Get An Edge With The Best Assignment Help
Are you struggling to finish assignments on time? Or, you may be good at drafting, but the formatting is not your forte. Avail our assignment help today!
Timely Nursing Writes
No matter the time or day, you can always contact our customer support team, whether you send in your order early or only 6 hours before the deadline. They’re available 24/7 to assist you, answer any questions, and give you the best customer support experience.
Contact US
4870 Cass Ave
Detroit, MI, United States
We guarantee
- Timely delivery, within 24 hours.
- Exceptional customer service and experience
- Value for your money by offering outstanding work.
- Premium and reasonably affordable services
- Authentic work with credible sources
- 100% authentic work
Discussion: The Inclusion Of Nurses In The Systems Development Life Cycle – 2025 Discussion The Inclusion of Nurses in the Systems Development Life Cycle In the media introduction to this module it
by adminNursing Assignment Help
Discussion: The Inclusion Of Nurses In The Systems Development Life Cycle – 2025
Discussion: The Inclusion of Nurses in the Systems Development Life Cycle
In the media introduction to this module, it was suggested that you as a nurse have an important role in the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC). With a focus on patient care and outcomes, nurses may not always see themselves as contributors to the development of new systems. However, as you may have observed in your own experience, exclusion of nurse contributions when implementing systems can have dire consequences.
In this Discussion, you will consider the role you might play in systems development and the ramifications of not being an active participant in systems development.
To Prepare:
By Day 3 of Week 9
Post a description of what you believe to be the consequences of a healthcare organization not involving nurses in each stage of the SDLC when purchasing and implementing a new health information technology system. Provide specific examples of potential issues at each stage of the SDLC and explain how the inclusion of nurses may help address these issues. Then, explain whether you had any input in the selection and planning of new health information technology systems in your nursing practice or healthcare organization and explain potential impacts of being included or not in the decision-making process. Be specific and provide examples.
3 PARTS – 2025 PART 1 2 PAGES PART 2 1 PAGE PART 3 2 PAGES THE STATE
by adminNursing Assignment Help
3 PARTS – 2025
PART 1 = 2 PAGES
PART 2 =1 PAGE
PART 3 = 2 PAGES
THE STATE THAT WE WILL BE USING IS FLORIDA
This paper will have three parts addressing two important pieces of legislation related to the right of individuals to make health care decisions for themselves.
Part I
The Advance Health Care Directive
Locate a copy of an advanced directive (AD) that complies with the laws of the state in which you work. The organization in which you work should have a copy of an advance directive that is given to patients. If not, download your state’s Advance Directives here http://www.caringinfo.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3289.
Complete the advance directive for yourself. Do not turn in your AD with your paper. The AD is for your personal use.
In your paper, Part I:
(Cite/ reference any sources you use to explore these questions, including your texts.)
Part II
Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Form
(Cite/reference any sources you use to explore these questions, including your texts.)
Part III
Tie the two first sections together by writing a summary and conclusion.
This section should address:
1. the differences between an Advance Health Care Directive and the POLST,
2. the RN’s important role in assuring the patient’s right to autonomy in choosing the healthcare interventions the patient does or does not want.
____________________________________________
Use current APA format.
The paper should be between 5 pages in length excluding the title and reference page(s).
Cite and reference the course text and at least two (2) additional appropriate professional sources.
SOURCES SHOULD NOT BE OLDER THAN 2015
Discussion 250 Words Apa Format – 2025 After reading about the three nursing theorists in chapters 29 30 and 31 reflect
by adminNursing Assignment Help
Discussion 250 Words Apa Format – 2025
After reading about the three nursing theorists in chapters 29, 30, and 31, reflect upon the events that are happening in health care today (Covid-19 Pandemic).
1. Which theorist would you select to construct a framework for care of your staff and patients?
2. Please explain why using two bulleted examples.
***Think about some of the concepts involved. Examples include fear, isolation, family separation, being pregnant and exposed to the virus, psychological issues, guilt, impacted care standards.
Remember your citations and follow the course grading rubric.
Discussion Board Rubric(Worth 3 points)
Proficient
Novice
Introduction and quality of discussion’s Argument
1 point
It is consistent with application in research related to its context. Clarity of ideas.
0.50 point
The topic has a partially weak association to the clarity of ideas and related topics.
The objectivity of Tone, overall quality & Review of
Literature in APA 6th format within the past 7 years
1 point
The tone is consistent, addressed professionally and objectively.
Evidence in literature supports arguments.
0.50 point
The tone is not consistently objective. Partially poor evidence in the review of the literature.
Quality of Reply posts
1 point
Consistent clarity and supported by research evidence.
0.25 point
Partially lack clarity or lack of support with research evidence.
NR632 Week 4 SR2 – 2025 respond summary When considering political advocacy the room for nurses to exert a stronger voice
by adminNursing Assignment Help
NR632 Week 4 SR2 – 2025
respond +summary
When considering political advocacy, the room for nurses to exert a stronger voice can appear immeasurable. One of the challenges for the nurse leader who is attempting to exert influence outside of the immediate care area is determining where opportunity and passion intersect. Certainly, there is an option of travelling to state or national capitals to speak on behalf of those who need the strong support of nurses; but limiting nursing influence to this level of influence limits the presence of the nursing voice at the level of more strategic discussions.
My personal drive regarding nursing advocacy is fueled by the idea that nurses need to be present as decision makers, not just within the context of the healthcare environment; but in the businesses, industries, and governing bodies that drive healthcare decisions at a larger level. It is not that I do not appreciate the steps it has taken for nurses to be claim roles in healthcare leadership; but boards of directors, those bodies that approve strategic operations that support healthcare, are still without adequate representation from nursing bodies (Dorritie, 2020). The desire for this balance is not a simple gesture of equality. The ability of a governing body to effectively respond to the needs of its charge is directly related to the willingness of that body to include representation from multiple stakeholders (Prybil et al., 2019). This is why hospitals are being encouraged to include patients on their boards of directors. Their decisions will be stronger if everyone gets a voice.
For a few years, I have been registered with the Nurses On Boards Coalition (NOBC). The organization, which facilitates the process of matching nurses with boards and panels, was formed after the Institute of Medicine placed a call to action for nurses to rise to higher levels of leadership in 2010 (Nurses on Boards Coalition, 2020). I am contacted when there are potential opportunities to serve, and the board has forwarded my applications on multiple occasions. Though I have not received a formal placement, I have been contacted for professional opinion on regarding several topics. Most recently, I applied to serve on a board that would advise both commercial and political lawmakers who were addressing pain management and long term opiate addiction. The commitment would have been a monthly meeting and approximately two weeks to present materials to governing bodies. The application process alone is an educational experience and wonderful opportunity to reflect on my personal practice and how my leadership philosophies have evolved. My hope is that this advanced degree will improve my profile enough that I will be able to serve on one of these boards.