta-analysis focuses on the researcher being able to analyze quantitative data from various sources. Systematic reviews on the other and focus on both qualitative and quantitative data to come up with results (Uman, 2011). The main difference is therefore what type of data each deals with. Systematic reviews follow a certain procedure in order to be able to come up with a result. This is not the same as in the case of meta analyses where the focus is on research results of article that are investigating the same topic. The similarity in both is that they are able to help the researcher to compare various forms of data and come up with a result. They allow the researcher to compare the results of multiple research and studies.

References

Melnyk, B. M., (2011). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: a guide to best practice (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Uman L. S. (2011). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l’Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l’enfant et de l’adolescent, 20(1), 57–59.

 

 

 
 

5-Two methods of evaluating evidence are Case control study and Systematic Review.  In Case control study Researchers choose people with a particular result (the cases) and interview the groups or check their records to ascertain what different experiences they had. They compare the odds of having an experience with the outcome to the odds of having an experience without the outcome. in Systematic Review a critical assessment and evaluation of all research studies that address a particular clinical issue. The researchers use an organized method of locating, assembling, and evaluating a body of literature on a particular topic using a set of specific criteria. A systematic review typically includes a description of the findings of the collection of research studies. The systematic review may also include a quantitative pooling of data, called a meta-analysis.In case studies, the study start with the identification of a group of individuals with a particular health outcome while in stystematic review  summarises the results of available carefully designed healthcare studies (controlled trials) and provides a high level of evidence on the effectiveness of healthcare interventions. They are both alike because there is always a control group to compare data.

References

Admin. (2013, June 21). Introduction to study designs – case-control studies. Retrieved from https://www.healthknowledge.org.uk/e-learning/epidemiology/practitioners/introduction-study-design-ccs

Nursing: Evaluate Evidence. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://guides.pcc.edu/c.php?g=210096&p=1385961

What is a systematic review? (n.d.). Retrieved from https://consumers.cochrane.org/what-systematic-review

 

 
 

6-A meta-analysis of all well-done studies of a given clinical topic (using participant-level data if available). Define criteria for which of the published studies are actually entered into this meta-analysis (e.g., only randomized blinded trials, or any direct comparison studies, etc.). This represents the reference standard. Limitations of this approach include the lack of agreement on reliable validity standards for meta-analysis and the possibility of incorporation bias due to testing the validity of a subset of evidence using the whole evidence as gold standard. In some instances, a small evidence base (consisting of one or a few well-designed, appropriately powered studies) may be sufficient to reach the most appropriate conclusion.

Systematic Reviews

A literature search could identify and compare the conclusions of different systematic reviews that used different prioritization strategies to address the same clinical question. The advantage of this method is its relative ease of implementation. Provided a reviewer can find published reviews that addressed the same clinical question using different strategies, the comparison of the reviews’ conclusions can be done relatively quickly. Although this would be the least labor-intensive method, it has some drawbacks. First, it may be difficult to identify clinical questions where different systematic reviews used different prioritization strategies. Second, the systematic reviews may have differed in other methodological areas, such as risk-of-bias assessment and strength of evidence assessment, which could then lead to differences in conclusions among reviews.

A reviewer could identify a single existing systematic review, determine its evidence prioritization strategy (by examining the report inclusion criteria), and test other prioritization strategies on the same evidence base, while keeping all other methodology the same. The advantage of this method over the method above is that other methodological aspects of review (e.g., risk-of-bias assessment) would no longer confound the comparison. However, this method is more labor-intensive than the method above, as it requires performing independent research synthesis using the other prioritization strategies

Treadwill, JR; Signh, S; Taliti, R. (2011). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. A Framework for “Best Evidence” Approaches in Systematic Reviews. Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK56652/

 
Reply  |  Quote & Reply 

#eduessaylab #assignmenthelp #nursingstudents #lawstudents #termpaperbuddy #savvyessaywriters #onlineprowriters #essaywriters4life #exclusivewritings #writinghub.net #collegerpapertutors #www.legalessaywriters.com # legalessaywriters  #nursingsavvywriters #nursingassignmenthelp #professionalessaybuddy.com #professionalessaybuddy #timelynursingwriters

We give our students 100% satisfaction with their assignments, which is one of the most important reasons students prefer us to other helpers. Our professional group and planners have more than ten years of rich experience. The only reason is that we have successfully helped more than 100000 students with their assignments on our inception days. Our expert group has more than 2200 professionals in different topics, and that is not all; we get more than 300 jobs every day more than 90% of the assignment get the conversion for payment.

PLACE ORDER NOW