Scientific Communication 2025

Read the 2 article attached and answer the questions below. Who is the targeted audience for each article? 2. What is the main take-home message of each article? How do these messages compare? 3. What do the authors report as “truth” and needs more research? 4. What biases do you see for each article? Selection bias, Attrition bias, Measurement bias, Performance bias and/or Reporting bias) 5. Is the consumer-oriented article an appropriate representation of the findings of the peer-reviewed article, or is the focus too narrow or broad? Provide examples from each article. For example, was one of the incidental findings of the peer-reviewed article blown out of proportion in the consumer-targeted message? 6. Regarding the peer-reviewed article, is this research important? Why or why not? When choosing a scientific or health study to discuss with patients or clients, consider what’s being contributed to the research field. Does it represent a major advance? Does it change the way people think about a problem? Not all studies are important; if you think this study is not, explain why. 7. Is the message over-generalized, or applied to a greater population than is reasonable? For example, did the authors conduct the study on a small sample, but the news-media article presents the findings as though they were applicable to all? 8. Is the research statistically and/or clinically significant? Take care not to overstate the importance of the study. A finding that is statistically significant may not be clinically significant. 9. What would you share with a client who brought the article to you? How would you respond? Consider Shared Decision Making in your response.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

The DNP Project: Introduction, Background And Problem 2025

Using ‘Commit to Sit’ to Impact Patient Satisfaction on a Pediatric Medical-Surgical Floor In healthcare, organizations are strategizing methods to improve the patient’s experience, by staying current and agile to meet consumer expectations and prevent mistrust and poor health outcomes. (Lidgett, 2016; Loos, 2021; Mazurenko et al., 2017; Merel et al., 2016; Odai-Afotey et al., 2018; Shin & Park, 2018; Trotta, 2020). Performance of person and community engagement, clinical outcomes, safety, efficiency, and cost reduction are subject to financial reimbursement through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Value-Based Purchasing Program which has a significant impact on an organization overall well-being (Centers for Medicare, and Medicaid Services [CMS], 2018; Mazurenko et al., 2017). The act of listening and effective health care communication has been linked to increased trust between patients and caregivers, improved perceptions of care, improved health outcomes, medication compliance, patient satisfaction scores, and lower readmission rates (George et al., 2018; Gilligan et al., 2017; Loos, 2021; McCaffrey et al., 2020). To best impact, these key performance and strategic measures, creating a culture that fosters a positive experience through interactions that emanate caring behaviors, staying present in the moment, empathy, and therapeutic verbal and non-verbal communications are key for organizational success (Merel et al., 2016; Orloski et al., 2019; Owens et al., 2017). The purpose of the proposed Doctor Nursing Practice (DNP) project is to improve patient satisfaction scores through the integration of the evidence-based intervention (EBI) ‘commit to sit’ to nurse rounding (George, 2018; Lidgett, 2016; Merel et al., 2016; Orloski et al., 2019; Pattison et al., 2017). This manuscript will describe an assessment of the practice problem and its significance, evidence synthesis of the intervention, translational science model and methodology, implementation plan, evaluation, and data analysis plan, and the sustainability of this EBI practice change. Problem The lens around patient experience has increased significantly over the past decade. Nationally, patient and family expectations are steadily increasing and requiring changes in practices to meet their needs (Lidgett, 2016; Loos, 2021; Mazurenko et al., 2017; Merel et al., 2016; Odai-Afotey et al., 2018; Shin & Park, 2018; Trotta, 2020). Alignment to the consumers’ needs of trust and safety is critical to provide an optimal experience that yields improved health outcomes (Loos, 2021; Merel et al., 2016; Odai-Afotey et al., 2018; Shin & Park, 2018). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Value-Based Purchasing Program established by the Affordable Care Act, provides compensation based upon the overall quality of care provided, rather than volume of services (Centers for Medicare, and Medicaid Services [CMS], 2018; Mazurenko et al., 2017). Performance and hospital reimbursement are measured by four key components: person and community engagement (25%), clinical outcomes (25%), safety (25%), and efficiency and cost reduction (25%) (CMS, 2018; Mazurenko et al., 2017). Performance related to person and community engagement or consumer satisfaction is measured through the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) patient satisfaction survey scores (Mazurenko et al., 2017; Orloski et al., 2019; Owens et al., 2017; Trotta et al., 2020). The HCAHPS survey is the first national, public, and standardized, data collection repository, and benchmarking tool dedicated to ascertaining the patient’s perceptions of the care they were provided (CMS, 2018; Mazurenko et al., 2017; Owens et al., 2017; Trotta et al., 2020). The HCAHPS scores determine financial reimbursement from CMS, consumer trust, and reputation to remain competitive in the healthcare arena (CMS, 2018; Mazurenko et al., 2017; Owens et al., 2017; Trotta et al., 2020). Understanding the significant impact of enhancing current practices to impact patient experience scores has on an organization it is critical for facilities to pivot from current practices and embrace new evidence-based interventions to improve the experience and health outcomes of the consumer and a more favorable financial outcome. In the United States over 7,700 HCAHPS surveys are completed daily by patients and families (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems, 2021). One dissatisfied patient can lead to a financial loss of approximately $200,000 to an institution (February & Holmes, 2020). On a local level, New York State data shows that a positive experience can enhance an institution’s marketability and attraction by 10%, whereas a poor experience can make a negative impact by 20%, as well as negatively impact the financial wellness and overall patient volume of an organization (February & Holmes, 2020). For many families, the act of listening and communicating effectively has been linked to improved perceptions of care, quality health outcomes, compliance, and higher satisfaction scores (Gilligan et al., 2017; Loos, 2021). Making these connections during patient interactions makes a significant impact on the overall patient experience and satisfaction scores. Campbell & Li (2018) discusses how both positive and negative interactions are cataloged on social media platforms and will correlate to an institution’s overall HCAHPS scores. At the practicum site, HCAHPS scores are tracked, trended, and analyzed to ensure alignment to the patients’ and families’ voices. Over the past year, this organization has seen a decrease in the HCAHPS scores, particularly around the nursing communication domain. Further analysis of the HCAHPS data revealed opportunities to improve the current practices to aid and support the nurse to stay present in the interaction and positively impact a patient’s experience (George, 2018; Lidgett, 2016; Merel et al., 2016; Orloski et al., 2019; Pattison et al., 2017). References Campbell, L., & Li, Y. (2018). Are Facebook user ratings associated with hospital cost, quality and patient satisfaction? A cross-sectional analysis of hospitals in New York State. BMJ Quality & Safety , 27 (2), 119-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006291 (Links to an external site.) Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2018). Hospital consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems (HCAHPS) Survey. Retrieved November 4, 2021, from https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInits/HospitalHCAHPS (Links to an external site.) February, T., & Holmes, S. (2020). The business case for Magnet® in an international hospital. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration , 50 (10), 533-538. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000930 (Links to an external site.) George, S., Rahmatinick, S., & Ramos, J. (2018). Commit to sit to improve nurse communication. Critical Care Nurse , 38 (2), 83-85. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2018846 (Links to an external site.) Gilligan, T., Coyle, N., Frankel, R. M., Berry, D. L., Bohlke, K., Epstein, R. M., … & Baile, W. F. (2018). Patient-clinician communication: American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus guideline. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey , 73(2), 96-97. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000530053.40106.9b (Links to an external site.) Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (2021). HCAHPS fact sheet. Retrieved November 26, 2021, from https://hcahpsonline.org/globalassets/hcahps/facts/hcahps_fact_sheet_march_2021.pdf (Links to an external site.) Lidgett, C. D. (2016). Improving the patient experience through a commit to sit service excellence initiative. Patient Experience Journal , 3 (2), 67-72. https://doi.org/10.35680/2372-0247.1148 (Links to an external site.) Loos, N. M. (2021). Nurse listening as perceived by patients: How to improve the patient experience, keep patients safe, and raise HCAHPS scores. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration , 51 (6), 324-328. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000001021 (Links to an external site.) Mazurenko, O., Collum, T., Ferdinand, A., & Menachemi, N. (2017). Predictors of hospital patient satisfaction as measured by HCAHPS: A systematic review. Journal of Healthcare Management , 62 (4), 272-283. https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-15-00050 (Links to an external site.) McCaffrey, R., Hale, D., Kunupakaphun, S., Kaufman, L., & Eamranond, P. (2020). A multifaceted approach to improve physician communication scores. Journal of Patient Experience , 7 (4), 522-526. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373519860041 (Links to an external site.) Merel, S. E., McKinney, C. M., Ufkes, P., Kwan, A. C., & White, A. A. (2016). Sitting at patients’ bedsides may improve patients’ perceptions of physician communication skills. Journal of Hospital Medicine , 11 (12), 865-868. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2634 (Links to an external site.) https://chamberlain.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01CUCON_INST/f6kb8f/cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826711072 (Links to an external site.) Odai-Afotey, A., Kliss, A., Hafler, J., & Sanft, T. (2020). Defining the patient experience in medical oncology. Supportive Care in Cancer , 28 (4), 1649-1658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04972-1 (Links to an external site.) Orloski, C. J., Tabakin, E. R., Shofer, F. S., Myers, J. S., & Mills, A. M. (2019). Grab a seat! Nudging providers to sit improves the patient experience in the emergency department. Journal of Patient Experience , 6 (2), 110-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373518778862 (Links to an external site.) https://chamberlain.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01CUCON_INST/f6kb8f/cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c136d5363ae74a569f5ca066642cd294 (Links to an external site.) Owens, K., Eggers, J., Keller, S., & McDonald, A. (2017). The imperative of culture: A quantitative analysis of the impact of culture on workforce engagement, patient experience, physician engagement, value-based purchasing, and turnover. Journal of Healthcare Leadership , 9 , 25. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S126381 (Links to an external site.) b (Links to an external site.) Pattison, K. H., Heyman, A., Barlow, J., & Barrow, K. (2017). Patient perceptions of sitting versus standing for nurse leader rounding. Journal of Nursing Care Quality , 32 (1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000214 (Links to an external site.) https://chamberlain.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01CUCON_INST/f6kb8f/cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826739417 (Links to an external site.) Shin, N., & Park, J. (2018). The effect of intentional nursing rounds based on the care model on patients’ perceived nursing quality and their satisfaction with nursing services. Asian Nursing Research , 12 (3), 203-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2018.08.003 (Links to an external site.) Trotta, R. L., Rao, A. D., McHugh, M. D., Yoho, M., & Cunningham, R. S. (2020). Moving beyond the measure: Understanding patients’ experiences of communication with nurses. Research in Nursing & Health , 43 (6), 568-578. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22087 I NEED A COMMENT FOR THIS DISCUSSION BOARD WITH AT LEAST 2 PARAGRAPHS AND USE AT LEAST 3 SOURCES NO LATER THAN 5 YEARS

Nursing Assignment Help 2025