Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics 2025

Search the GCU Library and find one new health care article that uses quantitative research. Do not use an article from a previous assignment, or that appears in the Topic Materials or textbook. Complete an article analysis and ethics evaluation of the research using the “Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics” template. See Chapter 5 of your textbook as needed, for assistance. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Article  1 Point Description Broad  Topic Area/Title Problem  Statement (What is the problem research is  addressing?) Purpose  Statement (What is the purpose of the study?) Research  Questions (What questions does the research  seek to answer?) Define  Hypothesis (Or state the correct hypothesis  based upon variables used) Identify  Dependent and Independent Variables and Type of Data for the Variables Population  of Interest for Study Sample Sampling  Method Identify  Data Collection Identify how data were collected Summarize  Data Collection Approach Discuss  Data Analysis Include what types of statistical  tests were used for the variables. Summarize  Results of Study Summary  of Assumptions and Limitations Identify the assumptions and  limitations from the article. Report other potential assumptions  and limitations of your review not listed by the author. Ethical Considerations Evaluate the article and identify potential ethical considerations that may have occurred when sampling, collecting data, analyzing data, or publishing results. Summarize your findings below in 250-500 words. Provide rationale and support for your evaluation.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

pathophysiological concepts to a child presenting with dermatological dysfunction (urticaria). 2025

A 12-year-old boy is brought to the office for evaluation of hives. He has no significant past medical history and no history of allergies. He has just joined the middle school soccer team and noticed that he gets hives about 10 minutes into practice. The hives are itchy and consist of irregular blotches on his legs and trunk, about 10–20 cm in size, and they persist for about 30 minutes. He does not experience swelling of the lips or oropharynx and denies any wheezing or shortness of breath. His physical examination is normal without skin lesions or oral swelling at that moment, and his lungs are clear. After evaluation, he is diagnosed with urticaria. Discuss  A 12-year-old boy is brought to the office for evaluation of hives. He has no significant past medical history and no history of allergies. He has just joined the middle school soccer team and noticed that he gets hives about 10 minutes into practice. The hives are itchy and consist of irregular blotches on his legs and trunk, about 10–20 cm in size, and they persist for about 30 minutes. He does not experience swelling of the lips or oropharynx and denies any wheezing or shortness of breath. His physical examination is normal without skin lesions or oral swelling at that moment, and his lungs are clear. After evaluation, he is diagnosed with urticaria. Discuss the likely cause of the patient’s urticaria . Describe the cellular mechanism of urticaria and how it leads to the signs and symptoms experienced by the patient. Describe the relationship between the patient’s symptoms and the concept of inflammation. What pharmacological and non-pharmacologic treatment options are available? Discuss the complications of urticaria. What teaching would be appropriate to provide the parent and child about urticaria? Support your response with at least one current evidence based resource the likely cause of the patient’s urticaria . Describe the cellular mechanism of urticaria and how it leads to the signs and symptoms experienced by the patient. Describe the relationship between the patient’s symptoms and the concept of inflammation. What pharmacological and non-pharmacologic treatment options are available? Discuss the complications of urticaria. What teaching would be appropriate to provide the parent and child about urticaria? Support your response with at least one current evidence based resource and non-pharmacologic

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Community Health Assessment / Windshield Survey 2025

pROVE IN TURNISTIN  MY ZIP CODE 33015 Community Health Assessment / Windshield Survey Community Assessment A community health assessment (sometimes called a CHA), also known as community health needs assessment (sometimes called a CHNA), refers to a state, tribal, local, or territorial health assessment that identifies key health needs and issues through systematic, comprehensive data collection and analysis. Community health assessments use such principles as Multisector collaborations that support shared ownership of all phases of community health improvement, including assessment, planning, investment, implementation, and evaluation Proactive, broad, and diverse community engagement to improve results A definition of community that encompasses both a significant enough area to allow for population-wide interventions and measurable results, and includes a targeted focus to address disparities among subpopulations Maximum transparency to improve community engagement and accountability Use of evidence-based interventions and encouragement of innovative practices with a thorough evaluation Evaluation to inform a continuous improvement process Use of the highest quality data pooled from and shared among, diverse public and private sources (Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/publichealthgateway/cha/plan.html ) Windshield Survey: “A windshield survey is an informal method used by community health nurses to obtain basic knowledge about a given community . It provides a subjective view of the various physical characteristics of a communal area as observed while driving or walking through a neighborhood. .”(Retrieved from; mynursingprofessionalportfolio.weebly.com/uploads/8/9/3/3/8933086/windshieldsurvey.docx ).” As stated in the syllabus please present your assignment in an APA format word document, Arial 12 font attached to the forum in the discussion board title “Week 1 discussion questions”. A minimum of 2 evidence-based references is required (not counting the class textbook) no older than 5 years. A minimum of 1000 words are required. Make sure the assessment is based in the community where you live. I don’t want community health assessment from other communities, once again it must be from the community you live. Please mention the zip code of your community in the first page of the assignment. Please follow the instructions given in the syllabus Discussion Question (DQ) Participation Guidelines” and “Discussion Question (DQ) Submission Guidelines.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Evidence-Based practice and the quadruple Aim 2025

To Prepare: Read the articles by Sikka, Morath, & Leape (2015); Crabtree, Brennan, Davis, & Coyle (2016); and Kim et al. (2016) provided in the Resources. Reflect on how EBP might impact (or not impact) the Quadruple Aim in healthcare. Consider the impact that EBP may have on factors impacting these quadruple aim elements, such as preventable medical errors or healthcare delivery. To Complete: Write a brief analysis (no longer than 2 pages) of the connection between EBP and the Quadruple Aim. Your analysis should address how EBP might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of: Patient experience Population health Costs Work life of healthcare providers

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Deontology Paper 2025

I need a Turnitin Report SELECT ONLY ONE FILM Read chapter 3, and watch the films “Gone Baby Gone” and “Sleepers”. Pick one movie and apply Kant’s moral philosophy to judge the MAIN FINAL action. ** For “Gone Baby Gone” judge Patrick’s final decision ** For “Sleepers” judge the priest’s final decision. Judging any other action in the movie is an automatic zero. 500 words minimum in MLA format. *You must apply Kant’s 3 premises and Michael Sandel’s 3 contrasts Kant’s Three Premises Kant’s Categorical Imperative Nature of the concept The concept of the categorical imperative is a syllogism 1.The first premise is that a person acts morally if his or her conduct would, without condition, be the “right” conduct for any person in similar circumstances (the “First Maxim”). 2.The second premise is that conduct is “right” if it treats others as ends in themselves and not as means to an end (the “Second Maxim”). 3.The conclusion is that a person acts morally when he or she acts as if his or her conduct was establishing a universal law governing others in similar circumstances (the “Third Maxim”). Kant’s Three Premises Explained In the case of ” Gone Baby Gone” the philosophical process you will follow in this paper should sound as something like this: According to Kant’s first premise Patrick behaved moral because he returned the victim he was hired to find and without condition this is the “right” conduct for any detective in cases of kidnapping (the “First Maxim”). Here Kant speaks of doing the right prior to good. 2. On Kant’s second premise Patrick acted moral because he respected the dignity of Amanda and he treated her as an end in herself and not as means to an end like everyone else was doing in the film (the “Second Maxim”). Here Kant speaks of humans as special creatures and ends in themselves. Humans are ends, not means to an end. Los seres humanos son un fin, no un medio para un fin. 3. The conclusion is that a detective act morally when he reports a kidnapping to the police and this behavior should establish a universal law governing all detectives in cases of kidnapping (the “Third Maxim”). Here Kant asks us to test the universality of our action. Will it be OK if everyone does what I am about to do? VIDEO Michael Sandel’s 3 contrasts Three contrasts: ** Morality { the motive of duty} **Freedom {Determination of will} ** Reason {imperatives} VIDEO (1) Justice: What’s The Right Thing To Do? Episode 06: “MIND YOUR MOTIVE” – YouTube

Nursing Assignment Help 2025