The focus of this discussion is on reading, interpreting, and evaluating qualitative research. The goal is to discuss all three methods: phenomenology, grounded theory, and ethnography. The ethnography article was selected because of its focus on motivational interviewing. This is a counseling strategy you may find very useful as nurse practitioners in order to promote changes in health behaviors.

Write a 300-word message in which you:

• 1. discuss all three methods: phenomenology, grounded theory, and ethnography. 
• 2.  Summarize the findings of the study by describing the research question and method (sample, data collection, and analysis).
• 3. Identify the major strengths and limitations of this study.
• 4. Address how your findings could apply to your program of study, as well as to your present and future practice.

Include a reference page identifying the article you selected using APA guidelines. Future Practice will be Family Nurse Practitioners. Please read carefully the article. Dot not invent. all writing needs to be base from article. Thank You, 

Title Begin this paragraph with your introduction. The introduction should briefly talk about the purpose for a Community Health Assessments. Introduce your selected Sentinel City community. Assessment Using your eight social determinants of health (subsystems), discuss the living condition within your community. Present your overall findings relative to the assignment’s social determinants of health in weeks 1-4. Analysis From the information you discussed above, analysis the information as the overall health of the community. What are the strengths and the challenges of the community? Describe the data you found that directly relates to the health concern you believe exist for your chosen community or a vulnerable population in the community. This data can be obtained from your templates in weeks 1-4. Make the connection between your community’s major health concerns and the Healthy People 2020/2030 objectives. Nursing Diagnosis You may have to brush up writing nursing diagnoses. Once you identified the leading challenge for the community/population, write a nursing diagnosis. Here is a link to help you figure some out – https://nursekey.com/community-diagnosis-planning-andintervention/ Be thorough and specific related to the problem, interventions, and expected outcomes.  3 Plan In this section, you will detail your plan for improvement for you community. This is the section for your interventions. Interventions must be achievable, measurable, and time limited. Include the information gained from Social Determinate worksheet to build the plan. Include the people from the city and the community you will work with, for example, the mayor, the police, the local church leaders, etc. Plans should be detailed, realistic (funding and supplies type of stuff), time limited, and measurable. Evaluation Because this is a simulation, you will not have an actual implementation for evaluation, but you will have an evaluation plan. How would you measure the success or needed adjustments to the plan? Did the intervention help correct the issue? How would you know? Explain how these interventions will increase the quality of life for the people that live in your chosen SC community. Conclusion Briefly summarize your paper and draw your conclusions. Make observations about the community and its place within Sentinel City. What future do you see for this community?

Instructions

1. Review the Overview of Research on ACO Performance and select one research study.
2. Submit an article critique of your selection.

Article Critique Instructions

Formatting Article Critique

Length: Your paper should be three-to-four (3–4) double-spaced pages.

Format your article critique by starting with the following:

• The name of the author
• The title of the article
• The title of the journal, volume number, date, month, and page numbers in APA format
• Brief statement of the issue or problem the article addresses
• Brief statement of the purpose, hypothesis, and methods
• Major conclusions

Compose Your Critique

After the opening summary, compose your critique. For this course, your critique needs to address the 1) technical components of the article and 2) your analysis and opinion of the article.

1. The technical components must include your assessment of:
   • The accuracy of the title
   • The specificity and accuracy of the abstract
   • The clarity of the purpose
   • The relevance and clarity of the literature review
   • Absence or error in facts or interpretation (This last item requires you to look at some of the author’s cited references when they seem to be in error or misused.)
2. Your analysis and opinion are the bulk of this critique and must address:
   • The relevancy of the topic and why it is important (or not)
   • Are the author’s assumptions stated clearly and located helpfully on the article?
   • Does the methodology seem appropriate for the issue and hypotheses? Could the work be replicated based on the description?
   • Is the data presented clearly, and is it error free? You do not need to do in-depth calculations, but evaluate the integrity in tables and charts; you may catch surprising errors.
   • Does the author provide a balanced focus on the most important and relevant ideas or weaken the article by over- or under-emphasizing certain ideas?
   • Does the author write clearly? Are there ambiguous statements that should have been clarified or more fully supported with evidence?
   • Does the author seem biased or have clear evidence of objectivity?
   • Are there gaps in the author’s work and conclusions that you believe warrant follow up?

School of Health Sciences: Article Critique Rubric

Article Critique – 100 PointsCriteriaExceeds ExpectationsMeets ExpectationsNeeds ImprovementInadequateTotal PointsIntroductory Summary:

• The name of the author
• The title of the article
• The title of the journal with required detail
• Brief statement of the issue/problem
• Brief statement of the purpose, hypothesis, methods
• Major conclusions

All elements incorporated fully and accurately and submitted on time

50 pointsFive to six elements incorporated fully and accurately

44 pointsThree to four elements incorporated but with multiple errors

39 pointsOne to two elements incorporated fully and accurately

34 points50 pointsTechnical AssessmentIncluded all five elements and accurately assessed each

20 pointsIncluded four elements and accurately assessed each

17 pointsIncluded four to five elements but did not accurately assess all

15 pointsIncluded two to four elements with limited accuracy

13 points20 pointsAnalytic AssessmentRobust analysis using course concepts and materials accurately

20 pointsPartial analysis using course concepts and materials accurately

17 pointsMinimal analysis with limited accurate use of course concepts and materials

15 pointsSuperficial analysis with limited integration of course concepts and materials

13 points20 pointsGrammar, Spelling, and FormattingWithout grammar, spelling, or formatting errors

10 pointsOne to two grammar, spelling, or formatting errors

8 pointsThree to four grammar, spelling, or formatting errors

7 pointsFive or more grammar, spelling, or formatting errors

6 points10 pointsTotal points100 

1-which of the following behaviors may be (1) ethical but illegal, (2) legal but unethical, (3) illegal and unethical, and (4) legal and ethical.

A. Working in a clinic that performs abortions

b. Respecting the wishes of a client suffering from ALS that he be permitted to die with dignity and not placed on “breathing machines”

c. Respecting the health surrogate’s wishes regarding termination of life support of her friend

d. Observing a coworker take out two tablets of oxycodone as ordered for pain management for his patient but keeping one for himself, administering only one tablet to the patient.

2-differentiate among the following: deontological theories, utilitarianism, and principlism.

3-what do you think about health-care professionals disclosing information to clients about a poor prognosis, even though the information may cause severe distress.

4-What do they think about health-care professionals disclosing information to clients against family wishes?

5. You see a colleague use another nurse’s password to access the medication administration system and take out a narcotic. What would you do?

6.Your colleague’s child fell and was brought to the emergency department. She comes back up to the unit and tells you that they cleaned and debrided the wound, and she needs to change the dressings twice a day using a wet to dry method. You see her go into the supply system and remove the dressings and saline using a patient’s identification number. What would you do?

7. You are caring for a patient who has a terminal disease. He asks you if he is dying. Would you tell him? If yes, how? If no, what might you say? .

8-You are administering hydromorphone to a patient. The patient asks you what you are administering. Would you tell the patient about the medication?

Discussion Question 1

Based on your performance and the expert feedback in your HISTORY collection, describe two missed questions and your understanding of why they were important to collect for this case history. Use specific references from your text to explain.

Discussion Question 2

Based on your performance and the expert feedback in your PHYSICAL EXAM collection, describe two errors in your exam performance or documentation. Use specific references from your text to explain the importance of these findings in correct assessment of this client.

Discussion Question 3

Based on your performance on the PHYSICAL EXAM collection, describe one key finding that you included in your list and describe a specific physical exam that you can perform at the point-of-care to further evaluate the finding. Use specific references from your text.

Discussion Question 4

Based on your performance and the expert feedback in your ASSESSMENT identification of problem categories, choose one missed/incorrect category and use specific references from your text to explain the importance of this category in arriving at correct differential diagnoses for this client.

Discussion Question 5

Based on your performance and the expert feedback in your ASSESSMENT of differential diagnoses, describe one incorrect/missed differential diagnosis and use specific references from your text to support the inclusion of the diagnosis for this client.