Tag Archive for: Last Minute Nursing Assingment Help

Facilities Coordinator | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Facilities Coordinator | 2025 Custom Writing

One & half page its about 450 words

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

summary writing | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

summary writing | 2025 Custom Writing

You will need to select and provide a summary of a maximum of five articles. Three of the articles will be drug related stories that appear in the recent news. The other two articles will be peer-reviewed scientific articles that are drug related.Requirements:1. Title, author, publication date, and link to article provided.2. Article must be from recent news (no more than three articles) or a peer-reviewed article (no more than two articles).3. An original summary (100-200 words), touching on key points of the article.4. All articles must be drug-related and credible.Grading:Grading will be done on an all-or-none basis. There will be no partial points awarded. If your article summary contains all necessary parts, you will receive credit for the article. However, if your article is missing any of the required components, no credit will be awarded.Identifying a Peer Review Article:In general, one way to determine if a paper is a peer review scientific article is if it contains a number of key sections, such as an Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Reference section. For the purpose of this assignment, review papers, opinion papers, editorial/commentary papers, etc. will not be accepted.Template1) Title: ________________________________________________________________Author(s): _______________________________________________________________Publication date: _________________Article type (select one): Recent news or peer-reviewed article?Summary: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Link to article: ___________________________________________________________

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

Reply to Irrational Beliefs and Distorted Core Beliefs | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Reply to Irrational Beliefs and Distorted Core Beliefs | 2025 Custom Writing

Book  Corey, G. (2017). Theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage LearningRequired Textbook Readings:Chapter 9 – Behavioral TherapyChapter 10 – Cognitive Behavior TherapyRequired Multimedia:Watch: The Case of Stan – Behavioral Therapy -In MindTap on Cengage site. Under Chapter 9: How do I practice what I’ve learnedWatch: The Case of Stan – Cognitive Behavior Therapy -In MindTap on Cengage site. Under Chapter 10: How do I practice what I’ve learnedInstructions:To at least one peer, reflect a critical understanding of his/her post and advance the discussion with thoughtful statements surrounding to what degree you agree with him/her and why. Include at least one reference to course material.When you begin, type the name of the person you are replying to.Make an analysis of the other person’s work/thinking.Support your comment with a reason, an example, or –preferably– by a reference from the material you’ve read in this course.Respond to 1 peerThe expectation is that response posts will add factual information to the discussion, whether in agreement or disagreement with the peer’s original post.75-100 wordsReply to:I can agree with Ellis’s assumption on REBT on the basis for emotional disturbance lays in irrational beliefs and thinking. I think I can only agree partially with Ellis on the notion that events themselves do not cause emotional and behavioral problems. I do agree that our cognitive evaluation of events can lead to emotional disturbance. Traumatic events though such as plane or car crashes, rape, being attacked or robbed are events that cannot be controlled and our cognitive evaluation can be compromised and possibly unable to fully comprehend these events in times of great stress or trauma. I can agree that our cognitions and behaviors create a “cause-and-effect” relationship (Corey, 2017, p. 271) Just this weekend in church the sermon was aimed at the story we attach to our wounds in life and how that affects our outlook on life. I do believe that we do present ourselves with the choice to respond to different events, but that is not the full reason as to why one can find themselves in emotional disturbance.CB is also an introspective therapy that is aimed at catching those distorted thoughts to restructure those thoughts, to “identify dysfunctional thinking, then weigh evidence for or against that thought.”(Corey, 2017, p. 285) I can accept the notion that cognitive therapists should assist clients to almost a full extent. I do not agree with the specified questions in collaborative empiricism (Corey, 2017, p. 285) which can leave room for therapists to bring the patients to biased conclusions about their thoughts. There should be assisting in the restructuring and examination of distorted beliefs to avoid further distorted beliefs but the clients need to bring themselves to those conclusions, not have them be given to them, but collarborated on instead.References:Corey, G. (2017). Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy. Cengage Learning

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

Test proposal | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Test proposal | 2025 Custom Writing

Throughout the course, students will conduct research on instruments that are currently used to measure a particular construct, develop a new instrument to measure that construct, administer the instrument to participants, and report on data arising from those administrations. . Students are free to select any construct of their interest, such as some ability, a personality construct, or any kind of attitude or belief.Over the six-week course, students will select a construct of interest (such as depression, anxiety, job satisfaction, etc.), conduct research on other popular instruments used to measure the same or similar construct, develop a 12-15 item instrument, administer the instrument to 3-5 participants, discuss the methods used to administer the instrument, provide a strengths and weaknesses/limitation section regarding the development of the instrument, and discuss ways to increase the reliability and validity of the instrument.This assignment is the second step toward completing your Final Test Development Proposal in Week 6.  Using your construct of interest from Week 1 and building upon the instruments and information you found in Step One (Week 1), develop a 7-8 page literature review (not including the title page, abstract, and references page) on your construct of interest and the 5-7 instruments used to assess it. Thus, the literature review should explain your construct of interest thoroughly, as well as provide thorough reviews of the 5-7 instruments used to measure it. This is slightly different from other literature reviews, whereby the idea is to review and critique the study and findings. For this literature review you are not reviewing the study but rather are reviewing and critiquing the instrument based on what studies and other researchers have found. The idea here is to review the instrument and its usefulness in measuring your construct. Thus, what does the instrument measure, how reliable and valid is it, and what are its strengths and weaknesses?  What is lacking in the instrument which paves the way for the necessity of your newly developed instrument? How are these instruments different from what you will develop?Use the Forbush, Wildes, Pollack, Dunbar, Patterson and  Watson (2013) Development and validation of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI) and the O’Neill, and Sevastos (2013) The development and validation of a new multidimensional Job Insecurity Measure (JIM): An inductive methodology articles for examples of how to conduct literature reviews of current or previous instruments/tests.Use 5-7 scholarly resources, including mostly research studies and articles related to your construct and the instruments used to measure it. Information should be drawn from appropriate sources, such as professional journals, test publisher websites, and dissertations. Information gathered from sources must be appropriately cited, following APA guidelines.Please be sure to include the following in your literature review:A discussion of your construct of interest.A thorough discussion of each instrument you review for your construct, including the name of the test, what the test is used for, whether the test is appropriate for this area, what the reliability and validity of the test is, and what reviewers say about the strengths and weaknesses of it with regard to assessing this constructWhat, in general, appears to be adequately assessed on each test with respect to the construct that you selected?What does not appear to be adequately assessed?Your literature review should justify your development of an assessment—is there a hole in what is currently being assessed that you can fill with your test? Make a case for why your proposed test would address an area that is not already well assessed.

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

Cyber psy 2 | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Cyber psy 2 | 2025 Custom Writing

PreparationStep 1: Choose a topicChoose a topic related to your current job (or desired career field) from the following list:Activism.Art.Artificial intelligence.Augmented reality.Big data.Blogging or microblogging.Cloud computing.Cloud forensics.Cyberdefense.Cybertherapy.Criminal networks.Digital divide.E-commerce or consumer behavior.Embedded computation.Enterprise architecture.Enterprise analytics.Education.Energy.Entrepreneurs.Ergonomic issues.Fundraising.Hackers.Health care.H–CI (human–computer interface).Media.Mobile technology.National security.Online learning or virtual high school.Product development.Real-time analytics.Robots.Security.User customization.Step Two: ResearchResearch a topic of interest and choose two scholarly articles that examine cyberpsychology research related to your chosen career field. You may use the Capella University Library, the Internet, or any other scholarly resource to find the articles. You may also use the Interpreting Data media piece (linked in the Resources) as an aid to complete this assessment.Note the following:References should be mostly scholarly in nature. In other words, you should direct your research to professional psychology journals and texts, as well as current articles from the media (for example, articles from PewResearch, professional journals, and respected media).The library guide for this course will help you locate appropriate sources.Wikipedia is not a reliable source of information for this purpose. Do not use Wikipedia.InstructionsComplete the following:Using the topic you chose in Step One, identify your job or the career in which you are interested and explain how your topic relates to the job.Using the two articles related to your chosen career or allied field that you located in Step Two, use the Critique Template, linked in the Resources under the Required Resources heading, to guide your evaluation of the methods, procedures, and techniques used in the research. Each article must be evaluated on a separate copy of the template. For each article, complete the following in the template:Explain the data collection methods.Identify the participants and participant recruitment methods.Explain the apparatus or material used to gather research, as well as the procedures performed to collect the data.Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the research methodology.Investigate the range of current unresolved issues in cyberpsychology.Using the APA Paper Template, linked in the Resources under the APA Resources heading, analyze a career-field-related issue or problem that requires more research.Additional RequirementsWritten communication:Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.Formatting: Format resources and citations according to current APA style and formatting guidelines. Use Microsoft Word.Number of pages: 2–3 double-spaced pages for the issue analysis, excluding the cover page and references, plus one Critique Template for each scholarly article reviewed,Number of resources: Use two scholarly articles.Font and font size: Use Times New Roman, 12-point fon

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

African American Psychology | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

African American Psychology | 2025 Custom Writing

YOU ARE TO FULLY ANSWER ANY THREE OF THE FOLLOWING ESSAY QUESTIONS IN YOUR OWN WORDS USING COMPLETE SENTENCES AND PARAGRAPHS.  EACH ANSWER MUST BE AT LEAST FOUR PRINTED PAGES.1.  IN CH. 1, DESCRIBE THE CRITICAL EVENTS  THAT LED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOLOGY 0F AFRICAN AMERICANS.2.  IN CH. 2, EXPLAIN THE AFRICENTRIC DIMENSIONS OF AFRICAN PHILOSOPHY.3.  IN CH. 3, DESCRIBE THE NIGRESCENCE MODEL OF RACIAL IDENTITY AND THE MULTIDIMENSIONAL MODEL OF RACIAL IDENTITY.4.  IN CH. 4, DISCUSS THE MAJOR CONSEQUENCES OF RACISM.5.  IN CH. 5, DESCRIBE THE HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE OF THE AFRICAN AMERICAN FAMILY STRUCTURE.

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

Can this be done by 2am tomorrow 9/17! | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Can this be done by 2am tomorrow 9/17! | 2025 Custom Writing

TRANSCRIPT:“Structural Framework: Authority and Supervision” Program Transcript MAURICE WILLIAMS: As former director of Treatment Foster Care, when I show up at work every day there are hundreds of problems that need to be solved– really hundreds. So when I show up at work, first thing I’m thinking is, “Have we had any disruptions overnight? Have we had any foster parents call the hotline and say, ‘Listen, I want this 15 year old boy out of my home immediately?'” Second problem would be, do we have enough children in the program? We need to do more recruitments, get other clients into our program, so that we can continue to grow. Our program, of course, thrives off of serving clients. And in order to serve them, they must first be transferred to us from the Department of Social Services. So when foster parents say, “Listen, I want this child out,” it is my responsibility to get with the clinical director, to get with case carrying social worker to figure out what actually is the problem in this home. We do what we call an emergency case review. We gather the entire team together, clinicians will come in, we will speak at length about what these issues have been. Most of the time we already know what some of them are, but then maybe there were some new issues that presented over night. ANDREA INGRAM: You know, Maurice, it sounds to me like you have the families to be concerned about, the children to be concerned about, and your staff to be concerned about. MAURICE WILLIAMS: Absolutely. ANDREA INGRAM: And there’s a little part of what you said, it reminded me a little bit of my job, which is when you come in the morning, you have an agenda of things you want to do, and lots of times, that’s not what you end up doing. MAURICE WILLIAMS: We’re crisis interventionist people. We thrive in crisis. We want to work it out. And I must ensure that the social workers don’t get tired. There are a lot of problems that they’re having, so the social worker could get tired, and just be like, well, “Listen, I’m done with this family as well.” So when I show up at work every day with all of the hundreds of problems that we do have, that is my primary responsibility, to keep these families intact. ANDREA INGRAM: My youngest child described my job one day as– somebody asked her, what does your mom do? And she said, well, she solves problems all day. I hadn’t thought about it, but in our agencies, that’s what we’re doing, we’re solving problems all the time. And I share a lot of those kinds of staffing and concern for families, because I run a crisis center also. © 2013 Laureate Education, Inc. 1                                          But I wanted to mention a sort of ongoing larger problem that we have. Our organization has two main things that we do. We do crisis services, and we have a whole staff that does that, and we have shelter programs. And so it’s almost like we have two big departments, and we share the same building, and our staff need to be very integrated. And what happens sometimes is that they start to sort of go their separate ways and lose some of that understanding of each other. I might start to hear criticism from one side to the other, criticism, or not understanding why they’re doing certain things. I’ve got to bring them back together, because we are a unified staff, and we also need to back each other. So how do I do that? How do we avoid that? One of the things that I have found to be most successful is cross-training– to take a crisis staff person and teach them to work in the shelter, take someone who’s in house in the shelter and have them work in another location, at our day resource center for example. So cross-training– and not only is that a good way to understand each other, but as far as in an emergency, if we have staff who are trained in a lot of different positions, then we can keep going, because we’ve got to keep all of our programs going 24 hours, all the time. Also, sometimes we just have meetings, if I’m hearing something’s cropping up as a problem, bring people together, and, OK, let’s have the shelter staff explain to the crisis staff why they did that, because there’s usually a good reason. So I’m constantly trying to keep people together, keep cohesiveness in the agency, keep respect for each other, and keep understanding of their jobs. HOLLY HOEY: So this question actually– you both were talking about internal problems, and this question to me, I automatically thought about external. And you work directly with clients, and United Way works indirectly with clients, through our partners. And I was thinking about volunteer management. And when I say volunteer management, I don’t see it as a problem, but it’s more about preventing a problem. I’ve been at United Way for about 12 years, and 50% of my job is working with volunteers, which I absolutely love. They’re vital to our organization, yet as a staff person, it’s very challenging managing volunteers, as we all know. And so with my team and to new staff that come on board, it’s really teaching them volunteer management 101. They always have great ideas, which is wonderful. There is just no possible way that we can accept all of these ideas. And so you as a staff person are responsible to make sure that you’re aligning with the mission and the strategic direction of the organization, and that you have to vet those ideas, and that it’s your responsibility to say to the volunteer, that’s a great idea, do we have the internal resources to support this idea? Do we have the finances to support it? Do we get it sponsored? © 2013 Laureate Education, Inc. 2                                        I think it’s important that you really instill in the staff members who are managing volunteers, that one is to manage the expectations– well, to have clear expectations up front. Let me give you an example of a couple of years ago, I’m working with a wonderful volunteer who is just so dedicated. He had an idea to bring together certain volunteers and our most generous donors to an event at an art museum, and to just have a kind of celebratory event, and to thank them, and to kick start the campaign, and he wanted to get the sponsorship. And I did not feel good about it as a staff person. I thought, It’s sending the wrong message, people aren’t feeling good, and we’re going to have this event. It just isn’t the right feel.” And he kept pushing me, he kept pushing me, and I finally had to say to him, “I just don’t feel good about this. Let’s really think about the environment right now.” “We’re about to get into the recession, having an event right now, it just wasn’t the right feeling. And I think donors would actually look poorly upon it.” And so he finally agreed, and it was my responsibility as a staff person to push back. And I think that we have that obligation to our organization and to our donors. We have to be a good steward to our donors and volunteers, and to say, “Is this really the right thing to do?” ANDREA INGRAM: Holly, what I really like about your story, though, is that you followed your intuition, your instincts. Sometimes we all are in situations where we have that battles with ourselves. HOLLY HOEY: Yeah, and it’s hard. MAURICE WILLIAMS: It is hard. HOLLY HOEY: It’s hard. ANDREA INGRAM: You know, “Am I right, am I wrong?” And you just didn’t let go of that feeling. And you were right. MAURICE WILLIAMS: It’s not only because they’re volunteers, I think it’s with staff alike. Because even with my staff, right, we have to ensure that they are first seeing the problems out in the field, because I’m not out there doing the home visits. I’m not interacting with the families and children on a consistent basis. So staff has to believe that upper management is going to first hear the problems that they’re having in the field. Part of our responsibility is to hear and listen to what the problems are out there, and then come up with a clear way of how to address them and modify any changes that we need to make in order for our placements to be successful. One thing that we do as well as that, we meet with our foster parents once every three months. So they are all there, all 50 of them are in this room, we’re talking © 2013 Laureate Education, Inc. 3                                          about all of the issues we’ve had on the ground. One thing that I’ve noticed that my staff is starting to do, is that any problem that has existed in more than three families in one review period– which would be three months– that is a problem that we will take to the major session that we have every three months. And we will speak openly about it, we will come up with a procedure that allows us to alleviate those types of problems. So I think seeing trends in our homes and in our families that create issues, for not just one or two families, but multiple families, how do we clearly define a process that’s going to be able to clearly talk to that problem, and come up with some viable solutions for all of us. How do you guys deal with problems that you see occurring currently, and then how you can mitigate those concerns from continuing? HOLLY HOEY: At United Way of Central Maryland, we’re a very complicated organization, because we send out checks and allocations to over 1600 nonprofit organizations a year. We can take credit cards, stock transition, you know there’s transactions, there’s payroll deduction, there’s cash, there’s checks– I mean, there’s so many ways that people can give on a monthly basis, on a quarterly basis, to United Way, and we have the infrastructure to support that, however, there’s going to be a human error. The one thing that we do to solve a problem is, right away, there’s a team in place. We create a cross functional team from the different departments. We pull everybody together, we say, “OK, how did it happen, what are we going to do to fix the problem, but most importantly, what are we going to do to fix the problem so that it is preventable in the future?” But this happens, and I think that it’s important that the existing policies and procedures that are in place, that you’re always maintaining that, you’re doublechecking that, you’re monitoring it, and then if something happens, you’re always modifying it to ensure that that problem will not happen in the future. MAURICE WILLIAMS: So how do we, Andrea, teach our staff to identify problems, so by the time that it reaches our desks, we are already aware of it, and we can deal with it before it gets out of control? ANDREA INGRAM: Well, I was thinking, as a response listening to you all, that it’s– for us, we’re all about people, we have a lot of staff, they have stressful jobs, much like your situation, and I would say that we listen, listen, listen. Because staff are not always going to come to you, you know, so you really have to be listening all the time for any little undercurrents, and then you have to respond. When you hear something, you have to respond. And I have found that you can’t always solve a problem. If staff gets the feeling that you are trying to solve the problem, then I think that goes a long way to improve morale, so that people still © 2013 Laureate Education, Inc. 4                          feel good about the organization and feel good about the way they’re being treated. HOLLY HOEY: You need to create a culture in which everybody– and our president and CEO say this– “You can lead from any chair in this organization. It doesn’t matter if you’re the CEO, or if you’re an administrator– you know, an administrative person– or if you are in finance, you are a leader in this organization. And it is your obligation and your responsibility to raise your hand, to ask the tough questions, if you see a problem, to not overlook it. If you’re at all in doubt of anything that you see or experience, you have to raise your hand.” MAURICE WILLIAMS: I tell my staff all the time that, “You guys are the ears and eyes of the agency. I mean, you will be the first ones to see, to sense some sort of inconsistency in the home. You always have to be in tune to what you see, what you’ve learned, your knowledge space that you carry every day, to bring back those problems to us.” And you’re right, they have to feel like we listen, like we care, and then, ultimately, we can do something about it, because they don’t always want to just have us listen. We can’t always solve every problem, nor can we solve the problem easily or quickly, because sometimes we have to really look at how we solve this problem will determine whether or not– for my organization– whether or not this placement stays intact, whether or not we have to move the child, whether or not we have to in fact decertify the foster home. So we have to take our time, we have to look at all of the factors involved to come to the right conclusion. © 2013 Laureate Education, Inc. 5ASSIGNMENT:Problems in human services organizations do not arrive in labeled packages with clear instructions on how to solve them. It is up to human services administrators to identify problems and strategies to address them. It is important to consider the steps or actions those human services administrators can take to address problems. It is also important to consider what an administrator can do to prevent problems from occurring initially.For this Assignment, view the “Structural Framework: Authority and Supervision” video and select a problem in human services articulated by one of the human services administrators. As you listen to the video, think about the responsibilities of human services administrators in solving problems. Consider how the administrators used supervision and/or authority to address the problem. Finally, consider whether the administrator might have prevented the problem.The assignment (2–3 pages):Briefly identify the human services administrator you selected from this week’s video.Describe the problems associated with the administrator you selected.Describe the responsibilities of the human services administrator related to the problem he or she outlined in the Roundtable Discussion.Explain how the administrator used authority and/or supervision to address problems in his or her organization.Explain whether the administrator might have prevented the problem outlined in the Roundtable Discussion and why or why not.Share an insight about the role of human services administrators in preventing and addressing problems in human services organizations.Support your Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You are asked to provide a reference list for all resources,includingthose in the Learning Resources for this course. You should include in your referencesat least tworesources included in this week’s resources andat least oneoutside scholarly resource.

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

psychology of WMD | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

psychology of WMD | 2025 Custom Writing

Assignment InstructionsFirst, select a newer scholarly journal article (no older than 2015) relevant to the course regarding the psychological impact of a Weapon of Mass Destruction attack on the population.  Then conduct an article review of that article. It must be related to the course or course materials. The intent is for students to do some external research away from the provided references and find an Article in the Library. Students should search the library’s online databases, such as ProQuest, EbscoHost, and others, to find scholarly or peer-reviewed articles.Additionally, the review of the journal article is an evaluation of the article’s strengths, weaknesses, and validity. It is used to inform of the article’s value through your explanation, interpretation, and analysis. As you do this, ask the major questions that are central to the review process:1. What is the purpose of this article?2. Why is it important to investigate or examine the subject of the article?3. How are the authors carrying out the task? Are their methods and comments appropriate and adequate to the task?4. What do they claim to have found out? Are the findings clearly stated?5. How does this advance knowledge in the field?Hint: These would make really good section titles for your paper.Writing Guidance:The paper should be no less than 5 pages for the body of your work, double spaced (cover and reference pages are required – note that they are not factored into your page count).Appropriate writing requirements using APA style formatted citations and compiling a complete reference list in accordance with the APA guidance are part of the requirement.Use scholarly or other relevant sources. Your article selection will be part of the grade.No abstract is required.Save your work as a Microsoft Word document entitled ‘YourLastNamewk#.doc’ (i.e., Smith1.doc) and upload this document as your assignment.Your work should consist of:Introduction (this will have a well-defined purpose statement in your intro paragraph that provides guidance to the reader about what you are going to cover in your paper)Body (feel free to use sub-headings if necessary)Conclusion (this wraps up the key points of your work and brings your paper to a logical conclusion)STYLE AND CONVENTION:All written submissions should be submitted in a font and page set-up that is readable and neat. Students will follow the APA 6 Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework.Additionally, the attached rubric will be used to grade your papers.Typewritten in double-spaced format.Times New Roman styles in 12-point font.Page margins Top, Bottom, Left Side and Right Side = 1 inch, with reasonable accommodation being made for special situations and online submission variances.Complete an appropriate page header with page number for each page.Create an appropriate title page.Points will be deducted for the use of Wikipedia or encyclopedic type sources. It is highly advised to utilize: books, peer reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc.The paper need to be a minimum of5 complete pagesfor the body of your work (not including the title and works cited pages in the page count). Points will be deducted if the minimum page requirement is not met accordingly.

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

Psychology 6 | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Psychology 6 | 2025 Custom Writing

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read the required chapters from the text and review the required articles for this week. Over the course of the past weeks, we have considered the use of medications in the treatment of various psychological disorders. This discussion will provide you with an opportunity to give an informed appraisal on the use of drugs to treat disorders and defend your stance based on your judgment of the literature. In your initial post, describe what you believe are the greatest strengths and weaknesses of using the medications to treat psychological disorders.  Evaluate the employment of psychoactive drugs in the treatment of disorders over the lifespan from both an ethical and risk-benefits perspective. Summarize the theories of psychiatric disease and the scientific rationale behind its treatment through the employment of drug therapies. Explain what you believe to be the greatest challenges in the use of psychoactive medications over the next several years. Support your statements with references and logical arguments

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com

Your literature review should justify your development of an assessment | 2025

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Your literature review should justify your development of an assessment | 2025 Custom Writing

This assignment is the second step toward completing your Final Test Development Proposal in Week 6.  Using your construct of interest from Week 1 and building upon the instruments and information you found in Step One (Week 1), develop a 7-8 page literature review (not including the title page, abstract, and references page) on your construct of interest and the 5-7 instruments used to assess it. Thus, the literature review should explain your construct of interest thoroughly, as well as provide thorough reviews of the 5-7 instruments used to measure it. This is slightly different from other literature reviews, whereby the idea is to review and critique the study and findings. For this literature review you are not reviewing the study but rather are reviewing and critiquing the instrument based on what studies and other researchers have found. The idea here is to review the instrument and its usefulness in measuring your construct. Thus, what does the instrument measure, how reliable and valid is it, and what are its strengths and weaknesses?  What is lacking in the instrument which paves the way for the necessity of your newly developed instrument? How are these instruments different from what you will develop?Use the Forbush, Wildes, Pollack, Dunbar, Patterson and  Watson (2013) Development and validation of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI) and the O’Neill, and Sevastos (2013) The development and validation of a new multidimensional Job Insecurity Measure (JIM): An inductive methodology articles for examples of how to conduct literature reviews of current or previous instruments/tests.Use 5-7 scholarly resources, including mostly research studies and articles related to your construct and the instruments used to measure it. Information should be drawn from appropriate sources, such as professional journals, test publisher websites, and dissertations. Information gathered from sources must be appropriately cited, following APA guidelines.Please be sure to include the following in your literature review:A discussion of your construct of interest.A thorough discussion of each instrument you review for your construct, including the name of the test, what the test is used for, whether the test is appropriate for this area, what the reliability and validity of the test is, and what reviewers say about the strengths and weaknesses of it with regard to assessing this constructWhat, in general, appears to be adequately assessed on each test with respect to the construct that you selected?What does not appear to be adequately assessed?Your literature review should justify your development of an assessment—is there a hole in what is currently being assessed that you can fill with your test? Make a case for why your proposed test would address an area that is not already well assessed.

 

Assignment Help OnlineLast Minute Nursing Assingment HelpNursing Assignment Helptimelynursingwriters.com