BIO-550 Week 7 Assignment Critical Appraisal 2025

Max Points: 100 Details: Healthy People 2020 is a framework to assist communities in preventing disease and promoting health. Search the scientific literature and find a research study related to one of the focus areas identified by Healthy People 2020. In a 750-1000-word essay, critically appraise the study by answering each of the following questions: What is the study question and is it relevant? Does the study add anything new? What type of research question is being asked? Was the study design appropriate for the research question? Did the study methods address the most important potential sources of bias? Was the study performed according to the original protocol? Does the study test a stated hypothesis? If so, what is it? Does the data justify the conclusions? Are there any conflicts of interest? There are methodological points to consider in appraising literature that are specific to cross-sectional, cohort, case-control, clinical trials, and case studies. Based on the design of this study, what are the key methodical points to consider? You are required to use a minimum of three scholarly resources. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

prof lex please 2025

DUE THURSDAY MAY SURE YOU USE IN TEXT CITATIONS IN PARAGRAPH 250-350 WORDS If you are witness to a medical emergency, should you offer assistance? To prepare for this Discussion, research the Good Samaritan Law for your state or province. Find another jurisdiction with a different Good Samaritan Law. Consider how the two are divergent. By Day 4 Post , a comprehensive response to the following: What are the fundamental elements of the Good Samaritan Laws for the two jurisdictions you researched? How do they differ from one another? Be specific and provide examples? Do you think the law is clear and well written? Support your stance with examples. Are there any changes that you would like to see made to the law? What are those changes? Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings. Note: Initial postings must be 250-350 words (not including references). ____________________________________________________________ RESOURCES Judson, K., & Harrison, C. (2016). Law and ethics for the health professions. (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Chapter 5, “Professional Liability and Medical Malpractice” Each of us have certain legal responsibilities or liabilities. This chapter introduces the concepts of professional liability in health care and medical malpractice when those responsibilities are breached. Chapter 7, “Medical Records and Informed Consent” This chapter examines the role that the doctrine of informed consent plays in the relationship between patients and providers. Chapter 8, “Privacy, Security, and Fraud” Few things are more personal than an individual’s medical information. This chapter focuses on privacy and maintaining the proper controls over medical information to protect the patient and the provider. Optional Resources Medical Law, Ethics, and Bioethics for the Health Professions Chapter 4, “State and Federal Regulations” Chapter 5, “Professional Liability” Privacy Law and HIPAA – Dispelling HIPAA Myths http://www.mhhe.com/career/alliedhealth/judson/vidvignettes/chapter07/

Nursing Assignment Help 2025