Get An Edge With The Best Assignment Help
Are you struggling to finish assignments on time? Or, you may be good at drafting, but the formatting is not your forte. Avail our assignment help today!
Timely Nursing Writes
No matter the time or day, you can always contact our customer support team, whether you send in your order early or only 6 hours before the deadline. They’re available 24/7 to assist you, answer any questions, and give you the best customer support experience.
Contact US
4870 Cass Ave
Detroit, MI, United States
We guarantee
- Timely delivery, within 24 hours.
- Exceptional customer service and experience
- Value for your money by offering outstanding work.
- Premium and reasonably affordable services
- Authentic work with credible sources
- 100% authentic work
2025 Assignment 1 Discussion Questions Select one of the two questions from the discussion
by adminDiscussion 2025
Assignment 1: Discussion Questions Select one of the two questions from the discussion questions listed below. Be sure to respond to the question using the lessons and vocabulary found in the reading. Justify your answers using examples and reasoning. Support your answers with examples and research and cite your research using APA format. Discussion Question 1 SE is a twenty-two-year-old Caucasian woman who was diagnosed with asthma at age seven. According to her medical record, she has “mild persistent” asthma. Today, she reports that she has been using her albuterol metered-dose inhaler (MDI) approximately three to four days per week over the last two months. Over the past week, she admits to using albuterol once daily. She has been awakened by a cough three nights during the last month. She states she especially becomes short of breath when she exercises. However, she also admits that the shortness of breath is not always brought on by exercise. She also has a fluticasone MDI, which she uses “most days of the week.” She has been hospitalized twice in the last year for poorly controlled asthma and has been to the emergency department (ED) three times in the last six months for the same problem. Her lab work is all within normal limits, with the exception of a positive human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG). Answer the following questions: What information in the case study suggests that her asthma is not well controlled? What factors could possibly lead to this? How would you classify the symptoms based upon the National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines? With the recognition that she is pregnant, how would you alter her treatment for asthma? Support your responses with guidelines, including the NIH guidelines, for management of asthma during pregnancy. Use other peer-reviewed articles as needed to support specific aspects of your plan. Discussion Question 2 TJ is a fifty-five-year-old police officer who presents to the clinic with complaints of epigastric pain for two weeks. He has been taking over-the-counter (OTC) Zantac without relief. He was diagnosed about a year ago with a bleeding ulcer, and he expresses concerns that the current symptoms remind him of that event. At that time, he was given “multiple prescriptions” for his stomach, but he did not complete the course of therapy because he began to feel better. He also has osteoarthritis in his wrists and hips, for which he takes OTC NSAIDs. He smokes one to two packs per week and drinks an average of one alcoholic beverage daily. His vital signs and blood work are all within normal limits. Answer the following questions: What additional testing would you suggest at this point? Describe any and all variables that could be contributing to his symptoms. What alterations would you suggest in his treatment? Be sure to consider additional diagnoses and whether prophylaxis would be appropriate for NSAID-induced ulcers. Support your responses with guidelines you locate in the literature and peer-reviewed articles as needed to support your ideas.
Nursing Assignment Help 2025
2025 To prepare Review the information presented in this week s Learning Resources on systems theory and the difference between open
by adminleadership discussion 2 2025
To prepare: Review the information presented in this week’s Learning Resources on systems theory and the difference between open and closed systems. Reflect on the practices and processes with which you are familiar in your organization. Identify one problematic issue or process that could be improved. Consider the problem from a closed-system perspective. Then think about how the issue or process you selected could be addressed by viewing it from an open-system perspective. How would the transition from a closed- to an open-system view help you and others to address the problem and improve outcomes? By Day 3 Post a description of the problem that you identified in your selected organization. Explain the problem from a closed-system perspective. Then, describe how the problem could be addressed by viewing it from an open-system perspective, and explain how this modification would help you and others improve health care outcomes.
Nursing Assignment Help 2025
2025 analyze and create a comprehensive plan of care for acute chronic care disease prevention and
by adminteacher Charles 2025
analyze and create a comprehensive plan of care for acute/chronic care, disease prevention, and health promotion for that patient and disorder. Your care plan should be based on current best practices and supported with citations from current literature, such as systematic reviews, published practice guidelines, standards of care from specialty organizations, and other research based resources. In addition, you will provide a detailed scientific rationale that justifies the inclusion of this evidence in your plan. Your paper should adhere to APA format for title page, headings, citations, and references. The paper should be no more than 3 pages typed excluding title page and references. Criteria: SOAP note Evaluation of priority diagnosis Facilitators and barriers to disorder management Genitourinary Clinical Case Patient Setting: 28-year-old female presents to the clinic with a 2 day history of frequency, burning and pain upon urination; increased lower abdominal pain and vaginal discharge over the past week. HPI Complains of urinary symptoms similar to those of previous urinary tract infections (UTIs) which started approximately 2 days ago; also experiencing severe lower abdominal pain and noted brown fouls smelling discharge after having unprotected intercourse with her former boyfriend. PMH Recurrent UTIs (3 this year); gonorrhea X2, chlamydia X 1; Gravida IV Para III Past Surgical History Tubal ligation 2 years ago. Family/Social History Family: Single; history of multiple male sexual partners; currently lives with new boyfriend and 3 children. Social: Denies smoking, alcohol and drug use. Medication History None Trimethoprim (TOM)/ Sulfamethoxazole (SMX) rash NKDA ROS Last pap 6 months ago, Denies breast discharge. Positive for Urine looking dark. Physical exam BP 100/80, HR 80, RR 16, T 99.7 F, Wt 120, Ht 5’ 0” Gen: Female in moderate distress. HEENT: WNL. Cardio: Regular rate and rhythm normal S1 and S2. Chest: WNL. Abd: soft, tender, increased suprapubic tenderness. GU: Cervical motion tenderness, adnexal tenderness, foul smelling vaginal drainage. Rectal: WNL. EXT: WNL. NEURO: WNL. Laboratory and Diagnostic Testing Lkc differential: Neutraphils 68%, Bands 7%, Lymphs 13%, Monos 8%, EOS 2% UA: Starw colored. Sp gr 1.015, Ph 8.0, Protein neg, Glucose neg, Ketones neg, Bacteria – many, Lkcs 10- 15, RBC 0-1 Urine gram stain – Gram negative rods Vaginal discharge culture: Gram negative diplococci, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, sensitivities pending Positive monoclonal AB for Chlamydia, KOH preparation, Wet preparation and VDRL negative
Nursing Assignment Help 2025
2025 Project Group Presentation on Nursing Theorist Overview of the Project This course project requires you
by adminproject 2025
Project: Group Presentation on Nursing Theorist Overview of the Project This course project requires you to complete a group task. As a group, you are required to submit a presentation on the theorist assigned to your group. Your final presentation is due in Week 4 . Group Formation You will be organized into three groups, each of which will be assigned a nursing theorist. The theorists to be studied include, but are not limited to, Madeline Leininger—Transcultural Nursing Theory, Nola Pender; the Health Promotion Model, and Patricia Benner; From Novice to Expert, the Skill Acquisition ModelIf your group would like to study a different theorist, seek permission from your instructor. Each group will conduct a literature review to obtain material related to the assigned theorist and the model. The material should include research conducted in the theory or model, with clinical examples. Click here to download a document that provides guidelines for the literature review. Project Deliverables The Project Deliverables include the following: 1. Packet of Materials Each group will prepare a packet of materials that will be posted to the DQ section in Week 4 for peer critique and submitted to the W4: Assignment 2 Dropbox. The purpose of this packet is to support your PowerPoint Presentation. The packet should include a detailed outline of the presentation and a one-page summary of each of the five relevant articles on or about the theory. Also include any handouts, such as charts, diagrams, or definitions, which will facilitate understanding of the PowerPoint presentation and the theory itself. This packet should be submitted as a single document that contains the outline, summaries, and any additional handouts, charts, etc. 2. Power Point Presentation Presentations will be made via PowerPoint and will be uploaded by the assigned due date. Your presentation should have: A brief overview of the theorist’s background. Discussion of the theorist’s view of the four basic metaparadigms and two concepts unique to the theory. The basic theoretical assertions or propositions. An analysis and a critique of the model with a focus on elaboration of the theory’s implications for nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing research. Click here to download the Theory Critique template. Please note: It is expected that each one of you will download and read each presentation, and will include relevant material about each theorist in your individual concept papers. Working Ahead In Week 1 , your group will be assigned the theorist on whom you have to make the presentation. Your final group presentation is due in Week 4 . However, it is recommended that in Week 2 you submit the work you have done on the project up to that point to the facilitator when necessary. The facilitator feedback will help you revise and refine the work already completed and apply the facilitator recommendations to the yet-to-be completed part of the project. For ease of completion, it is suggested that in Week 1 , you begin your literature search on the theorist and provide a brief overview of the theorist’s background. You could also complete a 1-page summary for each of the five articles related to the theory and theorist, the top of the page should have the complete reference in APA format. In Week 2 , you can focus on providing your findings on the theorist’s view of the four basic metaparadigms . In Week 3 , you can concentrate on providing the basic theoretical assertions or propositions and you can conduct an analysis and a critique of the model with a focus on elaboration of the theory’s implications for nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing research. Click here to download the Peer Presentation Review Checklist Template. Members of the group will be graded collectively. Grading of the presentation of the theory/conceptual model will be based on the following scale for each element: Grading Criteria: Maximum Points Group Formation Students formed effective groups and the group demonstrated signs of cooperation thereby facilitating the learning process. 6 Project Deliverables The packet of materials included a detailed outline of the presentation and a one-page summary of each of five relevant articles on or about the theory. 8 The selected articles reflected research into the historical perspective of the theory. 6 Selection of the articles reflected breadth of research into the theory and its utilization and evaluation. 6 Summary was articulate and included the entire article. 6 Summary clearly described the author’s perspective. 6 Editorial/personal response demonstrated critical thinking. 6 Articles included primary, secondary, and research sources. 6 The overview of the background of the theorist demonstrated critical thinking 6 The presentation discussed the theorist’s view of the four basic metaparadigms and two concepts unique to the theory. 6 The presentation discussed the basic theoretical assertions and propositions. 6 The theory critique provided a detailed description of the chosen model. 6 The theory critique elaborated on the theory’s implications on nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing research. 6 The theory critique incorporated all the elements recommended in the critique template. 6 The theory critique was comprehensive and highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of the chosen nursing model. 6 Presentation included all the specified components: a brief overview of the theorist’s background, discussion of the theorist’s view of the four basic metaparadigms and two concepts unique to the theory, the basic theoretical assertions or propositions, and an analysis and a critique of the model with a focus on elaboration of the theory’s implications for nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing research. 10 The presentation demonstrated focused research effort and good writing ability. 6 The presentation demonstrated understanding of the theory. 6 The presentation was comprehensive. 6 The presentation style was impressive and reflected organization and clarity. 6 Written responses are free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. Citations and references are included and written in the correct APA Style. 10 The posted packet included handouts, such as charts, diagrams, or definitions, which facilitated understanding of the presentation and the theory. 6 Reviewed two presentations of peer groups using the criteria listed in the Peer Presentation Review Checklist Template and provided an objective and unbiased feedback to the group members. 8 Total Group Project Assignments/Task: Larry Purnell-Purnell Model for Cultural Componence what i have to develop is the secondary theory from the library (you can find the articule in the library) and for the presentation: Discussion of the theorist’s view of the four basic metaparadigms and two concepts unique to the theory
Nursing Assignment Help 2025