Due Date: Mar 02, 2019 23:59:59       Max Points: 160

Details:

This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.

An important role of nursing is to provide health promotion and disease prevention. Review the 2020 Topics and Objectives on the Healthy People website. Choose a topic of interest that you would like to address, in conjunction with a population at-risk for the associated topic. Submit the topic and associated group to your instructor for approval.

Create a 3 slide PowerPoint presentation for your topic and focus group. Include speaker notes and citations for each slide, and create a slide at the end for References.

Address the following:

1. Identify interdisciplinary health professionals important to include in the health promotion. What is their role? Why is their involvement significant?

Cite at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources to complete this assignment. Sources should be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and public health content.

Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

CLC – Health Promotion and Community Resource Teaching Project  
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%3
Satisfactory
79.00%4
Good
89.00%5
Excellent
100.00%100.0 %Content 10.0 %Approved Topic, Associated Population and Health DisparityTopic and associated population selected is not approved; topic and associated population are not relevant to the scope of the assignment. Topic and associated population are omitted.Approved topic and associated population are partially presented. It is unclear how the topic adversely affects the selected population. Health disparities are partially described, or are not relevant to selected population. There are significant inaccuracies.Approved topic and associated population are summarized. A general correlation of how the topic adversely affects the selected population is presented. Relevant health disparities are summarized. There are some inaccuracies. More evidence or rationale is needed for support.Approved topic and associated population are described. A correlation of how the topic adversely affects the selected population is established and discussed. Relevant health disparities are discussed. There are minor inaccuracies. Some evidence or rationale is needed for support.Approved topic and associated population are thoroughly described. A strong correlation of how the topic adversely affects the selected population is established and discussed in detail. Relevant health disparities are clearly presented and discussed. Strong evidence and compelling rationale is offered for support.10.0 %Evidence-Based Approaches to Optimize Health for PopulationEvidence-based approaches to optimize health for this population are not presented.Evidence-based approaches to optimize health for this population are partially presented; some approaches presented are not evidence-based, or are not relevant for this population. Explanation of how these approaches minimize health disparity is incomplete, or are not relevant for the affected population. There are significant inaccuracies.Evidence-based approaches to optimize health for this population are summarized; it is unclear how some approaches presented are relevant for this population. A general explanation of how these approaches minimize health disparity is presented. There are some inaccuracies. More evidence or rationale is needed for support.Evidence-based approaches to optimize health for this population are discussed. Explanation of how these approaches minimize health disparity is presented. Some evidence or rationale is needed for support.Evidence-based approaches to optimize health for this population are discussed, and approaches are accurately represented and highly relevant to the population. Explanation of how these approaches minimize health disparity is well-developed. Strong evidence and rationale are provided throughout. An understanding of the importance of evidence-based approaches in the optimization of health for an at-risk population is demonstrated.10.0 %Proposal for Health Education for Family-Centered Health PromotionA proposal for health education for a family-centered health promotion to address the issue for the target population is omitted. The proposal is not supported by evidence-based practice.A proposal for health education for a family-centered health promotion to address the issue for the target population is partially presented. The proposal is not entirely relevant to the target population. The proposal requires more support relevant to evidence-based practice. There are significant inaccuracies.A proposal for health education for a family-centered health promotion to address the issue for the target population is presented. It is generally supported by evidence-based practice; there are some inaccuracies, or some areas need more support using evidence-based practice. Overall, the proposal is relevant to the target population. A proposal for health education for a family-centered health promotion to address the issue for the target population is presented. It is supported by evidence-based practice and relevant to the target population. There are minor inaccuracies.A well-developed proposal for health education for a family-centered health promotion to address the issue for the target population is presented. It is strongly supported by evidence-based practice and highly relevant to the target population. The ability to apply evidence-based practice to health education for a target population is clearly demonstrated.5.0 %Resources and Organizations for Proposed Education PlanResources and organizations to support the proposed education plan are omitted.One health-related organization for the selected topic is presented. The profile is incomplete, or it is unclear how the organization is relevant to the focus topic. Two resources (national or local) are presented. It is unclear how the resources are supposed to be used, or how the resources are relevant to the focus topic.A general profile for a health-related organization relevant to the selected topic is summarized. Two relevant resources (national or local) are presented, and there is a general explanation for how the resources are supposed to be used by the patient or provider.A general profile for a health-related organization relevant to the selected topic is presented. Two relevant resources (national or local) are presented, and there is an explanation for how the resources are supposed to be used by the patient or provider. A general profile for a health-related organization relevant to the selected topic is well presented. Two relevant resources (national or local) are presented, and there is a clear explanation for how the resources are supposed to be used by the patient or provider. 5.0 %Interdisciplinary Health Professional InvolvementInterdisciplinary health professionals important to the health promotion are not included.At least one significant interdisciplinary health professional is presented. It is unclear how the professional important to the health promotion, and what the role of the professional would be. Support for the suggested member is needed.Some significant interdisciplinary health professionals are presented. A summary of their role and importance to the health promotion is provided. Some support for the suggested members is needed.Key interdisciplinary health professionals are presented A discussion of their role and importance to the health promotion is provided. All significant interdisciplinary health professionals are presented. A clear discussion of their role and importance to the health promotion is provided.40.0 %Presentation of ContentThe content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.5.0 %LayoutThe layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.5.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.100 %Total Weightage

You  will locate a recent (less than 3 years) scholarly article or case  study (not a webpage). Please be very careful with your source selection  to ensure a high caliber and quality scholarly article. 

Read  and review the article in relation to the epidemiological concepts  covered in the course readings, discussion, and lectures. 

Create a 10-12 slide PowerPoint slide presentation to share with your classmates that includes the following points –

• Slide 1: a full properly APA formatted reference for the article. Also include the library database source.
• Slides 2 & 3: A brief summary covering the key points of the article.
• Remaining Slides: How the article specifically relates to 5 points of epidemiology course content.  This could bediscussing  the type of investigation, any terminology introduced here in the  course and how used in the article, discussion of prevention strategies,  or bias.  As the header of each slide, place the course content area  that you will address on the slide.
• Final slide: 3 ways this  article benefits the practicing advance practice nurse, including the  nurse practitioner, nurse educator, and nurse administrator?

This is not a  narrative paper placed in a slide set; you are to condense this  information in to a meaningful slide set that conveys only key  information. The only reference is on the first slide.  If you use other  resources to support your information, place the reference at the  bottom of the slide it falls upon. For example, if you use Merrill to  relate to course content, cite and reference on the individual slide. 

You  will then review at least two classmates slide presentations and offer  peer review and feedback to their article presentation.  This peer  review is not a graded part of the activity, however is still expected  for participation in the course.

Respond using one or more of the following approaches:

Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, and evidence.

Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.

Validate an idea with your own experience and additional sources.

Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.

Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional strategies for addressing barriers to EBP based on readings and evidence.

                                                        Main Post

                                         Introduction/PICOT Question

Pain is the most common complaint of people who present to the emergency department (ED).  It is estimated that 75% of all patients use the ED for pain related complaints (Bergman, 2012).  Patient satisfaction survey results emphasize the importance of adequate pain management (Bergman, 2012). With this in mind, nurses have a responsibility to evaluate, assess, and be advocates for a patient’s pain control.  Studies have shown when an ED department has pain management protocols and delegates these to the nurses there is a reduction in patient’s pain (Hadorn, Comte, Foucault, Morin, & Hugli, 2016).  Discovering patient expectations for pain management allows healthcare workers and patients to understand each other.  Once understanding has taken place, we can evaluate essential questions related to the patient’s pain management.  As healthcare workers are we expected to base pain management protocols solely on self-reported pain by the patient?  If so then an important question to answer is: When patients present with pain in the ED, how does a nurses’ perception of the pain influence the level of pain management the patient receives? 

Evidence-Based Practice

              Currently, in the ED I work in pain guidelines and protocols are in place for the nurse to initiate as needed.  Hadorn et al. (2016) state, “guidelines or protocols are generally used to facilitate the transfer of compelling evidence into clinical practice” (p. 81).  This evidence-based pain management protocol is available for the nurse to initiate based on the patient’s self-reported pain, nursing assessment, and observational data.  At times, nurses evaluate pain based on vital signs, facial expressions such as grimacing, restlessness, self-report, and chief complaint (Hazelett, Powell, & Androulakakis, 2002).  In our organization, the policies and procedures for pain management support the adoption of evidence-based practices.  By using the set protocol for pain, nurses are better able to treat pain promptly.  Nurses have a crucial role in delivering evidence-based healthcare in order to have the best outcomes and treatments for their patients (Majid et al., 2011).

Barriers

       Studies noted a barrier to effective pain management is the nurses’ perception of the individual.  Some patients frequent the ED over exaggerating or making up complaints to seek pain medications (Hazelett et al., 2002).  This repetitive drug seeking over time creates a barrier to compassionate care.  The ED is a vulnerable place for drug abuse, especially by patients attempting to get narcotics or other pain medications (Bergman, 2012). 

Emergency department nurses and staff have a culture within their units that influence everyday practices.  There is often a vast age range in the nursing staff which highlights differences in work ethic, attitudes, and professionalism.  The culture of our ED hinders the initiation of evidence-based practices due to stressed out, overworked, and underappreciated nurses.  With this in mind, it is vital that as an organization we provide opportunities for nurses to have adequate rest and find ways to show appreciation for all their hard work.

             Proper access and initiation of the pain management protocol increases the likelihood of adequate pain control for patients.  By discovering the expectations of patients and barriers to providing appropriate care we can eliminate miscommunication regarding pain control. 

References

Bergman, C. (2012). Emergency nurses’ perceived barriers to demonstrating caring when managing adult patients’ pain. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 38(3), 218-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2010.09.017 

Hadorn, F., Comte, P., Foucault, E., Morin, D., & Hugli, O. (2016). Task-shifting using a pain management protocol in an emergency care service: Nurses’ perception through the eye of the roger’s diffusion of innovation theory. Pain Management Nursing, 17(1), 80-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2015.08.002

Hazelett, S., Powell, C., & Androulakakis, V. (2002). Patients’ behavior at the time of injury: Effect on nurses’ perception of pain level and subsequent treatment. Pain Management Nursing, 3(1), 28-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jpmn.2002.29012

Majid, S., Foo, S., Luyt, B., Zhang, X., Thong, Y., Chang, Y., & Mokhtar, I. (2011). Adopting evidence-based practice in clinical decision making: Nurses’ perceptions, knowledge, and barriers. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 99(3), 229-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.99.3.010

 
number 1

Outline the process for the development of nursing standards of practice for your state, including discussion of the entities involved in developing the standards of practice and how the standards of practice influence the nursing process for your areas of specialty.

number 2

Outline the concept of professional accountability as it pertains to nursing. Provide examples of how a nurse demonstrates professional accountability in clinical expertise, the nursing process, and evidence-based practice.

Discuss the importance of advocacy as it pertains to patient care.   What is the nurse’s role in patient advocacy? Describe a situation in   which you were involved with patient advocacy. Explain what the   advocacy accomplished for the patient, and what the repercussions   would have been if the patient would not have had an advocate.