Hide Assignment InformationTurnitin®This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.Instructions

Course Project—Part 2

Instructional Unit: Goals, Objectives, and the Teaching Plans

This week you will submit your instructional unit, which should include three lesson plans: one focused on patient education, one on family education, and one on staff development. Remember, your plans should demonstrate a logical approach to teaching, communicate what is to be taught and how, and outline how objectives are to be evaluated. Click here for a refresher on what each final lesson should include.

Building on the work that you started in Week 2, for all three groups of learners:

• Write several broad instructional goals for the educational experience.
• Write several behavioral objectives based on Bloom’s taxonomy.
• Describe the lesson content.
• Provide a sequence for teaching activities.
• Describe instructional methods.
• Indicate time allotted for each activity.
• Identify and describe the instructional resources (materials, tools, etc.) and technology to be used.
• Describe how the learning will be evaluated.

On a separate references page, cite all sources using APA format.

• Use this APA Citation Helper as a convenient reference for properly citing resources.
• This handout will provide you the details of formatting your essay using APA style.
• You may create your essay in this APA-formatted template.

Submission Details:

• Submit your response in a 6- to 7-page paper to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned. Be sure to use appropriate APA formatting.

Due DateMar 6, 2019 11:59 PMHide Rubrics

Rubric Name: NSG4028 Week 4 Project Rubric

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.CriteriaNo Submission0 pointsEmerging (F through D Range)11 pointsSatisfactory (C Range)13 pointsProficient (B Range)14 pointsExemplary (A Range)16 pointsListed two broad instructional goals for the educational experience for each of the three groups of learners.

Student did not submit assignment

Did not include instructional goals for the educational experience and/or did not include all learners.

Minimally listed broad instructional goals for the educational experience and included two of the three groups of learners.

Listed several broad instructional goals for the educational experience and included all learners. Goals could be more clearly stated.

Expertly stated several broad instructional goals for the educational experience and included all learners.

/ 16This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.CriteriaNo Submission0 pointsEmerging (F through D Range)11 pointsSatisfactory (C Range)13 pointsProficient (B Range)14 pointsExemplary (A Range)16 pointsListed learning objectives that addressed the cognitive capabilities of each of the three groups of learners.

Student did not submit assignment

Did not include learning objectives that addressed the cognitive capabilities of the learner and/or did not include all groups of learners.

Minimally listed learning objectives that addressed the cognitive capabilities of the learner and included two of the three groups of learners

Listed learning objectives that addressed the cognitive capabilities of the learner and included all learners. Objectives could be more clearly stated.

Expertly stated learning objectives that addressed the cognitive capabilities of the learner and included all learners.

/ 16This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.CriteriaNo Submission0 pointsEmerging (F through D Range)11 pointsSatisfactory (C Range)13 pointsProficient (B Range)14 pointsExemplary (A Range)16 pointsListed learning objectives that addressed the affective capabilities for each of the three groups of learners.

Student did not submit assignment

Did not include learning objectives that addressed the affective capabilities of the learner and/or did not include all learners.

Minimally listed learning objectives that addressed the affective capabilities of the learner and included two of the three groups of learners.

Listed learning objectives that addressed the affective capabilities of the learner and included all learners identified. Objectives could be more clearly stated.

Expertly stated learning objectives that addressed the affective capabilities of the learner and included all three groups of learners.

/ 16This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.CriteriaNo Submission0 pointsEmerging (F through D Range)11 pointsSatisfactory (C Range)13 pointsProficient (B Range)14 pointsExemplary (A Range)16 pointsListed learning objectives that addressed the psychomotor capabilities of each of the three groups of learners.

Student did not submit assignment

Did not include learning objectives that addressed the psychomotor capabilities of the learner and/or did not include all learners.

Minimally listed learning objectives that addressed the psychomotor capabilities of the learner and included two of the three groups of learners.

Listed learning objectives that addressed the psychomotor capabilities of the learner and included all learners. Objectives could be more clearly stated.

Expertly stated learning objectives that addressed the psychomotor capabilities of the learner and included all learners identified.

/ 16This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.CriteriaNo Submission0 pointsEmerging (F through D Range)8 pointsSatisfactory (C Range)9 pointsProficient (B Range)11 pointsExemplary (A Range)12 pointsProvided an appropriate description of the lesson content

Student did not submit assignment

Provided a description of the lesson contentbut was not clearly focused or coherent.

Minimally Provided an appropriate description of the lesson content.

Provided an appropriate description of the lesson content, but could be more detailed.

Provided a description of the lesson content that was appropriate, thorough, and detailed.

/ 12This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.CriteriaNo Submission0 pointsEmerging (F through D Range)8 pointsSatisfactory (C Range)9 pointsProficient (B Range)11 pointsExemplary (A Range)12 pointsProvided a sequence for teaching activities and time allotted for each activity.

Student did not submit assignment

Provided a sequence for teaching activities and time allotted for each activity but was not clearly focused or coherent.

Minimally provided a sequence for teaching activities and time allotted for each activity

Provided an appropriate sequence for teaching activities and time allotted for each activity, but could be more detailed.

Provided a thoroughly detailed sequence for teaching activities and time allotted for each activity.

/ 12This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.CriteriaNo Submission0 pointsEmerging (F through D Range)8 pointsSatisfactory (C Range)9 pointsProficient (B Range)11 pointsExemplary (A Range)12 pointsDescribed the instructional strategies

Student did not submit assignment

Description of the instructional strategies was not clearly focused or coherent.

Provided a minimal description of the instructional strategies.

Provided an acceptable description of the instructional strategies, but could be more detailed.

Thoroughly described the instructional strategies in detail.

/ 12This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.CriteriaNo Submission0 pointsEmerging (F through D Range)8 pointsSatisfactory (C Range)9 pointsProficient (B Range)11 pointsExemplary (A Range)12 pointsIdentified and described the instructional resources and technology

Student did not submit assignment

Identified and described the instructional resources and technology but was not focused or coherent.

Minimally identified and described the instructional resources and technology

Identified and described the instructional resources and technology but could be more detailed.

Identified and thoroughly described the instructional resources and technology in detail.

/ 12This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.CriteriaNo Submission0 pointsEmerging (F through D Range)11 pointsSatisfactory (C Range)13 pointsProficient (B Range)14 pointsExemplary (A Range)16 pointsProvided an evaluation methodology

Student did not submit assignment

Provided an evaluation methodology but was not clearly focused or coherent.

Provided an evaluation methodology with minimal information.

Provided an acceptable evaluation methodology but could be more detailed.

Thoroughly provided an evaluation methodology in detail.

/ 16This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.CriteriaNo Submission0 pointsEmerging (F through D Range)5 pointsSatisfactory (C Range)6 pointsProficient (B Range)7 pointsExemplary (A Range)8 pointsOrganization Introduction Thesis Transitions Conclusion

Student did not submit assignment

Introduction is limited or missing entirely.

The paper lacks a thesis statement.

Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely.

Conclusion is limited or missing entirely. 

 Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped.

The paper is loosely organized around a thesis that may have to be inferred.

Transitions are sporadic.

Conclusion is present, but incomplete or underdeveloped.

Introduction has a clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic.

The paper is organized around an arguable, clearly stated thesis statement.

Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas.

Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.

Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background info, and clearly states the topic.

The paper is well organized around an arguable, focused thesis.

Thoughtful transitions clearly show how ideas relate.

Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights.

/ 8This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.CriteriaNo Submission0 pointsEmerging (F through D Range)8 pointsSatisfactory (C Range)9 pointsProficient (B Range)11 pointsExemplary (A Range)12 pointsUsage and Mechanics Grammar Spelling Sentence structure

Student did not submit assignment

Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension.

Errors in spelling and grammar exist that somewhat interfere with readability and/or comprehension.

Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension.

The paper is basically error free in terms of mechanics. Grammar and mechanics help establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic.

/ 12This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.CriteriaNo Submission0 pointsEmerging (F through D Range)8 pointsSatisfactory (C Range)9 pointsProficient (B Range)11 pointsExemplary (A Range)12 pointsAPA Elements Attribution Paraphrasing Quotations

Student did not submit assignment

No attempt at APA format.

APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but errors are significant.

Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited in many spots throughout when appropriate or called for. Errors present are somewhat minor.

Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited throughout the presentation when appropriate or called for. Only a few minor errors present.

/ 12Total/ 160

Overall Score

 

Now that you have completed a series of assignments that have led you   into the active project planning and development stage for your   project, briefly describe your proposed solution to address the   problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need and how it   has changed since you first envisioned it. What led to your current   perspective and direction?

ITS IMPORTANT TO MEET THE COMPETENCES. PLEASE READ THE COMPETENCES !

Write 8-10 pages in which you identify a major patient-safety issue within your own organization and use evidence-based best practices and technology to develop a plan to improve the safety issue.

Quality improvement and patient safety are central to the nursing leadership role.

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

• Competency 2: Safety and Quality Practices – Incorporate concepts of patient safety, clinical management, and quality improvement to improve patient outcomes.            
  • Describe a patient safety issue and compare currently used organizational processes for handling this issue with concepts, principles, and practices that contribute to quality improvement and patient safety.
• Competency 3: Nursing Research and Informatics – Incorporate evidence-based practice interventions (for example, information systems and patient care technologies) as appropriate for managing the acute and chronic care of patients, promoting health across the lifespan.            
  • Recommend evidence-based interventions, including technology, to address specific patient-safety issues.
• Competency 4: Policy, Finance, and Regulations – Understand the scope and role of policy, finance, and regulatory environments in relationship to individual and population outcomes.            
  • Analyze the legal and ethical consequences of not addressing patient-safety issues.
• Competency 5: Communication – Communicate effectively with all members of the health care team, including interdepartmental and interdisciplinary collaboration for quality outcomes.            
  • Write coherently to support a central idea in appropriate APA format with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a nursing professional.
• Competency 6: Organizational and Systems Management – Apply knowledge of organizational behavior, nursing theory, and systems (micro- and macro-) as appropriate for the scope and role of one’s own practice.            
  • Describe strategies to overcome specific organizational barriers to change.

Assessment Instructions 

Preparation

As you prepare for this assessment, complete the following:

1. Before you begin, examine your organization’s history of safety in a specific area and how your organization addresses patient safety issues. If possible, consult with a key stakeholder in the organization (such as an administrator) to better understand specific patient-safety concerns and how the organization is working to resolve the concerns. This person should also be able to discuss some of the organizational barriers impacting the patient safety issue.
2. Next, look at the basic concepts, principles, and practices that contribute to organizational quality improvement and patient safety. Review the literature for best practices and how technology might be used to improve the issue.
3. Finally, be sure to consider the legal and ethical implications associated with the safety issue, as well as possible organizational barriers to change.

Directions

As you construct this assessment, address each point as completely as possible:

• Describe a patient-safety issue within your organization, comparing the way your organization addresses the issue with the concepts, principles, and practices that contribute to quality improvement and patient safety.
• Analyze the legal and ethical consequences of not addressing the issue.
• Recommend evidence-based interventions, including technology, to address the patient-safety issue.
• Describe strategies to overcome specific organizational barriers to change, based on your knowledge of the organization.

Additional Requirements

• Format: Include a title page and reference page. Use APA style and formatting.
• Length: Ensure your completed assessment is 8–10 pages in length, not including the title page and reference page.
• References: Cite at least five current scholarly or professional resources.
• Font: Use double-spaced, 12-point, Times New Roman font.

Quantitative Research

Write a fully developed and detailed APA essay addressing each of the following points/questions. There is no required word count; be sure to completely answer all the questions for each question in detail. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least one (1) source using citations in your essay. Make sure to cite using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page are required. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

Conduct a literature search to select a quantitative research study related to the problem identified in Module 1(  The clinical question identified in this section is about chronic neck pain in adults).and conduct an initial critical appraisal. Respond to the overview questions for the critical appraisal of quantitative studies, including:

• Is this quantitative research report a case study, case control study, cohort study, randomized control trial or systematic review?
• Where does the study fall in the hierarchy of evidence in terms of reliability and risk of bias?
• Why was the study done? (Define the problem and purpose.)
• Were the steps of the study clearly identified?
• What was the sample size?
• Are the measurements of major variables reliable and valid? Explain.
• How were the data analyzed?
• Were there any untoward events during the conduct of the study?
• How do the results fit with previous research in the area? (This may be reflected in the literature review.)
• What does this research mean to clinical practice?

Additionally, be sure to include the rapid appraisal questions for the specific research design of the quantitative study that you have chosen. These can be found in Chapter 5 of the textbook (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2015). 

This critical appraisal should be written in complete sentences (not just a numbered list) using APA format. 

Provide a reference for the article according to APA format and a copy of the article.

Assignment Expectations:

Length: Clearly and fully answer all questions; attach a copy of the article
Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA format. Your essay must include an introduction and a conclusion.
References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. A minimum of one (1) scholarly source for the article is required for this assignment.

  

 
 

1-, remarkable presentation, just to add on I would recommend the physician if he/she can consider treating the patient with hyper baric oxygen in order to increases oxygenation to the tissue, improves circulation and blood flow, to increase the ability of neutrophils to kill the Mucar and to decreases the pain and swelling.

Thank you

 
 

2-There really isn’t enough information to determine if this patient really warrants an ICU admission. Where I work, our Progressive Care Unit could most likely manage this patient. Depending on the presentation, such things to consider are vitals, face to face assessment data, respiratory efforts, heart rate and rhythm. The chest xray does show white out of the mid to lower left fields but is clear at the left apex and to the right. Hard to determine the appropriate level of care based on the limited data provided.

 

 
 

3-Hyperbaric oxygen would help this patient because hyperbaric therapy increases oxygenation to the tissue, improves circulation and blood flow, boosts white blood cells especially neutrophils, enhances effectiveness of antibiotics, and decreases pain and swelling

(Latham E., 2018). However, there is some precaution while taking this treatment “the fire hazard” because the use of oxygen is always high risk to fire explosion. so, any material that can explode fire is prohibited in the treatment room, for instance nurses must make sure that the patient is not using a hair spray, deodorant, electric devices or cigarette lighter and proper education should be given to the patient (Latham E., 2018).

Reference

Latham E. (2018) Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy retrieved [online] from: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1464149-overview

 

4-I enjoyed reading your post. Over the years, I have had many diabetic patients that are diagnosed with pneumonia, but never with Mucor. You stated, “Mucor is most commonly found in uncontrolled diabetics, transplant patients, cancer patients, and others who are immunocompromised (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2015).” It is interesting to know that Mucor is commonly found in uncontrolled diabetics. However, I found that there have also been cases found in well controlled diabetics. According to Panigrahi,M., Manju,R., Kumar, S.V. & Toi, P.C. (2014) “Uncontrolled diabetes, particularly diabetic ketoacidosis, predisposes patients to the development of mucormycosis; however, cases have been described even in patients with well controlled diabetes mellitus.”

Panigrahi,M., Manju,R., Kumar, S.V. & Toi, P.C. (2014). Pulmonary Mucormycosis Presenting as Nonresolving Pneumonia in a Patient With Diabetes Mellitus. Retrieved  from http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/59/12/e201

 

5-I agree, a sputum or tissue sample like biopsy is needed to identify the fungal infection. However, amphotericin B, posaconazole or isavuconazole iv  are very effective treatments if started early and aggressively. In addition to this and an excision of the infected tissue or organ is also needed to save the rest of the tissue or organ and life as well. Nice post.

 

6- Nice post, I agree, once patient is on bed rest and NPO,  pantop and low molecular weight heparin needed to be started as gastric and  DVT prophylaxis. And this patient is going to be very unstable so needed to be admitted in ICU for monitoring and further management.