Get An Edge With The Best Assignment Help
Are you struggling to finish assignments on time? Or, you may be good at drafting, but the formatting is not your forte. Avail our assignment help today!
Are you struggling to finish assignments on time? Or, you may be good at drafting, but the formatting is not your forte. Avail our assignment help today!
No matter the time or day, you can always contact our customer support team, whether you send in your order early or only 6 hours before the deadline. They’re available 24/7 to assist you, answer any questions, and give you the best customer support experience.
4870 Cass Ave
Detroit, MI, United States

Week 3 Nurs 340 – 2025 Within your community there has been a large increase in teenage smoking and community leaders are developing a
by adminNursing Assignment Help
Week 3 Nurs 340 – 2025
A) Develop a research question to address the problem.
B) Determine what kind of study should be undertaken.
C) Design a study to decrease the incidence of smoking in teenagers.
Week 3 NURS 340 Assignment – 2025 Go to the website using this link Outbreak at Watersedge Click the
by adminNursing Assignment Help
Week 3 NURS 340 Assignment – 2025
Due: Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)
Points Possible: 75
This game was developed by the Midwest Center for Life-Long-Learning in Public Health (MCLPH) funded in part by a grant from the Health Resources and Services Administration, DHHS, Public Health Training Center Program. MCLPH is part of the Centers for Public Health Education and Outreach at the University of Minnesota School of Public Health
Dq Response – 2025 What are your thoughts Reply to this discussion question Per our infection control
by adminNursing Assignment Help
Dq Response – 2025
What are your thoughts? Reply to this discussion question.
Per our infection control nurse, one area in which my hospital lacks is with patients diagnosed with sepsis. I have yet to get ahold of the numbers which I will have later this week, but per Melissa, these numbers are not great and could be improved. She believes and even from working as a bedside nurse in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), I agree with her that we are lacking in the department of handoff communication between nurses. Report from the emergency room to the floors, or from the floors to a higher level of care (I.e. ICU’s, Cardiac ICU’s, ICU step downs or telemetry), there is a lack of effective communication between nurses.
We all are aware of a sepsis bundle as it was drilled into our minds during our nursing programs and very well followed us into our careers. Whether you work medical-surgical, telemetry, critical care, mother/baby, labor and deivery, pediatrics, etc., we will always have patients of all ages who can have sepsis. Although the sepsis bundle is quite straightforward, communicating that is not always easy. Many times, nurses are not thorough in their reports of interventions and cares already provided, fail to notify the receiving nurse of sepsis protocol interventions that were canceled by physicians although this is not allowed in my facility or miss handing off important parts of report. By discontinuing interventions I am talking about a physician saying it is not necessary to achieve repeat lactates, administer fluid boluses, more than one sets of blood cultures, etc. Main things you would do during a sepsis bundle. It is now the nurses responsibility, per protocol, to reorder any interventions that a physician has canceled despite the discontinuation.
Our hospital is beginning to implement a paper form, strictly for nursing to complete and then hand into our quality department for review. We are calling this the “Sepsis Handoff Tool”. It is a form that has the nurse fill out the time and date of when severe sepsis was recognized and what systemic inflammatory response syndromes (SIRS) were identified. It also requires the hospitalist notified three sets of vital signs to be noted. The form also has two boxes, one with a three hour sepsis bundle power plan and the other with a six hour sepsis bundle power plan; all which much be checked off with no exceptions. Then registered nurse and physician both must sign the paper and send to the quality department. With this new implemenation, infection control will then perform a study on whether this new tool increased patient outcomes or not.
As nurses, there are many implications to our job. WIth sepsis and nursing in general, we are expected to be on top of our patients, their cares and interventions. We are responsible for making sure our patients are receiving all of the treatments they have ordered and that they are appropriate. WIth sepsis, a patients condition can rapidly deteriorate. We are a part of the team that attempts to prevent this from occuring, which means implementing our protocols and policies to the fullest extent. This handoff tool has the potential for nurse to nurse and nurse to phyisicians to both be on the same page and aware of patient care. The second implication for nurses would be that we are here to help our patients. As nurses, we do what we do to help those who are sick. Accurately implementing interventions that have been proven to decrease morbidity related to sepsis when performed together are interventions that we should be doing. Having a form that helps nurses reduce time wasted in determining what has and has not been done is very beneficial as we can go right ahead to implement appropriate interventions that are left.
Case Study/BPH – 2025 Mr E is a pleasant 70 year old black male Source Self reliable source Subjective
by adminNursing Assignment Help
Case Study/BPH – 2025
Mr. E is a pleasant, 70-year-old, black, male
Source: Self, reliable source
Subjective:
Chief complaint: “I urinate frequently.”
HPI: Patient states that he has had an increase in urination for the past several years, which seems to be worsening over the past year. He estimates that he urinates clear/light yellow urine approximately every 1.5-2 hours while awake and is up 2-4 times at night to urinate. He states some urgency and hesitancy with urination and feeling of incomplete voiding. He denies any pain or blood. Denies any head trauma. Denies any increase in thirst or hunger. He denies any unintentional weight loss.
Allergies: NKA
Current Mediations:
Multivitamin, daily
Aspirin, 81 mg, daily
Olmesartan, 20 mg daily
Atorvastatin, 10 mg daily
Diphenhydramine, 50 mg, at night
Pertinent History: Hypertension, hyperlipidemia, insomnia
Health Maintenance. Immunizations: Immunizations up to date
Family History: No cancer, cardiac, pulmonary or autoimmune disease in immediate family members
Social History: Patient lives alone. He drinks one cup of caffeinated coffee each morning at the local diner. He denies any nicotine, alcohol or drug use.
ROS: Incorporated into HPI
Objective:
VS – BP: 118/68, HR: 86, RR: 16, Temp 97.6, oxygenation 100%, weight: 195 lbs, height: 70 inches.
Mr. E is alert, awake, oriented x 3. Patient is clean and dressed appropriate for age.
Cardiac: No cardiomegaly or thrills; regular rate and rhythm, no murmur or gallop
Respiratory: Clear to auscultation
Abdomen: Bowel sounds positive. Soft, nontender, nondistended, no hepatomegaly
Neuro: CN 2-12 intact
Renal/prostate: Prostate enlarged, non-tender. No asymmetry or nodules palpated
Labs:
Test Name
Result
Units
Reference Range
Color
Yellow
Yellow
Clarity
Clear
Clear
Bilirubin
Negative
Negative
Specific Gravity
1.011
1.003-1.030
Blood
Negative
Negative
pH
7.5
4.5-8.0
Nitrite
Negative
Negative
Leukocyte esterase
Negative
Negative
Glucose
Negative
mg/dL
Negative
Ketones
Negative
mg/dL
Negative
Protein
Negative
mg/dL
Negative
WBC
Negative
/hpf
Negative
RBC
Negative
/hpf
Negative
Lab
Pt’s Result
Range
Units
Sodium
137
136-145
mmol/L
Potassium
4.7
3.5-5.1
mmol/L
Chloride
102
98-107
mmol/L
CO2
30
21-32
mmol/L
Glucose
92
70-99
mg/dL
BUN
7
6-25
mg/dL
Creat
1.6
.8-1.3
mg/dL
GFR
50
>60
Calcium
9.6
8.2-10.2
mg/dL
Total Protein
8.0
6.4-8.2
g/dL
Albumin
4.5
3.2-4.7
g/dL
Bilirubin
1.1
<1.1
mg/dL
Alkaline Phosphatase
94
26-137
U/L
AST
25
0-37
U/L
ALT
55
15-65
U/L
Pt’s results
Normal Range
Units
WBC
9.9
3.4 – 10.8
x10E3/uL
RBC
4.0
3.77 – 5.28
x10E6/uL
Hemoglobin
11.5
11.1 – 15.9
g/dL
Hematocrit
35.0
34.0 – 46.6
%
MCV
85
79 – 97
FL
MCH
28
26.6 – 33.0
Pg
MCHC
34
31.5 – 35.7
g/dL
RDW
14
12.3 – 15.4
%
Platelets
220
150 – 379
X10E3/uL
PSA
5.4
0-4.0
ng/mL
Assessment:
Diagnosis: Benign prostatic hyperplasia, ICD-10: N40.1
Please answer the following:
For the sake of this case study, the patient has confirmed BPH and prostate cancer has already been ruled out. Hence, please document your prescribed treatment plan for this patient (i.e. don’t state “refer to urology”).
Three months later, the patient notes improvement, but no resolution of symptoms. What would be your next prescribed treatment option (1 point)?