view of the analysis of disease and healing in the readings 2025

Topic 1 DQ 2 There are many things in topics that show how peoples believe in God and spirituality can be related to modern medicine. Even though the world around us have become so much modern and with complication that many can come across such as infertility and then having a gift of God given to them through modern medicine. It all comes in place when people believe in divine power of God and have faith in power and then see their believe become reality is what makes it joyful and keep people faith in God alive even after hundreds of years. Many cultures do not believe in modern medicine and to them God and its holy water can help get well and find cure for their illness. I have seen it work for people you can say its way of body healing by self or power of God helping them heal. It hard to give reasoning when you see modern medicine and then God doing its magic but then I do believe there is power above us that can help us heal with or without modern medicine. Using 200-300 APA format with at least two references to support this discussion. What aspects of the topic readings do you find the most interesting? What is your view of the analysis of disease and healing in the readings? Explain.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

The Inclusion of Nurses in the Systems Development Life Cycle 2025

In the media introduction to this module, it was suggested that you as a nurse have an important role in the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC). With a focus on patient care and outcomes, nurses may not always see themselves as contributors to the development of new systems. However, as you may have observed in your own experience, exclusion of nurse contributions when implementing systems can have dire consequences. In this Discussion, you will consider the role you might play in systems development and the ramifications of not being an active participant in systems development. To Prepare: Review the steps of the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) as presented in the Resources. Reflect on your own healthcare organization and consider any steps your healthcare organization goes through when purchasing and implementing a new health information technology system. Consider what a nurse might contribute to decisions made at each stage of the SDLC when planning for new health information technology. By Day 3 of Week 9 Post a description of what you believe to be the consequences of a healthcare organization not involving nurses in each stage of the SDLC when purchasing and implementing a new health information technology system. Provide specific examples of potential issues at each stage of the SDLC and explain how the inclusion of nurses may help address these issues. Then, explain whether you had any input in the selection and planning of new health information technology systems in your nursing practice or healthcare organization and explain the potential impacts of being included or not in the decision-making process. Be specific and provide examples. By Day 6 of Week 9 Respond to at least two of your colleagues * on two different days , by offering additional thoughts regarding the examples shared, SDLC-related issues, and ideas on how the inclusion of nurses might have impacted the example described by your colleagues. Discussion one that needs a response in APA 7 format and at least 2-3 references.( Micheal ) The health care industry has met with numerous changes over the years; some of the changes lay emphasis on either the patient, the organization or its employees. Of the numerous changes any given health care institution experiences, the goal of patient safety and patient satisfaction preempts the motive for necessary changes to better serve our patient population while also bearing in mind the effectiveness of the interventions that the organization is implementing. For an institution saddled with the responsibility of rendering health care services to members of its community, it is often faced with the need for constant system development of their life cycle to enhance the efficiency of the services provided while also taking patient safety into consideration. “The first step in developing a system is to understand the problems or business needs. It is followed by understanding the solution or how to address those needs; developing a plan; implementing the plan; evaluating the implementation and finally maintenance” (McGonigle, 2017, p175) System development life cycle presents as the precursor to the innovations that trigger the much needed difference in terms of efficiency or safety, such changes sometimes suffer the brunt when nurses are excluded in the preliminary phases of planning leading up to its implementation. The consequence of not having nurses weigh in on the intended innovation includes but is not limited to having a poorly designed project since the design and planning was done without the end users input, the project may become obsolete months after its implementation for failing to meet the needs of the nurses with regards to efficiency in patient care and safety considerations. According to a Laureate video presentation by Stuart Speedie, “the goal of health care informatics and technology should be its interoperability.” (Laureate Education Producer, 2018) In a different light, if the nurses were included as prospective end users of this innovation, ideas generated from the conversation about the intended innovation will be viewed from many perspectives which will in turn make for a better design knowing what the end user desires for the innovation to be mutually beneficial to the institution and the patient population alike. At the institution that I work, the latest innovation was the inclusion of an automated Alaris infusion pump that synchronizes information across the electronic health record platform and the medication pyxis, the nurses did not have any input on the planning or design of this new innovation. The impact of not being included or consulted prior to designing and implementing this design were as follows; some medications were not compatible with the pump interface and will not accept manual entry this problem in its self constituted a missed medication for the patient hence delaying patient care, the network interface on the electronic health record platform was a bit confusing and needed more than just a day of orientation to say the least, over all the system launch was chaotic and stressful leading to loss of considerable man hours trying to figure things out on the go with little to no assistance especially for nurses working on the night shift. According to a Laureate video presentation by Kevin Johnson, “He highlights the need to acknowledge that the cycle is ongoing and never done even after its implementation.” (Laureate Education Producer, 2018) References Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Interoperability, Standards, and Security [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Managing Health Information Technology [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learn Discussion one that needs a response in APA 7 format and at least 2-3 references.( Monica) Discussion Week 9 Initial Post Nursing is the largest healthcare profession in the world. According to the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2020), there is an estimated 3.8 million registered nurses (RN) nationally and 84.5% of those nurses are employed in the healthcare setting. Nurses are so vital to healthcare organizations because they are hands on with rendering care to patients and oversee the overall care that the patient receives. Nurses serve as patient advocates and are involved on every aspect of the patient’s care. They are the integral party with the responsibility to make sure that other healthcare professionals are doing their part to ensure that patients are receiving the safest and best quality of care. High in numbers and with such an intricate role in healthcare, nurses are the heartbeat of the hospitals, therefore it would behoove healthcare organizations to involve nurses in every aspect of care including the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC).SDLC is a process of addressing an identified need and putting a plan/system into operation. Phases of the SDLC include planning, analysis, design, implementation, and maintenance (Laureate, 2018). Nurses can contribute greatly to the process of selecting and implementing new health systems because they are hands on and see first-hand the needs of the patients and healthcare systems. If healthcare administrations fail to include nurses during the SDLC process of purchasing and implementing new information technology system, consequences could be failure to identify pertinent issues (Cleveland, 2019). The planning, analysis, design, implementation, and maintenance phases would not persist because nurses are the primary bodies that are hands-on and they are on the frontlines to witness how the whole process plays out. Nurses play a role that is essential to the success of the system. During the planning process, nurses contribute by identifying needs. They collaborate with multidisciplinary teams to formulate a plan to prosecute. During the analysis and design phases, nursing informaticists play a huge role by assuring that the plan is suitable and of evidence based practices. After the best practices are identified, nurses then, implement by using the system. Over time, evaluation and maintenance is done by the nursing staff. This cycle of evaluation is ongoing with the goal of the system to become more efficient with each evaluation. About 6 years ago, I was involved in the maintenance and evaluation phase of an information technology tool (Patient Touch) that was launched 2 years prior on the medical surgical floor. The Patient Touch, similar to an iPhone, allows healthcare workers to chart all care and nurses to scan and record medication administration, It is a hand-held scanner that has many protective measures built in, and it allows workers of all entities to pull up useful information in a matter of seconds. It heavily supports evidence-based practice and has produced positive outcomes with patient care. To keep the momentum going, nursing informaticians made rounds monthly to see how using the Patient Touch was going and they asked for feedback on how to improve the tool. I mentioned to them an issue I had with it, while charting the nursing assessment using Patient Touch, there were a lot of assessment pieces that did not apply to medical surgical patients which prolonged time. There were a lot of assessments that ICU utilized, and I asked if there was anyway to eliminate the issue. A couple of months later, the informaticians implemented a division of the units and whatever unit selected, the nursing daily assessment was customized for each unit. This change eliminated a lot of unnecessary assessments that did not apply to medical surgical floor. It made a huge difference with charting and really improve our nurses time management. “Nurses play an active and vital role in electronic healthcare information system acquisition and upgrading project along- side their health informatics and IT colleagues (McLean, Frisch, &Roudsari, 2020). Nurses being involved with the SDLC process is necessary because they are the ones using the systems the most. Without the nurses’ input and expertise, healthcare administrations will miss the mark and the success rate of the tool would be minimized. References AACN. (2020). AACN fact sheet – Nursing . The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). https://www.aacnnursing.org/News-Information/fact-sheets/Nursing-Fact-Sheet Cleveland, K. A., Motter, T., & Smith, Y. (2019, May 31). Affordable care: Harnessing the power of nurses . OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. https://ojin.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Vol-24-2019/No2-May-2019/Affordable-Care.html?css=print Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Systems implementation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Mclean, A., Frisch, N., & Roudsari, A. (2020, September 21). Nursing’s voice in healthcare IT acquisition decisions . Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics. https://cjni.net/journal/?p=4248#:~:text=%20Nursing%E2%80%99s%20Voice%20in%20Healthcare%20IT%20Acquisition%20Decisions,senior%20nurse%20executives%20and%20leaders%20develop…%20More%20

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Assignment 1: Case Study Assignment: Assessing the Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat 2025

Assignment 1: Case Study Assignment: Assessing the Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat Most ear, nose, and throat conditions that arise in non-critical care settings are minor in nature. However, subtle symptoms can sometimes escalate into life-threatening conditions that require prompt assessment and treatment. Nurses conducting assessments of the ears, nose, and throat must be able to identify the small differences between life-threatening conditions and benign ones. For instance, if a patient with a sore throat and a runny nose also has inflamed lymph nodes, the inflammation is probably due to the pathogen causing the sore throat rather than a case of throat cancer. With this knowledge and a sufficient patient health history, a nurse would not need to escalate the assessment to a biopsy or an MRI of the lymph nodes but would probably perform a simple strep test. In this Case Study Assignment, you consider case studies of abnormal findings from patients in a clinical setting. You determine what history should be collected from the patients, what physical exams and diagnostic tests should be conducted, and formulate a differential diagnosis with several possible conditions. To Prepare · By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study CASE STUDY 1: Focused Ear Exam · Martha brings her 11-year old grandson, James, to your clinic to have his right ear checked. He has complained to her about a mild earache for the past 2 days. His grandmother believes that he feels warm but did not verify this with a thermometer. James states that the pain was worse while he was falling asleep and that it was harder for him to hear. When you begin basic assessments, you notice that James has a prominent tan. When you ask him how he’s been spending his summer, James responds that he’s been spending a lot of time in the pool. · Also, your Case Study Assignment should be in the Episodic/Focused SOAP Note format rather than the traditional narrative style format. Refer to Chapter 2 of the Sullivan text and the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template in the Week 5 Learning Resources for guidance. Remember that all Episodic/Focused SOAP Notes have specific data included in every patient case. With regard to the case study you were assigned: · Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide. · Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient. · Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis? · Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient. The Assignment Use the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template and create an episodic/focused note about the patient in the case study to which you were assigned using the episodic/focused note template provided in the Week 5 resources. Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for each case. List five different possible conditions for the patient’s differential diagnosis and justify why you selected each book link https://www.sendspace.com/file/wd7quh

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation 2025

Review the performance dashboard for a health care organization, as well as relevant local, state, and federal laws and policies. Then, write a report for senior leaders in the organization that communicates your analysis and evaluation of the current state of organizational performance, including a recommended metric to target for improvement. Maintaining standards and promoting quality in modern health care are crucial, not only for the care of patients, but also for the continuing success and financial viability of health care organizations. In the era of health care reform, health care leaders must understand what quality care entails and how quality in health care connects to the standards set by relevant federal, state, and local laws and policies. An understanding of relevant benchmarks that result from these laws and policies, and how they relate to quality care and regulatory standards, is also vitally important. · Health care is a dynamic, complex, and heavily regulated industry. For this reason, you will be expected to constantly scan the external environment for emerging laws, new regulations, and changing industry standards. You may discover that as new policies are enacted into law, ambiguity in interpretation of various facets of the law may occur. Sometimes, new laws conflict with preexisting laws and regulations, or unexpected implementation issues arise, which may warrant further clarification from lawmakers. Adding partisan politics and social media to the mix can further complicate understanding of the process and buy-in from stakeholders. How many health care laws can you name that affect your practice in your current or future workplace? How do they impact your daily work? How many regulatory agencies oversee the types of services your health care organization provides? Which regulatory agencies apply to your workplace setting? Are you familiar with the process of complying with those agencies in order to maintain certification? You might be overwhelmed as you consider these broad questions. · As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend or family member, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment. What local, state, or federal health care policies or laws set benchmarks and standards reflected in performance dashboards common in your professional area of practice? · What are the potential challenges or opportunities for health care organizations or interprofessional teams in meeting prescribed performance benchmarks and standards? Factors you might consider include the organization’s mission, its size and resources, operational policies and procedures, and the population the organization serves. · Preparation For this assessment, you may choose one of the following three options for a performance dashboard to use as the basis for your benchmark evaluation. Option 1: Dashboard and Health Care Benchmark Evaluation Simulation If you decide to use one of the simulation dashboards for your evaluation, review both dashboards, as well as the relevant local, state, and federal laws and policies linked in each dashboard. Choose one of the dashboards and consider the metrics within it that are falling short of the prescribed benchmarks. Option 2: Actual Dashboard From a Professional Practice Setting If you choose an actual dashboard from a professional practice setting for your evaluation, be sure to add a brief description of the organization and setting that includes: · The size of the facility that the dashboard is reporting on. · The specific type of care delivery. · The population diversity and ethnicity demographics. · The socioeconomic level of the population served by the organization. Note: Ensure that your data is Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant. Do not use any easily identifiable organization or patient information. Option 3: Hypothetical Dashboard Based on a Professional Practice Setting If you have a sophisticated understanding of dashboards that are relevant to your own practice, you may also construct a hypothetical dashboard for your evaluation, based on that setting. Your hypothetical dashboard must present at least four different metrics, at least two of which must be under-performing the relevant benchmark set forth by a federal, state, or local laws or policies. In addition, be sure to add a brief description of the organization and setting that includes: · The size of the facility that the dashboard is reporting on. · The specific type of care delivery. · The population diversity and ethnicity demographics. · The socioeconomic level of the population served by the organization. Note: Ensure that your data is HIPAA compliant. Do not use any easily identifiable organization or patient information. Report Requirements Structure your report in such a way that it would be easy for a colleague or supervisor to locate the information they need. Be sure to cite relevant local, state, or federal health care laws or policies when evaluating metric performance against prescribed benchmarks. Cite an additional 2–4 credible sources to support your analysis and evaluation of the challenges in meeting the benchmarks, the potential for performance improvement, and your advocacy for ethical action. Note: The tasks outlined below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide. In your report, be sure to: · Evaluate dashboard metrics against the benchmarks set by local, state, or federal health care laws or policies. 9. Which metrics are below the mandated benchmarks in the organization? Evaluate weaknesses within the entire set of benchmarks. 9. What are the local, state, or federal health care laws or policies that set these benchmarks? . Analyze challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for the organization or for an interprofessional team. 10. What are the specific challenges or opportunities that the organization or interprofessional team might have in meeting the benchmarks? For example, consider: 1. The strategic direction of the organization. 1. The organization’s mission. 1. Available resources: 3. Staffing. 3. Operational and capital funding. 3. Physical space. 3. Support services (any ancillary department that supports a specific care unit in the organization, such as a pharmacy, cleaning services, and dietary services). 1. Cultural diversity in the organization. 1. Cultural diversity in the community. 1. Organizational processes and procedures. 10. How might these challenges be contributing to benchmark underperformance? . Evaluate a benchmark underperformance in the organization or interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance. 11. Which metric is underperforming its benchmark by the greatest degree? 11. Which benchmark underperformance is the most widespread throughout the organization or interprofessional team? 11. Which benchmark affects the greatest number of patients? 11. Which benchmark affects the greatest number of staff? 11. How does this underperformance affect the community the organization serves? 11. Where is the greatest opportunity for improvement in the overall quality or performance of the organization or interpersonal team—and ultimately in patient outcomes? . Advocate for ethical action in addressing the benchmark underperformance that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance. 12. At which group of stakeholders should your advocacy be directed? Which group could be expected to take the appropriate action to improve the benchmark metric? 12. What are some ethical actions that the stakeholder group could take that support improved benchmark performance? 12. Why should the stakeholder group take action? . Communicate your findings and recommendations in a professional and effective manner. 13. Ensure that your report is well organized and easy to read. 13. Write clearly and logically, using correct grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. . Integrate relevant sources to support your arguments, correctly formatting source citations and references using current APA style. 14. Did you cite relevant local, state, or federal health care laws or policies when discussing the mandated benchmarks? 14. Did you cite an additional 2–4 credible sources to support your analysis, evaluation, and advocacy?

Nursing Assignment Help 2025