Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Need an expert with Critical Thinking course. Phi 210 | 2025 Custom Writing

Seeking someone who can master this….Must be done in APA format, citing all references, 4 full pages, and complete reference page.  Also subtitles must be included to response to each question….subtitles are in bold below.  Must be finished by Sunday May 5th, by 9pm.I have attached the logistics and the rubric as a guide to follow.Assignment 1: Conflicting Viewpoints EssayDue Week 4 and worth 130 pointsWhen looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist confirmation bias by seeking out sources that might contradict your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking. This assignment is divided into two (2) parts. In Part I of the assignment, you will read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes, review one (1) Website in order to gather information, and engage in pre-writing to examine your thoughts. In Part II of the assignment, you will write an essay geared towards synthesizing your ideas. As author E.M. Forster said, “How do I know what I think until I see what I say?”Part IPreparation and Pre-writing: Follow the steps below to explore an issue through reading and writing –Read “The Believing Game and How to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful” by Peter Elbow at http://www.procon.org/sourcefiles/believinggame.pdf. Devise strategies for playing the “Believing Game” and the “Doubting Game,” which are discussed in the Elbow article. According to the article, “the doubting game represents the kind of thinking most widely honored and taught. It’s the disciplined practice of trying to be as skeptical and analytic as possible with every idea we encounter. The believing game is the mirror image of the doubting game or critical thinking. It’s the disciplined practice of trying to be as welcoming as possible to every idea we encounter.”Select one (1) of the issues from ProCon.org that your professor has approved as a topic choice for your essay. Go to www.procon.org, scroll to the list of issues, click on the issue you selected, and read the background information section on the issue.To play the “Believing Game,” read either the Pro section or the Con section on the www.procon.org Website – whichever argument is in opposition to your position on the chosen issue. Consider at least three (3) of the premises (reasons) listed in that section. Apply the “believing” questions suggested by Elbow, such as “What’s interesting or helpful about the view? What would you notice if you believed this view? … In what sense or under what conditions might this idea be true?”To play the “Doubting Game,” read either the Pro column or the Con column on the www.procon.org Website – whichever argument is in agreement with your position. Consider at least three (3) of the premises (reasons) listed in that section. Apply the “doubting” questions suggested by Elbow, such as the journalistic questions who, what, when, where, why, how.Part IISynthesizing and Writing: Now that you have examined your thinking about an issue by pre-writing about your ideas –Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you (SUBTITLES)Present an argument on an issue by stating your conclusion and identifying your premises.Identify three (3) premises of the argument in opposition to your conclusion, and describe your reactions to these premises, based on the believing questions suggested by Elbow, such as “What’s interesting or helpful about the view? What would you notice if you believed this view? In what sense or under what conditions might this idea be true?”Identify three (3) premises of the argument in agreement with your conclusion, and explain your responses to the journalistic questions you asked in order to probe these premises, based on the doubting questions suggested by Elbow, such as the journalistic questions who, what, when, where, why, and how.Examine at least three (3) types of biases that you likely experienced when you read the premises on the Pro side of the argument and the premises on the Con side of the argument. (Note: Refer to the specific types of biases discussed in Chapter 2 of the Webtext.)Describe whether or not your position on the issue has changed. Indicate whether or not your premises supporting the issue have changed. Explain why or why not.The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA Style format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.You must follow these submission guidelines:Submit the essay to Turnitin.com and then submit the originality report and final essay with any needed revisions to Blackboard.The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:Identify the informal fallacies, assumptions, and biases involved in manipulative appeals and abuses of language.Write clearly and concisely about critical thinking using proper writing mechanics.Use technology and information resources to research issues in critical thinking skills and informal logic.RUBRIC:Grading for this assignment will be based on quality, logic / organization, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.Points: 130Assignment 1: Conflicting Viewpoints EssayCriteriaUnacceptableBelow 60% FMeets Minimum Expectations60-69% DFair70-79% CProficient80-89% BExemplary90-100% A1. Present an argument on an issue by stating your conclusion and identifying your premises.Weight: 15%Did not submit or incompletely presented an argument on an issue by stating your conclusion and identifying your premises.Insufficiently presented an argument on an issue by stating your conclusion and identifying your premises.Partially presentedan argument on an issue by stating your conclusion and identifying your premises.Satisfactorily presented an argument on an issue by stating your conclusion and identifying your premises.Thoroughly presented an argument on an issue by stating your conclusion and identifying your premises.2. Identify three (3) premises of the argument in opposition to your conclusion, and describe your reactions to these premises, based on the believing questions suggested by Elbow.Weight: 15%Did not submit or incompletely identified three (3) premises of the argument inopposition to your conclusion; did not submit or incompletely described your reactions to these premises, based on the believing questions suggested by Elbow.Insufficiently identified three (3) premises of the argument inopposition to your conclusion; insufficiently described your reactions to these premises, based on the believing questions suggested by Elbow.Partially identifiedthree (3) premises of the argument inopposition to your conclusion; partially described your reactions to these premises, based on the believing questions suggested by Elbow.Satisfactorily identified three (3) premises of the argument inopposition to your conclusion; satisfactorily described your reactions to these premises, based on the believing questions suggested by Elbow.Thoroughly identified three (3) premises of the argument inopposition to your conclusion; thoroughly described your reactions to these premises, based on the believing questions suggested by Elbow.3. Identify three (3) premises of the argument in agreement with your conclusion, and explain your responses to the journalistic questions you asked in order to probe these premises, based on the doubting questions suggested by Elbow.Weight: 15%Did not submit or incompletely identified three (3) premises of the argument inagreement with your conclusion, did not submit or incompletely explained your responses to the journalistic questions you asked in order to probe these premises, based on the doubting questions suggested by Elbow.Insufficiently identified three (3) premises of the argument inagreement with your conclusion, insufficiently explained your responses to the journalistic questions you asked in order to probe these premises, based on the doubting questions suggested by Elbow.Partially identifiedthree (3) premises of the argument inagreement with your conclusion, partially explained your responses to the journalistic questions you asked in order to probe these premises, based on the doubting questions suggested by Elbow.Satisfactorily identified three (3) premises of the argument inagreement with your conclusion, satisfactorily explained your responses to the journalistic questions you asked in order to probe these premises, based on the doubting questions suggested by Elbow.Thoroughly identified three (3) premises of the argument inagreement with your conclusion, thoroughly explained your responses to the journalistic questions you asked in order to probe these premises, based on the doubting questions suggested by Elbow.4. Examine at least three (3) types of biases that you likely experienced when you read the premises on the Pro side of the argument and the premises on the Con side of the argument.Weight: 15%Did not submit or incompletely examined at least three (3) types of biases that you likely experienced when you read the premises on the Pro side of the argument and the premises on the Con side of the argument.Insufficiently examined at least three (3) types of biases that you likely experienced when you read the premises on the Pro side of the argument and the premises on the Con side of the argument.Partially examinedat least three (3) types of biases that you likely experienced when you read the premises on the Pro side of the argument and the premises on the Con side of the argument.Satisfactorily examined at least three (3) types of biases that you likely experienced when you read the premises on the Pro side of the argument and the premises on the Con side of the argument.Thoroughly examined at least three (3) types of biases that you likely experienced when you read the premises on the Pro side of the argument and the premises on the Con side of the argument.5. Describe whether or not your position on the issue has changed. Indicate whether or not your premises supporting the issue have changed. Explain why or why not.Weight: 10%Did not submit or incompletely described whether or not your position on the issue has changed. Did not submit or incompletely indicated whether or not your premises supporting the issue have changed. Did not submit or incompletely explained why or why not.Insufficiently described whether or not your position on the issue has changed. Insufficiently indicated whether or not your premises supporting the issue have changed.Insufficientlyexplained why or why not.Partially describedwhether or not your position on the issue has changed. Partially indicated whether or not your premises supporting the issue have changed. Partiallyexplained why or why not.Satisfactorily described whether or not your position on the issue has changed. Satisfactorily indicated whether or not your premises supporting the issue have changed.Satisfactorilyexplained why or why not.Thoroughly described whether or not your position on the issue has changed. Thoroughly indicated whether or not your premises supporting the issue have changed.Thoroughlyexplained why or why not.6. Follow APA Style requirements for format, in-text citation of quotes and paraphrases, and references page.Weight: 10%Did not complete the assignment or had more than 9 errors in following APA Style requirements.Had 8-9 errors in following APA Style requirements.Had 6-7 different errors in following APA Style requirements.Had 4-5 different errors in following APA Style requirements.Had 0-3 different errors in following APA Style requirements.7. Follow guidelines for clear and organized writing: include an introductory and concluding paragraph; address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.Weight: 10%Did not submit or incompletely followed guidelines for clear and organized writing.Insufficiently followed guidelines for clear and organized writing: did not include an introductory and / or concluding paragraph; did not address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.Partially followed guidelines for clear and organized writing: included a partially developed introductory and / or concluding paragraph; partially addressed main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.Sufficiently followed guidelines for clear and organized writing: included an introductory and concluding paragraph; sufficiently addressed main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.Thoroughly   followed guidelines for clear and organized writing: included an engaging introductory and thoughtful concluding paragraph; thoroughly addressed main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and detailed supporting sentences.8. Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.Weight: 10%Did not complete the assignment or had more than 9 errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.Had 8-9 errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.Had 6-7 different errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.Had 4-5 different errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.Had 0-3 different errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.

Assignment Help Online, Last Minute Nursing Assingment Help, Nursing Assignment Help, timelynursingwriters.com

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Many people don’t like liver and other “organ meats” Give a possible explanation using classical conditioning (use terms and principles) | 2025 Custom Writing

Many people don’t like liver and other “organ meats” Give a possible explanation using classical conditioning (use terms and principles)

Assignment Help Online, Last Minute Nursing Assingment Help, Nursing Assignment Help, timelynursingwriters.com

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Attend any event that provides you with a new experience in terms of exposure to beliefs or experiences which are different than your own. | 2025 Custom Writing

Attend any event that provides you with a new experience in terms of exposure to beliefs or experiences which are different than your own. This can be culturally different religious or spiritual service, community celebration, club meeting or guest speaker, etc. Keep in mind diversity includes ethnicity, race, gender, social class, age, sexual orientation, disability, or political views, select any experience which is different from your own. The experience should last approximately 1-2 hours and address the following questions within your response:Describe the experience and why you selected this experience and how it is a new experience, different than your normal experiences.Explain how you felt during the experience and what you gained from the experience.What was similar to other experiences you have had in the past.Select 1-2 concepts from the chapter which helps you to better understand the experience and make connections with your experience.Create your response into a word doc using APA format with a minimum of 550-750 minimum word count. Include in text citations which will connect to the factual points from the article and/or textbook, and include the reference citation(s) at the end of the document.

Assignment Help Online, Last Minute Nursing Assingment Help, Nursing Assignment Help, timelynursingwriters.com

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Adolescent | 2025 Custom Writing

How would you describe yourself during adolescence?  Were you an early maturer or a late maturer?  What positive qualities came out of this? What negative qualities came out of this?As an adult, looking back on your adolescence, what would you tell your younger self now?

Assignment Help Online, Last Minute Nursing Assingment Help, Nursing Assignment Help, timelynursingwriters.com

Psychology Assignment Custom Writng

Synthesis Paper – Leadership Style | 2025 Custom Writing

Synthesis is the act of creating something new from multiple existing entities. Synthesis of research, then, is creating a new idea from existing ideas. It is a process developed through time and practice. In this assignment, you will apply the synthesis process to the course journal readings and your selected readings. As you synthesize, consider how leadership style influences leadership practice and results. For example, leadership style effects followers through the choice of public vs. private engagement or the use of public praise vs. active coaching. In some cases, what a leader does not say or do can have a significant effect on both the sense of value and the motivation of group members.General Requirements:Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:Refer to the annotated bibliography and outline you created in the Module 2 assignment along with the assignment feedback from your instructor.Locate at least two additional, topically-related, empirical articles. Use “Empirical Research Checklist” to guide your selection.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.Directions:Locate the annotated bibliography and outline you created in the Module 2 assignment. Using the outline you developed, the information from the annotated bibliography, and the feedback provided by your instructor, write a paper (2,000-2,250 words) that synthesizes three of the articles assigned in the first two modules of this course with the two (or more) topically-related, empirical articles you selected. Do that by including the following:A statement of at least three common themes addressed in all of the articles.A statement of the conclusions that can be drawn when the articles are taken together as a single entity. What is the overall message of the group of articles? Focus specifically on the connection between leadership style and leadership theory in areas such as individual identity, culture, and worldview. What are the potential effects of these and other individual leadership characteristics and style; how do they influence the methods leaders choose to guide groups or organizations?*****do not quote, **** do not use “Per” or “According To” MUST BE ORIGINAL WORDSLEADERSHIP – Situationalleadership “situational”You can see my annotated bibliography please add the other twoMY JOURNAL ARTICLES1. Effects of LeadershipIN TEXT CITING:(Cavazotte et al., 2012)Cavazotte, F., Moreno, V., & Hickmann, M. (2012). Effects of leader intelligence, personality and emotional intelligence on transformational leadership and managerial performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 443-455. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.10.0032. Leadership Concise Conceptual OverviewBerger, Joseph B., “Leadership: A Concise Conceptual Overview” (2014). Center for International Education Faculty Publications. 18.Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cie_faculty_pubs/183. Can Charisma Be TaughtIN TEXT CITING:(ANTONAKIS et al., 2011)ANTONAKIS, J., FENLEY, M., & LIECHTI, S. (2011). Can Charisma Be Taught? Tests of Two Interventions. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(3), 374-396. 10.5465/amle.2010.0012The last two is where I need to Construct an outline for a paper that will explain and synthesize the articles you read for this assignment with at least two additional, topically-related, empirical articles that you will select. The paper will require identification of themes common to all of the articles as well as a statement of the conclusions that can be drawn when the articles are taken together as a single entity. You will be writing the paper in the next assignment.Making Sense of Leadership DevelopmentIN TEXT CITING:(McCauley-Smith et al., 2015)McCauley-Smith, C., Williams, S. J., Gillon, A. C., & Braganza, A. (2015). Making sense of leadership development: developing a community of education leaders. Studies in Higher Education, 40(2), 311-328. 10.1080/03075079.2013.842209Understanding the Curvilinear Relationship Between Charismatic Personality and Leader Effectiveness.IN TEXT CITING:(Vergauwe et al., 2018)Vergauwe, J., Wille, B., Hofmans, J., Kaiser, R. B., & De Fruyt, F. (2018). The double-edged sword of leader charisma: Understanding the curvilinear relationship between charismatic personality and leader effectiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(1), 110-130. 10.1037/pspp0000147

Assignment Help Online, Last Minute Nursing Assingment Help, Nursing Assignment Help, timelynursingwriters.com