Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

• Textbook: Chapter 3
• Lesson
• Link (online PDF): The Upanishads (Links to an external site.) (Skim the first few chapters or locate a specific section in the table of contents. You are not responsible to read the entire text.)
• Minimum of 1 scholarly source

Initial Post Instructions
For the initial post, respond to one of the following options:

1. Identify and describe one of the five (Brahman and Atman, Maya, Karma, Samsara, Moksha) key concepts from the Upanishads. Examine these teachings and the way they have influenced other expressions of Indian spirituality. Make sure your response is supported with quotes from the Upanishads and citations from scholarly sources.
2. Choose one of the 4 Yogas. Define this path to the Divine, using examples. How does this path help to lead a person to realization? Why did you choose this path to discuss?

Follow-Up Post Instructions
Respond to at least two peers or one peer and the instructor. Respond to a peer who chose an option different from the one you chose. Further the dialogue by providing more information and clarification.

Writing Requirements

• Minimum of 3 posts
• Initial Post Length: 400-500 words
• APA format for in-text citations and list of references

 Required Resources

 

Molloy, M. (2013). Experiencing the world’s religions (6th ed.). New York City, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

 

The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Upanishads, by Swami Paramananda, or get it online at www.gutenberg.org/license
 

– This assignment about Saudi Arabia

 – Follow instructions in the attached file carefully  and make sure to answer all the questions
     – Avoid Plagiarism 
     – 1 page not include the cover page and the references. 
     – follow APA style. 
     – provide in-text citation

– Use 3 articles not later than 2013
     Kindly stick to your price if you change I will dispute

Bioethics Case Study: This assignment asks you to examine a current ethical controversy case study. The paper is informal, but should be in APA style, and does not need an abstract or cover page. With a minimum of two pages and a maximum of four pages A reference page is needed. In-text citations should be in APA format. Papers will be graded on a 0 to 25-point scale.

Case Study in Primary care:

One hypothetical case study involves Jim a 54, year old patient who has recently diagnose with hypertension and his Creatinine and BUN laboratory results are elevated, if left untreated, will result in kidney failure. The patient refuses to take the medication because he said it will affect his sex life The NP must work with the patient to respect the fact that he doesn’t want the medication (autonomy), and needs to find a solution that would prevent him from going into kidney failure and other complications, which is in his best interest (beneficence). Although medications are the best choice, forcing the patient to accept the medication will result in probably patient leaving the care (non-maleficence). Finally, the NP needs to consider the impact that the patient’s choices might have on others if he starts to go into preventable kidney failure, he’ll need dialysis, which affects other people who need the same treatment (justice). So before making the final decision the NP must consider all four principles of health care ethics, which will help the NP make the choice that will have the best possible benefits for both the patient and society.

Questions?

1. What are the skills necessary for the provider to identify, address, and assess this clinical ethical issue?
2. What are the provider’s obligations when a patient discloses does he not intent to follow the treatment?
3. What are the ethical considerations in evaluating a patient’s failure to adhere to a prescribed therapy?
4. Will you terminate care for this patient? What are the implications?

• Case Study Rubric
  CriterionOutstanding  (25)Very Good  (22)   Average (18)Unacceptable (15)ScoreCompletenessComplete in all respects; reflects all requirementsComplete in most respects; reflects most requirementsIncomplete many respects; reflects few requirementsIncomplete in most respects; does not reflect requirements UnderstandingDemonstrates excellent understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s)
  Demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s)Demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s)Demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) AnalysisPresents an insightful and through analysis  of the issue (s) identifiedPresents a thorough analysis of most of the issue(s) identifiedPresents a superficial analysis of some of the issue(s) identifiedPresents an incomplete analysis of the issue(s) identified. EvaluationMakes appropriate and powerful connections between the issue(s) identified and the concept(s) studiedMakes appropriate connections between the issue(s) identified and the concept(s) studiedMakes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between the issue(s) identified and the concept(s) studiedMakes little or no connection between the issue(s) identified and the concept(s) studied. OpinionSupports opinion with strong arguments and evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objectiveSupports opinion with reasons and evidence; presents a fairly balanced view; interpretation is both reasonable and objectiveSupports opinion with limited reasons and evidence; presents a somewhat one-sided argumentSupports opinion with few reasons and little evidence; argument is one-sided and not objective. RecommendationsPresents detailed, realistic, and appropriate recommendations clearly supported by the information presented and concepts studiedPresents specific, realistic and appropriate recommendation supported by the information presented and the concepts studiedPresents realistic or appropriate recommendation supported by the information presented and the concepts studiedPresents realistic or appropriate recommendation with little, if any, support from the information and the concepts studied. Grammar and SpellingMinimal spelling and grammar errorsSome spelling and grammar errorsNoticeable spelling and grammar errorsUnacceptable number of spelling and grammar errors APA guidelinesUses APA guidelines accurately and consistently to cite sourcesUses APA guidelines with minor violations to cite sourcesReflects incomplete knowledge of APA guidelinesDoes not use APA guidelines                 Total
• 

 

In a 1- to 2-page paper, address the following:

Briefly describe how cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and rational emotive behavioral therapy (REBT) are similar.

Explain at least three differences between CBT and REBT. Include how these differences might impact your practice as a mental health counselor.

Explain which version of cognitive behavioral therapy you might use with clients and why. Support your approach with evidence-based literature.

Note: The School of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/57.htm). All papers submitted must use this formatting.