Discussion: Patient Preferences and Decision Making

Changes in culture and technology have resulted in patient populations that are often well informed and educated, even before consulting or considering a healthcare need delivered by a health professional. Fueled by this, health professionals are increasingly involving patients in treatment decisions. However, this often comes with challenges, as illnesses and treatments can become complex.

What has your experience been with patient involvement in treatment or healthcare decisions?

In this Discussion, you will share your experiences and consider the impact of patient involvement (or lack of involvement). You will also consider the use of a patient decision aid to inform best practices for patient care and healthcare decision making.

To Prepare:

• Review the Resources and reflect on a time when you experienced a patient being brought into (or not being brought into) a decision regarding their treatment plan.
• Review the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute’s Decision Aids Inventory at https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/.
  • Choose “For Specific Conditions,” then Browse an alphabetical listing of decision aids by health topic.

NOTE: To ensure compliance with HIPAA rules, please DO NOT use the patient’s real name or any information that might identify the patient or organization/practice.

By Day 3 of Week 8

Post a brief description of the situation you experienced and explain how incorporating or not incorporating patient preferences and values impacted the outcome of their treatment plan. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain how including patient preferences and values might impact the trajectory of the situation and how these were reflected in the treatment plan. Finally, explain the value of the patient decision aid you selected and how it might contribute to effective decision making, both in general and in the experience you described. Describe how you might use this decision aid inventory in your professional practice or personal life.

Learning Resources

Note: To access this module’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

Required Readings

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
Chapter 7, “Patient Concerns, Choices and Clinical Judgement in Evidence-Based Practice” (pp. 219–232)

Hoffman, T. C., Montori, V. M., & Del Mar, C. (2014). The connection between evidence-based medicine and shared decision making. Journal of the American Medical Association, 312(13), 1295–1296. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10186
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Kon, A. A., Davidson, J. E., Morrison, W., Danis, M., & White, D. B. (2016). Shared decision making in intensive care units: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society policy statement. Critical Care Medicine, 44(1), 188–201. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000001396
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Opperman, C., Liebig, D., Bowling, J., & Johnson, C. S., & Harper, M. (2016). Measuring return on investment for professional development activities: Implications for practice. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 32(4), 176–184. doi:10.1097/NND.0000000000000483
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Schroy, P. C., Mylvaganam, S., & Davidson, P. (2014). Provider perspectives on the utility of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for facilitating shared decision making. Health Expectations, 17(1), 27–35. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00730.x
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. (2019). Patient decision aids. Retrieved from https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/

3 sources for this discussion

please read this question and request for any further materials, thanks

 Post an explanation of how the use of CBT in groups compares to its use in family settings. Provide specific examples from your own practicum experiences. Then, explain at least two challenges counselors might encounter when using CBT in the group setting. Support your response with specific examples from this week’s media. 

Rubric:

Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.–

Outstanding Performance 44 (44%) – 44 (44%)Excellent Performance 40 (40%) – 43 (43%)Competent Performance 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Proficient Performance 31 (31%) – 34 (34%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

Main Posting: Writing–

Outstanding Performance 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Excellent Performance 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Competent Performance 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Proficient Performance 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

Main Posting: Timely and full participation–

Outstanding Performance 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)Excellent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Competent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Proficient Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

First Reponse

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.–

Outstanding Performance 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)Excellent Performance 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)Competent Performance 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)Proficient Performance 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

First Reponse: Writing–

Outstanding Performance 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Excellent Performance 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Competent Performance 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Proficient Performance 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

First Reponse: Timely and full participation–

Outstanding Performance 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Excellent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Competent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Proficient Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

Second Reponse: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.–

Outstanding Performance 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)Excellent Performance 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)Competent Performance 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)Proficient Performance 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Second Reponse: Writing–

Outstanding Performance 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Excellent Performance 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Competent Performance 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Proficient Performance 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

Second Reponse: Timely and full participation–

Outstanding Performance 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Excellent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Competent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Proficient Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)