Planning for Evaluation 2025

Assignment 4: Planning for Evaluation Section 5 of Major Assessment 7: Using an Epidemiological Approach to Critically Analyze a Population Health Problem DNP-prepared nurses are expected to effectively use research methods to analyze data, “design evidence-based interventions, [and] predict and analyze outcomes…,” (AACN, 2006, p. 11). Every research design requires you to evaluate your results. Epidemiologic studies are no different. In Week 7, you explored how using causal models can assist with evaluating the data analysis section of a study. In this week’s Discussion, you explored how epidemiological data are used to substantiate or negate the need for screening programs; evaluation is critical to ensure the data are sound and suitable as the basis for such decisions. As these experiences demonstrate, if the results of a study are not evaluated, they cannot be used to improve population health. As you begin working on Assignment 4, Section 5 of the Major Assessment 7 paper, consider how you would evaluate the anticipated results of your population health intervention developed in Sections 3 and 4 of Assignment 4. As noted in the AACN Essentials of Doctoral Education for Advanced Nursing Practice , as a DNP-prepared nurse, you are expected to predict and analyze outcomes and then design evidence-based interventions based on your analysis. This Assignment provides you with an opportunity to practice that skill. Begin developing Section 5, which is due by Friday 4/27/18 at 5pm Review the Major Assessment Overview (see attached file, section 5 highlighted in yellow). Review Exhibit 8–7: The Four Stages of Evaluation on page 400 of Epidemiology for Public Health Practice . In addition, review the articles in the Learning Resources that describe program evaluation in various settings. The four stages of evaluation are : Formative Evaluation Process Evaluation Impact Evaluation Outcome Evaluation Section 5: Evaluation To Complete: In 3-page, write the following section of your paper: 1) An Introduction ending with a purpose statement (e.g. the purpose of this paper is…) 2) An evaluation plan based upon the health outcome that you have chosen and your anticipated results ( please select the best method for evaluating the effect of the intervention out of the 4 methods mentioned above). 3) A conclusion. APA format required and minimum of 4 scholarly required from the list of required readings below P.S. The content must be of a professional portfolio quality; it must address every major subsection in the assignment; selects most appropriate evaluation method for the project and fully and clearly describes the method for evaluating the effect of the intervention using advanced critical thinking skills; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through reflections supported by the literature about the content area. Excels in meeting expectations for graduate-level work. Required Readings Friis, R. H., & Sellers, T. A. (2014). Epidemiology for public health practice (5th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett. Chapter 10, “Data Interpretation Issues” Chapter 11, “Screening for Disease in the Community” Chapter 11 examines aspects of screening for disease, including characteristics of a good screening test and how screening programs can be evaluated. Nash, D. B., Fabius, R. J., Skoufalos, A., Clarke, J. L. & Horowitz, M. R. (2016). Population health: Creating a culture of wellness (2nd ed). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. Chapter 13, “Decision Support” This chapter addresses measurement and analysis tools used to support decision making for improvement, accountability, and research related to population health. The three main purposes of measurement in population health (improvement, accountability, research) provide the framework for this chapter. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). A framework for program evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/eval/framework/index.htm The CDC provides this framework for program evaluation. Review the information presented as you prepare for Assignment 4. Association for Community Health Improvement. (2006). Planning, assessment, outcomes & evaluation resources. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20130709124030/http://www.communityhlth.org/ communityhlth/resources/planning.html Explore the many resources available for program evaluation. These resources will inform for Assignment 4. Rural Health Information Hub. Retrieved from: fromhttps://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/toolkits/health-promotion/4/types-of-evaluation

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Congressional Budget Office: Options for Reducing the Deficit ( FOR (MHA 516 Thom Sloan Instructor)NYANA)
please don’t repurchase this answer if this is your professor 2025

Download Options for Reducing the Deficit: 2017 to 2026 from the Congressional Budget Office website. Read Ch. 5 of the report. Select one of the health options listed. Select a health care facility or service (e.g., hospital, physician practice, long-term care facility, ambulance service, pharmacy, or skilled nursing facility), and evaluate the effects that implementing the health option would have on a health care facility or service you selected. Write a 350- to 525-word article about your evaluation and proposed changes to the facility or service that can help curb negative effects. Publish the article on your own social media account (e.g., LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.), or post it on a health care message board of your choice. Include a citation of your article in your assignment. (I WILL PUBLISH) Cite 3 reputable references to support your assignment (e.g., trade or industry publications, government or agency websites, scholarly works, or other sources of similar quality). attached is the grading rubic for this assignment pay attention Materials Options for Reducing the Deficit: 2017 to 2026 – found on internet Congressional Budget Office- found on internet

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Case studies for doctoral learners 2025

According to General Colin Powell, “Great leaders are almost always great simplifiers who can cut through argument, debate, and doubt to offer a solution everybody can understand” (as cited by Harari, 2002). Assignment Preparation For this assignment, imagine that you are the manager of a health care organization confronting numerous issues potentially affecting the provision of safe, high-quality health care practices. You have decided to focus first on the issue that has particular relevance to your area of specialization or professional goals, or that presents a situation you might expect to encounter in your leadership role. As you consider an appropriate course of action to address this issue, you have decided to begin by searching the case study literature with the intention of possibly gaining insight into the actions of other health care leaders who have dealt with similar issues and may have provided a sound solution to the problem or issues he or she faced. A colleague with whom you have spoken about this has recommended the Buchbinder, Shanks, and Buchbinder text, Cases in Health Care Management as an excellent case study reference. For your convenience, Appendix B lists all cases by topic (Leadership; Quality/Patient Safety; Finance; Healthcare Professionals/Human Resources; Health Disparities/Cultural Competence; Ethics/Law/Conflict of Interest; Crossing the Line/Fraud) and by primary and secondary settings. In the Buchbinder, Shanks, and Buchbinder text, locate two case studies that are most closely aligned with the issue(s) you have decided to address. In addition, be sure that your selected case studies will enable you to · Evaluate the effectiveness of different leadership approaches in facilitating collaborative professional relationships across disciplines. · Evaluate health care leaders’ ability to communicate effectively. · Analyze the role of communication in both creating and resolving a problem in health care leadership. · Evaluate how effectively leaders address any issues involving ethical practice, diversity or inclusion. · Evaluate health care leaders’ ability to manage and prioritize leadership responsibilities to resolve issues. Note: The case studies in the text may not supply all of the information you may need. In such cases, you should consider a variety of possibilities and infer plausible conclusions. Assignment Instructions Complete the following steps: 1. Include a title page, abstract, and reference page. o An APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] and the associated APA Style Paper Template [DOCX] are linked in Resources to help you in writing and formatting your paper. Format your work per these documents. 2. Include on your cover page the titles of the case studies you have chosen. For example, your title could read: “Demonstrating Effective Leadership: Case 82 – When Yes Means No and Case 83 – Emergency Divert Status .” o Include the case study in your references and use in-text citations when appropriate. 3. In the body of the paper, begin by briefly summarizing the facts surrounding the case studies. After you identify who the leaders are and the issues they are faced with, analyze the factors that you believe contributed to each issue. o Note: In graduate level writing, you should minimize the use of direct quotes. Lengthy quotes do not count toward assignment minimums. It is your interpretation of the material and its application to practice that is assessed. o Remember, the case studies may not supply all of the information you may need. In such cases, you should consider a variety of possibilities and infer plausible conclusions. However, please be sure to identify any speculations that you make as such. o An excellent tool for analyzing factors that contribute to a problem is the Fishbone Diagram, linked in the Resources. Use of this tool is highly recommended, but it is optional, and you will not hand in your diagram with this assignment. 4. Compare and contrast the leadership approaches or styles these leaders use. Analyze how the approaches or styles make these leaders more or less effective in building interprofessional relationships across disciplines within the organization. Based on your analysis, determine how likely it will be that these leaders will be able to build and maintain such relationships with other communities and leaders outside their organization. Support your analysis with citations and appropriate APA references to peer-reviewed journals or scholarly sources. 5. Analyze how well these leaders communicate, verbally or in writing. Analyze the role of communication and communication strategies in both creating and resolving the issues presented in the case study. 6. Summarize and analyze how well the leaders managed professional responsibilities and priorities to resolve the issue in the case. What lessons could you take away from this case that could be applied by other leaders? 7. Summarize and evaluate how effectively the leaders addressed any issues involving ethical practice, diversity or inclusion in the case. What key lessons do these cases provide for leaders? Use examples to clarify and support your ideas. Submission Requirements Your paper should meet the following requirements: · Written communication: Write coherently to support central ideas, in appropriate format, and with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics. · Length of paper: 5–6 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page, abstract, and reference page. · References: At least four different resources (peer-reviewed journals or other scholarly resource, assigned unit readings, and the like). · APA formatting: o Include a properly formatted title page, abstract, and reference page. o An APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] and the associated APA Style Paper Template [DOCX] are linked in Resources to help you in writing and formatting your paper. Format your work per these documents. o Apply correct formatting to all in-text citations and references. · Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

quantitative correlational study’s research 2025

Answer the following questions and reply to at least two colleagues: For the instructor assigned article this week, what research approach (basic vs. applied) is used in the study? What is the specific type of the research method, qualitative or quantitative? Why do you think the author(s) choose this method? What is the specific research design for this study? Give a rationale for why you think the author(s) chose this design. What other type of research design could be used for a study about this topic? Why would you choose to study the topic this way? Post your initial response by 2359 Wednesday of Module 2 Posts must be substantive and reflect thought and effort in the discussion. Always remember to cite and reference your resources appropriately using APA format. You should be using in-text citations in your initial response. Use in-text citations as needed in your replies.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025