Get An Edge With The Best Assignment Help
Are you struggling to finish assignments on time? Or, you may be good at drafting, but the formatting is not your forte. Avail our assignment help today!
Timely Nursing Writes
No matter the time or day, you can always contact our customer support team, whether you send in your order early or only 6 hours before the deadline. They’re available 24/7 to assist you, answer any questions, and give you the best customer support experience.
Contact US
4870 Cass Ave
Detroit, MI, United States
We guarantee
- Timely delivery, within 24 hours.
- Exceptional customer service and experience
- Value for your money by offering outstanding work.
- Premium and reasonably affordable services
- Authentic work with credible sources
- 100% authentic work
2025 Updated 09 2019 Purpose The purpose of this assignment is To apply a change
by adminEvidence-Based Practice Change Process 2025
Updated 09/2019 Purpose The purpose of this assignment is: To apply a change process using the ACE Star Model of Knowledge Transformation and a systematic review after identifying a clinical topic of concern and related nursing practice issue. The information from the ‘Illustration’ part of our lessons in Weeks 1-6 will mentor you through this process. Your change process is to be set up as a pilot project. Course Outcomes This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes: CO2: Proposes leadership and collaboration strategies for use with consumers and other healthcare providers in managing care and/or delegating responsibilities for health promotion, illness prevention, health restoration and maintenance, and rehabilitative activities. (PO#2) CO8: Selects evidence for best practices when planning professional nursing care involving systems, processes, and devices for individuals, families, aggregates and communities. (PO#8) Points The assignment is worth 225 points. Due Date Submit your completed assignment by Sunday end of Week 6 by 11:59 p.m. MT. Directions Please do not use any of the Nurse Daniel information for your own topic, nursing intervention, or change project. Nurse Daniel serves as an example only to illustrate the change process. Please review the infographic as way to guide you in getting started with your assignment: Developing an Assignment with Integrity (Links to an external site.) A short tutorial with tips for completing this assignment may be viewed below or by reading the transcript (Links to an external site.) . EBP Change Process (form) Download the EBP Change Process form (Links to an external site.) during Week 1. The use of this specific form is REQUIRED and is due at the end of Week 6. A short tutorial with tips for completing this assignment may be viewed in the short video above. Identify a clinical topic and related nursing practice issue you think needs to be changed. Locate a systematic review on your topic from the CCN Library databases. Be sure this involves nursing actions. Work through each step of the ACE Star Model as outlined on the assignment form (Star Points 1-5: Discovery, Summary, Translation, Implementation, and Evaluation). Respond to the instructions provided on the form. Follow the activities and thinking of Nurse Daniel in Weeks 1-6 in the ‘Illustration’ part of each lesson. He will be working through a clinical topic and nursing practice issue to demonstrate a change (ACE Star Model and systematic review). Work on a portion of the process each week, as the illustration unfolds. Please reach out to your instructor for feedback or assistance with your PICOT question as needed. Required and Additional Background Reading in Weeks 1 and 2 under Readings is available for more information on the ACE Star Model and the use of systematic reviews. Please cite any references (in APA format) of your systematic review or other scholarly document (optional) as needed. Paraphrasing information, rather than quoting, is expected. No quotes for this assignment please! For questions about this assignment, please contact your instructor. Use the grading rubric as a final way to check that all components of the form have been completed. The rubric is the tool your instructor will use to assess your content. Reminder Before preparing your assignment, please review this ” Crediting Sources Made Simple (Links to an external site.) ” resource. This tool is intended to help you understand scholarly writing, APA, referencing, and crediting. Please reach out to your instructor with any questions as you prepare your assignment. **Academic Integrity** Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments. By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment. Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page. NOTE: Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page. Rubric Week 6: EBP Change Process Assignment Grading Rubric Week 6: EBP Change Process Assignment Grading RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelected Systematic ReviewA systematic review from the CCN Library databases was selected, identified, and was appropriate for the selected nursing change process. 25.0 ptsOne systematic review from the CCN Library databases was identified and was clearly appropriate.22.0 ptsA systematic review was selected from the CCN Library databases and was mostly appropriate for a nursing change process.20.0 ptsA systematic review was selected from the CCN Library databases and was fairly appropriate for a nursing change process.10.0 ptsA systematic review was selected, but not from the CCN Library databases and/or was not appropriate for this assignment.0.0 ptsNo systematic review selected or used. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 1 (Discovery)The topic, nursing practice issue, rationale and scope of the problem were clearly identified and described. 25.0 ptsStar Point 1 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed.22.0 ptsStar Point 1 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed.20.0 ptsStar Point 1 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail.10.0 ptsStar Point 1 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail.0.0 ptsThe ACE Star Model Star Point 1 was not completed. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 2 (Summary)The NURSING practice problem, NURSING related PICOT question, a systematic review from any database in the Chamberlain Library, and other optional references, evidence summary, strength, and solutions, are listed and described. 35.0 ptsStar Point 2 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed.31.0 ptsStar Point 2 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed.28.0 ptsStar Point 2 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail.13.0 ptsStar Point 2 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail. or were inappropriate.0.0 ptsThe ACE Star Model Star Point 2 was not completed. 35.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 3 (Translation)Care standards, practice guidelines, or protocols; stakeholders and their roles and responsibilities; the nursing role; rationale for including certain stakeholders, and cost analysis plan are addressed. 35.0 ptsStar Point 3 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed.31.0 ptsStar Point 3 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed.28.0 ptsStar Point 3. was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail.13.0 ptsStar Point 3 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail.0.0 ptsThe ACE Star Model Star Point 3 was not completed. 35.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 4 (Implementation)Permission process, education plan, timeline, measurable outcomes, forms, resources, and stakeholder meetings, are addressed. 35.0 ptsStar Point 4 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed.31.0 ptsStar Point 4 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed28.0 ptsStar Point 4 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail.13.0 ptsStar Point 4 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail.0.0 ptsThe ACE Star Model Star Point 4 was not completed. 35.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 5 (Evaluation)Reporting results, process and next steps are addressed. 35.0 ptsStar Point 5 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed.31.0 ptsStar Point 5 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed28.0 ptsStar Point 5 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail.13.0 ptsStar Point 5 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail.0.0 ptsThe ACE Star Model Star Point 5 was not completed. 35.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentationInformation was presented clearly and thoughts were well organized and logical. 20.0 ptsInformation was presented clearly and thoughts were well organized and logical throughout.18.0 ptsInformation was presented clearly and thoughts were mainly organized and logical throughout.16.0 ptsInformation was presented clearly and thoughts were somewhat organized and logical throughout.8.0 ptsInformation was not consistently clear and/or was not consistently organized and logical.0.0 ptsInformation was disorganized and difficult to understand. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics/APAThe systematic review and any other scholarly resources were properly listed in APA format. The writing includes error free grammar and spelling, and complete sentence structure. 15.0 ptsExcellent mechanics and APA formatting with minimal errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.13.0 ptsGood mechanics and formatting considering the elements listed in the first column12.0 ptsFair mechanics and formatting considering the elements listed in the first column6.0 ptsPoor mechanics and formatting considering the elements listed in the first column0.0 ptsVery poor mechanics and formatting such that information is difficult to read. 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Form Used 0.0 pts0 points deductedCorrect assignment form used0.0 pts22.5 points (10%) deductedIncorrect form used resulting in point deduction 0.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction 0.0 pts0 points deductedSubmitted on time0.0 ptsNot submitted on time – Point deduction1 day late =11.25 deduction; 2 days=22.5 deduction; 3 days=33.75 deduction; 4 days =45 deduction; 5 days = 56.25 deduction; 6 days =67.5 deduction; 7 days =78.75 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late 0.0 pts Total Points: 225.0 Previous Next Top
Nursing Assignment Help 2025
2025 Develop a 5 10 minute video in which you reflect on your capstone experience Important Complete this assessment
by adminAssessment 4 Instructions: Capstone Reflection 2025
Develop a 5-10 minute video in which you reflect on your capstone experience. Important : Complete this assessment fourth . For this assessment, you will reflect on various aspects of your capstone experience. This will give you a chance to discuss elements of the project of which you are proud and aspects of the experience that will help you grow in your personal practice and nursing career. Demonstration of Proficiency By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 2: Make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence. Reflect on use of evidence and the literature to plan and implement a capstone project, and compare project outcomes to initial predictions based on a review of the literature. Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to improve patient and systems outcomes. Reflect on the degree to which health care technology was leveraged successfully to improve outcomes or communication to relevant stakeholders in a capstone project. Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of care. Reflect on how organizational and governmental health policy influenced the planning and implementation of a capstone project, as well as any contributions of the project to policy development. Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice. Reflect on personal and professional growth throughout the capstone project and the BSN program, addressing the provision of ethical care and demonstration of professional standards. Communicate professionally in a clear, audible, and well-organized presentation, with correct grammar, spelling, and use of APA style. Important: You must complete all of the assessments in order for this course. Professional Context BSN-prepared nurses have many opportunities to reflect on their contributions to patient care outcomes during clinical experiences. After a patient care interaction, it is important to evaluate how well you addressed the criteria set for the nurse-patient interaction and consider future improvements. Research suggests that creating and sharing video reflections may enhance learning (Speed, Lucarelli, & Macaulay, 2018). Preparation This assessment requires you to prepare a 5–10-minute video reflection on your capstone clinical practicum experience. Note : If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in this activity, please contact [email protected] to request accommodations. If you are unable to record a video, please contact your faculty member as soon as possible to explore options for completing the assessment. Complete the following preparatory activities: If necessary, set up and test your microphone or headset per the manufacturer instructions. Practice using the equipment to ensure the audio quality is sufficient. Consult the Campus resource Using Kaltura [PDF] for guidance on recording and uploading your assessment in the courseroom. Begin developing your reflection. Some questions you might address in your reflection video are: What were your most important outcomes or findings? What challenges did you overcome throughout your project? How did your initial research and evidence base help you plan and execute your capstone project? How were the outcomes similar to and different from your expectations? How did you feel your professional product turned out? What impacts of the implementation of your professional product did you observe? To what degree were you successful in using technology in your capstone project? How did organizational or governmental health policy impact the way in which you approached your project? What contributions did you make to your organization’s policies throughout the course of your project? In which areas do you feel you grew the most? How will your learning affect your professional practice and ability to implement ethical care in accordance with professional codes of conduct? What would you do differently if you could do the capstone project or program again? What accomplishment are you most proud of, within the context of the capstone or the program as a whole? Examine your capstone project through the lens of your initial plan and literature review. Instructions Use Kaltura to record a 5–10-minute video reflection addressing the following scoring guide grading criteria. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you know what is needed for a distinguished score: Reflect on how evidence and the literature were utilized to plan and implement a capstone project, as well as how project outcomes compared to initial predictions based on a review of the literature. Reflect on the degree to which health care technology was successfully used to improve outcomes or communication to relevant stakeholders in the capstone project. Reflect on how organizational and governmental health policy influenced the planning and implementation of a capstone project as well as any contributions to policy development that the project made. Reflect on personal and professional growth throughout the capstone project and the BSN program, paying special attention to growth related to the provision of ethical care and demonstration of professional standards. Communicate audibly and professionally, using proper grammar and including a reference list formatted in current APA style. Important Note: You do not need to submit the transcript of your video, but do address each scoring guide criterion in the video, including a discussion of authors in the literature who support the ideas presented. Please submit a separate APA-formatted reference list for the resources discussed in your reflection. Additional Requirements References: Cite a minimum of three scholarly and/or authoritative sources to support your assertions. APA style and format: Submit, along with the video, a separate references page that follows APA style and formatting guidelines. Refer to the APA Module as needed.
Nursing Assignment Help 2025
2025 Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to provide the student an opportunity to reflect on selected RN BSN competencies acquired
by adminCourse Reflection Ethical and Legal Aspects of Nursing 2025
Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to provide the student an opportunity to reflect on selected RN-BSN competencies acquired through the NUR3826 course. Course Outcomes This assignment provides documentation of student ability to meet the following course outcomes: – Identify the different legal and ethical aspects in the nursing practice (ACCN Essential V; QSEN: patient-centered care, teamwork and collaboration). – Analyze the legal impact of the different ethical decisions in the nursing practice (ACCN Essential V; QSEN: patient- centered care, teamwork and collaboration). – Understand the essential of the nursing law and ethics (ACCN Essential V; QSEN: patient-centered care, teamwork and collaboration). Points This assignment is worth a total of 100 points (10%). Due Date Submit your completed assignment under the Assignment tab by Sunday 11:59 p.m. EST of Week 15 as directed. Requirements 1. The Course Reflection is worth 100 points (10%) and will be graded on quality of self-assessment, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric. 2. Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about your essay may be posted under the Q & A forum under the Discussions tab. 3. The length of the reflection is to be within three to six pages excluding title page and reference pages. 4. APA format is required with both a title page and reference page. Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headers (upper and lower case, centered): Note: Introduction – Write an introduction but do not use “Introduction” as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in the Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (2010, p. 63). a. Course Reflection b. Conclusion Preparing the Reflection The BSN Essentials (AACN, 2008) outline a number of healthcare policy and advocacy competencies for the BSN-prepared nurse. Reflect on the NUR3826 course readings, discussion threads, and applications you have completed across this course and write a reflective essay regarding the extent to which you feel you are now prepared to: 1. “Demonstrate the professional standards of moral, ethical, and legal conduct. 2. Assume accountability for personal and professional behaviors. 3. Promote the image of nursing by modeling the values and articulating the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of the nursing profession. 4. Demonstrate professionalism, including attention to appearance, demeanor, respect for self and others, and attention to professional boundaries with patients and families as well as among caregivers. 5. Demonstrate an appreciation of the history of and contemporary issues in nursing and their impact on current nursing practice. 6. Reflect on one’s own beliefs and values as they relate to professional practice. 7. Identify personal, professional, and environmental risks that impact personal and professional choices, and behaviors. 8. Communicate to the healthcare team one’s personal bias on difficult healthcare decisions that impact one’s ability to provide care. 9. Recognize the impact of attitudes, values, and expectations on the care of the very young, frail older adults, and other vulnerable populations. 10. Protect patient privacy and confidentiality of patient records and other privileged communications. 11. Access interprofessional and intra-professional resources to resolve ethical and other practice dilemmas. 12. Act to prevent unsafe, illegal, or unethical care practices. 13. Articulate the value of pursuing practice excellence, lifelong learning, and professional engagement to foster professional growth and development. 14. Recognize the relationship between personal health, self-renewal, and the ability to deliver sustained quality care.” (p. 28). Reference: American Association of Colleges of Nursing [AACN]. (2008). The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. Washington, DC: Author.
Nursing Assignment Help 2025
2025 It is necessary for an RN BSN prepared nurse to demonstrate an enhanced understanding of the pathophysiological processes of
by adminCase Study: Mr. C. 2025
It is necessary for an RN-BSN-prepared nurse to demonstrate an enhanced understanding of the pathophysiological processes of disease, the clinical manifestations and treatment protocols, and how they affect clients across the life span. Evaluate the Health History and Medical Information for Mr. C., presented below. Based on this information, formulate a conclusion based on your evaluation, and complete the Critical Thinking Essay assignment, as instructed below. Health History and Medical Information Health History Mr. C., a 32-year-old single male, is seeking information at the outpatient center regarding possible bariatric surgery for his obesity. He currently works at a catalog telephone center. He reports that he has always been heavy, even as a small child, gaining approximately 100 pounds in the last 2-3 years. Previous medical evaluations have not indicated any metabolic diseases, but he says he has sleep apnea and high blood pressure, which he tries to control by restricting dietary sodium. Mr. C. reports increasing shortness of breath with activity, swollen ankles, and pruritus over the last 6 months. Objective Data: Height: 68 inches; weight 134.5 kg BP: 172/98, HR 88, RR 26 3+ pitting edema bilateral feet and ankles Fasting blood glucose: 146 mg/dL Total cholesterol: 250 mg/dL Triglycerides: 312 mg/dL HDL: 30 mg/dL Serum creatinine 1.8 mg/dL BUN 32 mg/dl Critical Thinking Essay In 750-1,000 words, critically evaluate Mr. C.’s potential diagnosis and intervention(s). Include the following: Describe the clinical manifestations present in Mr. C. Describe the potential health risks for obesity that are of concern for Mr. C. Discuss whether bariatric surgery is an appropriate intervention. Assess each of Mr. C.’s functional health patterns using the information given. Discuss at least five actual or potential problems can you identify from the functional health patterns and provide the rationale for each. (Functional health patterns include health-perception, health-management, nutritional, metabolic, elimination, activity-exercise, sleep-rest, cognitive-perceptual, self-perception/self-concept, role-relationship, sexuality/reproductive, coping-stress tolerance.) Explain the staging of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and contributing factors to consider. Consider ESRD prevention and health promotion opportunities. Describe what type of patient education should be provided to Mr. C. for prevention of future events, health restoration, and avoidance of deterioration of renal status. Explain the type of resources available for ESRD patients for nonacute care and the type of multidisciplinary approach that would be beneficial for these patients. Consider aspects such as devices, transportation, living conditions, return-to-employment issues. You are required to cite to a minimum of two sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. PLEASE FOLLOW THE RUBRIC Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are detailed. The clinical manifestations are accurate and clearly report the observed and perceived signs and symptoms. A detailed discussion of the potential health risks for obesity is presented. A through and compelling discussion on whether bariatric surgery is an appropriate intervention is presented. The discussion is well-developed and supported by evidence and additional rationale. Five or more actual or potential problems identified from the functional health patterns are discussed. The discussion is insightful, and the identified problems are highly relevant for the patient and his condition. The discussion is well-supported by rationale and evidence. The staging of ESRD and the contributing factors for ESRD are explained. The information is accurate and reflects contemporary practice and research. Patient education for the prevention of future events, health restoration, and avoidance of deterioration of renal status is thoroughly described. The proposed items are clearly presented and highly relevant and supportive of patient and his health status. Strong evidence and rationale generally support the discussion. A clear and detailed explanation on the types of resources available for ESRD patients for nonacute care, and the beneficial types of multidisciplinary approaches, is presented. The explanation demonstrates insight into both resources and multidisciplinary approaches for nonacute care for ESRD patients. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Nursing Assignment Help 2025