Get An Edge With The Best Assignment Help
Are you struggling to finish assignments on time? Or, you may be good at drafting, but the formatting is not your forte. Avail our assignment help today!
Are you struggling to finish assignments on time? Or, you may be good at drafting, but the formatting is not your forte. Avail our assignment help today!
No matter the time or day, you can always contact our customer support team, whether you send in your order early or only 6 hours before the deadline. They’re available 24/7 to assist you, answer any questions, and give you the best customer support experience.
4870 Cass Ave
Detroit, MI, United States

Intro to CPT Coding – 2025 Intro to CPT Coding Answer all 20 questions and send them back to me must make sure ALL answers are
by adminNursing Assignment Help
Intro to CPT Coding – 2025
Intro to CPT Coding
Answer all 20 questions and send them back to me- must make sure ALL answers are correct and get it back to me in the next 3 hours
1. Modifier -78 indicates a/an
A. unplanned return to the OR.
B. emergency room procedure.
C. ambulance service.
D. distinct dental procedure.
2. Modifier -92 indicates a/an
A. anesthesia administration.
B. multiple service.
C. mandated procedure.
D. laboratory test included a kit or a transportable instrument.
3. An unrelated procedure in the postoperative period is indicated with modifier
A. -81.
B. -47.
C. -52.
D. -79.
4. Modifier -33 indicates a
A. preventive service.
B. reduced anesthesia.
C. bilateral procedure.
D. blood pressure screening.
5. A surgical procedure named after a person is called a/an
A. synonym.
B. antonym.
C. eponym.
D. pseudonym.
6. Staged or related procedures are indicated with
A. add-on code 65239.
B. modifier -58.
C. add-on code A1C.
D. modifier -51.
7. Right and left triangles indicate a
A. code correction.
B. change in the text description.
C. deleted code.
D. new modifier.
8. Modifier -77 indicates a
A. required service.
B. multiple procedure.
C. repeat procedure performed by another physician.
D. bundled service.
9. Modifier -59 indicates a/an _______ procedure.
A. reduced
B. abbreviated
C. distinct
D. bilateral
10. Appendix E includes a list of
A. medical supplies.
B. CPT codes exempt from modifier -51.
C. commonly prescribed medications.
D. clinical examples.
11. A significant separately identifiable E/M service is indicated with a/an
A. add-on code 52.
B. modifier -23.
C. modifier -25.
D. optional code 2523.
12. Dr. Brown stops a surgical procedure due to the patient’s reaction to anesthesia. What modifier code is appended to the CPT code?
A. -53 for discontinued procedure
B. -13 for abbreviated service
C. -1 for reduced time
D. -97 for reduced anesthesia service
13. Vascular families can be found in Appendix
A. G.
B. L.
C. A.
D. M.
14. What function does the times symbol (×) indicate?
A. Code deletion
B. Each
C. Single
D. Multiple
15. The modifier for the assistant surgeon is
A. -59.
B. -74.
C. -32
D. -82.
16. Codes 22305–22325 demonstrate an example of a/an
A. multiple code set.
B. range of codes.
C. alternate code set.
D. single code span.
17. Modifier -54 indicates
A. specialized services were provided.
B. only the surgical care portion.
C. bilateral procedures were performed.
D. two surgeons worked simultaneously.
18. When general anesthesia is administered in lieu of local or regional anesthesia, the coder would assign
A. modifier -23.
B. modifier -77.
C. code 95222.
D. code 99059.
19. The triangle symbol in CPT indicates a
A. new code for a procedure or service.
B. code that requires a modifier.
C. code has been changed or modified in some way.
D. code that requires a descriptor.
20. The codes that are widely used for services and procedures are found in Category
A. IV.
B. III.
C. II.
D. I.
NUR-504 Week 7 Assignment CLC – EBP Develop Clinical Guideline and Implementation Plan – 2025 CLC EBP Develop Clinical Guideline and Implementation Plan This is a Collaborative Learning Community CLC
by adminNursing Assignment Help
NUR-504 Week 7 Assignment CLC – EBP Develop Clinical Guideline and Implementation Plan – 2025
CLC – EBP Develop Clinical Guideline and Implementation Plan
This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.
In a 750-1,000 word paper, complete the protocol and write the plan to pilot the change in practice.
The clinical guidelines should include the problem statement, EBP question, literature review, research synthesis, the clinical protocol, and the implementation plan. Identify specific, realistic patient outcomes that will be used for evaluating the clinical guidelines.
The implementation plan for the protocol should include a timeline with criteria for evaluating the outcomes. Barriers/Obstacles or drivers for change should be identified and addressed.
Refer to the “CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based Project (EBP) Student Guide” for additional guidance.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Reflective Analysis – 2025 Throughout this course you have identified examined and provided individual as well as collaborative
by adminNursing Assignment Help
Reflective Analysis – 2025
Throughout this course, you have identified, examined, and provided individual as well as collaborative analysis on multiple facets of risk management in the health care setting.
Addressing the knowledge you have gained, and building on that knowledge to add your evaluation of the role that the managed care organization (MCO) plays in today’s health care environment, develop a 250-500 word reflection to incorporate the following:
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Rubric:
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Explains the Administrative Role of a Health Care Organization Regarding Oversight of Risk Management Policies and Ensuring Compliance With Managed Care Organization (MCO) Standards
Not included.
An explanation of the administrative role of a health care organization regarding oversight of risk management policies and ensuring compliance with MCO standards is somewhat present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
An explanation of a health care organization’s administrative role regarding oversight of risk management policies and ensuring compliance with MCO standards is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.
An explanation of a health care organization’s administrative role regarding oversight of risk management policies and ensuring compliance with MCO standards is present, and is incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.
An explanation of a health care organization’s administrative role regarding oversight of risk management policies and ensuring compliance with MCO standards is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
20.0 %Discussion Regarding Assessment of the Value Provided to an Organization That Stems From the Following Aspects of a Typical MCO: Regulatory Statutes, Inclusive of Conflict Resolution and Risk Management Strategies From the Employer/Employee Perspective and Patient Conflict Circumstances
Not included.
A discussion regarding assessment of the value provided to an organization that stems from a typical MCO (regulatory statutes, inclusive of conflict resolution and risk management strategies from the employer/employee perspective and patient conflict circumstances) is somewhat present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
A discussion regarding assessment of the value provided to an organization that stems from a typical MCO (regulatory statutes, inclusive of conflict resolution and risk management strategies from the employer/employee perspective and patient conflict circumstances) is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.
A discussion regarding assessment of the value provided to an organization that stems from a typical MCO (regulatory statutes, inclusive of conflict resolution and risk management strategies from the employer/employee perspective and patient conflict circumstances) is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.
A discussion regarding assessment of the value provided to an organization that stems from a typical MCO (regulatory statutes, inclusive of conflict resolution and risk management strategies from the employer/employee perspective and patient conflict circumstances) is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
20.0 %Describes MCO Responsibilities Pertaining to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) and Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Focus on Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Laws
Not included.
A description of MCO responsibilities pertaining to PPACA and CMS focus on fraud, waste, and abuse laws is somewhat present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
A description of MCO responsibilities pertaining to PPACA and CMS focus on fraud, waste, and abuse laws is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.
A description of MCO responsibilities pertaining to PPACA and CMS focus on fraud, waste, and abuse laws is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.
A description of MCO responsibilities pertaining to PPACA and CMS focus on fraud, waste, and abuse laws is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
10.0 %Discussion Addresses Course Content and Learning
A discussion that addresses course content and learning is not provided.
A discussion addressing course content and learning is somewhat present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
A discussion addressing course content and learning is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.
A discussion addressing course content and learning is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.
A discussion addressing course content and learning is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
NUR-508 Week 6 Assignment CLC – Health Issue Analysis: Part 4 – 2025 Details This is a Collaborative Learning Community CLC assignment In your Collaborative Learning Community
by adminNursing Assignment Help
NUR-508 Week 6 Assignment CLC – Health Issue Analysis: Part 4 – 2025
Details:
This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.
In your Collaborative Learning Community, write a formal paper of 500-1,000 words that examines the previously addressed aspects of health policies, finance, global/national prevention, or treatment initiatives related to the health issue by identifying applicable ethics principles.
Refer to “CLC Health Issue Analysis Overview.”
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract, introduction, and conclusion are not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.